Happy Birthday, FDR

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,289
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1. January 30th, 1882

FDR born in New Hyde Park, NY. 32nd President (1933-1945) When he was nominated in 1932, he pledged himself “to a new deal for the American people.”

His New Deal was a program of social justice which brought security to the aged, relief to the unemployed and shorter hours an d higher wages to workingmen. “…social values more noble than mere monetary profits.” His Four Freedoms speech in his State of the Union message (see 1/6/1941) is considered the most succinct statement of our democratic values (speech, worship, from want and from fear) .


2. The following pluses for FDR( from “The Hundred Days of FDR”, by Schlesinger)

"Who can now imagine a day when America offered no Social Security, no unemployment compensation, no food stamps, no Federal guarantee of bank deposits, no Federal supervision of the stock market, no Federal protection for collective bargaining, no Federal standards for wages and hours, no Federal support for farm prices or rural electrification, no Federal refinancing for farm and home mortgages, no Federal commitment to high employment or to equal opportunity - in short, no Federal responsibility for Americans who found themselves, through no fault of their own, in economic or social distress?"
The 'Hundred Days' of F.D.R.




3. Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union[2]:

“ We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”[3] People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.
For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world."
Second Bill of Rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
There is nothing HAPPY about that assholes birthday.

If you take careful look at his accomplishments.....I'll bet you can find one or two that you might find beneficial.

And, he was the President under whom the was was successfully advanced.


Now, between us, I had to resist the temptation to list the myriad disagreements I have with FDR....
...but those will be reserved for another day, not his birthday.
 
There is nothing HAPPY about that assholes birthday.

If you take careful look at his accomplishments.....I'll bet you can find one or two that you might find beneficial.

And, he was the President under whom the was was successfully advanced.


Now, between us, I had to resist the temptation to list the myriad disagreements I have with FDR....
...but those will be reserved for another day, not his birthday.

I can agree that FDR did DO some good things, after all the jackass was president for over three terms. However, his mistakes and failures far out weigh any accomplishments. Don't you agree?
 
There is nothing HAPPY about that assholes birthday.

If you take careful look at his accomplishments.....I'll bet you can find one or two that you might find beneficial.

And, he was the President under whom the was was successfully advanced.


Now, between us, I had to resist the temptation to list the myriad disagreements I have with FDR....
...but those will be reserved for another day, not his birthday.

I can agree that FDR did DO some good things, after all the jackass was president for over three terms. However, his mistakes and failures far out weigh any accomplishments. Don't you agree?




OK....it's a new day....


My gripe isn't that he did many things with which I can't agree, it's that he didn't have the courage to challenge the Constitution via the amendment process.


The Imperial President, Franklin the First, changed the nature of the government's relationship with the people, and the President with the rest of the government.



Theodore J, Lowi, “The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States”
1. “Theodore Lowi, a political science eminence at Cornell University, years ago drew a bead on what was wrong with the American polity. In his The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States, he claimed that the Founder's constitution of 1787 had been surreptitiously replaced with a new one by the FDR administration, and no one had actually noticed it for seventy-plus years. In current argot, we have been operating under US Constitution, 2.0 since the Roosevelt era. The contours of the constitution of this "Second Republic" as he deemed it, bears some scrutiny, as the Obama Administration and the 112th Congress go to work bringing even more change--possibly US Constitution 3.0. The preamble and first article of the actual constitution we have been living under, which Lowi acutely discerned, suffice to show where an Obama constitution will be taking off from. Archived-Articles: America's Third Republic?
.
___________________________________________________________
2. Though the Constitution of the Second Republic is unwritten, here is Lowi's "sketch" of its essential outlines
PREAMBLE. There ought to be a national presence in every aspect of the lives of American citizens. National power is no longer a necessary evil; it is a positive virtue.

Article I. It is the primary purpose of this national government to provide domestic tranquility by reducing risk. This risk may be physical or it may be fiscal. In order to fulfill this sacred obligation, the national government shall be deemed to have sufficient power to eliminate threats from the environment through regulation, and to eliminate threats from economic uncertainty through insurance.

