The Government Cartel paid billions to Walgreens and CVS not to fill Ivermectin – the question is why

Kind of hard to tack about the COVID vaccine without mentioning Trump.

I mean he did it ignore Fauci's advice on the EUA, bullied his agencies to hurry up and approve it because he had an election to win and he threw billions of our tax money at big pharma. All this while praising Xi, getting Ivanka multiple Chinese patents in record time and getting caught lying about a Chinese bank account he had.

Not to mention he was President of the United States.

Agreed. I simply posted both Rs and Ds should have their stocks looked at...although not sure how telling that would be. It doesn't take a genius stock broker to know big pharma stocks are where it's at during a pandemic...but still, I agree with you if not for COVID but insider trading in general.
B.S
 
Kind of hard to tack about the COVID vaccine without mentioning Trump.

I mean he did it ignore Fauci's advice on the EUA, bullied his agencies to hurry up and approve it because he had an election to win and he threw billions of our tax money at big pharma. All this while praising Xi, getting Ivanka multiple Chinese patents in record time and getting caught lying about a Chinese bank account he had.

Not to mention he was President of the United States.

Agreed. I simply posted both Rs and Ds should have their stocks looked at...although not sure how telling that would be. It doesn't take a genius stock broker to know big pharma stocks are where it's at during a pandemic...but still, I agree with you if not for COVID but insider trading in general.

Explain why every lefty on here pushed Trump's shots, guess they're all just dumbasses. :dunno:

Explain why most conservatives on here didn't get Trump's shot, there goes the lefty mantra of 'cultism' and 'worship'. :auiqs.jpg:

Yes, let's parrot the same 'talking points' you parrot on every thread on this forum. Might be time to put you on ignore, you offer nothing of value to any discussion, you're incapable of it.
 
Trump recommended the COVID vaccine (I think he said it was one of mankind's greatest achievements) he facilitated but you have a good point. Let's check and see if any suspicious monetary exchanges, either cash stocks, took place with any ivermectin suppliers.

Trump's a sharp guy and could have been hedging his bets.
Lol, maybe you could finally get him. Since the trial failed big time yesterday.
 
B.S
Well as usual a COVID thread has devolved into a defend Trump at all costs.

As is common knowledge, scientists did not realize the how extensive asymptomatic spread was early on.

But that is irrelevant and doesn't really address potential insider training and how big pharma used billions of our tax money.

It's just an excuse to absolve Trump of any accountability by focusing on a scientist who was employed by Trump.
 
Just dreadful.

And need I remind the leftoids that Ivermectin was developed for humans, and that the men who came up with it won the Nobel Prize in Medicine.

So no, it is not a "horse dewormer" though it may be used as such, same as with penicillin that is also used to treat horses is not a "horse antibiotic". That was the pathetic MSM putting that into your heads. All propaganda courtesy of Uncle Sam.


Former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who pushed the government’s deadly COVID-19 narrative and shamed the unvaccinated,1 admitted he is taking Ivermectin for Long COVID – a condition affecting 17 million Americans2 which many believe could be caused by COVID-19 vaccines. Defending his use of Ivermectin, Cuomo – showing no remorse – stated, “Ivermectin was a boogeyman during COVID. That was wrong. We were given bad information about Ivermectin. The real question is, why?”​
Cuomo’s admission comes too late for the millions of Americans who could have benefited from Ivermectin as part of a treatment protocol for COVID-19.4 While Cuomo now admits the government got it dead wrong, he seems less willing to admit the part he played in perpetuating the government’s lies in what has become the biggest story of our lifetimes: In cartel-like fashion, the U.S. government bribed private entities to push experimental genetic injections knowing the shots caused serious injuries and even death, while blocking promising but unprofitable repurposed medications with high safety profiles that could have saved lives.​
Americans Were Purposely Given “Bad” Information
Ivermectin was baselessly maligned at the height of the pandemic by the U.S. government, its captured medical establishment, and a bought-off mainstream media.5 According to Dr. Pierre Kory – a pulmonary and critical care specialist who has testified and written extensively about the intentional censure of Ivermectin in the U.S. – Ivermectin had the potential to save countless U.S. lives and could have ended the entire pandemic.​
Yet, bought-off hospitals and pharmacies, which were allocated a staggering $178 billion in federal COVID-19 relief money during the pandemic,7 would turn on the Nobel prize-winning drug. According to Dr. Kory in his book The War on Ivermectin.
“In the wake of the global horse-dewormer propaganda campaign, hospitals started pulling ivermectin from their pharmacies. Health systems began harassing and threatening employees with loss of employment if they prescribed ivermectin. Pharmacies became even more brazen in their refusals to fill ivermectin prescriptions.”​
Hospitals and pharmacies refused to administer or fill Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.9 Clinical doctors who spoke out about successes they had treating patients with Ivermectin were shamed or – as in the high-profile case of Dr. Mary Talley Bowden – had privileges suspended.​


