Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,072
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #81
Yeah you think you did as you always are so sure and always so wrong.Why did you bring it up then? Are you denying that the "protest" went from social injustice to defending the NFL and the rich men that own it? Anyone should be able to see at least that far.What is the reason? All people like you want to do is talk about the protest as if it is in a vacuum. The whole protest is just hypocritical BS.I've noticed guys like you want to talk about anything but the reason for the protests.
The laughable part is that the NFL players are taking the side of rich white guys, sounds like the relationship with the democrats before the civil war.
That doesn't make a lot of sense. As I told another poster who ran away, Democrats got shut out in the South in the 1860 election. The South had already split from them. The defeated Democrat candidate worked with Lincoln to try to prevent secession, and when that failed advised Lincoln on how to wage the war.
You don't know this?
Got nothing to do with the topic anyway.
Now what we do about it is the question.
I didn't bring it up. You did. I've posted nothing here about the Civil War, "social injustice" or "the rich".
You brought up an allusion to the Civil War that made no sense, so I pointed out the flaw. That got done.
My analogy is right on. Before Sunday the protest was by a few, on Sunday it was by many, what happened? The owners saw a challenge to their empire and reacted, the teams followed their lead as sure a the confederates followed the lead of the rich democrat aristocrats during the civil war.