Do you believe in the virgin birth of Jesus?

Do Christians think the only human being ever to be born with the capacity to be inseparable from God is Jesus?

What do you have to look forward to then?

See? That's the problem with Christians. The Catholic church fucked it up for everyone by striking some books of the Bible from the popular version. They ignored the Agnostics.

At least the Buddhists kept it sort of pure by stating that anyone could join the Nothing and become a Buddha.
 
See? That's the problem with Christians. The Catholic church fucked it up for everyone by striking some books of the Bible from the popular version. They ignored the Agnostics.

At least the Buddhists kept it sort of pure by stating that anyone could join the Nothing and become a Buddha.
fyi...
Gnostic, not A-gnostic....agnostic is the opposite of gnostic, i believe...similar to Atheist is the opposite of theist?

the gnostic scripture, a great deal found among the dead sea scrolls was omitted....

care
 
fyi...
Gnostic, not A-gnostic....agnostic is the opposite of gnostic, i believe...similar to Atheist is the opposite of theist?

the gnostic scripture, a great deal found among the dead sea scrolls was omitted....

care

The Gospel of Mary among them.

Ironically, there was a whole thing on this last night on the history channel called: Banned in the Bible. I've already seen it before but it's a good 2 hour watch.
 
There were no Bank of America, however if I remember correctly did Jesus not always talk about forgiveness and forgiveness of debts?

Tampering with the market system to redistribute the wealth or assure that the poor are protected is defined as "Socialism."

Jesus was not political....he would not be considered in the class of today's Liberal or today's Conservative....and in my opinion, this is the problem, when people try to do such.

Jesus was not involved with the political aspects of the Roman government at the time, this is why he told the Pharisees to give unto Caesar, what is his when it came to taxes. Jesus believed in a Separation of Church and State, so to say....

where he was rebellious was with the leaders of His Church or Synagogue who he felt were "messing" with God's message and getting it all wrong....like He could not heal the sick on the Sabbath because it was considered by the religious as working on the Sabbath, helping the injured man left for dead on the Sabbath as the Samaritan did but the religious Priest and Levite passed him by and left him for dead....the permission to divorce as Moses granted the jews for any reason other than marital unfaithfulness should not have been permitted....making people pay to enter the temple and only take a certain currency as their alms, making a bundle off of the "exchange rate"....(the money changers)....he spent a great deal of time "correcting" what people believed, not admonishing the Old testament, but correcting how the hierarchy wthin their religion interpreted it.

He talked about forgiveness of sins, I don't think he mentioned forgiveness of debt....in fact, He mentioned that if you were (in debt and) forced to walk a mile and carry a load for your adversary or let's say slave master, then once done with what this person required you to do, you should walk another mile for him, at your own free will....all in the name of the Lord!

He also mentions to settle your differences or debt outside of court, because you could end up in prison if you don't!

care
 
Jesus was not political....he would not be considered in the class of today's Liberal or today's Conservative....and in my opinion, this is the problem, when people try to do such.

Jesus was not involved with the political aspects of the Roman government at the time, this is why he told the Pharisees to give unto Caesar, what is his when it came to taxes. Jesus believed in a Separation of Church and State, so to say....

where he was rebellious was with the leaders of His Church or Synagogue who he felt were "messing" with God's message and getting it all wrong....like He could not heal the sick on the Sabbath because it was considered by the religious as working on the Sabbath, helping the injured man left for dead on the Sabbath as the Samaritan did but the religious Priest and Levite passed him by and left him for dead....the permission to divorce as Moses granted the jews for any reason other than marital unfaithfulness should not have been permitted....making people pay to enter the temple and only take a certain currency as their alms, making a bundle off of the "exchange rate"....(the money changers)....he spent a great deal of time "correcting" what people believed, not admonishing the Old testament, but correcting how the hierarchy wthin their religion interpreted it.

He talked about forgiveness of sins, I don't think he mentioned forgiveness of debt....in fact, He mentioned that if you were (in debt and) forced to walk a mile and carry a load for your adversary or let's say slave master, then once done with what this person required you to do, you should walk another mile for him, at your own free will....all in the name of the Lord!