Article II. The separation of powers to the contrary notwithstanding, the center of this national government is the presidency. Said office is authorized to use any powers, real or imagined, to set our nation to rights making any rules or regulations the president deems appropriate; the president may delegate this authority to any other official or agency. The right to make all such rules and regulations is based on the assumption in this constitution that the office of the presidency embodies the will of the real majority of the American nation.

Article III. Congress exists, but only as a consensual body. Congress possesses all legislative authority but should limit itself to the delegation of broad grants of unstructured authority to the president. Congress must take care never to draft a careful and precise statute because this would interfere with the judgment of the president and his professional and full time administrators.

Article IV. There exists a separate administrative branch composed of persons whose right to govern is based on two principles: (1), the delegations of power flowing from Congress; and (2), the authority inherent in professional training and promotion through an administrative hierarchy. Congress and the courts may provide for administrative procedures and have the power to review agencies for their observance of these procedures; but in no instance should Congress or the courts attempt to displace the judgment of the administrators with their own.

Article V. The Judicial branch is responsible for two functions: (1), to preserve the procedural rights of citizens before all federal courts, state and local courts, and administrative agencies; and (2), to apply the Fourteenth Amendment of the 1787 Constitution as a natural-law defense of all substantive and procedural rights. The appellate courts shall exercise vigorous judicial review of all state and local government and court decisions, but in no instance shall the courts review the constitutionality of Congress’s grants of authority to the president or to the federal administrative agencies.

Article VI. The public interest shall be defined by the satisfaction of the voters in their constituencies. The test of public interest is reelection.

Article VII. The public interest to the contrary notwithstanding, actual policy making will not come from voter preferences or congressional enactments but form a process of tripartite bargaining between specialized administrators, relevant members of Congress, and the representatives of self-selected organized interests. Principalities And Powers: Goodbye Liberalism: Hello Socialism
 
Every president up to FDR gracefully left office after two elected terms. America had to establish a term limit Amendment after FDR refused to step down. The liberal establishment still defends his legacy in remarkably dishonest ways. I watched a documentary about FDR and the opening of WW2. The narrators actually said "FDR considered Japan to be just an annoyance and that was part of his genius"? His genius? It was an indication of his profound ignorance and criminal negligence. America never had an intelligence network prior to WW2 and the documentary dodged around that fact, alluded to it but never criticized. The presidential order to incarcerate innocent American citizens because of their ethnicity is one of the most profound violations of the Constitution in modern times. The democrat party was well aware of FDR's failing health and they knew he would not live through his 4th term so they hand picked a successor and left the sitting V.P. off the ticket while he was on vacation. FDR barely lasted a month and his medical records disappeared from a locked safe.
 
Every president up to FDR gracefully left office after two elected terms. America had to establish a term limit Amendment after FDR refused to step down. The liberal establishment still defends his legacy in remarkably dishonest ways. I watched a documentary about FDR and the opening of WW2. The narrators actually said "FDR considered Japan to be just an annoyance and that was part of his genius"? His genius? It was an indication of his profound ignorance and criminal negligence. America never had an intelligence network prior to WW2 and the documentary dodged around that fact, alluded to it but never criticized. The presidential order to incarcerate innocent American citizens because of their ethnicity is one of the most profound violations of the Constitution in modern times. The democrat party was well aware of FDR's failing health and they knew he would not live through his 4th term so they hand picked a successor and left the sitting V.P. off the ticket while he was on vacation. FDR barely lasted a month and his medical records disappeared from a locked safe.




M. Stanton Evans wrote the forward to the Folsoms' book "FDR Goes To War."

In it, he says, in agreement with your post:
“Though FDR is treated in many histories as a far-seeing statesman waging a great crusade for freedom, the record provided by the Folsoms, backed by their extensive researches, shows us something different.
In lack of preparedness during the run-up to the war (while contriving to get us into it), thereafter in many phases of its conduct, and most of all in the end game played out with the Soviet dictator Stalin at Teheran and Yalta, Roosevelt made countless tragic blunders, … In particular, by various wartime stratagems he pursued and postwar policies he favored, he materially increased the strength of the Soviet Union and so helped consign untold numbers of suffering victims to its despotic rule.”



