Israeli Jewish media figure openly talks about massacring innocents in Palestine.

View attachment 859975

Listen to how this Jewish media figure says ā€œIsrael is ready to fight America and the whole worldā€. šŸ˜®

Heā€™s just like isilā€¦ this is a disgrace to the religion of Judaism. And this is the great difference between a civilized world where the anti-Muslimā€™s for example will not say something nice about Islam ā€¦they think all Muslims are the same. Thatā€™s like imagining all Jews are the same as that Jewish beast above in the video.

May Jesus protect the Honorable people of Palestine


Which Jewish media figure is that?
 
Another lie. The Palestinians have made it extremely clear they want a Palestinian State with Israel obliterated as a Jewish State

No they haven't. Jews lived all over the Arab world until Zionist nationalism arrived with their terror gangs and weapons.
 
Jews should close their entire country to Muslims. So should we.
We can't. That would be unconstitutional for the US to do so. Sorry.

86pxl9.jpg
 
Israel has offered a two state solution numerous times and its turned down by the Palestinians... take a history course....
Did the Israelis ever offer a two state solution to the Palestinians, with E. Jerusalem as their Capital? Or Jerusalem as an internationally administered neutral zone?

šŸ¤”


Did they. . . "negotiate," a two state solution. . . ????

. . . . or did they tell them what the solution and peace plan would be, giving them no say in the matter, and say, "here it is, take it or leave it!"
 
Seems Israel's favorite hobby is creating new generations of terrorists to plague them and the U.S.
I've always thought it was plausible that Israel orchestrated 9/11. They seem to want the world to condemn Muslims and by doing so they got the biggest dog (the U.S.) in on the game. Since their Mossad is arguably the savviest intelligence agency in the world, I would NOT put it past them to be able to pull it off.
 
No they haven't. Jews lived all over the Arab world until Zionist nationalism arrived with their terror gangs and weapons.
So you REALLY BELIEVE that if they had won the 67 War they would be living in peace with the Israelis?? Youā€™re a MORON
 
Did the Israelis ever offer a two state solution to the Palestinians, with E. Jerusalem as their Capital? Or Jerusalem as an internationally administered neutral zone?

šŸ¤”


Did they. . . "negotiate," a two state solution. . . ????

. . . . or did they tell them what the solution and peace plan would be, giving them no say in the matter, and say, "here it is, take it or leave it!"
Yasser Arafat got in a room with Bill Clinton and agreed to the terms offered by Israel then the next day he turned it down in front of the cameras.... They offered the Temple Mount to the Palestinians... a few years after the IDF dragged Jews from their homes in the disputed settlements by force to turn over to the Palestinians.... you can't give the Palestinians what they really want because its not land they want... its dead Jews that they seek... how can you work with a foe like that?...
I wish I could have brought home school books from Iraq to show what Iraqi Children are taught about Jews... its medieval it really is....
 
Yasser Arafat got in a room with Bill Clinton and agreed to the terms offered by Israel then the next day he turned it down in front of the cameras....

I'm thinking that might be oversimplified.

Osloā€™s Collapse, 1996ā€“2000

". . . In November 1995, Rabin was assassinated by Yigal Amir, an Israeli who opposed the Oslo Accords on religious grounds. Rabinā€™s murder was followed by a string of terrorist attacks by Hamas, which undermined support for the Labor Party in Israelā€™s May 1996 elections. New Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu hailed from the Likud Party, which had historically opposed Palestinian statehood and withdrawal from the occupied territories.

Worried that the peace process might collapse, the Clinton administration involved itself more actively in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. In January 1997, following intensive U.S. mediation, Israel and the PA signed the Hebron Protocol, which provided for the transfer of most of Hebron to Palestinian control. In October 1998, Clinton hosted Netanyahu and Arafat at the Wye River Plantation, where they negotiated an agreement calling for further Israeli withdrawals from the West Bank. Infighting over the implementation of the Wye Memorandum, however, brought down Netanyahuā€™s government in January 1999.

In Israelā€™s May 1999 elections, the Labor Partyā€™s Ehud Barak decisively defeated Netanyahu. Barak predicted that he could reach agreements with both Syria and the Palestinians in 12 to 15 months, and pledged to withdraw Israeli troops from southern Lebanon. In September, Barak signed the Sharm al-Shaykh Memorandum with Arafat, which committed both sides to begin permanent status negotiations. An initial round of meetings, however, achieved nothing, and by December the Palestinians suspended talks over settlement-building in the occupied territories.

Barak then focused on Syria. In January 2000, Israeli, Syrian, and U.S. delegations convened in West Virginia for peace talks. These negotiations foundered when Barak refused to reaffirm Rabinā€™s pledge to withdraw to the June 4, 1967 line, arguing that none of the concessions offered by the Syrian delegation in return could be considered final, since Syrian President Hafiz al-Asad was not present. A subsequent meeting between Clinton and Asad in Geneva failed to produce an Israeli-Syrian accord.

Barak then withdrew Israeli forces unilaterally from Lebanon and returned to the Palestinian track. At the prime ministerā€™s insistence, Clinton convened a summit at Camp David in July 2000, where he, Barak, and Arafat attempted to reach a final agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Accounts differ as to why Camp David failed, but it is clear that despite additional concessions by Barak, the Israelis and Palestinians remained strongly at odds over borders, Jerusalem, and whether Israel would recognize Palestinian refugeesā€™ ā€œright of return.ā€ The summit ended without a settlement; Clinton would blame Arafat for its failure.