As we wrote about in 2022, a safe, effective drug for early treatment of COVID-19 would have threatened the public’s acceptance of the government’s experimental gene therapy rebranded as vaccines, placing in question trillions of dollars in prospective profits for the medical-industrial complex.​
Pharmacies Were Incentivized to Follow the Government’s Lethal COVID-19 Narrative
As it always does, the truth eventually wins out. Americans are waking up to the sobering truth that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have inflicted widespread disability and death, even if they are hesitant to admit the actual numbers of those injured and killed.13 Americans are also waking up to another distasteful truth (which we have written about many times before)14 – the U.S. government targeted and paid off “trusted” sources to purposefully spoon-feed bad and even dangerous information to everyday Americans.15 These “trusted” sources chose profits over people.​
A host of influential private voices in every sector of American life were on the government take. As we expose for the first time in this piece, we now know these “trusted” voices included two leading pharmacy companies around the country. Some of these very pharmacies claim, even today, that they are prohibited from filling Ivermectin for COVID-1916 and refuse to fill doctors’ prescriptions for Ivermectin.​
Some of these pharmacies brazenly pushed the government’s COVID-19 shots while balking at filling prescriptions for Ivermectin – even though during mass Ivermectin treatment in another country, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over a 30-day period, as reported in one 2021 study.18 In July of 2022, Walgreens ran a public-relations propaganda piece, highlighting a trusted “Walgreens healthcare supervisor” sharing the relief he felt over the fact that his 3-year-old daughter had finally received the COVID-19 shot.19 Walgreens would run another shameless propaganda piece in October of 2022, featuring then-NIAID Director Anthony Fauci getting his COVID-19 booster at a Walgreens pharmacy.20 Coincidentally, just before the Walgreens booster infomercial featuring Fauci ran, CVS had run its very own similar COVID-19 booster infomercial – this one picked up by mainstream media21 – showcasing then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky getting her bi-valent COVID-19 vaccine at a CVS in Massachusetts.​
Coincidence? Hardly. Our research reveals that both Walgreens and CVS were recipients of large monetary contract awards from the federal government for their work related to COVID-19. Had these pharmacies readily filled or promoted Ivermectin – an inexpensive drug frowned upon by the medical establishment which potentially threatened the government’s COVID-19 narrative – this would likely have interfered with COVID-19-related contract money these pharmacies stood to receive from the federal government.​


How Much Did These Pharmacies Stand to Earn? Two Government Websites Show Billions
Two separate government websites reveal billions in COVID-19-related government contracts were awarded to the nation’s two largest pharmacy companies: CVS and Walgreens.25 Some of these government contracts appear to be ongoing today.​
According to one U.S. government website, in June of 2022, CVS was the recipient of a government contract award with a potential worth of over $2.1 billion.26 Transaction descriptions on the website show some of the money paid to CVS was for ICATT 27 – a CDC program providing COVID-19 testing and vaccine services.28 As the CDC’s website notes, “ICATT pharmacy sites provide vaccine services, while a subset of ICATT pharmacy sites provide both testing and vaccine services.”​
...​


"Why?"

Because it was being prescribed off label for conditions for which it has no effectiveness. This can lead to shortages of ivermectin for people who actually need it.

Basically they tried to protect the people who actually need it from the right wing idiots who slurped up Trump's lies.
 