He also mentions to settle your differences or debt outside of court, because you could end up in prison if you don't!

care

I never said Jesus was political. I'm simply stating that his views could be what is considered Socialism. Socialism can be a non-political view on society as a whole too.

I also never said Jesus was involved with political aspects, merely what his views mean when applied to government and society. Obviously Jesus would not be a Socialist in everyway, but rather his thinking.

1.) Jesus didn't own any material items.

2.) Jesus told others to leave their brothers, sisters, mothers, and fathers to join him so they can become a commune.

3.) Jesus treats everyone he meets equally.

4.) He multiplied the loaves and fishes to feed the people. Is that not spreading the wealth amongst all who were listening to him?

5.) He healed the sick for free because he felt it was right, is that not free health care for all?

6.) He overturned the vendor tables in the temple and kicked out the capitalists because of the way they used his "father's temple."

7.) He would also have been in favor of welfare: giving to the poor, sick, and hungry.

8.) Jesus spoke often about the wealthy and poverty. To the poor he said, "Blessed are you poor, for yours is the kingdom of God," (Luke's version). To the rich he said, "Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth," and "go, sell what you have, and give to the poor." When the rich turned away from him because they couldn't follow his command he observed, "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."

Ironically though, Jesus would not involve himself even in today's politics because of the way they are. He would also probably be disheartened with the way he sees so many people treat one another with such distain.

Here you go Care, I think. Tell me what you think:

Matthew 23-35: “Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. As he began the settlement, a man who owed him ten thousand talentsb was brought to him. Since he was not able to pay, the master ordered that he and his wife and his children and all that he had be sold to repay the debt. The servant fell on his knees before him. ‘Be patient with me,’ he begged, ‘and I will pay back everything. The servant’s master took pity on him, canceled the debt and let him go.

But when that servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii.c He grabbed him and began to choke him. ‘Pay back what you owe me!’ he demanded. His fellow servant fell to his knees and begged him, ‘Be patient with me, and I will pay you back. But he refused. Instead, he went off and had the man thrown into prison until he could pay the debt. When the other servants saw what had happened, they were greatly distressed and went and told their master everything that had happened. Then the master called the servant in. ‘You wicked servant,’ he said, ‘I canceled all that debt of yours because you begged me to. Shouldn’t you have had mercy on your fellow servant just as I had on you? In anger his master turned him over to the jailers to be tortured, until he should pay back all he owed. This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother from your heart.”
 
Do Christians think the only human being ever to be born with the capacity to be inseparable from God is Jesus?

What do you have to look forward to then?
no, most Christians believe Jesus IS God, not a separate being but a manifestation of God, in the form of man.

We believe that we will be inseparable from God when we pass on in to the next life. We don't see this as being God ourselves...Jesus was God, in the form of man....

if we believed that jesus was a separate entity or the Holy Spirit was a separate entity and continued to reverence or worship them....that would be Blasphemy....but because He is God made man, then we are only worshiping the Triune God, the Trinity.....one God, 3 manifestations of HIM.....


care
 
There is plenty of other verses in the bible that show Christ was not God in Human form.

For many christians though, God NEEDS to be Jesus. Why? Because only God's death would be good enough to pay the penalty for the sins of the entire world. Only god could pay such a price. Only God could take on the sins of the world.



But if we do assume (for sake of argument) that God was Jesus. Then he still wasn't perfect. Unless you believe every word that Jesus spoke and every action that God/Jesus did was perfect. Nobody is perfect, even God.

Remember this: God created us in HIS IMAGE.
"In his image" means we look like him and are a reflection of him. Not that we are him or have his godform.

Please quote the verses which portray Jesus as anything but perfect and the living God.
 
He never made any such political affiliation. Just like he never straight out and said "I am God". To ask me for such a quote is being a hypocrite. :)

The Bible says that he is God. THe Bible does not say that he was pulling for any particular political party.
And no, asking for the quote isn't being a hypocrite. I can quote scripture, and do to make my point. If you're going to assert something is in scripture, if it's not one which immediately comes to people's heads, you get to quote it or be recognized as someone who is lying about the content of the bible and/or his knowledge about it.
 
Do Christians think the only human being ever to be born with the capacity to be inseparable from God is Jesus?

What do you have to look forward to then?

