Do you listen to Alex Jones?

[G.T.]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwAhEXxwVGY]ALEX JONES GETS PWNED BY MARK ROBERTS 1 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[konradv]

Playboy is porn

Giving us an example of a non sequitur, are you? What does Playboy have to do with TSA scanners? The images are supposed to be confidential, but rightwing nutjobs keep violating peoples' privacy by leaking images.

Deflection are we?

playboy uses a camera to view the naked body just as the scanners do.
What's the difference?

The difference is public vs private. Scanner images aren't made public unless some nutjob releases them and violates the peoples' privacy.

 

[Mad Scientist]

ALEX JONES GETS PWNED BY MARK ROBERTS 1 of 2 - YouTube

No Pwnage seen there. Try again?

 

[G.T.]

Alex Jones gets slayed by the Talk Master, Neal Boortz - YouTube

 

[konradv]

"conspiracy theorist" is just a lable someone uses to delegitimize an aurgument or a person.

People do conspire and and some government conspiracies are true. If people who believe false conspiracies are "nutbars" then what are the people who believed Gulf of Tonkin,Bay of Pigs,Agent Orange,Operation Ajax,Tuskegee study and CIA spreds drugs to war protesters were false?

It's not just what others say that puts him in that category, but what he, himself, says. What else would you call someone who labels TSA equipment as "porno scanners", but a Class A nutjob?

Some people are very cynical of the government.

The government? Who released the "porno" scans? It had to be one of the nutjobs out to "prove" something.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Giving us an example of a non sequitur, are you? What does Playboy have to do with TSA scanners? The images are supposed to be confidential, but rightwing nutjobs keep violating peoples' privacy by leaking images.

Deflection are we?

playboy uses a camera to view the naked body just as the scanners do.
What's the difference?

The difference is public vs private. Scanner images aren't made public unless some nutjob releases them and violates the peoples' privacy.

I opt out of the Cancer Machine Scan Ray every time I fly. I just say: "I'm not going through the Cancer Machine" and they pat me down (which is an illegal search but still better than radiation)

 

[G.T.]

Deflection are we?

playboy uses a camera to view the naked body just as the scanners do.
What's the difference?

The difference is public vs private. Scanner images aren't made public unless some nutjob releases them and violates the peoples' privacy.

I opt out of the Cancer Machine Scan Ray every time I fly. I just say: "I'm not going through the Cancer Machine" and they pat me down (which is an illegal search but still better than radiation)

voluntarily patroning a private airline makes it legal.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Giving us an example of a non sequitur, are you? What does Playboy have to do with TSA scanners? The images are supposed to be confidential, but rightwing nutjobs keep violating peoples' privacy by leaking images.

Deflection are we?

playboy uses a camera to view the naked body just as the scanners do.
What's the difference?

The difference is public vs private. Scanner images aren't made public unless some nutjob releases them and violates the peoples' privacy.

But the porn can be released to the public?

 

[konradv]

Deflection are we?

playboy uses a camera to view the naked body just as the scanners do.
What's the difference?

The difference is public vs private. Scanner images aren't made public unless some nutjob releases them and violates the peoples' privacy.

But the porn can be released to the public?

The right wing nutjobs who do, should spend time in jail. Nobody's standing up for the sleaze bags who hate Obama so much, they'd violate peoples' right to privacy in an attempt to give him a black eye. They're sickos who'd be first in line to condemn the TSA, if something got through.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The difference is public vs private. Scanner images aren't made public unless some nutjob releases them and violates the peoples' privacy.

But the porn can be released to the public?

The right wing nutjobs who do, should spend time in jail. Nobody's standing up for the sleaze bags who hate Obama so much, they'd violate peoples' right to privacy in an attempt to give him a black eye. They're sickos who'd be first in line to condemn the TSA, if something got through.

The rightwing? I don't think the TSA hires someone because of their politics. The rest of your partisan post is what's wrong with America today.

The AirSafe.com News: Is the TSA allowing convicted rapists to perform pat-down searches?

 

[paulitician]

Why or why not?