And, the Folsoms wrote, p. 304:

"Roosevelt joined forces with Churchill and Stalin, but Roosevelt especially liked and trusted Stalin, whom he called “Uncle Joe.” Thus, when Churchill and various military leaders supported and Allied invasion of Central Europe- to stop the Russian advance- FDR listed to Stalin instead and insisted on as second front far to the west of Germany. “Stalin is not an imperialist,” Roosevelt insisted."
 
1. January 30th, 1882

FDR born in New Hyde Park, NY. 32nd President (1933-1945) When he was nominated in 1932, he pledged himself “to a new deal for the American people.”

His New Deal was a program of social justice which brought security to the aged, relief to the unemployed and shorter hours an d higher wages to workingmen. “…social values more noble than mere monetary profits.” His Four Freedoms speech in his State of the Union message (see 1/6/1941) is considered the most succinct statement of our democratic values (speech, worship, from want and from fear) .


2. The following pluses for FDR( from “The Hundred Days of FDR”, by Schlesinger)

"Who can now imagine a day when America offered no Social Security, no unemployment compensation, no food stamps, no Federal guarantee of bank deposits, no Federal supervision of the stock market, no Federal protection for collective bargaining, no Federal standards for wages and hours, no Federal support for farm prices or rural electrification, no Federal refinancing for farm and home mortgages, no Federal commitment to high employment or to equal opportunity - in short, no Federal responsibility for Americans who found themselves, through no fault of their own, in economic or social distress?"
The 'Hundred Days' of F.D.R.




3. Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union[2]:

“ We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”[3] People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.
For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world."
Second Bill of Rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PC is sane for a day!
 
Every president up to FDR gracefully left office after two elected terms. America had to establish a term limit Amendment after FDR refused to step down. The liberal establishment still defends his legacy in remarkably dishonest ways. I watched a documentary about FDR and the opening of WW2. The narrators actually said "FDR considered Japan to be just an annoyance and that was part of his genius"? His genius? It was an indication of his profound ignorance and criminal negligence. America never had an intelligence network prior to WW2 and the documentary dodged around that fact, alluded to it but never criticized. The presidential order to incarcerate innocent American citizens because of their ethnicity is one of the most profound violations of the Constitution in modern times. The democrat party was well aware of FDR's failing health and they knew he would not live through his 4th term so they hand picked a successor and left the sitting V.P. off the ticket while he was on vacation. FDR barely lasted a month and his medical records disappeared from a locked safe.

Even the ones that died?

Now that's a neat trick.
 
1. January 30th, 1882

FDR born in New Hyde Park, NY. 32nd President (1933-1945) When he was nominated in 1932, he pledged himself “to a new deal for the American people.”

His New Deal was a program of social justice which brought security to the aged, relief to the unemployed and shorter hours an d higher wages to workingmen. “…social values more noble than mere monetary profits.” His Four Freedoms speech in his State of the Union message (see 1/6/1941) is considered the most succinct statement of our democratic values (speech, worship, from want and from fear) .


2. The following pluses for FDR( from “The Hundred Days of FDR”, by Schlesinger)

"Who can now imagine a day when America offered no Social Security, no unemployment compensation, no food stamps, no Federal guarantee of bank deposits, no Federal supervision of the stock market, no Federal protection for collective bargaining, no Federal standards for wages and hours, no Federal support for farm prices or rural electrification, no Federal refinancing for farm and home mortgages, no Federal commitment to high employment or to equal opportunity - in short, no Federal responsibility for Americans who found themselves, through no fault of their own, in economic or social distress?"
The 'Hundred Days' of F.D.R.




3. Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union[2]:

“ We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”[3] People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.
For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world."
Second Bill of Rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PC is sane for a day!


Now....you know I'm never anything but even-handed (cough...cough)


....you might be interested in knowing that tomorrow is the anniversary of Congress approving the Republican-inspired 13th amendment, banning slavery. 1865.


