Its Noon On Thursday, Did Obama's Justice Department Turn in Their Homework?

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by PLYMCO_PILGRIM, Apr 5, 2012.

  1. PLYMCO_PILGRIM
    Offline

    PLYMCO_PILGRIM Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    17,416
    Thanks Received:
    2,855
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    America's Home Town
    Ratings:
    +2,863
    If you don't know what I'm talking about here is the raw information.

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McbataTFdcU]5th Circuit Court audio - YouTube[/ame]


     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. PoliticalChic
    Online

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    55,967
    Thanks Received:
    15,725
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +25,098

    Dog ate it......


    Signed 'my mother....'
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  3. mmmjvpssm
    Offline

    mmmjvpssm Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    379
    Thanks Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +36
    I just sent the following letter to the Justice Department and a copy to the President


    You're actually going to comply with the demands of this judge who demands that you account for in writing for what President Obama has said ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL?? WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE! Complying with this BS would set a very dangerous precedent. This idiot judge who is so stupid he doesn't even know that the courts DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER CAMPAIGN SPEECHES should have been told to go to f... hell right then and there. He should have been told that the President will say whatever he damn well pleases while he is on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL and he should have been told that that if he doesn't like it then that is just too damned bad. (ok, maybe not quite that blunt, but that's what he should have been told)

    His calling the Affordable Health Care act "Obamacare" would alone be reason to be removed from the case. But with his absurd, stupid, idiotic, arrogant demand that President Obama, or anybody, account for what President Obama says on the CAMPAIGN TRAIL he should be impeached.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    hes a partisan hack.

    Bush tried to fill the country with them
     
  5. BluePhantom
    Offline

    BluePhantom Educator (of liberals)

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2011
    Messages:
    7,062
    Thanks Received:
    1,738
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Portland, OR / Salem, OR
    Ratings:
    +3,137
    I'm sure they will get right back to you.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  6. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,338
    Yeah they'll be sure to use that letter in the contempt charge brought against the attorney who got the order.
     
  7. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    remember the DOJ scandal.

    they filled the DOj with partisan hacks
     
  8. peach174
    Offline

    peach174 Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    20,665
    Thanks Received:
    4,071
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    S.E. AZ
    Ratings:
    +7,479

    He wasn't on the Campaign Trail.
    It was a news conference on the WH lawn.
     
  9. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,049
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,064

    Although I think the author of the OP is a bit off the rails in his rhetoric, I will say again (since I voiced the opinion my own self, earlier): I think the "request" by those judges for a letter from the DOJ IS actually a bit out of bounds.

    I'd be more than happy to see Holder knuckle under.

    But as a matter of principle, I don't think I'd "honor" the "request."
     
  10. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,576
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,220
    Well, it seems obvious that when a judge requests you clarify a department position, it's probably good to do so, especially when it involves an ongoing case.
     

Share This Page