Explain why every lefty on here pushed Trump's shots, guess they're all just dumbasses. :dunno:

Naive is a better word. Trump praised the vaccine...he took it himself. A lot of people just assumed it was safe I suppose. I did but as I have said before, I had to take the anthrax sequence...like 5 or 6 shots over a few months plus all the other mandated vaccines...all of which have side effects..

Explain why most conservatives on here didn't get Trump's shot, there goes the lefty mantra of 'cultism' and 'worship'. :auiqs.jpg:

That's a bold claim but for sake of argument, let's assume that's true.

What about the people who did take it? Many took it and didn't have too, but believed Trump.

Do they matter?

Does that solve the insider trading issue that I thought you were all for investigating?

You went from almost bipartisan investigation into Congress to everyone is an idiot except Trump and people who didn't get the vaccine...which is contradictory because Trump took the vaccine.


Yes, let's parrot the same 'talking points' you parrot on every thread on this forum. Might be time to put you on ignore, you offer nothing of value to any discussion, you're incapable of it.
I don't post those talking points in a vacuum. I post them in response to the same claims made over and over.

Should these claims go unrefuted because they repeat?

Ignore me if you must. I didn't see that from you but feel free.
 
Lol, maybe you could finally get him. Since the trial failed big time yesterday.
This isn't about yesterday's trial or finally getting him.

This is about finding out what happened with the vaccine as many Trump supporters claim is deadly.

It was your tax money. Why don't you care how it was spent?
 
Just dreadful.

And need I remind the leftoids that Ivermectin was developed for humans, and that the men who came up with it won the Nobel Prize in Medicine.

So no, it is not a "horse dewormer" though it may be used as such, same as with penicillin that is also used to treat horses is not a "horse antibiotic". That was the pathetic MSM putting that into your heads. All propaganda courtesy of Uncle Sam.


Former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who pushed the government’s deadly COVID-19 narrative and shamed the unvaccinated,1 admitted he is taking Ivermectin for Long COVID – a condition affecting 17 million Americans2 which many believe could be caused by COVID-19 vaccines. Defending his use of Ivermectin, Cuomo – showing no remorse – stated, “Ivermectin was a boogeyman during COVID. That was wrong. We were given bad information about Ivermectin. The real question is, why?”​
Cuomo’s admission comes too late for the millions of Americans who could have benefited from Ivermectin as part of a treatment protocol for COVID-19.4 While Cuomo now admits the government got it dead wrong, he seems less willing to admit the part he played in perpetuating the government’s lies in what has become the biggest story of our lifetimes: In cartel-like fashion, the U.S. government bribed private entities to push experimental genetic injections knowing the shots caused serious injuries and even death, while blocking promising but unprofitable repurposed medications with high safety profiles that could have saved lives.​
Americans Were Purposely Given “Bad” Information
Ivermectin was baselessly maligned at the height of the pandemic by the U.S. government, its captured medical establishment, and a bought-off mainstream media.5 According to Dr. Pierre Kory – a pulmonary and critical care specialist who has testified and written extensively about the intentional censure of Ivermectin in the U.S. – Ivermectin had the potential to save countless U.S. lives and could have ended the entire pandemic.​
Yet, bought-off hospitals and pharmacies, which were allocated a staggering $178 billion in federal COVID-19 relief money during the pandemic,7 would turn on the Nobel prize-winning drug. According to Dr. Kory in his book The War on Ivermectin.
“In the wake of the global horse-dewormer propaganda campaign, hospitals started pulling ivermectin from their pharmacies. Health systems began harassing and threatening employees with loss of employment if they prescribed ivermectin. Pharmacies became even more brazen in their refusals to fill ivermectin prescriptions.”​
Hospitals and pharmacies refused to administer or fill Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.9 Clinical doctors who spoke out about successes they had treating patients with Ivermectin were shamed or – as in the high-profile case of Dr. Mary Talley Bowden – had privileges suspended.​


