J. Marion Sims: Pioneer of Medical Science Now Erased From History BY History

[BULLDOG]

J. Marion Sims, often called The Father Of Modern Gynecology---- how many women's lives has he saved by his pioneering work? So much so that they erected a statue to him in Central Park where it has stood for ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY YEARS --- --- --- now gone.

Why?

View attachment 188678


Not just a general pioneer in the field of surgery, his most significant work was to develop a surgical technique for the repair of vesicovaginal fistula, a severe complication of obstructed childbirth. Sims conformed to accepted medical practices of the time, he performed surgery for a therapeutic result, and the women he operated on suffered what could be a catastrophic condition for their health and quality of life.

There is only one problem: medical science and techniques were still very crude and in their developmental stages back in the 1840s. Anesthesia was only then beginning to become available and not wholly accepted, and the standard at the time to try out new procedures was quite naturally: on slaves.

But these women all suffered from a medical condition and Sims helped them. Not only did they get helped and cured, for free, but they advanced the field of medicine. Back in the 1840s, this is how things were done. The man was a pioneer and a hero.

Now today though, he is being seen through the eyes of a world 170 years later hell bent on condemning all aspects of slavery. Despite all the good he did and his good intentions and standards for the day, none of that matters now. He operated on slaves as all doctors did in pioneering medical work back then, they were usually brought to him by their owners because they were very ill and it was hoped he could treat and help them, but therefore: VERY BAD MAN. His statue after 120 years has been removed from Central Park to cleanse the conscience of a PC world gone mad to forget its own history.

View attachment 188680

Once adorning the New York Academy of Medicine, his statue is now being moved to be hidden in shame in the cemetery near where he is buried. Until now, he was honored "for his service to suffering women, Empress and slave alike."

Central Park statue of gynecologist J. Marion Sims removed

You are absolutely right. The nerve of those ingrateful people who just didn't appreciate the medical care they received, and at no cost to them. Here are a bunch of other ungrateful takers who probably never even thanked the medical personell who experimented on them for free.

Nazi Medical Experiments — Photograph
View attachment 188684

Completely different eras and contexts. But leave it to a hateful bigoted lefty Marxist dupe like you to conflate them for your own bigoted purposes.

Really? The victims in both cases had no choice in the experimentation where they were regularly disfigured and/or died from brutal butchery with no anesthetic, and you consider it a plus that they weren't charger for their unwanted "treatment". That's just disgusting.

Your dishonest deflection from context is disgusting. You have more hate than those you accuse of hate.

Are you kidding? The guy bought slaves to experiment on.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

J. Marion Sims, often called The Father Of Modern Gynecology---- how many women's lives has he saved by his pioneering work? So much so that they erected a statue to him in Central Park where it has stood for ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY YEARS --- --- --- now gone.

Why?

View attachment 188678


Not just a general pioneer in the field of surgery, his most significant work was to develop a surgical technique for the repair of vesicovaginal fistula, a severe complication of obstructed childbirth. Sims conformed to accepted medical practices of the time, he performed surgery for a therapeutic result, and the women he operated on suffered what could be a catastrophic condition for their health and quality of life.

There is only one problem: medical science and techniques were still very crude and in their developmental stages back in the 1840s. Anesthesia was only then beginning to become available and not wholly accepted, and the standard at the time to try out new procedures was quite naturally: on slaves.

But these women all suffered from a medical condition and Sims helped them. Not only did they get helped and cured, for free, but they advanced the field of medicine. Back in the 1840s, this is how things were done. The man was a pioneer and a hero.

Now today though, he is being seen through the eyes of a world 170 years later hell bent on condemning all aspects of slavery. Despite all the good he did and his good intentions and standards for the day, none of that matters now. He operated on slaves as all doctors did in pioneering medical work back then, they were usually brought to him by their owners because they were very ill and it was hoped he could treat and help them, but therefore: VERY BAD MAN. His statue after 120 years has been removed from Central Park to cleanse the conscience of a PC world gone mad to forget its own history.

View attachment 188680

Once adorning the New York Academy of Medicine, his statue is now being moved to be hidden in shame in the cemetery near where he is buried. Until now, he was honored "for his service to suffering women, Empress and slave alike."

