Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I couldn't read more than 2 sentences of the OP. It starts stupid then it gets worse.
Get out from Mom's basement, get out in the real world. Your hero Obama called it "behind enemy lines"
businesses are run to produce profit
governments are run to produce service
remembering these facts, let's start the discussion again
Please show me where in the constitution it says that the governments purpose it to provide services.
LOL. Here we go again.
Where in the constitution does it say we need military bases all over the world, nuclear weapons , etc...
Dude I have lived in my new home for four years now. It's on a side street that gets very little traffic. There is NO EXCUSE for repaving it 3 times since I moved in. The fucking street is so smooth it has kids on skateboards on it constantly.
You just don't seem to get it. They have x amount of dollars in the bank. Rather than lowering our local taxes they take the excess funds every year and blow it on busy work for govt employees.
I just don't think you're smart enough to understand shit and the dems dumb down something to your level and you fall for it.
"Those darn teenagers on their dad gum skateboards!!!!"
I'm smart enough to know that if your side street came under a crime wave you'd demand something be done. By someone. If there was a wild fire in woods near your home, you'd demand someone do something to stop it. If a storm blew a huge oak over the street, you'd be calling 911 to get "somebody out here to move it".
Would it be nice if KC gave that excess fund back in a rebate check? Yes, it would. Do you know that there is about a 99.9% KC is getting those paving funds from THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT? Yep. Most states and cities get most of their money for roads from the Feds, through grants that are given in exchange for local cops enforcing speed and seat belt laws on federal highways and interstates. KC has to spend that money, on roads, or they dont get it next year. If they dont get it next year, they may not have it when a problem does occur.
You dont seem to have experience working inside a government. And that said, I absolutely acknowledge that there is too much red tape, like KC having to spend that money on roads and not being able to send it back, or rebate it.
But a taxpayer bitching that his roads are too smooth is just........well, hard to put into words.
Seems some want to live under nothing but a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Nothing, literally nothing, more than that.
Ok. Lets start listing the things we're gonna lose:
Social Security
Medicaid
Local Police
State Police
County Police
All fire departments
Public schools
DMV's
Federal highways
State highways
City roads
County roads
State parks
City parks
Federal parks
Pollution regulation
The list could keep going........but the Army and well regulated militia better get ready, because being the only allowable services of the Constitution, they are gonna have a lot of work to do.
businesses are run to produce profit
governments are run to produce service
remembering these facts, let's start the discussion again
Please show me where in the constitution it says that the governments purpose it to provide services.
LOL. Here we go again.
Where in the constitution does it say we need military bases all over the world, nuclear weapons , etc...
Dude I have lived in my new home for four years now. It's on a side street that gets very little traffic. There is NO EXCUSE for repaving it 3 times since I moved in. The fucking street is so smooth it has kids on skateboards on it constantly.
You just don't seem to get it. They have x amount of dollars in the bank. Rather than lowering our local taxes they take the excess funds every year and blow it on busy work for govt employees.
I just don't think you're smart enough to understand shit and the dems dumb down something to your level and you fall for it.
"Those darn teenagers on their dad gum skateboards!!!!"
I'm smart enough to know that if your side street came under a crime wave you'd demand something be done. By someone. If there was a wild fire in woods near your home, you'd demand someone do something to stop it. If a storm blew a huge oak over the street, you'd be calling 911 to get "somebody out here to move it".
Would it be nice if KC gave that excess fund back in a rebate check? Yes, it would. Do you know that there is about a 99.9% KC is getting those paving funds from THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT? Yep. Most states and cities get most of their money for roads from the Feds, through grants that are given in exchange for local cops enforcing speed and seat belt laws on federal highways and interstates. KC has to spend that money, on roads, or they dont get it next year. If they dont get it next year, they may not have it when a problem does occur.
You dont seem to have experience working inside a government. And that said, I absolutely acknowledge that there is too much red tape, like KC having to spend that money on roads and not being able to send it back, or rebate it.
But a taxpayer bitching that his roads are too smooth is just........well, hard to put into words.
I worked as a general contractor for 7 years for the ACOE. I've seen and even been the recipient of govt waste. It is you who doesn't have a clue. I would just be out of one ghetto remodel starting the second building and get called back to fix shit the tenants tore up.
Then their was the insane requirements that drove costs of everything from material to labor through the roof.
I've worked on multiple military bases building new housing and the sheer amount of waste is mind boggling.
Yeah, it's you who is clueless
Please show me where in the constitution it says that the governments purpose it to provide services.
LOL. Here we go again.
Where in the constitution does it say we need military bases all over the world, nuclear weapons , etc...
Oh Jesus Christ... it is not going to lay out every base needed for national defense.... you can argue all you want whether we SHOULD have a base in South Korea or Turkey, but the federal government is indeed constitutionally charged with national defense... the government is NOT constitutionally charged to take care of individual needs of individual citizens
LOL. Here we go again.
Where in the constitution does it say we need military bases all over the world, nuclear weapons , etc...
Oh Jesus Christ... it is not going to lay out every base needed for national defense.... you can argue all you want whether we SHOULD have a base in South Korea or Turkey, but the federal government is indeed constitutionally charged with national defense... the government is NOT constitutionally charged to take care of individual needs of individual citizens
Haha, so the defense part is to be considered general language but everything else must be explicit. How convenient.
Please show me where in the constitution it says that the governments purpose it to provide services.
LOL. Here we go again.
Where in the constitution does it say we need military bases all over the world, nuclear weapons , etc...
It does say provide for the common defense so part of that is justified but I agree we don't need to be able to blow up the world a hundred times over and we shouldn't have bases all over the world.
I have never seen a rightwinger do such an abrupt about face.
LOL. Here we go again.
Where in the constitution does it say we need military bases all over the world, nuclear weapons , etc...
Oh Jesus Christ... it is not going to lay out every base needed for national defense.... you can argue all you want whether we SHOULD have a base in South Korea or Turkey, but the federal government is indeed constitutionally charged with national defense... the government is NOT constitutionally charged to take care of individual needs of individual citizens
Haha, so the defense part is to be considered general language but everything else must be explicit. How convenient.
You have no credibility. I know who you are you pulled this sane crap at hannity. And your posts have always been too long.
I couldn't read more than 2 sentences of the OP. It starts stupid then it gets worse.
Get out from Mom's basement, get out in the real world. Your hero Obama called it "behind enemy lines"
I worked in the real world. You probably have no clue.
Do you NOT understand the difference between local and/or state government and the federal government?? Do you read your constitution at all?
Moron
I dont know, how about you explain it to me.
Start with the part about how the Feds dont give any aid of any kind to the states and cities. Next, explain to me where the states and cities have rejected that aid, and shown how they dont need it (if it exists).
So I assume then, that you OPPOSED the US government allowing military C17's to aid the local and state firefighters in Colorado last month??????? The Constitution doesnt allow for that ya know.
OF THE UNITED STATES... you fucking idiotic morons LOVE to stop the phrase where it suits YOU... it is of the UNION, not of the individuals.... there is NOWHERE AT ALL that the constitution is charged to take care of your PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITIES, WANTS, OR NEEDSLOL. Here we go again.
Where in the constitution does it say we need military bases all over the world, nuclear weapons , etc...
It does say provide for the common defense so part of that is justified but I agree we don't need to be able to blow up the world a hundred times over and we shouldn't have bases all over the world.
Right it does say for the common defense and general welfare.
