Some Democrats are claiming this may have been a result of sequester cuts.
Barney Fwank said no tax-cut would have prevented it.
Barney Fwank said no tax-cut would have prevented it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Obama will find a way to spend more money.Speculation of course but what if? How do you think we would respond?
Also if the perp(s) are caught should they be detained by public officials or military officials? Basically do you think this should be treated as a crime or an act of war?
Speculation of course but what if? How do you think we would respond?
Also if the perp(s) are caught should they be detained by public officials or military officials? Basically do you think this should be treated as a crime or an act of war?
As we learned from the Republicans, the most important thing is deciding what terms to use to refer to things. Policy, action, and facts are only minor concerns - the most important thing is to get our language right.
Terms like "act of war" and "terrorism" have, at this point, completely lost any sense of meaning.
Barring any extraordinary new pieces of information coming to light, this should be handled by law enforcement, not the military.
Well we know if it was Saudis he will do nothing about it.
And Bush would?
The only way to deal with something like this effectively is to hit them harder than they hit us. Period.
The only way to deal with something like this effectively is to hit them harder than they hit us. Period.
No.
The only way to deal with something like this effectively, is to hit them hard enough to remove any possible capability they have, to ever do it again.
You don't make war, simply to retaliate.
You make war, to eliminate the threat.
Countries that don't like that, should think twice before threatening us.
Terms like "act of war" and "terrorism" have, at this point, completely lost any sense of meaning.
Barring any extraordinary new pieces of information coming to light, this should be handled by law enforcement, not the military.
Why have those terms lost any sense of meaning? Give me an example as to when they've been used inappropriately. From where I stand, this administration has gone out of their way to not use such language, even when it was obviously appropriate.
Terms like "act of war" and "terrorism" have, at this point, completely lost any sense of meaning.
Barring any extraordinary new pieces of information coming to light, this should be handled by law enforcement, not the military.
Why have those terms lost any sense of meaning? Give me an example as to when they've been used inappropriately. From where I stand, this administration has gone out of their way to not use such language, even when it was obviously appropriate.
This is actually a perfect example of what I'm talking about.
You've attached some non-existent relevance to the word "terrorism", which is the only reason why from where you stand, you see a lack of that language.
What difference does it make if Obama calls it "terrorism" or not?
Some Democrats are claiming this may have been a result of sequester cuts.
Barney Fwank said no tax-cut would have prevented it.
Well we know if it was Saudis he will do nothing about it.
And Bush would?
And Obama would?
Speculation of course but what if? How do you think we would respond?
Also if the perp(s) are caught should they be detained by public officials or military officials? Basically do you think this should be treated as a crime or an act of war?
Speculation of course but what if? How do you think we would respond?
Also if the perp(s) are caught should they be detained by public officials or military officials? Basically do you think this should be treated as a crime or an act of war?