Central Park statue of gynecologist J. Marion Sims removed

You are absolutely right. The nerve of those ingrateful people who just didn't appreciate the medical care they received, and at no cost to them. Here are a bunch of other ungrateful takers who probably never even thanked the medical personell who experimented on them for free.

Nazi Medical Experiments — Photograph
View attachment 188684

Completely different eras and contexts. But leave it to a hateful bigoted lefty Marxist dupe like you to conflate them for your own bigoted purposes.

Really? The victims in both cases had no choice in the experimentation where they were regularly disfigured and/or died from brutal butchery with no anesthetic, and you consider it a plus that they weren't charger for their unwanted "treatment". That's just disgusting.

Your dishonest deflection from context is disgusting. You have more hate than those you accuse of hate.

Are you kidding? The guy bought slaves to experiment on.

Legally 3/5 of a human — at the time. Like lab rats.

 

[BULLDOG]

J. Marion Sims, often called The Father Of Modern Gynecology---- how many women's lives has he saved by his pioneering work? So much so that they erected a statue to him in Central Park where it has stood for ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY YEARS --- --- --- now gone.

Why?

View attachment 188678


Not just a general pioneer in the field of surgery, his most significant work was to develop a surgical technique for the repair of vesicovaginal fistula, a severe complication of obstructed childbirth. Sims conformed to accepted medical practices of the time, he performed surgery for a therapeutic result, and the women he operated on suffered what could be a catastrophic condition for their health and quality of life.

There is only one problem: medical science and techniques were still very crude and in their developmental stages back in the 1840s. Anesthesia was only then beginning to become available and not wholly accepted, and the standard at the time to try out new procedures was quite naturally: on slaves.

But these women all suffered from a medical condition and Sims helped them. Not only did they get helped and cured, for free, but they advanced the field of medicine. Back in the 1840s, this is how things were done. The man was a pioneer and a hero.

Now today though, he is being seen through the eyes of a world 170 years later hell bent on condemning all aspects of slavery. Despite all the good he did and his good intentions and standards for the day, none of that matters now. He operated on slaves as all doctors did in pioneering medical work back then, they were usually brought to him by their owners because they were very ill and it was hoped he could treat and help them, but therefore: VERY BAD MAN. His statue after 120 years has been removed from Central Park to cleanse the conscience of a PC world gone mad to forget its own history.

View attachment 188680

Once adorning the New York Academy of Medicine, his statue is now being moved to be hidden in shame in the cemetery near where he is buried. Until now, he was honored "for his service to suffering women, Empress and slave alike."

Central Park statue of gynecologist J. Marion Sims removed

You are absolutely right. The nerve of those ingrateful people who just didn't appreciate the medical care they received, and at no cost to them. Here are a bunch of other ungrateful takers who probably never even thanked the medical personell who experimented on them for free.

Nazi Medical Experiments — Photograph
View attachment 188684

Completely different eras and contexts. But leave it to a hateful bigoted lefty Marxist dupe like you to conflate them for your own bigoted purposes.

Really? The victims in both cases had no choice in the experimentation where they were regularly disfigured and/or died from brutal butchery with no anesthetic, and you consider it a plus that they weren't charger for their unwanted "treatment". That's just disgusting.

They were dying a particularly painful death as it was. They received treatment and went on to live healthy lives. How disgusting is that?

The procedures were performed with no anesthetic, but procedures were performed with no anesthetic all the time. It was before anesthesia was widely used. Do you know that WHITE MEN had legs cut off with no anesthetic at all?

Were white men bought and experimented on with no choice in the matter? He bought human guinea pigs. There is not a single example of him asking permission to do his experiments. They were his property, and he cut on the ones he wanted to cut on.

 

[BULLDOG]

You are absolutely right. The nerve of those ingrateful people who just didn't appreciate the medical care they received, and at no cost to them. Here are a bunch of other ungrateful takers who probably never even thanked the medical personell who experimented on them for free.

Nazi Medical Experiments — Photograph
View attachment 188684

Completely different eras and contexts. But leave it to a hateful bigoted lefty Marxist dupe like you to conflate them for your own bigoted purposes.

Really? The victims in both cases had no choice in the experimentation where they were regularly disfigured and/or died from brutal butchery with no anesthetic, and you consider it a plus that they weren't charger for their unwanted "treatment". That's just disgusting.

Your dishonest deflection from context is disgusting. You have more hate than those you accuse of hate.

