You're in denial regarding the Hamas Charter and islamic ideology.The Hamas Charter is little more than a re-statement of the hate and war manual inspired by muhammud (swish).It's truly silly to use slogans and cliches about "resistance" when applied to Islamic terrorists.Try paying attention when you're scouring the web for your cutting and pasting.
Your cutting and pasting references the West Bank. Did you happen to notice that?
Lastly, control of the airspace would be a requirement as a preventative to Islamic terrorist attacks. If the Islamic terrorists had chosen not to wage acts of war, there would be no need to control them.
Yes, and I highlighted the section regarding Gaza in bold, for your benefit. I don't like to break up paragraphs as it often results in accusations of withholding information.
The continuance of the blockade and control of air sea and land borders was the act of war, the resistance by the Palestinians was to be expected. If there were no blockade, an act of war, there would be no need for resistance.
You should read the Hamas Charter. The requirement to obliterate Israel as a part of offensive gee-had is not "resistance".
Resistance against occupation is what it is called by the occupied. Terrorism is what the occupier/oppressor calls resistance to its rule. The Nazis, for example, called the French Resistance terrorists. The Apartheid regime called the ANC terrorists. When the Algerian FLN bombed movie theaters and restaurants in Algiers, the French called the FLN terrorists. When the IRA were called terrorists by the British when they set of bombs in shopping centers in England, yet many Americans called them freedom fighters and supported them financially.
It is just historical fact. Why do you think the I/P conflict is any different than those others. It isn't.
The Hamas Charter explicitly states the obliteration of Israel with gee-had as the mechanism.
As we have seen repeatedly, Israel has the weapons, tactics and know-how to put the had in gee-had.
There is no such thing as a Hamas Charter.
There is however, a Likud Charter which makes much the same declarations vis-a-vis the Palestinians with respect to their presence in what they call Eretz Israel.
Why would you presume others are?