On September 28, riots erupted following a visit of Likud Party leader Ariel Sharon to the Temple Mount, and soon escalated into a wave of Israeli-Palestinian violence that became known as the al-Aqsa Intifada. In December 2000, Clinton put forward his own proposals for an Israeli-Palestinian agreement. By this point, however, the president was leaving office, Barak faced electoral defeat, and Israeli-Palestinian violence continued unabated. . . . "

The Oslo Accords: Failure or Betrayal?​

 
I'm thinking that might be oversimplified.

Osloā€™s Collapse, 1996ā€“2000

". . . In November 1995, Rabin was assassinated by Yigal Amir, an Israeli who opposed the Oslo Accords on religious grounds. Rabinā€™s murder was followed by a string of terrorist attacks by Hamas, which undermined support for the Labor Party in Israelā€™s May 1996 elections. New Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu hailed from the Likud Party, which had historically opposed Palestinian statehood and withdrawal from the occupied territories.

Worried that the peace process might collapse, the Clinton administration involved itself more actively in Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. In January 1997, following intensive U.S. mediation, Israel and the PA signed the Hebron Protocol, which provided for the transfer of most of Hebron to Palestinian control. In October 1998, Clinton hosted Netanyahu and Arafat at the Wye River Plantation, where they negotiated an agreement calling for further Israeli withdrawals from the West Bank. Infighting over the implementation of the Wye Memorandum, however, brought down Netanyahuā€™s government in January 1999.

In Israelā€™s May 1999 elections, the Labor Partyā€™s Ehud Barak decisively defeated Netanyahu. Barak predicted that he could reach agreements with both Syria and the Palestinians in 12 to 15 months, and pledged to withdraw Israeli troops from southern Lebanon. In September, Barak signed the Sharm al-Shaykh Memorandum with Arafat, which committed both sides to begin permanent status negotiations. An initial round of meetings, however, achieved nothing, and by December the Palestinians suspended talks over settlement-building in the occupied territories.

Barak then focused on Syria. In January 2000, Israeli, Syrian, and U.S. delegations convened in West Virginia for peace talks. These negotiations foundered when Barak refused to reaffirm Rabinā€™s pledge to withdraw to the June 4, 1967 line, arguing that none of the concessions offered by the Syrian delegation in return could be considered final, since Syrian President Hafiz al-Asad was not present. A subsequent meeting between Clinton and Asad in Geneva failed to produce an Israeli-Syrian accord.

Barak then withdrew Israeli forces unilaterally from Lebanon and returned to the Palestinian track. At the prime ministerā€™s insistence, Clinton convened a summit at Camp David in July 2000, where he, Barak, and Arafat attempted to reach a final agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Accounts differ as to why Camp David failed, but it is clear that despite additional concessions by Barak, the Israelis and Palestinians remained strongly at odds over borders, Jerusalem, and whether Israel would recognize Palestinian refugeesā€™ ā€œright of return.ā€ The summit ended without a settlement; Clinton would blame Arafat for its failure.

On September 28, riots erupted following a visit of Likud Party leader Ariel Sharon to the Temple Mount, and soon escalated into a wave of Israeli-Palestinian violence that became known as the al-Aqsa Intifada. In December 2000, Clinton put forward his own proposals for an Israeli-Palestinian agreement. By this point, however, the president was leaving office, Barak faced electoral defeat, and Israeli-Palestinian violence continued unabated. . . . "

The Oslo Accords: Failure or Betrayal?​


Bill Clinton tells the story very differently... he is still steaming over being played... and that's why you can't make deals with these people... they don't want a deal... they don't want to live in peace... we need to stop looking at them like they are like us... because they are not like us....
 
Bill Clinton tells the story very differently... he is still steaming over being played... and that's why you can't make deals with these people... they don't want a deal... they don't want to live in peace... we need to stop looking at them like they are like us... because they are not like us....
Oh. . . that's B.S. I have seen such inflammatory B.S. to push an agenda before.

We saw it from folks like Hitler. Dehumanizing entire populations is a very old tactic to push a war agenda.

iu
iu

iu
iu

iu


iu
 
View attachment 859975

Listen to how this Jewish media figure says ā€œIsrael is ready to fight America and the whole worldā€. šŸ˜®

Heā€™s just like isilā€¦ this is a disgrace to the religion of Judaism. And this is the great difference between a civilized world where the anti-Muslimā€™s for example will not say something nice about Islam ā€¦they think all Muslims are the same. Thatā€™s like imagining all Jews are the same as that Jewish beast above in the video.

May Jesus protect the Honorable people of Palestine

It is interesting,
the worst image of evil Muslims project
to demonize a Jew, is to insult him as an Islamist.

Now the message is slowly sipping, this is a more accurate translation -

 
I agree. This is a disgrace to the religion of Judaism. And to the State of Israel.

For all the answers required for peace,
this war is a religious war before anything,

This is what G-d promised us about not fearing
the evil of war in our hearts when returning from war.
But when going forward, one has to forget every obstacle.

Why is this a disgrace to talk Dresden to Germans, and Arabic to 'Amalek?
 

Forum List

Back
Top