Are you kidding? The guy bought slaves to experiment on.

Legally 3/5 of a human — at the time. Like lab rats.

When were lab rats considered 3/5 of a human?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

J. Marion Sims, often called The Father Of Modern Gynecology---- how many women's lives has he saved by his pioneering work? So much so that they erected a statue to him in Central Park where it has stood for ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY YEARS --- --- --- now gone.

Why?

View attachment 188678


Not just a general pioneer in the field of surgery, his most significant work was to develop a surgical technique for the repair of vesicovaginal fistula, a severe complication of obstructed childbirth. Sims conformed to accepted medical practices of the time, he performed surgery for a therapeutic result, and the women he operated on suffered what could be a catastrophic condition for their health and quality of life.

There is only one problem: medical science and techniques were still very crude and in their developmental stages back in the 1840s. Anesthesia was only then beginning to become available and not wholly accepted, and the standard at the time to try out new procedures was quite naturally: on slaves.

But these women all suffered from a medical condition and Sims helped them. Not only did they get helped and cured, for free, but they advanced the field of medicine. Back in the 1840s, this is how things were done. The man was a pioneer and a hero.

Now today though, he is being seen through the eyes of a world 170 years later hell bent on condemning all aspects of slavery. Despite all the good he did and his good intentions and standards for the day, none of that matters now. He operated on slaves as all doctors did in pioneering medical work back then, they were usually brought to him by their owners because they were very ill and it was hoped he could treat and help them, but therefore: VERY BAD MAN. His statue after 120 years has been removed from Central Park to cleanse the conscience of a PC world gone mad to forget its own history.

View attachment 188680

Once adorning the New York Academy of Medicine, his statue is now being moved to be hidden in shame in the cemetery near where he is buried. Until now, he was honored "for his service to suffering women, Empress and slave alike."

Central Park statue of gynecologist J. Marion Sims removed

You are absolutely right. The nerve of those ingrateful people who just didn't appreciate the medical care they received, and at no cost to them. Here are a bunch of other ungrateful takers who probably never even thanked the medical personell who experimented on them for free.

Nazi Medical Experiments — Photograph
View attachment 188684

Completely different eras and contexts. But leave it to a hateful bigoted lefty Marxist dupe like you to conflate them for your own bigoted purposes.

Really? The victims in both cases had no choice in the experimentation where they were regularly disfigured and/or died from brutal butchery with no anesthetic, and you consider it a plus that they weren't charger for their unwanted "treatment". That's just disgusting.

They were dying a particularly painful death as it was. They received treatment and went on to live healthy lives. How disgusting is that?

The procedures were performed with no anesthetic, but procedures were performed with no anesthetic all the time. It was before anesthesia was widely used. Do you know that WHITE MEN had legs cut off with no anesthetic at all?

Were white men bought and experimented on with no choice in the matter? He bought human guinea pigs. There is not a single example of him asking permission to do his experiments. They were his property, and he cut on the ones he wanted to cut on.

And those, for the most part, were the ones that lived. The beginnings of medicine and the practice of surgery is barbaric and bloody. It wasn't just black people, those are the ones we hear about the most. It was anyone who was poor, and some who were just daring and willing to do anything up to and including experimental medicine. Of course white men and white women underwent surgical procedures without anesthesia. Amputations were generally done without anesthesia. Cesarian births were done without anesthesia no matter what the race.

It's called "presentiment". The taking of actions in history and judging them by present day standards. It's ridiculous.

 

[BULLDOG]

You are absolutely right. The nerve of those ingrateful people who just didn't appreciate the medical care they received, and at no cost to them. Here are a bunch of other ungrateful takers who probably never even thanked the medical personell who experimented on them for free.

Nazi Medical Experiments — Photograph
View attachment 188684

Completely different eras and contexts. But leave it to a hateful bigoted lefty Marxist dupe like you to conflate them for your own bigoted purposes.

Really? The victims in both cases had no choice in the experimentation where they were regularly disfigured and/or died from brutal butchery with no anesthetic, and you consider it a plus that they weren't charger for their unwanted "treatment". That's just disgusting.

They were dying a particularly painful death as it was. They received treatment and went on to live healthy lives. How disgusting is that?



