Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I can understand those that do thinking that Obama can lie if he wants to. I understand that it is up to each listener to discern the truth. I understand that free speech allows people to lie about anything. However, when the President of the United States tells such outlandish lies about the duties and authority of the Judicial Branch in such a way as to broadcast the lie through the media and totally mislead listeners regarding what the Supreme Court can and cannot do, what the Supreme Court has already done hundreds of times...it's time for the arrogant ass to get educated.
I believe the "request" for the letter comes more in the form of an ORDER than a DO ME A FAVOR AND TELL ME IN WRITING WHAT YOU MEANT.
Perhaps we'll see Holder indicted for contempt.
The 5th Circuit Court Scolds Obama Then Schools Him | The Gateway Pundit
Posted by Andrea Ryan on Tuesday, April 3, 2012, 10:36 PM
By: Andrea Ryan
I will not throw spitballs at the Supreme Court I will not throw spitballs at the Supreme Court I will not throw spitballs at the Supreme Court Repeat this statement fifty more times, President Obama, single-spaced, on three pages, by Thursday.
This is what happens when our Constitutional lecturer president stands on the White House lawn and astoundingly challenges the authority and credibility of the Supreme Court; he gets issued a homework assignment on the fundamentals of our Constitution.
Fox was just reading Holder's letter. Sorry, no, I wasn't really paying attention at all so don't know what it said . . .too many people and animals bouncing in and out of here today. But the admin complied with the request.
I just sent the following letter to the Justice Department and a copy to the President
You're actually going to comply with the demands of this judge who demands that you account for in writing for what President Obama has said ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL?? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE! Complying with this BS would set a very dangerous precedent. This idiot judge who is so stupid he doesn't even know that the courts DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER CAMPAIGN SPEECHES should have been told to go to f... hell right then and there. He should have been told that the President will say whatever he damn well pleases while he is on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL and he should have been told that that if he doesn't like it then that is just too damned bad. (ok, maybe not quite that blunt, but that's what he should have been told)
His calling the Affordable Health Care act "Obamacare" would alone be reason to be removed from the case. But with his absurd, stupid, idiotic, arrogant demand that President Obama, or anybody, account for what President Obama says on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL he should be impeached.
Although I think the author of the OP is a bit off the rails in his rhetoric, I will say again (since I voiced the opinion my own self, earlier): I think the "request" by those judges for a letter from the DOJ IS actually a bit out of bounds.
I'd be more than happy to see Holder knuckle under.
But as a matter of principle, I don't think I'd "honor" the "request."
The President REMAINS wrong for commenting (.)
Fox was just reading Holder's letter. Sorry, no, I wasn't really paying attention at all so don't know what it said . . .too many people and animals bouncing in and out of here today. But the admin complied with the request.
I thought they were just reading his comments about the situation from yesterday and not a new letter from today in direct response....link?
I just checked foxnews.com and google.com and couldn't find it.
foxnews.com said:Attorney General Eric Holder has provided a formal response to a federal appeals court on whether the administration believes judges have the power to overturn federal laws.
Holder said "the power of the courts to review the constitutionality of legislation is beyond dispute," though it should only be exercised in "appropriate cases."
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ical-football-as-justice-preps/#ixzz1rBgueMpd
Fox was just reading Holder's letter. Sorry, no, I wasn't really paying attention at all so don't know what it said . . .too many people and animals bouncing in and out of here today. But the admin complied with the request.
I thought they were just reading his comments about the situation from yesterday and not a new letter from today in direct response....link?
I just checked foxnews.com and google.com and couldn't find it.
Well, it seems obvious that when a judge requests you clarify a department position, it's probably good to do so, especially when it involves an ongoing case.
It is also good -- sometimes -- to rebuff an invalid directive from a court or a judge.
Although I think the author of the OP is a bit off the rails in his rhetoric, I will say again (since I voiced the opinion my own self, earlier): I think the "request" by those judges for a letter from the DOJ IS actually a bit out of bounds.
I'd be more than happy to see Holder knuckle under.
But as a matter of principle, I don't think I'd "honor" the "request."
The President REMAINS wrong for commenting (.)
I don't think that commenting is what's wrong.
I think that WHAT he said was stupid.
The President REMAINS wrong for commenting (.)
I don't think that commenting is what's wrong.
I think that WHAT he said was stupid.
No comment would have been best; you are correct, he went on to add details. UNPRECEDENTED being the stupid part.
Well, it seems obvious that when a judge requests you clarify a department position, it's probably good to do so, especially when it involves an ongoing case.
It is also good -- sometimes -- to rebuff an invalid directive from a court or a judge.
I'm certain the Supreme Court justices will take note of the rebuff!
It is also good -- sometimes -- to rebuff an invalid directive from a court or a judge.
I'm certain the Supreme Court justices will take note of the rebuff!
Maybe. Frankly, I doubt it.
That kind of thing is probably beneath their notice.
I'm certain the Supreme Court justices will take note of the rebuff!
Maybe. Frankly, I doubt it.
That kind of thing is probably beneath their notice.
Actually I think they're paying close attention, see? the game plan for the wh is to now make the supreme court a political battle. I think.
Fox was just reading Holder's letter. Sorry, no, I wasn't really paying attention at all so don't know what it said . . .too many people and animals bouncing in and out of here today. But the admin complied with the request.
Fox was just reading Holder's letter. Sorry, no, I wasn't really paying attention at all so don't know what it said . . .too many people and animals bouncing in and out of here today. But the admin complied with the request.
The letter is fine, except for the last line:
DOJ Letter to 5th Circuit re Judicial Authority
black is white, day is night, good is bad, etc etc etc.The Presidents remarks were fully consistent with the principles described herein.
Yeah they'll be sure to use that letter in the contempt charge brought against the attorney who got the order.
