RDD_1210
Forms his own opinions
- May 13, 2010
- 18,981
- 1,817
- 265
Oh Jesus Christ... it is not going to lay out every base needed for national defense.... you can argue all you want whether we SHOULD have a base in South Korea or Turkey, but the federal government is indeed constitutionally charged with national defense... the government is NOT constitutionally charged to take care of individual needs of individual citizens
Haha, so the defense part is to be considered general language but everything else must be explicit. How convenient.
So you expect every base, every new weapon, etc to be included in the text of the constitution?? No.... The fed is charged constitutionally with national defense and it goes thru order and legislation thru there...
BUT THE FED IS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY CHARGED to take care of the individual wants and needs of individual citizens...
Big difference
Hahhahahahaha, so you want every possible way that the government should promote the "general welfare" of We the people to be included in the text of the constitution?
And No I don't expect every base to be listed, but I'm also not the one who cries "where does it say that in the constitution" as my only defense for shit I don't like.
The fact that you can't see your utter and blatant hypocrisy is frankly.....not shocking at all.