The procedures were performed with no anesthetic, but procedures were performed with no anesthetic all the time. It was before anesthesia was widely used. Do you know that WHITE MEN had legs cut off with no anesthetic at all?

Were white men bought and experimented on with no choice in the matter? He bought human guinea pigs. There is not a single example of him asking permission to do his experiments. They were his property, and he cut on the ones he wanted to cut on.

And those, for the most part, were the ones that lived. The beginnings of medicine and the practice of surgery is barbaric and bloody. It wasn't just black people, those are the ones we hear about the most. It was anyone who was poor, and some who were just daring and willing to do anything up to and including experimental medicine. Of course white men and white women underwent surgical procedures without anesthesia. Amputations were generally done without anesthesia. Cesarian births were done without anesthesia no matter what the race.

It's called "presentiment". The taking of actions in history and judging them by present day standards. It's ridiculous.

Please give examples of white people who were the victims of systematic involuntary medical research, other than the Nazi experiments.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Try this

The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

Or this, poor Irish white woman

In 1874, Mary Rafferty, an Irish servant woman, came to Dr. Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati for treatment of her cancer. Seeing a research opportunity, he cut open her head, and inserted needle electrodes into her exposed brain matter.[11] He described the experiment as follows:

When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck. In order to develop more decided reactions, the strength of the current was increased ... her countenance exhibited great distress, and she began to cry. Very soon, the left hand was extended as if in the act of taking hold of some object in front of her; the arm presently was agitated with clonic spasm; her eyes became fixed, with pupils widely dilated; lips were blue, and she frothed at the mouth; her breathing became stertorous; she lost consciousness and was violently convulsed on the left side. The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma. She returned to consciousness in twenty minutes from the beginning of the attack, and complained of some weakness and vertigo.

— Dr. Bartholow's research report[11]
In 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 young children, without the knowledge or consent of their parents, at the Children's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts to discover whether doing so would be harmful.[12]

Then there's this

From 1913 to 1951, Dr. Leo Stanley, chief surgeon at the San Quentin Prison, performed a wide variety of experiments on hundreds of prisoners at San Quentin. Many of the experiments involved testicular implants, where Stanley would take the testicles out of executed prisoners and surgically implant them into living prisoners. In other experiments, he attempted to implant the testicles of rams, goats, and boars into living prisoners. Stanley also performed various eugenics experiments, and forced sterilizations on San Quentin prisoners.[13] Stanley believed that his experiments would rejuvenate old men, control crime (which he believed had biological causes), and prevent the "unfit" from reproducing.[13][14]

Let's ONLY concentrate on black people because those are the the sainted victims to be worshipped and eulogized.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Completely different eras and contexts. But leave it to a hateful bigoted lefty Marxist dupe like you to conflate them for your own bigoted purposes.

Really? The victims in both cases had no choice in the experimentation where they were regularly disfigured and/or died from brutal butchery with no anesthetic, and you consider it a plus that they weren't charger for their unwanted "treatment". That's just disgusting.

They were dying a particularly painful death as it was. They received treatment and went on to live healthy lives. How disgusting is that?



The procedures were performed with no anesthetic, but procedures were performed with no anesthetic all the time. It was before anesthesia was widely used. Do you know that WHITE MEN had legs cut off with no anesthetic at all?

Were white men bought and experimented on with no choice in the matter? He bought human guinea pigs. There is not a single example of him asking permission to do his experiments. They were his property, and he cut on the ones he wanted to cut on.

And those, for the most part, were the ones that lived. The beginnings of medicine and the practice of surgery is barbaric and bloody. It wasn't just black people, those are the ones we hear about the most. It was anyone who was poor, and some who were just daring and willing to do anything up to and including experimental medicine. Of course white men and white women underwent surgical procedures without anesthesia. Amputations were generally done without anesthesia. Cesarian births were done without anesthesia no matter what the race.

It's called "presentiment". The taking of actions in history and judging them by present day standards. It's ridiculous.

Please give examples of white people who were the victims of systematic involuntary medical research, other than the Nazi experiments.

If any non-white civilizations had been more advanced at the time that would have been the case.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You are absolutely right. The nerve of those ingrateful people who just didn't appreciate the medical care they received, and at no cost to them. Here are a bunch of other ungrateful takers who probably never even thanked the medical personell who experimented on them for free.

