ISIS funded by our corrupt US government and Israel.

[LA RAM FAN]

 

[Ringel05]

Uuummmmm, let's see, ISIS is primarily Sunni, Iran is primarily Shia, ancient enemies. The US is seen as the Great Satan and an enemy of Islam especially by Iran so using propaganda to allege collusion between ISIS and the US would be an obvious move by Iran......... All one needs is unbiased, critical thinking skills and a working knowledge of the culture to see what is happening here but so many of you eat it up hook, line and sinker. Now that's funny!!!

 

[Fenton Lum]

The US is arming and training both ISIS and al-Nusra in Syria as well as supplying the Saudi's with the cluster bombs, known to have a 90% collateral casualty rate, they rain down on Yemen. And now we're in Somalia. Wy don't they like our way of life?

 

[montelatici]

Yup, the U.S. would never collude with Islamist groups.

 

[louie888]

There was a large wikileaks dump on these connections. But moreover, has isis ever attacked America or Israel?

Think!

 

[Ringel05]

Yup, the U.S. would never collude with Islamist groups.

Missed the point to promote your bias. How parochial of you. Or is your post a pathetic attempt at deflection?

 

[Ringel05]

There was a large wikileaks dump on these connections. But moreover, has isis ever attacked America or Israel?

Think!

The Curtis Culwell Center attack
University of California, Merced
San Bernardino shooting
Shooting of Philadelphia police officer
Orlando nightclub shooting
Ohio State University attack

As for Israel;
Google

All ISIS inspired attacks, it's how they function outside of their direct areas of control.

Nope, ISIS hasn't attacked either county in any way shape or form........

 

[louie888]

There was a large wikileaks dump on these connections. But moreover, has isis ever attacked America or Israel?

Think!

The Curtis Culwell Center attack
University of California, Merced
San Bernardino shooting
Shooting of Philadelphia police officer
Orlando nightclub shooting
Ohio State University attack

As for Israel;
Google

All ISIS inspired attacks, it's how they function outside of their direct areas of control.

Nope, ISIS hasn't attacked either county in any way shape or form........

So, you think those attacks were isis?

OK, dude.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

There was a large wikileaks dump on these connections. But moreover, has isis ever attacked America or Israel?

Think!

The Curtis Culwell Center attack
University of California, Merced
San Bernardino shooting
Shooting of Philadelphia police officer
Orlando nightclub shooting
Ohio State University attack

As for Israel;
Google

All ISIS inspired attacks, it's how they function outside of their direct areas of control.

Nope, ISIS hasn't attacked either county in any way shape or form........

As for Israel, ISIS knows that Israel would bomb the crap out of them, so it better not start up with them.

 

[Ringel05]

There was a large wikileaks dump on these connections. But moreover, has isis ever attacked America or Israel?

Think!

The Curtis Culwell Center attack
University of California, Merced
San Bernardino shooting
Shooting of Philadelphia police officer
Orlando nightclub shooting
Ohio State University attack

As for Israel;
Google

All ISIS inspired attacks, it's how they function outside of their direct areas of control.

Nope, ISIS hasn't attacked either county in any way shape or form........

So, you think those attacks were isis?

OK, dude.

So you think those attacks were false flags? Okay dud.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Did anyone stop to think that Trump has been in charge for the past 100 days, and if the US is still funding ISIL, that it's now on him? I mean, he's told us repeatedly that he's got a secret plan to get rid of ISIL.

Besides, Trump said he was going to stop all that corruption on day 1.

 

[louie888]

There was a large wikileaks dump on these connections. But moreover, has isis ever attacked America or Israel?

Think!

The Curtis Culwell Center attack
University of California, Merced
San Bernardino shooting
Shooting of Philadelphia police officer
Orlando nightclub shooting
Ohio State University attack

As for Israel;
Google

All ISIS inspired attacks, it's how they function outside of their direct areas of control.

Nope, ISIS hasn't attacked either county in any way shape or form........

As for Israel, ISIS knows that Israel would bomb the crap out of them, so it better not start up with them.

Where would they bomb them?

 

[Ringel05]

There was a large wikileaks dump on these connections. But moreover, has isis ever attacked America or Israel?

Think!

The Curtis Culwell Center attack
University of California, Merced
San Bernardino shooting
Shooting of Philadelphia police officer
Orlando nightclub shooting
Ohio State University attack

As for Israel;
Google

All ISIS inspired attacks, it's how they function outside of their direct areas of control.

Nope, ISIS hasn't attacked either county in any way shape or form........

As for Israel, ISIS knows that Israel would bomb the crap out of them, so it better not start up with them.

Where would they bomb them?

In the same areas that we do and that Syria, Iraq and the Russians do, in their strongholds. Duh.

 

[montelatici]

Yup, the U.S. would never collude with Islamist groups.

Missed the point to promote your bias. How parochial of you. Or is your post a pathetic attempt at deflection?

Do you even know what parochial means? If you do, you would realize that it's an inappropriate term for the dynamic you are trying to characterize. I have actaully widened the debate rather than narrowing it.

Do you know what pathetic means? Pathetic would be not noting that the U.S. has allied itself with Islamists and Wahabis when it served U.S. interests.

So, far from a deflection, it presents facts which are perhaps to difficult for your naive little brain to process given your severe case of cognizant dissonance.