That sting?
 
1. January 30th, 1882

FDR born in New Hyde Park, NY. 32nd President (1933-1945) When he was nominated in 1932, he pledged himself “to a new deal for the American people.”

His New Deal was a program of social justice which brought security to the aged, relief to the unemployed and shorter hours an d higher wages to workingmen. “…social values more noble than mere monetary profits.” His Four Freedoms speech in his State of the Union message (see 1/6/1941) is considered the most succinct statement of our democratic values (speech, worship, from want and from fear) .


2. The following pluses for FDR( from “The Hundred Days of FDR”, by Schlesinger)

"Who can now imagine a day when America offered no Social Security, no unemployment compensation, no food stamps, no Federal guarantee of bank deposits, no Federal supervision of the stock market, no Federal protection for collective bargaining, no Federal standards for wages and hours, no Federal support for farm prices or rural electrification, no Federal refinancing for farm and home mortgages, no Federal commitment to high employment or to equal opportunity - in short, no Federal responsibility for Americans who found themselves, through no fault of their own, in economic or social distress?"
The 'Hundred Days' of F.D.R.




3. Roosevelt's January 11, 1944 message to the Congress of the United States on the State of the Union[2]:

“ We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”[3] People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.
For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world."
Second Bill of Rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PC is sane for a day!


Now....you know I'm never anything but even-handed (cough...cough)


....you might be interested in knowing that tomorrow is the anniversary of Congress approving the Republican-inspired 13th amendment, banning slavery. 1865.


That sting?

Nope.

Back then..the Republicans were the "Liberals" that left the Whig Party.

But you knew that, right?

:eusa_whistle:
 
Every president up to FDR gracefully left office after two elected terms. America had to establish a term limit Amendment after FDR refused to step down. The liberal establishment still defends his legacy in remarkably dishonest ways. I watched a documentary about FDR and the opening of WW2. The narrators actually said "FDR considered Japan to be just an annoyance and that was part of his genius"? His genius? It was an indication of his profound ignorance and criminal negligence. America never had an intelligence network prior to WW2 and the documentary dodged around that fact, alluded to it but never criticized. The presidential order to incarcerate innocent American citizens because of their ethnicity is one of the most profound violations of the Constitution in modern times. The democrat party was well aware of FDR's failing health and they knew he would not live through his 4th term so they hand picked a successor and left the sitting V.P. off the ticket while he was on vacation. FDR barely lasted a month and his medical records disappeared from a locked safe.

Even the ones that died?

Now that's a neat trick.

OK let me be more specific for those who still believe in zombies. Every... living...president voluntarily left office after two elected terms.
 
Every president up to FDR gracefully left office after two elected terms. America had to establish a term limit Amendment after FDR refused to step down. The liberal establishment still defends his legacy in remarkably dishonest ways. I watched a documentary about FDR and the opening of WW2. The narrators actually said "FDR considered Japan to be just an annoyance and that was part of his genius"? His genius? It was an indication of his profound ignorance and criminal negligence. America never had an intelligence network prior to WW2 and the documentary dodged around that fact, alluded to it but never criticized. The presidential order to incarcerate innocent American citizens because of their ethnicity is one of the most profound violations of the Constitution in modern times. The democrat party was well aware of FDR's failing health and they knew he would not live through his 4th term so they hand picked a successor and left the sitting V.P. off the ticket while he was on vacation. FDR barely lasted a month and his medical records disappeared from a locked safe.

Even the ones that died?

Now that's a neat trick.

OK let me be more specific for those who still believe in zombies. Every... living...president voluntarily left office after two elected terms.

Don't you love it when some people get so precise?....they think they are so smart.:rolleyes:
 
Yeah, and who saw FDR's birth certificate? A lot can be said about FDR, but historians have never placed FDR less than third greatest American president and finally they rated him the greatest.
Republicans had to pass an amendment to keep FDR from being elected even after he died. So FDR will hold that 4 times record for some time perhaps forever? His record, elected four times and rated america's greatest president. Hard to beat that.
 