Nazi Medical Experiments — Photograph
View attachment 188684

Completely different eras and contexts. But leave it to a hateful bigoted lefty Marxist dupe like you to conflate them for your own bigoted purposes.

Really? The victims in both cases had no choice in the experimentation where they were regularly disfigured and/or died from brutal butchery with no anesthetic, and you consider it a plus that they weren't charger for their unwanted "treatment". That's just disgusting.

Your dishonest deflection from context is disgusting. You have more hate than those you accuse of hate.

Are you kidding? The guy bought slaves to experiment on.

Legally 3/5 of a human — at the time. Like lab rats.

It's like you don't know that considering the slaves 3/5 of a person was solely for legislative purposes to keep the south from having more representatives than the north. It's like you are pretending you don't know this, but you must! It's basic history. Oh yes, basic history is no longer taught.

 

[BULLDOG]

Try this

The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

Or this, poor Irish white woman

In 1874, Mary Rafferty, an Irish servant woman, came to Dr. Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati for treatment of her cancer. Seeing a research opportunity, he cut open her head, and inserted needle electrodes into her exposed brain matter.[11] He described the experiment as follows:

When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck. In order to develop more decided reactions, the strength of the current was increased ... her countenance exhibited great distress, and she began to cry. Very soon, the left hand was extended as if in the act of taking hold of some object in front of her; the arm presently was agitated with clonic spasm; her eyes became fixed, with pupils widely dilated; lips were blue, and she frothed at the mouth; her breathing became stertorous; she lost consciousness and was violently convulsed on the left side. The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma. She returned to consciousness in twenty minutes from the beginning of the attack, and complained of some weakness and vertigo.

— Dr. Bartholow's research report[11]
In 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 young children, without the knowledge or consent of their parents, at the Children's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts to discover whether doing so would be harmful.[12]

Then there's this

From 1913 to 1951, Dr. Leo Stanley, chief surgeon at the San Quentin Prison, performed a wide variety of experiments on hundreds of prisoners at San Quentin. Many of the experiments involved testicular implants, where Stanley would take the testicles out of executed prisoners and surgically implant them into living prisoners. In other experiments, he attempted to implant the testicles of rams, goats, and boars into living prisoners. Stanley also performed various eugenics experiments, and forced sterilizations on San Quentin prisoners.[13] Stanley believed that his experiments would rejuvenate old men, control crime (which he believed had biological causes), and prevent the "unfit" from reproducing.[13][14]

Let's ONLY concentrate on black people because those are the the sainted victims to be worshipped and eulogized.

Mary Rafferty was seeking the doctor's treatment, and I don't see any statues dedicated to the other monsters you mentioned.

 

[del]

Try this

The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

Or this, poor Irish white woman

In 1874, Mary Rafferty, an Irish servant woman, came to Dr. Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati for treatment of her cancer. Seeing a research opportunity, he cut open her head, and inserted needle electrodes into her exposed brain matter.[11] He described the experiment as follows:

When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck. In order to develop more decided reactions, the strength of the current was increased ... her countenance exhibited great distress, and she began to cry. Very soon, the left hand was extended as if in the act of taking hold of some object in front of her; the arm presently was agitated with clonic spasm; her eyes became fixed, with pupils widely dilated; lips were blue, and she frothed at the mouth; her breathing became stertorous; she lost consciousness and was violently convulsed on the left side. The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma. She returned to consciousness in twenty minutes from the beginning of the attack, and complained of some weakness and vertigo.

— Dr. Bartholow's research report[11]
In 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 young children, without the knowledge or consent of their parents, at the Children's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts to discover whether doing so would be harmful.[12]

Then there's this

From 1913 to 1951, Dr. Leo Stanley, chief surgeon at the San Quentin Prison, performed a wide variety of experiments on hundreds of prisoners at San Quentin. Many of the experiments involved testicular implants, where Stanley would take the testicles out of executed prisoners and surgically implant them into living prisoners. In other experiments, he attempted to implant the testicles of rams, goats, and boars into living prisoners. Stanley also performed various eugenics experiments, and forced sterilizations on San Quentin prisoners.[13] Stanley believed that his experiments would rejuvenate old men, control crime (which he believed had biological causes), and prevent the "unfit" from reproducing.[13][14]

Let's ONLY concentrate on black people because those are the the sainted victims to be worshipped and eulogized.

