Lovebears65
Gold Member
hes a partisan hack.
Bush tried to fill the country with them
I think you have officially lost your marble. HOLDER is OBAMA guy.. HE HIRED HIM...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
hes a partisan hack.
Bush tried to fill the country with them
I just sent the following letter to the Justice Department and a copy to the President
You're actually going to comply with the demands of this judge who demands that you account for in writing for what President Obama has said ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL?? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE! Complying with this BS would set a very dangerous precedent. This idiot judge who is so stupid he doesn't even know that the courts DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER CAMPAIGN SPEECHES should have been told to go to f... hell right then and there. He should have been told that the President will say whatever he damn well pleases while he is on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL and he should have been told that that if he doesn't like it then that is just too damned bad. (ok, maybe not quite that blunt, but that's what he should have been told)
His calling the Affordable Health Care act "Obamacare" would alone be reason to be removed from the case. But with his absurd, stupid, idiotic, arrogant demand that President Obama, or anybody, account for what President Obama says on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL he should be impeached.
He wasn't on the Campaign Trail.
It was a news conference on the WH lawn.
Yeah they'll be sure to use that letter in the contempt charge brought against the attorney who got the order.
A contempt charge for not giving an account of Obama's campaign speeches??? Sadly that could happen. Obama needs to fight this and he needs to fight it hard. He needs to be angry and he needs to be vicious
I just sent the following letter to the Justice Department and a copy to the President
You're actually going to comply with the demands of this judge who demands that you account for in writing for what President Obama has said ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL?? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE! Complying with this BS would set a very dangerous precedent. This idiot judge who is so stupid he doesn't even know that the courts DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER CAMPAIGN SPEECHES should have been told to go to f... hell right then and there. He should have been told that the President will say whatever he damn well pleases while he is on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL and he should have been told that that if he doesn't like it then that is just too damned bad. (ok, maybe not quite that blunt, but that's what he should have been told)
His calling the Affordable Health Care act "Obamacare" would alone be reason to be removed from the case. But with his absurd, stupid, idiotic, arrogant demand that President Obama, or anybody, account for what President Obama says on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL he should be impeached.
Although I think the author of the OP is a bit off the rails in his rhetoric, I will say again (since I voiced the opinion my own self, earlier): I think the "request" by those judges for a letter from the DOJ IS actually a bit out of bounds.
I'd be more than happy to see Holder knuckle under.
But as a matter of principle, I don't think I'd "honor" the "request."
I just sent the following letter to the Justice Department and a copy to the President
You're actually going to comply with the demands of this judge who demands that you account for in writing for what President Obama has said ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL?? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE! Complying with this BS would set a very dangerous precedent. This idiot judge who is so stupid he doesn't even know that the courts DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER CAMPAIGN SPEECHES should have been told to go to f... hell right then and there. He should have been told that the President will say whatever he damn well pleases while he is on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL and he should have been told that that if he doesn't like it then that is just too damned bad. (ok, maybe not quite that blunt, but that's what he should have been told)
His calling the Affordable Health Care act "Obamacare" would alone be reason to be removed from the case. But with his absurd, stupid, idiotic, arrogant demand that President Obama, or anybody, account for what President Obama says on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL he should be impeached.
Although I think the author of the OP is a bit off the rails in his rhetoric, I will say again (since I voiced the opinion my own self, earlier): I think the "request" by those judges for a letter from the DOJ IS actually a bit out of bounds.
I'd be more than happy to see Holder knuckle under.
But as a matter of principle, I don't think I'd "honor" the "request."
For something as absurd and arrogant as this I don't think it's possible to go off the rails
Yeah they'll be sure to use that letter in the contempt charge brought against the attorney who got the order.
A contempt charge for not giving an account of Obama's campaign speeches??? Sadly that could happen. Obama needs to fight this and he needs to fight it hard. He needs to be angry and he needs to be vicious
Too late.
Our illustrious AG meekly complied.
Bwahahahahaha!
Yeah they'll be sure to use that letter in the contempt charge brought against the attorney who got the order.
A contempt charge for not giving an account of Obama's campaign speeches??? Sadly that could happen. Obama needs to fight this and he needs to fight it hard. He needs to be angry and he needs to be vicious
Too late.
Our illustrious AG has already meekly complied.*
Bwahahahahaha!
______________
* Of course, he didn't fully comply. It wasn't 3 pages. It was maybe 2 1/2 pages. I still say the Court should give the AG a letter grade. C+ to B-.
Yeah they'll be sure to use that letter in the contempt charge brought against the attorney who got the order.
A contempt charge for not giving an account of Obama's campaign speeches??? Sadly that could happen. Obama needs to fight this and he needs to fight it hard. He needs to be angry and he needs to be vicious
Well, it seems obvious that when a judge requests you clarify a department position, it's probably good to do so, especially when it involves an ongoing case.
Yeah they'll be sure to use that letter in the contempt charge brought against the attorney who got the order.
A contempt charge for not giving an account of Obama's campaign speeches??? Sadly that could happen. Obama needs to fight this and he needs to fight it hard. He needs to be angry and he needs to be vicious
i can understand those that do thinking that obama can lie if he wants to. I understand that it is up to each listener to discern the truth. I understand that free speech allows people to lie about anything. However, when the president of the united states tells such outlandish lies about the duties and authority of the judicial branch in such a way as to broadcast the lie through the media and totally mislead listeners regarding what the supreme court can and cannot do, what the supreme court has already done hundreds of times...it's time for the arrogant ass to get educated.