As we wrote about in 2022, a safe, effective drug for early treatment of COVID-19 would have threatened the public’s acceptance of the government’s experimental gene therapy rebranded as vaccines, placing in question trillions of dollars in prospective profits for the medical-industrial complex.​
Pharmacies Were Incentivized to Follow the Government’s Lethal COVID-19 Narrative
As it always does, the truth eventually wins out. Americans are waking up to the sobering truth that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have inflicted widespread disability and death, even if they are hesitant to admit the actual numbers of those injured and killed.13 Americans are also waking up to another distasteful truth (which we have written about many times before)14 – the U.S. government targeted and paid off “trusted” sources to purposefully spoon-feed bad and even dangerous information to everyday Americans.15 These “trusted” sources chose profits over people.​
A host of influential private voices in every sector of American life were on the government take. As we expose for the first time in this piece, we now know these “trusted” voices included two leading pharmacy companies around the country. Some of these very pharmacies claim, even today, that they are prohibited from filling Ivermectin for COVID-1916 and refuse to fill doctors’ prescriptions for Ivermectin.​
Some of these pharmacies brazenly pushed the government’s COVID-19 shots while balking at filling prescriptions for Ivermectin – even though during mass Ivermectin treatment in another country, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over a 30-day period, as reported in one 2021 study.18 In July of 2022, Walgreens ran a public-relations propaganda piece, highlighting a trusted “Walgreens healthcare supervisor” sharing the relief he felt over the fact that his 3-year-old daughter had finally received the COVID-19 shot.19 Walgreens would run another shameless propaganda piece in October of 2022, featuring then-NIAID Director Anthony Fauci getting his COVID-19 booster at a Walgreens pharmacy.20 Coincidentally, just before the Walgreens booster infomercial featuring Fauci ran, CVS had run its very own similar COVID-19 booster infomercial – this one picked up by mainstream media21 – showcasing then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky getting her bi-valent COVID-19 vaccine at a CVS in Massachusetts.​
Coincidence? Hardly. Our research reveals that both Walgreens and CVS were recipients of large monetary contract awards from the federal government for their work related to COVID-19. Had these pharmacies readily filled or promoted Ivermectin – an inexpensive drug frowned upon by the medical establishment which potentially threatened the government’s COVID-19 narrative – this would likely have interfered with COVID-19-related contract money these pharmacies stood to receive from the federal government.​


How Much Did These Pharmacies Stand to Earn? Two Government Websites Show Billions
Two separate government websites reveal billions in COVID-19-related government contracts were awarded to the nation’s two largest pharmacy companies: CVS and Walgreens.25 Some of these government contracts appear to be ongoing today.​
According to one U.S. government website, in June of 2022, CVS was the recipient of a government contract award with a potential worth of over $2.1 billion.26 Transaction descriptions on the website show some of the money paid to CVS was for ICATT 27 – a CDC program providing COVID-19 testing and vaccine services.28 As the CDC’s website notes, “ICATT pharmacy sites provide vaccine services, while a subset of ICATT pharmacy sites provide both testing and vaccine services.”​
...​



1716303072812.png
 
"Why?"

Because it was being prescribed off label for conditions for which it has no effectiveness. This can lead to shortages of ivermectin for people who actually need it.

Basically they tried to protect the people who actually need it from the right wing idiots who slurped up Trump's lies.
^This you dumb Bingos. :lmao:

Of course the government was protecting the supply from you morons.
 
This isn't about yesterday's trial or finally getting him.

This is about finding out what happened with the vaccine as many Trump supporters claim is deadly.

It was your tax money. Why don't you care how it was spent?
I was against the vaccine, didn't get one shot. But most of the people demanded the vaccine. Trump delivered, if you trust our government. You're an idiot.
 
I was against the vaccine, didn't get one shot. But most of the people demanded the vaccine. Trump delivered, if you trust our government. You're an idiot.
Yet this has nothing to do with finding out what went wrong.

We need to subpeana Trump and big pharma execs. Like oldlfame says, we also need to check Congress for insider trading.
 
Just dreadful.

And need I remind the leftoids that Ivermectin was developed for humans, and that the men who came up with it won the Nobel Prize in Medicine.

So no, it is not a "horse dewormer" though it may be used as such, same as with penicillin that is also used to treat horses is not a "horse antibiotic". That was the pathetic MSM putting that into your heads. All propaganda courtesy of Uncle Sam.


