NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
No, it proves that the issue is irrelevant and you are bringing in a red herring.Are you fucking insane? This 'doctor' controversy was started by the Right by people who didn't even know who Bush appointed as AIDs czars.
In fact, I was the first one, a few days ago, to even mention here that Bush had AIDs czars who weren't doctors.
It was a about relevant experience, which he has none. Bush's guy was experienced in E-prep and worked for HHS.
Bush's AIDs czar has degrees in political science and theology.
He had relevant experience in emergency preparedness and HHS work prior to his appointment. The fact you have to ignore this and go to the degrees shows you have a losing argument.
The fact that you are ignoring that Bush also appointed 2 AIDs czars just proves how you cannot win the argument.
Why? Haven't you ever heard of AIDs? It's a disease. Google it.