- Oct 19, 2012
- 1,798
- 589
- 198
- Thread starter
- #61
feel free not to believe me. fortunately, that has no bearing on me or this exercise.At least be honest. This whole bit here is bull shit.
The question is about taking logical arguments to extremes. Could one establish the ethical position that any harm is problematic, and any risk of harm is problematic. If you don't see that as necessary for an anti-abortion (is anyone "pro-abortion" or "anti-life") position then say so and help me understand the limitations and explanation.In some states, if a woman is drinking, smoking, or using drugs the state or CPS will intervene. But lets be realistic here, A bowl of pickles and ice cream, a Marlboro, amd a milkshake to finish it off will do less harm then this set up right here-
I am restating the question and reframing it so that if someone did not understand the point, this other presentation might help. If you got it the first time then great. Sorry it offends you that different people might appreciate different wordings.This part of your post is redundant, as such useless. You are asking the same question twice in the same post.