1

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Try this

The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

Or this, poor Irish white woman

In 1874, Mary Rafferty, an Irish servant woman, came to Dr. Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati for treatment of her cancer. Seeing a research opportunity, he cut open her head, and inserted needle electrodes into her exposed brain matter.[11] He described the experiment as follows:

When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck. In order to develop more decided reactions, the strength of the current was increased ... her countenance exhibited great distress, and she began to cry. Very soon, the left hand was extended as if in the act of taking hold of some object in front of her; the arm presently was agitated with clonic spasm; her eyes became fixed, with pupils widely dilated; lips were blue, and she frothed at the mouth; her breathing became stertorous; she lost consciousness and was violently convulsed on the left side. The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma. She returned to consciousness in twenty minutes from the beginning of the attack, and complained of some weakness and vertigo.

— Dr. Bartholow's research report[11]
In 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 young children, without the knowledge or consent of their parents, at the Children's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts to discover whether doing so would be harmful.[12]

Then there's this

From 1913 to 1951, Dr. Leo Stanley, chief surgeon at the San Quentin Prison, performed a wide variety of experiments on hundreds of prisoners at San Quentin. Many of the experiments involved testicular implants, where Stanley would take the testicles out of executed prisoners and surgically implant them into living prisoners. In other experiments, he attempted to implant the testicles of rams, goats, and boars into living prisoners. Stanley also performed various eugenics experiments, and forced sterilizations on San Quentin prisoners.[13] Stanley believed that his experiments would rejuvenate old men, control crime (which he believed had biological causes), and prevent the "unfit" from reproducing.[13][14]

Let's ONLY concentrate on black people because those are the the sainted victims to be worshipped and eulogized.

Mary Rafferty was seeking the doctor's treatment, and I don't see any statues dedicated to the other monsters you mentioned.

That's because we OWE gynocological medicine to Dr. Sims. Had he not performed his techniques, it might have been years, before some other doctor did the same thing. But, I'm not infected with presentiment. The man did more for women, including black women, than you ever will.

 

[BULLDOG]

Try this

The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

Or this, poor Irish white woman

In 1874, Mary Rafferty, an Irish servant woman, came to Dr. Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati for treatment of her cancer. Seeing a research opportunity, he cut open her head, and inserted needle electrodes into her exposed brain matter.[11] He described the experiment as follows:

When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck. In order to develop more decided reactions, the strength of the current was increased ... her countenance exhibited great distress, and she began to cry. Very soon, the left hand was extended as if in the act of taking hold of some object in front of her; the arm presently was agitated with clonic spasm; her eyes became fixed, with pupils widely dilated; lips were blue, and she frothed at the mouth; her breathing became stertorous; she lost consciousness and was violently convulsed on the left side. The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma. She returned to consciousness in twenty minutes from the beginning of the attack, and complained of some weakness and vertigo.

— Dr. Bartholow's research report[11]
In 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 young children, without the knowledge or consent of their parents, at the Children's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts to discover whether doing so would be harmful.[12]

Then there's this

From 1913 to 1951, Dr. Leo Stanley, chief surgeon at the San Quentin Prison, performed a wide variety of experiments on hundreds of prisoners at San Quentin. Many of the experiments involved testicular implants, where Stanley would take the testicles out of executed prisoners and surgically implant them into living prisoners. In other experiments, he attempted to implant the testicles of rams, goats, and boars into living prisoners. Stanley also performed various eugenics experiments, and forced sterilizations on San Quentin prisoners.[13] Stanley believed that his experiments would rejuvenate old men, control crime (which he believed had biological causes), and prevent the "unfit" from reproducing.[13][14]

Let's ONLY concentrate on black people because those are the the sainted victims to be worshipped and eulogized.

Mary Rafferty was seeking the doctor's treatment, and I don't see any statues dedicated to the other monsters you mentioned.

That's because we OWE gynocological medicine to Dr. Sims. Had he not performed his techniques, it might have been years, before some other doctor did the same thing. But, I'm not infected with presentiment. The man did more for women, including black women, than you ever will.

I never subjected women of any color to unwanted cutting of her hoo ha, so there's that.

 

[Preacher]

J. Marion Sims, often called The Father Of Modern Gynecology---- how many women's lives has he saved by his pioneering work? So much so that they erected a statue to him in Central Park where it has stood for ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY YEARS --- --- --- now gone.