 

[Ringel05]

Yup, the U.S. would never collude with Islamist groups.

Missed the point to promote your bias. How parochial of you. Or is your post a pathetic attempt at deflection?

Do you even know what parochial means? If you do, you would realize that it's an inappropriate term for the dynamic you are trying to characterize. I have actaully widened the debate rather than narrowing it.

Do you know what pathetic means? Pathetic would be not noting that the U.S. has allied itself with Islamists and Wahabis when it served U.S. interests.

So, far from a deflection, it presents facts which are perhaps to difficult for your naive little brain to process given your severe case of cognizant dissonance.

Nice rationalization, you must practice on a continual basis.

 

[Ringel05]

Yup, the U.S. would never collude with Islamist groups.

Missed the point to promote your bias. How parochial of you. Or is your post a pathetic attempt at deflection?

Do you even know what parochial means? If you do, you would realize that it's an inappropriate term for the dynamic you are trying to characterize. I have actaully widened the debate rather than narrowing it.

Do you know what pathetic means? Pathetic would be not noting that the U.S. has allied itself with Islamists and Wahabis when it served U.S. interests.

So, far from a deflection, it presents facts which are perhaps to difficult for your naive little brain to process given your severe case of cognizant dissonance.

Nice rationalization, you must practice on a continual basis.

Yes we have allied with different groups at different times when it serves our national security. ISIS does not serve our national security in any way shape or form, care to try again?

 

[montelatici]

Yup, the U.S. would never collude with Islamist groups.

Missed the point to promote your bias. How parochial of you. Or is your post a pathetic attempt at deflection?

Do you even know what parochial means? If you do, you would realize that it's an inappropriate term for the dynamic you are trying to characterize. I have actaully widened the debate rather than narrowing it.

Do you know what pathetic means? Pathetic would be not noting that the U.S. has allied itself with Islamists and Wahabis when it served U.S. interests.

So, far from a deflection, it presents facts which are perhaps to difficult for your naive little brain to process given your severe case of cognizant dissonance.

Nice rationalization, you must practice on a continual basis.

Yes we have allied with different groups at different times when it serves our national security. ISIS does not serve our national security in any way shape or form, care to try again?

Of course, initially in Syria, ISIS served the interests of the U.S., the Saudis (et al) and the Turks. ISIS were the strongest force that faced the Syrian Government.

 

[Ringel05]

Yup, the U.S. would never collude with Islamist groups.

Missed the point to promote your bias. How parochial of you. Or is your post a pathetic attempt at deflection?

Do you even know what parochial means? If you do, you would realize that it's an inappropriate term for the dynamic you are trying to characterize. I have actaully widened the debate rather than narrowing it.

Do you know what pathetic means? Pathetic would be not noting that the U.S. has allied itself with Islamists and Wahabis when it served U.S. interests.

So, far from a deflection, it presents facts which are perhaps to difficult for your naive little brain to process given your severe case of cognizant dissonance.

Nice rationalization, you must practice on a continual basis.

Yes we have allied with different groups at different times when it serves our national security. ISIS does not serve our national security in any way shape or form, care to try again?

Of course, initially in Syria, ISIS served the interests of the U.S., the Saudis (et al) and the Turks. ISIS were the strongest force that faced the Syrian Government.

That's why we're bombing ISIS strongholds and using drones to take out their leaders....... Got it.......

 

[montelatici]

Missed the point to promote your bias. How parochial of you. Or is your post a pathetic attempt at deflection?

Do you even know what parochial means? If you do, you would realize that it's an inappropriate term for the dynamic you are trying to characterize. I have actaully widened the debate rather than narrowing it.

Do you know what pathetic means? Pathetic would be not noting that the U.S. has allied itself with Islamists and Wahabis when it served U.S. interests.

So, far from a deflection, it presents facts which are perhaps to difficult for your naive little brain to process given your severe case of cognizant dissonance.

Nice rationalization, you must practice on a continual basis.

Yes we have allied with different groups at different times when it serves our national security. ISIS does not serve our national security in any way shape or form, care to try again?

Of course, initially in Syria, ISIS served the interests of the U.S., the Saudis (et al) and the Turks. ISIS were the strongest force that faced the Syrian Government.

That's why we're bombing ISIS strongholds and using drones to take out their leaders....... Got it.......

Do you know what initially means?

 

[Ringel05]

Do you even know what parochial means? If you do, you would realize that it's an inappropriate term for the dynamic you are trying to characterize. I have actaully widened the debate rather than narrowing it.

Do you know what pathetic means? Pathetic would be not noting that the U.S. has allied itself with Islamists and Wahabis when it served U.S. interests.

So, far from a deflection, it presents facts which are perhaps to difficult for your naive little brain to process given your severe case of cognizant dissonance.

Nice rationalization, you must practice on a continual basis.

Yes we have allied with different groups at different times when it serves our national security. ISIS does not serve our national security in any way shape or form, care to try again?

Of course, initially in Syria, ISIS served the interests of the U.S., the Saudis (et al) and the Turks. ISIS were the strongest force that faced the Syrian Government.

That's why we're bombing ISIS strongholds and using drones to take out their leaders....... Got it.......

Do you know what initially means?

Initially ISIS did not serve our interests no matter how you chose to spin their getting a hold of some of our support to other non ISIS groups.