Eradicate Multiculturalism - Ban Foreign Language Use

[protectionist]

Melania and her family speak several languages.

Those who are nativists and uber nationalistic and uber racialistic are the old Americans, much like our Alt Right today.

They will go away, in form or manner or fashion.

It is the multiculturalist loons who are on the way out. Actually you're ALREADY OUT.

 

[protectionist]

Well, I have to admit, I am confused. Old Benny was supporting your position with that quote. I referenced it specifically because it sounds much like those who oppose immigration today. And I have to say, if you would give up liberty to attain security, will Old Benny was right, you deserve neither.

You are breaking records in dumb posting. You answered a refute with the same quote that was jusat refuted. Well, some people have to be told twice. OK >> You blew this post when you quoted Benjamin Franklin. Old Benny might have gotten shocked by electricity a few too many times. Another of his quotes puts liberty over security. Note: you don't have much "liberty", when you're dead. Get it ?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Don't be silly, legal immigration is fine.

You obviously know nothing about the H1B visa scandal.

Americans Aren't Very Good at Subservience

The hidden scandal is that it proves how unmotivating our unpaid educational system is. It will stay that way as long as corporations have the option of importing skilled foreigners to fill the gaps their unworkable educational mandate has caused.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Melania and her family speak several languages.

Those who are nativists and uber nationalistic and uber racialistic are the old Americans, much like our Alt Right today.

They will go away, in form or manner or fashion.

It is the multiculturalist loons who are on the way out. Actually you're ALREADY OUT.
View attachment 115265

You guys are the past not the future. Just fact.

 

[Doc1]

Don't be silly, legal immigration is fine.

You obviously know nothing about the H1B visa scandal.

LOL, oh lookie , another kook who knows everything about everything

 

[protectionist]

NATION - a community of people with a territory, economic system and a DISTINCTIVE LANGUAGE AND CULTURE.

 

[protectionist]

The hidden scandal is that it proves how unmotivating our unpaid educational system is. It will stay that way as long as corporations have the option of importing skilled foreigners to fill the gaps their unworkable educational mandate has caused.

The notion that Americans aren't as qualified as the foreigners is about a FAKE as any fake news ever was. The Americans (many of the with 20 years on the jobs) have been forced by the tyrant companies to TRAIN the foreigners (under the threat of losing their severance packages)[/QUOTE]

EXCLUSIVE-Claim: Carnival Forces U.S. Workers to Train Foreign Replacements Before Christmas - Breitbart

http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2016/03/displaced-american-stem-workers-spur-senate-hearing

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/04/...t-disney-train-foreign-replacements.html?_r=0

Southern California Edison IT workers 'beyond furious' over H-1B replacements

 

[Skylar]

We need to dispose of all the foreign language usage that has been inserted into our society. This includes telephone recordings, voting ballots, TV and radio broadcasting, newspapers, billboards, etc. We need to clearly establish that our national language is American English. The insertion of foreign language (esp. Spanish) has been a dleiberate political act, to encourage illegal immigration into our country, from Mexico and other Latin American countries, to add to the counts of Democrat Party VOTES.

This is harmful to America. Not only does it encourage illegal immigration and increase it, it also deters foreign language speaking people from learning English, and makes us a multicultural society, thereby establishing conflict whereby people cannot communicate with each other.

Language if the foundation of nationality. A NATION is a community of people with a distinctive language and culture (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 4th ed.) Language is the reason why/how nations came to exist.

In past years, immigrants came to America legally,learned English and assimilated into our American culture. They had no telephone recordings, foreign language TV shows,or any other external assistance. And they did fine. One of the ways we can "make America great again" is to return to those days when immigrants came here legally, without changing America into a "tangle of squabbling nationalities" as ex-President Theodore Roosevelt stated it.

To be truly a NATION, we must have ONE clearly defined national language, or else we will be a mish-mash, not a nation. Either you have a nation, or you don't.

How would the government have the authority to do anything you just demanded? That would be a blatant 1st amendment violation.

Nor is there any such mandate that there be only one language in use for the US to be a nation. You've literally made all that shit up. Legally your arguments are nonsense, constitutionally they are void, and linguistically they are imaginary gibberish.

Which is why nothing you demanded will happen.

 

[protectionist]

LOL, oh lookie , another kook who knows everything about everything

Plenty more than you, obviously. But you don't have to remain ignorant. Read the links in Post # 107. Or stay ignorant. Your choice.

 

[Winston]

Well, I have to admit, I am confused. Old Benny was supporting your position with that quote. I referenced it specifically because it sounds much like those who oppose immigration today. And I have to say, if you would give up liberty to attain security, will Old Benny was right, you deserve neither.

You are breaking records in dumb posting. You answered a refute with the same quote that was jusat refuted. Well, some people have to be told twice. OK >> You blew this post when you quoted Benjamin Franklin. Old Benny might have gotten shocked by electricity a few too many times. Another of his quotes puts liberty over security. Note: you don't have much "liberty", when you're dead. Get it ?

Better to die on your feet than live on your knees. Evidently, those brown people understand freedom better than you do. Now you know why I support open borders.

 

[protectionist]

How would the government have the authority to do anything you just demanded? That would be a blatant 1st amendment violation.

Nor is there any such mandate that there be only one language in use for the US to be a nation. You've literally made all that shit up. Legally your arguments are nonsense, constitutionally they are void, and linguistically they are imaginary gibberish.

Which is why nothing you demanded will happen.

1. Free speech does not include foreign languages, nor is there any mandate that there be more than one language in use for the US.

2. The DICTIONARY is what tells us what a nation is - and Post # 106 taken from the dictionary (Websters New World College Dictionary, 4th ed.)

