Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
You're the only one claiming such a difference.
A constitutional right is a citizen's right to something that is protected by the constitution of his country. He might not even have to be a citizen.
No one of any consequence disagrees with that definition. That you want to live in your own manufactured fantasy world is your choice.
I am not the only one claiming such a difference, there are, quite literally, hundreds of books about the difference. Even among people who prefer not to use the term entitlement because of the negative connotations there is a recognition of the difference between positive and negative rights. To spell it out for the political nincompoops, like yourself, a negative right is something that prevents you from hurting me, and a positive right is something that obliges you to do something for me.
Look it up.
There are hundreds of books but you can't name any. If I name some books about psychic power or time travel does that prove the existence of same?
Did I say I cannot name any? Or did you just assume that because you are a brain dead nincompoop? If you want to know a few of them you can start here.
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_0_20/180-0636308-3440567?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=political+philosophy&sprefix=political+philosophy%2Caps%2C252]Amazon.com: political philosophy: Books[/ame]