I do occasionally. But i visit his site more. He gets a bad rap from the usual suspects, but he's actually very intelligent. His detractors don't listen to his show or check out his website enough. If they did, they would be very surprised to find how interesting the guy really is. People shouldn't judge him on what third parties say about him. They should just give his show & site a chance, with no preconceived notions. It can be a very enlightening experience. But you have to be open-minded to get it. I don't agree with all of his beliefs, but i do find myself agreeing with him often. More Stations should carry his show. At the very least, it's very interesting entertainment.

 

[konradv]

But the porn can be released to the public?

The right wing nutjobs who do, should spend time in jail. Nobody's standing up for the sleaze bags who hate Obama so much, they'd violate peoples' right to privacy in an attempt to give him a black eye. They're sickos who'd be first in line to condemn the TSA, if something got through.

The rightwing? I don't think the TSA hires someone because of their politics. The rest of your partisan post is what's wrong with America today.

The AirSafe.com News: Is the TSA allowing convicted rapists to perform pat-down searches?

But who would release the photos, but a right wing nutjob? Who's using deflection now? Hit a little close to home, didn't I?

 

[konradv]

Why or why not?

I do occasionally. But i visit his site more. He gets a bad rap from the usual suspects, but he's actually very intelligent. His detractors don't listen to his show or check out his website enough. If they did, they would be very surprised to find how interesting the guy really is. People shouldn't judge him on what third parties say about him. They should just give his show & site a chance, with no preconceived notions. It can be a very enlightening experience. But you have to be open-minded to get it. I don't agree with all of his beliefs, but i do find myself agreeing with him often. More Stations should carry his show. At the very least, it's very interesting entertainment.

Anyone who uses the term "porno scanners", isn't worth my time.

 

[bobcollum]

I think Jones takes much of the initial information he gives, of which much has some truth to it, and churns it through a charlatan machine to create outlandish scenarios which seem to only benefit his wallet.

Still waiting on that martial law...

 

[paulitician]

Why or why not?

I do occasionally. But i visit his site more. He gets a bad rap from the usual suspects, but he's actually very intelligent. His detractors don't listen to his show or check out his website enough. If they did, they would be very surprised to find how interesting the guy really is. People shouldn't judge him on what third parties say about him. They should just give his show & site a chance, with no preconceived notions. It can be a very enlightening experience. But you have to be open-minded to get it. I don't agree with all of his beliefs, but i do find myself agreeing with him often. More Stations should carry his show. At the very least, it's very interesting entertainment.

Anyone who uses the term "porno scanners", isn't worth my time.

Give his show & site another chance. It's an aquired taste for sure. The guy really is very intelligent.

 

[G.T.]

He's very good at duping people, who are very good at being duped.

 

[Swagger]

He's very good at duping people, who are very good at being duped.

You make it sound like he should run for office.

 

[G.T.]

He's very good at duping people, who are very good at being duped.

You make it sound like he should run for office.

I think he'd go about as far as Ron PaUL.

 

[Mad Scientist]

The difference is public vs private. Scanner images aren't made public unless some nutjob releases them and violates the peoples' privacy.

I opt out of the Cancer Machine Scan Ray every time I fly. I just say: "I'm not going through the Cancer Machine" and they pat me down (which is an illegal search but still better than radiation)

voluntarily patroning a private airline makes it legal.

I'm not being searched by a Privately Owned Airline, I'm being searched by the Gov't.

TSA is Gov't.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The right wing nutjobs who do, should spend time in jail. Nobody's standing up for the sleaze bags who hate Obama so much, they'd violate peoples' right to privacy in an attempt to give him a black eye. They're sickos who'd be first in line to condemn the TSA, if something got through.

The rightwing? I don't think the TSA hires someone because of their politics. The rest of your partisan post is what's wrong with America today.

The AirSafe.com News: Is the TSA allowing convicted rapists to perform pat-down searches?

But who would release the photos, but a right wing nutjob? Who's using deflection now? Hit a little close to home, didn't I?

Dumb ass it was bush who created the monster known as the TSA. We can come to the conclusion that you are a partisan hack and look behind every door and under every bed for right wingers that you fear is coming for you. And you call Alex Jones a nut.