Yeah, and who saw FDR's birth certificate? A lot can be said about FDR, but historians have never placed FDR less than third greatest American president and finally they rated him the greatest.
Republicans had to pass an amendment to keep FDR from being elected even after he died. So FDR will hold that 4 times record for some time perhaps forever? His record, elected four times and rated america's greatest president. Hard to beat that.

A good question is "who saw FDR's death certificate"? His medical records disappeared so fawning "historians" can ignore the possibility that the democrat party propped up a virtual corpse for his 4th run and a shadow government was making the decisions that impacted the 2nd half of the 20th century. The criminal negligence of Pearl Harbor should knock FDR out of the top 100 and the criminal incarceration of American citizens in concentration camps should put him at the bottom of the list.
 
Yeah, and who saw FDR's birth certificate? A lot can be said about FDR, but historians have never placed FDR less than third greatest American president and finally they rated him the greatest.
Republicans had to pass an amendment to keep FDR from being elected even after he died. So FDR will hold that 4 times record for some time perhaps forever? His record, elected four times and rated america's greatest president. Hard to beat that.

Funny how many historians rate FDR and Lincoln as great presidents, when both were instrumental in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans and completely ignored the Constitution.

Many are fooled by the statist propaganda, which apparently includes you. Or is it you find killing Americans and ignoring the rule of law, a sign of greatness in a president?
 
Yeah, and who saw FDR's birth certificate? A lot can be said about FDR, but historians have never placed FDR less than third greatest American president and finally they rated him the greatest.
Republicans had to pass an amendment to keep FDR from being elected even after he died. So FDR will hold that 4 times record for some time perhaps forever? His record, elected four times and rated america's greatest president. Hard to beat that.

What if the historians are biased?
Is that possible?
 
Yeah, and who saw FDR's birth certificate? A lot can be said about FDR, but historians have never placed FDR less than third greatest American president and finally they rated him the greatest.
Republicans had to pass an amendment to keep FDR from being elected even after he died. So FDR will hold that 4 times record for some time perhaps forever? His record, elected four times and rated america's greatest president. Hard to beat that.

What if the historians are biased?
Is that possible?

Of course historians are biased, and I'm sure some do not go along with the ratings. The facts are usually correct but the interpretation of the facts is the important divider. History also goes through periods where historians tend to see the facts in a different light. For example, in our history we had the nationalist historians, (Bancroft etc) all is great with our country, then Beard comes along and a new period emerges. But through it all, historians tend to keep each other in line, their facts straight and just put a different tlhought on interpretations. Perhaps it is similar to any professional group, say the AMA, where doctors have different slants on procedures but not too big a slant or the others wacks their knuckles. They have their approved methods and procedures as do the Historians.
 
Yeah, and who saw FDR's birth certificate? A lot can be said about FDR, but historians have never placed FDR less than third greatest American president and finally they rated him the greatest.
Republicans had to pass an amendment to keep FDR from being elected even after he died. So FDR will hold that 4 times record for some time perhaps forever? His record, elected four times and rated america's greatest president. Hard to beat that.

What if the historians are biased?
Is that possible?

Of course historians are biased, and I'm sure some do not go along with the ratings. The facts are usually correct but the interpretation of the facts is the important divider. History also goes through periods where historians tend to see the facts in a different light. For example, in our history we had the nationalist historians, (Bancroft etc) all is great with our country, then Beard comes along and a new period emerges. But through it all, historians tend to keep each other in line, their facts straight and just put a different tlhought on interpretations. Perhaps it is similar to any professional group, say the AMA, where doctors have different slants on procedures but not too big a slant or the others wacks their knuckles. They have their approved methods and procedures as do the Historians.

In the greatest Country in the world the truth might be hard to find sometimes but it is still out there if you want to look for it. Sadly there is often a big difference between the pop-culture "history" we learn in the 8th grade and the truth. Anybody can call himself or herself a "historian" and the current crop of pop-culture historians are beyond a doubt so liberally biased that they should be embarrassed by the inaccuracies they promote based on political agenda.
 

Forum List

Back
Top