I believe the "request" for the letter comes more in the form of an order than a do me a favor and tell me in writing what you meant.
Perhaps we'll see holder indicted for contempt
the 5th circuit court scolds obama then schools him | the gateway pundit
posted by andrea ryan on tuesday, april 3, 2012, 10:36 pm
by: Andrea ryan
i will not throw spitballs at the supreme court i will not throw spitballs at the supreme court i will not throw spitballs at the supreme court repeat this statement fifty more times, president obama, single-spaced, on three pages, by thursday.
This is what happens when our constitutional lecturer president stands on the white house lawn and astoundingly challenges the authority and credibility of the supreme court; he gets issued a homework assignment on the fundamentals of our constitution.
i can understand those that do thinking that obama can lie if he wants to. I understand that it is up to each listener to discern the truth. I understand that free speech allows people to lie about anything. However, when the president of the united states tells such outlandish lies about the duties and authority of the judicial branch in such a way as to broadcast the lie through the media and totally mislead listeners regarding what the supreme court can and cannot do, what the supreme court has already done hundreds of times...it's time for the arrogant ass to get educated.
I believe the "request" for the letter comes more in the form of an order than a do me a favor and tell me in writing what you meant.
Perhaps we'll see holder indicted for contempt
the 5th circuit court scolds obama then schools him | the gateway pundit
posted by andrea ryan on tuesday, april 3, 2012, 10:36 pm
by: Andrea ryan
i will not throw spitballs at the supreme court i will not throw spitballs at the supreme court i will not throw spitballs at the supreme court repeat this statement fifty more times, president obama, single-spaced, on three pages, by thursday.
This is what happens when our constitutional lecturer president stands on the white house lawn and astoundingly challenges the authority and credibility of the supreme court; he gets issued a homework assignment on the fundamentals of our constitution.
it's none of the judges damned business what he meant.
I just sent the following letter to the Justice Department and a copy to the President
You're actually going to comply with the demands of this judge who demands that you account for in writing for what President Obama has said ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL?? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE! Complying with this BS would set a very dangerous precedent. This idiot judge who is so stupid he doesn't even know that the courts DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER CAMPAIGN SPEECHES should have been told to go to f... hell right then and there. He should have been told that the President will say whatever he damn well pleases while he is on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL and he should have been told that that if he doesn't like it then that is just too damned bad. (ok, maybe not quite that blunt, but that's what he should have been told)
His calling the Affordable Health Care act "Obamacare" would alone be reason to be removed from the case. But with his absurd, stupid, idiotic, arrogant demand that President Obama, or anybody, account for what President Obama says on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL he should be impeached.
He has to comply or risk possible impeachment.
Do you think the President is above a court order?
A contempt charge for not giving an account of Obama's campaign speeches??? Sadly that could happen. Obama needs to fight this and he needs to fight it hard. He needs to be angry and he needs to be vicious
Too late.
Our illustrious AG meekly complied.
Bwahahahahaha!
No it's not too late, impeachement proceedings can still be bought against him. Interesting to see that you're so please and gleeful at this amazing overreach of judicial power. Let me take a wild guess. You've complained about "activist judges" in the past and that they're "stepping out of bounds"?
Fox was just reading Holder's letter. Sorry, no, I wasn't really paying attention at all so don't know what it said . . .too many people and animals bouncing in and out of here today. But the admin complied with the request.
Yeah they'll be sure to use that letter in the contempt charge brought against the attorney who got the order.
A contempt charge for not giving an account of Obama's campaign speeches??? Sadly that could happen. Obama needs to fight this and he needs to fight it hard. He needs to be angry and he needs to be vicious
Yes. When an attorney is ordered by the court and does not do it, the charge is contempt of court.
I do hope that obama gets angry and gets TRULY vicious with the court. He hasn't done nearly enough to be vicious. There are only veiled threats, he needs to make some REAL ones.
I can understand those that do thinking that Obama can lie if he wants to. I understand that it is up to each listener to discern the truth. I understand that free speech allows people to lie about anything. However, when the President of the United States tells such outlandish lies about the duties and authority of the Judicial Branch in such a way as to broadcast the lie through the media and totally mislead listeners regarding what the Supreme Court can and cannot do, what the Supreme Court has already done hundreds of times...it's time for the arrogant ass to get educated.
I believe the "request" for the letter comes more in the form of an ORDER than a DO ME A FAVOR AND TELL ME IN WRITING WHAT YOU MEANT.
Perhaps we'll see Holder indicted for contempt.
The 5th Circuit Court Scolds Obama Then Schools Him | The Gateway Pundit
Posted by Andrea Ryan on Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 10:36 PM
By: Andrea Ryan
I will not throw spitballs at the Supreme Court I will not throw spitballs at the Supreme Court I will not throw spitballs at the Supreme Court Repeat this statement fifty more times, President Obama, single-spaced, on three pages, by Thursday.
This is what happens when our Constitutional lecturer president stands on the White House lawn and astoundingly challenges the authority and credibility of the Supreme Court; he gets issued a homework assignment on the fundamentals of our Constitution.
The Administration was represented in the judicial proceeding. The lawyer answered the question. The homework assignment was kind of petty. Call it an "order." Ok. So? Challenge that "order."
I'm just saying, I'd not stand for it if I was the AG.
I'm truly ok with it if this AG sees fit to just meekly comply. In fact, I'd love to see how his homework assignment stacks up against what his dopey boss said.