Former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who pushed the government’s deadly COVID-19 narrative and shamed the unvaccinated,1 admitted he is taking Ivermectin for Long COVID – a condition affecting 17 million Americans2 which many believe could be caused by COVID-19 vaccines. Defending his use of Ivermectin, Cuomo – showing no remorse – stated, “Ivermectin was a boogeyman during COVID. That was wrong. We were given bad information about Ivermectin. The real question is, why?”​
Cuomo’s admission comes too late for the millions of Americans who could have benefited from Ivermectin as part of a treatment protocol for COVID-19.4 While Cuomo now admits the government got it dead wrong, he seems less willing to admit the part he played in perpetuating the government’s lies in what has become the biggest story of our lifetimes: In cartel-like fashion, the U.S. government bribed private entities to push experimental genetic injections knowing the shots caused serious injuries and even death, while blocking promising but unprofitable repurposed medications with high safety profiles that could have saved lives.​
Americans Were Purposely Given “Bad” Information
Ivermectin was baselessly maligned at the height of the pandemic by the U.S. government, its captured medical establishment, and a bought-off mainstream media.5 According to Dr. Pierre Kory – a pulmonary and critical care specialist who has testified and written extensively about the intentional censure of Ivermectin in the U.S. – Ivermectin had the potential to save countless U.S. lives and could have ended the entire pandemic.​
Yet, bought-off hospitals and pharmacies, which were allocated a staggering $178 billion in federal COVID-19 relief money during the pandemic,7 would turn on the Nobel prize-winning drug. According to Dr. Kory in his book The War on Ivermectin.
“In the wake of the global horse-dewormer propaganda campaign, hospitals started pulling ivermectin from their pharmacies. Health systems began harassing and threatening employees with loss of employment if they prescribed ivermectin. Pharmacies became even more brazen in their refusals to fill ivermectin prescriptions.”​
Hospitals and pharmacies refused to administer or fill Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.9 Clinical doctors who spoke out about successes they had treating patients with Ivermectin were shamed or – as in the high-profile case of Dr. Mary Talley Bowden – had privileges suspended.​


As we wrote about in 2022, a safe, effective drug for early treatment of COVID-19 would have threatened the public’s acceptance of the government’s experimental gene therapy rebranded as vaccines, placing in question trillions of dollars in prospective profits for the medical-industrial complex.​
Pharmacies Were Incentivized to Follow the Government’s Lethal COVID-19 Narrative
As it always does, the truth eventually wins out. Americans are waking up to the sobering truth that the COVID-19 “vaccines” have inflicted widespread disability and death, even if they are hesitant to admit the actual numbers of those injured and killed.13 Americans are also waking up to another distasteful truth (which we have written about many times before)14 – the U.S. government targeted and paid off “trusted” sources to purposefully spoon-feed bad and even dangerous information to everyday Americans.15 These “trusted” sources chose profits over people.​
A host of influential private voices in every sector of American life were on the government take. As we expose for the first time in this piece, we now know these “trusted” voices included two leading pharmacy companies around the country. Some of these very pharmacies claim, even today, that they are prohibited from filling Ivermectin for COVID-1916 and refuse to fill doctors’ prescriptions for Ivermectin.​
Some of these pharmacies brazenly pushed the government’s COVID-19 shots while balking at filling prescriptions for Ivermectin – even though during mass Ivermectin treatment in another country, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over a 30-day period, as reported in one 2021 study.18 In July of 2022, Walgreens ran a public-relations propaganda piece, highlighting a trusted “Walgreens healthcare supervisor” sharing the relief he felt over the fact that his 3-year-old daughter had finally received the COVID-19 shot.19 Walgreens would run another shameless propaganda piece in October of 2022, featuring then-NIAID Director Anthony Fauci getting his COVID-19 booster at a Walgreens pharmacy.20 Coincidentally, just before the Walgreens booster infomercial featuring Fauci ran, CVS had run its very own similar COVID-19 booster infomercial – this one picked up by mainstream media21 – showcasing then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky getting her bi-valent COVID-19 vaccine at a CVS in Massachusetts.​
Coincidence? Hardly. Our research reveals that both Walgreens and CVS were recipients of large monetary contract awards from the federal government for their work related to COVID-19. Had these pharmacies readily filled or promoted Ivermectin – an inexpensive drug frowned upon by the medical establishment which potentially threatened the government’s COVID-19 narrative – this would likely have interfered with COVID-19-related contract money these pharmacies stood to receive from the federal government.​


