Hillary to Gun Owners: Take Back The Second Amendment From NRA Extremists

[Sallow]

While discussing the NRA Clinton said, “I mean ideally what I would love to see is gun owners, responsible gun owners, hunters form a different organization and take back the Second Amendment from these extremists.”

Hillary to Gun Owners: Take Back The Second Amendment From NRA Extremists - Breitbart

Virtually all of these people understand that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home

Virtually all of these people understand that the right to keep and bear arms is among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty

Why would any of them listen to Hillary?

the second amendment was never understood to protect a private right of gun ownership until scalia put his little paws on it.

justice berger laughed at the concept. so did every other justice before him.

Justice Berger can go to hell. The PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms, it doesn't get simpler than that.

as part of a well-regulated militia....

sorry, marty. justice berger was right... so was every other justice for the almost 200 years before him. scalia is an aberration and just because you like what he says, doesn't make him correct. it makes heller law.... but not good law.

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

That..is a modern invention.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

It does, however, have a clause the protects the right to same.

 

[martybegan]

Hillary to Gun Owners: Take Back The Second Amendment From NRA Extremists - Breitbart

Virtually all of these people understand that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home

Virtually all of these people understand that the right to keep and bear arms is among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty

Why would any of them listen to Hillary?

the second amendment was never understood to protect a private right of gun ownership until scalia put his little paws on it.

justice berger laughed at the concept. so did every other justice before him.

Justice Berger can go to hell. The PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms, it doesn't get simpler than that.

as part of a well-regulated militia....

sorry, marty. justice berger was right... so was every other justice for the almost 200 years before him. scalia is an aberration and just because you like what he says, doesn't make him correct. it makes heller law.... but not good law.

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

That..is a modern invention.

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Not the State, not the militia, not the police, not the government, THE PEOPLE.

 

[Sallow]

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

It does, however, have a clause the protects the right to same.

What?

 

[M14 Shooter]

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

It does, however, have a clause the protects the right to same.

What?

I'll type slowly.
There is a clause in the constitution -- an amendment, to be specific, - that protects the right of private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense

 

[LOki]

I hear that the NRA is an extremist organization rather often. Since I'm not a member, I think it might be presumed that I naturally know why.

The thing is, I don't.

I am sure someone here who believes that the NRA is an extremist organization could explain to me why that is so.

Thank you.

I was a member for a long time but I close and burned my membership card after the Sandy hook shootings.
OH.....look Hillary is talking about closing loopholes at gun shows. That's today.
Your welcome..

That's no explanation.

I'm not explaining anything. I'm just showing a fiction coming from CNN.

Thanks for sharing?

 

[Katzndogz]

Every democrat should make gun confiscation the primary plank in their campaigns.

 

[LOki]

Hillary to Gun Owners: Take Back The Second Amendment From NRA Extremists - Breitbart

Virtually all of these people understand that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home

Virtually all of these people understand that the right to keep and bear arms is among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty

Why would any of them listen to Hillary?

the second amendment was never understood to protect a private right of gun ownership until scalia put his little paws on it.

justice berger laughed at the concept. so did every other justice before him.

Justice Berger can go to hell. The PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms, it doesn't get simpler than that.

as part of a well-regulated militia....

sorry, marty. justice berger was right... so was every other justice for the almost 200 years before him. scalia is an aberration and just because you like what he says, doesn't make him correct. it makes heller law.... but not good law.

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

 

[hazlnut]

While discussing the NRA Clinton said, “I mean ideally what I would love to see is gun owners, responsible gun owners, hunters form a different organization and take back the Second Amendment from these extremists.”

Hillary to Gun Owners: Take Back The Second Amendment From NRA Extremists - Breitbart

Virtually all of these people understand that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home

Virtually all of these people understand that the right to keep and bear arms is among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty

Why would any of them listen to Hillary?

God bless Hillary.

The NRA has hijacked the idea of the NRA to promote gun sales.

Only idiots don't see that.

 

[jillian]

the second amendment was never understood to protect a private right of gun ownership until scalia put his little paws on it.

justice berger laughed at the concept. so did every other justice before him.

Justice Berger can go to hell. The PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms, it doesn't get simpler than that.

as part of a well-regulated militia....

sorry, marty. justice berger was right... so was every other justice for the almost 200 years before him. scalia is an aberration and just because you like what he says, doesn't make him correct. it makes heller law.... but not good law.

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

it was never intended to protect a private right of gun ownership.

justices laughed at the idea until scalia put in his two cents for the NRA gun dealers organization.

 

[Sallow]

the second amendment was never understood to protect a private right of gun ownership until scalia put his little paws on it.

justice berger laughed at the concept. so did every other justice before him.

Justice Berger can go to hell. The PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms, it doesn't get simpler than that.

as part of a well-regulated militia....

sorry, marty. justice berger was right... so was every other justice for the almost 200 years before him. scalia is an aberration and just because you like what he says, doesn't make him correct. it makes heller law.... but not good law.

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

Feel free.

Cite the clause in the Constitution that specifically grants citizens the right to a gun for personal protection.