3. I wouldn't say that "your arguments are nonsense", becuase you don't even have the beginning of any kind of argument at all.

4. The govt has "the authority" to make laws. Hadn't you heard ?

 

[Doc1]

LOL, oh lookie , another kook who knows everything about everything

Plenty more than you, obviously. But you don't have to remain ignorant. Read the links in Post # 107. Or stay ignorant. Your choice.

You poor kid, just one more run of the mill racist pig.

 

[protectionist]

Better to die on your feet than live on your knees. Evidently, those brown people understand freedom better than you do. Now you know why I support open borders.

No, I DON'T know why you support open borders (other that you being a globalist traitor to the USA, guilty of TREASON)

PS - this has nothing to do with "brown people" (of which I am one 50%), but you just couldn't resist getting race involved, could you ?

 

[protectionist]

You poor kid, just one more run of the mill racist pig.

Same thing goes for you what I just told Winston in Post # 113. Back to the drawing board for you , Mr Race Carder.

 

[Skylar]

How would the government have the authority to do anything you just demanded? That would be a blatant 1st amendment violation.

Nor is there any such mandate that there be only one language in use for the US to be a nation. You've literally made all that shit up. Legally your arguments are nonsense, constitutionally they are void, and linguistically they are imaginary gibberish.

Which is why nothing you demanded will happen.

1. Free speech does not include foreign languages, nor is there any mandate that there be more than one language in use for the US.

Who says that free speech doesn't include foreign languages? The 1st amendment makes no mention of your restrictions on it. Nor is there the slighest mention anywhere in the constitution. Nor is there any such mention in the federalist papers, the Supreme Court, anything.

There's you citing you. And.....you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. You're literally just making this nonsense up as you go along.

2. The DICTIONARY is what tells us what a nation is - and Post # 106 taken from the dictionary (Websters New World College Dictionary, 4th ed.)

Nation: a large aggregate of people united by common descent, history, culture, or language, inhabiting a particular country or territory.

OR. A common descent OR history OR culture OR language.

Any one of those would satisfy the requirement of a nation. You insist that a nation is ONLY the use of a common language. And there's no such mandate. Not linguistically, legally or constitutionally.

Your claims are once again, meaningless made up gibberish.

3. I wouldn't say that "your arguments are nonsense", becuase you don't even have the beginning of any kind of argument at all.

Laughing....see above. You citing yourself as the constitution and the dictionary doesn't seem to be working out so well for you.

4. The govt has "the authority" to make laws. Hadn't you heard ?

Within the bounds of the constituion. And none of the restrictions to the 1st amendment that you pulled out of your ass....actually exist.

Or hadn't you heard?

Try again. This time with more facts and less imagination. As so far your greatest battle is with relevance.

 

[protectionist]

You guys are the past not the future. Just fact.

The "fact" is the nationalists are in. (in the PRESENT) The internationalist IDIOTS are out. (in the PAST)

Whether you want to face it or not.

 

[protectionist]

Laughing....see above. You citing yourself as the constitution and the dictionary doesn't seem to be working out so well for you.

4. The govt has "the authority" to make laws. Hadn't you heard ?

Within the bounds of the constituion. And none of the restrictions to the 1st amendment that you pulled out of your ass....actually exist.

Or hadn't you heard?

Try again. This time with more facts and less imagination. As so far your greatest battle is with relevance.

I'm on a LIBRARY computer. I have just 2 minutes left. I will respond to you inane comments NEXT WEEK.

Actually what I've said already should have been enough to shut you up, but you're too stupid to realize it.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Yes, it would. Also, it's moronically unenforceable.

No it would not. And it's easily enforceable. You print something in a language other than English, you broadcast a radio or TV show in non-English, you get fined or arrested. Gee that was tough, huh ?

Only enforceable in your cartoon existence of make believe. You are describing fascism. It would seem your (and the people you elect) 'final solution' to illegal immigration is to make America some kind of dystopian isolationist paradise because your are too stupid/lazy to actually think about a cogent solution for two seconds. That's your brilliant 'plan'. Ironic, right? Because that has worked so well historically? See the irony yet? No? For fucks sake, you are just as loony as the lefties.

Unbelievable. Americans on the spectrum of our political environment are talking all manner of ignorant, ill-advised shit lately. More fear talking, I suppose. I don't know if the terrorists won, but they certainly seem to have taken a great deal of our spines.

No one is going to begin prosecuting citizens speaking foreign languages because an entitled little snowflake like yourself are too inconvenienced by the sound of non-native tongues to live. The idea is just plain stupid and incredibly naive. Just, no.

 

[SYTFE]

What an idiot.

Come back when you can present SOMETHING to support your opinion. Until then, we can assume you have nothing.

What else is there to say? You're a first class, grade A moron. Everything should be in English because you, some right wing nutjob, says so? Get the fuck out of here you clown. We are a country of immigrants, conservative fuckboy.

 

[Skylar]

Laughing....see above. You citing yourself as the constitution and the dictionary doesn't seem to be working out so well for you.

4. The govt has "the authority" to make laws. Hadn't you heard ?

Within the bounds of the constituion. And none of the restrictions to the 1st amendment that you pulled out of your ass....actually exist.

Or hadn't you heard?

Try again. This time with more facts and less imagination. As so far your greatest battle is with relevance.

I'm on a LIBRARY computer. I have just 2 minutes left. I will respond to you inane comments NEXT WEEK.

Actually what I've said already should have been enough to shut you up, but you're too stupid to realize it.

Translation: you've got jack shit to back up your made up restrictions to the 1st amendment.

Just a hint, buddy; research your inane claims FIRST. Then post. It will save embarassing blunders like the one you just made.