How Much Did These Pharmacies Stand to Earn? Two Government Websites Show Billions
Two separate government websites reveal billions in COVID-19-related government contracts were awarded to the nation’s two largest pharmacy companies: CVS and Walgreens.25 Some of these government contracts appear to be ongoing today.​
According to one U.S. government website, in June of 2022, CVS was the recipient of a government contract award with a potential worth of over $2.1 billion.26 Transaction descriptions on the website show some of the money paid to CVS was for ICATT 27 – a CDC program providing COVID-19 testing and vaccine services.28 As the CDC’s website notes, “ICATT pharmacy sites provide vaccine services, while a subset of ICATT pharmacy sites provide both testing and vaccine services.”​
...​



The simple reason is because ivermectin did absolutely nothing to cure Covid. People died when they took it thinking it would help and it did nothing.

It is simply astounding to me that idiots like you will believe some clown on the internet who says he’s a doctor, over proven medical specialists.

Quite frankly, anyone who bought into this bullshit deserves what happened to them.
 
The simple reason is because ivermectin did absolutely nothing to cure Covid. People died when they took it thinking it would help and it did nothing.

It is simply astounding to me that idiots like you will believe some clown on the internet who says he’s a doctor, over proven medical specialists.

Quite frankly, anyone who bought into this bullshit deserves what happened to them.

"Proven medical specialists". LOL

1716303848839.png
 
People have to alwYs make their own personal choices reooated to their heslth. Those who chose not to have noone to blane but themselves. Fhose who were forced to under duress have a real legal case I would. Imagine IF there is something amiss about the vaxcine. I haven't seen proof as yet of its dangers.
Unless everyone is a medical doctor, they’ll have to rely on experts in order to make those decisions. If the info they’re given is wrong or incomplete then they can’t make the proper decision.
Bad people control the messaging right now so responsible people have to vet everything.
 
Naive is a better word. Trump praised the vaccine...he took it himself. A lot of people just assumed it was safe I suppose. I did but as I have said before, I had to take the anthrax sequence...like 5 or 6 shots over a few months plus all the other mandated vaccines...all of which have side effects..



That's a bold claim but for sake of argument, let's assume that's true.

What about the people who did take it? Many took it and didn't have too, but believed Trump.

Do they matter?

Does that solve the insider trading issue that I thought you were all for investigating?

You went from almost bipartisan investigation into Congress to everyone is an idiot except Trump and people who didn't get the vaccine...which is contradictory because Trump took the vaccine.



I don't post those talking points in a vacuum. I post them in response to the same claims made over and over.

Should these claims go unrefuted because they repeat?

Ignore me if you must. I didn't see that from you but feel free.

Naive? Most Trump supporters did not take the 'vaccine', I bet you did though, why did you listen to the guy you hate? Trump supporters didn't 'assume' anything, they used common sense, something the left clearly lacks.

I don't care about the people who did take it, I care about the people that were forced to take it to keep their livelihood and careers going. I care about the people who were refused drugs that worked so that they felt there was no alternative to the 'vaccines' that were being pushed by everyone in government and media. Doctors got banned, lost credentials, and jobs for speaking up and trying to do the right thing. Elderly were locked away in nursing homes from their loved ones (and ironically exposed to covid positive patients - people who did that will burn in hell), never being able to see them, hug them, spend special occasions with them. Millions of people were harmed and are still experiencing the side effects today. Who was responsible for that entire movement against safe medications and forcing covid shots? Who advocated for and allowed covid patients to be sent to nursing homes in order to increase positive cases and deaths in order to get their headlines so they could control an election? Who changed election laws on the fly because there was a 'pandemic' and scared the public enough to believe it wasn't safe to vote in person? Who 'won' that election, who did all of these things favor? It sure as hell wasn't Trump, every single person of authority that had a hand in pushing shots to make big pharma billions needs to be investigated. You can add Trump to the mix, cause if they go after him for that, they have to admit it was a big government scheme to enrich certain parties and manipulate an election, and it can't stop at just Trump, and they know it. That's why your screams to go after Trump will go ignored, but do continue to make a fool of yourself every time you post about it. :cuckoo:
 

Forum List

Back
Top