Why?

View attachment 188678


Not just a general pioneer in the field of surgery, his most significant work was to develop a surgical technique for the repair of vesicovaginal fistula, a severe complication of obstructed childbirth. Sims conformed to accepted medical practices of the time, he performed surgery for a therapeutic result, and the women he operated on suffered what could be a catastrophic condition for their health and quality of life.

There is only one problem: medical science and techniques were still very crude and in their developmental stages back in the 1840s. Anesthesia was only then beginning to become available and not wholly accepted, and the standard at the time to try out new procedures was quite naturally: on slaves.

But these women all suffered from a medical condition and Sims helped them. Not only did they get helped and cured, for free, but they advanced the field of medicine. Back in the 1840s, this is how things were done. The man was a pioneer and a hero.

Now today though, he is being seen through the eyes of a world 170 years later hell bent on condemning all aspects of slavery. Despite all the good he did and his good intentions and standards for the day, none of that matters now. He operated on slaves as all doctors did in pioneering medical work back then, they were usually brought to him by their owners because they were very ill and it was hoped he could treat and help them, but therefore: VERY BAD MAN. His statue after 120 years has been removed from Central Park to cleanse the conscience of a PC world gone mad to forget its own history.

View attachment 188680

Once adorning the New York Academy of Medicine, his statue is now being moved to be hidden in shame in the cemetery near where he is buried. Until now, he was honored "for his service to suffering women, Empress and slave alike."

Central Park statue of gynecologist J. Marion Sims removed

Wonder if I am related to him. My mother's maiden name is Sims...I asked her if we were related...she is probably researching it right now she has been on this huge kick with genealogy right now.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Try this

The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

Or this, poor Irish white woman

In 1874, Mary Rafferty, an Irish servant woman, came to Dr. Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati for treatment of her cancer. Seeing a research opportunity, he cut open her head, and inserted needle electrodes into her exposed brain matter.[11] He described the experiment as follows:

When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck. In order to develop more decided reactions, the strength of the current was increased ... her countenance exhibited great distress, and she began to cry. Very soon, the left hand was extended as if in the act of taking hold of some object in front of her; the arm presently was agitated with clonic spasm; her eyes became fixed, with pupils widely dilated; lips were blue, and she frothed at the mouth; her breathing became stertorous; she lost consciousness and was violently convulsed on the left side. The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma. She returned to consciousness in twenty minutes from the beginning of the attack, and complained of some weakness and vertigo.

— Dr. Bartholow's research report[11]
In 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 young children, without the knowledge or consent of their parents, at the Children's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts to discover whether doing so would be harmful.[12]

Then there's this

From 1913 to 1951, Dr. Leo Stanley, chief surgeon at the San Quentin Prison, performed a wide variety of experiments on hundreds of prisoners at San Quentin. Many of the experiments involved testicular implants, where Stanley would take the testicles out of executed prisoners and surgically implant them into living prisoners. In other experiments, he attempted to implant the testicles of rams, goats, and boars into living prisoners. Stanley also performed various eugenics experiments, and forced sterilizations on San Quentin prisoners.[13] Stanley believed that his experiments would rejuvenate old men, control crime (which he believed had biological causes), and prevent the "unfit" from reproducing.[13][14]

Let's ONLY concentrate on black people because those are the the sainted victims to be worshipped and eulogized.

Mary Rafferty was seeking the doctor's treatment, and I don't see any statues dedicated to the other monsters you mentioned.

How about you be exempt from the opportunity to any medical procedure that stemmed from this doctor’s discoveries? As a matter of principle, you must be left to die with no choice.

 

[BULLDOG]

Try this

The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

Or this, poor Irish white woman

In 1874, Mary Rafferty, an Irish servant woman, came to Dr. Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati for treatment of her cancer. Seeing a research opportunity, he cut open her head, and inserted needle electrodes into her exposed brain matter.[11] He described the experiment as follows:

When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck. In order to develop more decided reactions, the strength of the current was increased ... her countenance exhibited great distress, and she began to cry. Very soon, the left hand was extended as if in the act of taking hold of some object in front of her; the arm presently was agitated with clonic spasm; her eyes became fixed, with pupils widely dilated; lips were blue, and she frothed at the mouth; her breathing became stertorous; she lost consciousness and was violently convulsed on the left side. The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma. She returned to consciousness in twenty minutes from the beginning of the attack, and complained of some weakness and vertigo.