 

[LOki]

Justice Berger can go to hell. The PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms, it doesn't get simpler than that.

as part of a well-regulated militia....

sorry, marty. justice berger was right... so was every other justice for the almost 200 years before him. scalia is an aberration and just because you like what he says, doesn't make him correct. it makes heller law.... but not good law.

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

it was never intended to protect a private right of gun ownership.

It was always intended to protect a private right of gun ownership. ALWAYS.

The notion that it wasn't came only after racists and "progressives" were being inconvenienced by an armed citizenry.

justices laughed at the idea until scalia put in his two cents for the NRA gun dealers organization.

Nonsense.

 

[LOki]

Justice Berger can go to hell. The PEOPLE have the right to keep and bear arms, it doesn't get simpler than that.

as part of a well-regulated militia....

sorry, marty. justice berger was right... so was every other justice for the almost 200 years before him. scalia is an aberration and just because you like what he says, doesn't make him correct. it makes heller law.... but not good law.

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

Feel free.

Cite the clause in the Constitution that specifically grants citizens the right to a gun for personal protection.

1) Nothing in the Constitution grants any rights--certain rights are recognized by their enumeration.
2) 2nd Amendment is what you're looking for.

 

[jon_berzerk]

While discussing the NRA Clinton said, “I mean ideally what I would love to see is gun owners, responsible gun owners, hunters form a different organization and take back the Second Amendment from these extremists.”

Hillary to Gun Owners: Take Back The Second Amendment From NRA Extremists - Breitbart

Virtually all of these people understand that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home

Virtually all of these people understand that the right to keep and bear arms is among those fundamental rights necessary to our system of ordered liberty

Why would any of them listen to Hillary?

because they are idiots who will vote for anything that has a (D) behind the name

 

[Sallow]

as part of a well-regulated militia....

sorry, marty. justice berger was right... so was every other justice for the almost 200 years before him. scalia is an aberration and just because you like what he says, doesn't make him correct. it makes heller law.... but not good law.

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

Feel free.

Cite the clause in the Constitution that specifically grants citizens the right to a gun for personal protection.

1) Nothing in the Constitution grants any rights--certain rights are recognized by their enumeration.
2) 2nd Amendment is what you're looking for.

There are plenty of rights granted by the Constitution.

And the 2nd Amendment sets up a structure for a militia.

 

[jon_berzerk]

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

Feel free.

Cite the clause in the Constitution that specifically grants citizens the right to a gun for personal protection.

1) Nothing in the Constitution grants any rights--certain rights are recognized by their enumeration.
2) 2nd Amendment is what you're looking for.

There are plenty of rights granted by the Constitution.

And the 2nd Amendment sets up a structure for a militia.

however it is the right of the (people) to keep and bear arms

 

[Sallow]

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

Feel free.

Cite the clause in the Constitution that specifically grants citizens the right to a gun for personal protection.

1) Nothing in the Constitution grants any rights--certain rights are recognized by their enumeration.
2) 2nd Amendment is what you're looking for.

There are plenty of rights granted by the Constitution.

And the 2nd Amendment sets up a structure for a militia.

however it is the right of the (people) to keep and bear arms

Who are required to be part of a militia and at the ready to defend the state and under the jurisdiction of Congress and the Commander in Chief.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

The STATES have the right to form militas, the PEOPLE keep the right to retain arms.

People in the past would consider banning a law abiding citizen from owning a firearm as ludicrous, its a modern invention.

The Constitution doesn't have any clauses where private citizens have the right to own a gun for self defense.

2nd Amendment.

That..is a modern invention.

Nonsense.

Feel free.

Cite the clause in the Constitution that specifically grants citizens the right to a gun for personal protection.

1) Nothing in the Constitution grants any rights--certain rights are recognized by their enumeration.
2) 2nd Amendment is what you're looking for.

There are plenty of rights granted by the Constitution.

And the 2nd Amendment sets up a structure for a militia.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."


Note the commas.

com·ma
ˈkämə/
noun
noun: comma; plural noun: commas; noun: comma butterfly; plural noun: comma butterflies
1.
a punctuation mark (,) indicating a pause between parts of a sentence. It is also used to separate items in a list and to mark the place of thousands in a large numeral.
2.
Music
a minute interval or difference of pitch.

 

[jon_berzerk]

2nd Amendment.

Nonsense.

Feel free.

Cite the clause in the Constitution that specifically grants citizens the right to a gun for personal protection.

1) Nothing in the Constitution grants any rights--certain rights are recognized by their enumeration.
2) 2nd Amendment is what you're looking for.

There are plenty of rights granted by the Constitution.

And the 2nd Amendment sets up a structure for a militia.

however it is the right of the (people) to keep and bear arms

Who are required to be part of a militia and at the ready to defend the state and under the jurisdiction of Congress and the Commander in Chief.

nope settled years ago the SC said unconnected to the militia

so you can hem and haw all you want but it does not change the fact

that owning a firearm is an individual right

 

[the_human_being]

Don't understand what the problem is here. If anyone out there is for strong gun control laws all they need do is move to the south side of Chicago.