— Dr. Bartholow's research report[11]
In 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 young children, without the knowledge or consent of their parents, at the Children's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts to discover whether doing so would be harmful.[12]

Then there's this

From 1913 to 1951, Dr. Leo Stanley, chief surgeon at the San Quentin Prison, performed a wide variety of experiments on hundreds of prisoners at San Quentin. Many of the experiments involved testicular implants, where Stanley would take the testicles out of executed prisoners and surgically implant them into living prisoners. In other experiments, he attempted to implant the testicles of rams, goats, and boars into living prisoners. Stanley also performed various eugenics experiments, and forced sterilizations on San Quentin prisoners.[13] Stanley believed that his experiments would rejuvenate old men, control crime (which he believed had biological causes), and prevent the "unfit" from reproducing.[13][14]

Let's ONLY concentrate on black people because those are the the sainted victims to be worshipped and eulogized.

Mary Rafferty was seeking the doctor's treatment, and I don't see any statues dedicated to the other monsters you mentioned.

How about you be exempt from the opportunity to any medical procedure that stemmed from this doctor’s discoveries? As a matter of principle, you must be left to die with no choice.

I doubt I'll be having any gynocological concerns. My nuts have made me immune from any of those problems.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Try this

The 30 Most Disturbing Human Experiments in History

Or this, poor Irish white woman

In 1874, Mary Rafferty, an Irish servant woman, came to Dr. Roberts Bartholow of the Good Samaritan Hospital in Cincinnati for treatment of her cancer. Seeing a research opportunity, he cut open her head, and inserted needle electrodes into her exposed brain matter.[11] He described the experiment as follows:

When the needle entered the brain substance, she complained of acute pain in the neck. In order to develop more decided reactions, the strength of the current was increased ... her countenance exhibited great distress, and she began to cry. Very soon, the left hand was extended as if in the act of taking hold of some object in front of her; the arm presently was agitated with clonic spasm; her eyes became fixed, with pupils widely dilated; lips were blue, and she frothed at the mouth; her breathing became stertorous; she lost consciousness and was violently convulsed on the left side. The convulsion lasted five minutes, and was succeeded by a coma. She returned to consciousness in twenty minutes from the beginning of the attack, and complained of some weakness and vertigo.

— Dr. Bartholow's research report[11]
In 1896, Dr. Arthur Wentworth performed spinal taps on 29 young children, without the knowledge or consent of their parents, at the Children's Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts to discover whether doing so would be harmful.[12]

Then there's this

From 1913 to 1951, Dr. Leo Stanley, chief surgeon at the San Quentin Prison, performed a wide variety of experiments on hundreds of prisoners at San Quentin. Many of the experiments involved testicular implants, where Stanley would take the testicles out of executed prisoners and surgically implant them into living prisoners. In other experiments, he attempted to implant the testicles of rams, goats, and boars into living prisoners. Stanley also performed various eugenics experiments, and forced sterilizations on San Quentin prisoners.[13] Stanley believed that his experiments would rejuvenate old men, control crime (which he believed had biological causes), and prevent the "unfit" from reproducing.[13][14]

Let's ONLY concentrate on black people because those are the the sainted victims to be worshipped and eulogized.

Mary Rafferty was seeking the doctor's treatment, and I don't see any statues dedicated to the other monsters you mentioned.

How about you be exempt from the opportunity to any medical procedure that stemmed from this doctor’s discoveries? As a matter of principle, you must be left to die with no choice.

I doubt I'll be having any gynocological concerns. My nuts have made me immune from any of those problems.

That's all subjective.

 

[Care4all]

uh oh.... I have the last name Sims, in my Alabama family tree.... I wonder if I am related?

I gotta go and check this out....

 

[peach174]

So you would rather see these women wearing cloth diapers for the rest of their lives?

Seems that alternative is what would be cruel ,rather than being cured of incontinence.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

It's like you don't know that considering the slaves 3/5 of a person was solely for legislative purposes to keep the south from having more representatives than the north. It's like you are pretending you don't know this, but you must! It's basic history. Oh yes, basic history is no longer taught.

It interferes with the narrative of the Leftists.