No, Christians think the only perfect human being ever was Jesus, because he was God as man.

What we have to look forward to is a world without pain, without death, without war, eternal life in bodies which will not age or decay, as ourselves yet fulfilled and in the presence of the presence and visible love of the Lord.

Not too shabby.
 
"In his image" means we look like him and are a reflection of him. Not that we are him or have his godform.

Please quote the verses which portray Jesus as anything but perfect and the living God.

The fact that Jesus does not condemn slavery but encourages it should be enough proof.

The bible is not going to say God or Jesus is wrong. However, history and facts prove them and it wrong.

I do love how you ask me to find direct verses for my own points when you cannot find direct verses for your own.

"In his image" means we look like him and we are a reflection of him. Which is true, I never said we are him. However, godform or being God does not make you perfect. If we are a reflection of God, then we are a reflection of the fact that nobody is perfect.
 
The Bible says that he is God. THe Bible does not say that he was pulling for any particular political party.
And no, asking for the quote isn't being a hypocrite. I can quote scripture, and do to make my point. If you're going to assert something is in scripture, if it's not one which immediately comes to people's heads, you get to quote it or be recognized as someone who is lying about the content of the bible and/or his knowledge about it.

Did I ever say he was pulling for any particular party? No

I can quote scripture too, but all I'm told is that it's bullshit or I'm twisting it. Asking for a quote is being a hypocrite when you yourself cannot find a direct quote in the bible where Jesus says "I am God".

I've quoted from both the O.T and N.T countless times in many threads in the last day. Besides, you assume that most Christians just know when they see a scripture from the Bible or hear it. I will bet you a dime a dozen that at least 50% of the Christians in America have not looked at the bible as closely as I have. And I am supposedly the Anti-Christ doing Satan's work. :lol:

And to further prove my point:

http://www.theologicalstudies.citymax.com/page/page/1573625.htm

Like Burge, George Lindbeck, the famous Yale theologian, has commented on the decreasing knowledge of Scripture from a professor’s perspective.

“When I first arrived at Yale, even those who came from nonreligious backgrounds knew the Bible better than most of those now who come from churchgoing families,” he says
 
Last edited:
I never said Jesus was political. I'm simply stating that his views could be what is considered Socialism. Socialism can be a non-political view on society as a whole too.

I also never said Jesus was involved with political aspects, merely what his views mean when applied to government and society. Obviously Jesus would not be a Socialist in everyway, but rather his thinking.

1.) Jesus didn't own any material items.

2.) Jesus told others to leave their brothers, sisters, mothers, and fathers to join him so they can become a commune.

3.) Jesus treats everyone he meets equally.

4.) He multiplied the loaves and fishes to feed the people. Is that not spreading the wealth amongst all who were listening to him?

5.) He healed the sick for free because he felt it was right, is that not free health care for all?

6.) He overturned the vendor tables in the temple and kicked out the capitalists because of the way they used his "father's temple."

7.) He would also have been in favor of welfare: giving to the poor, sick, and hungry.



Ironically though, Jesus would not involve himself even in today's politics because of the way they are. He would also probably be disheartened with the way he sees so many people treat one another with such distain.

Here you go Care, I think. Tell me what you think:

Ok. You make some good points Robert, but all of what you pointed out was how and what Jesus was teaching every day folk in their every day lives and their varying neighborhoods to do, NOT necessarily government....to do.

To me, it would not necessarily be wrong for our government to be involved in this way, just that this is not what Jesus was trying to get across....no political message or movement, but a desire inside of us to take care of our fellow man without malice and be forgiving.

On your last passage, the emphasis or the moral of the parable to me is on "Do unto others as you want them to do unto you" or "Love thy neighbor as thyself" or "forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us...."

simply giving Justice or true Love....the Golden Rule imho.

care
 
Ok. You make some good points Robert, but all of what you pointed out was how and what Jesus was teaching every day folk in their every day lives and their varying neighborhoods to do, NOT necessarily government....to do.

To me, it would not necessarily be wrong for our government to be involved in this way, just that this is not what Jesus was trying to get across....no political message or movement, but a desire inside of us to take care of our fellow man without malice and be forgiving.

On your last passage, the emphasis or the moral of the parable to me is on "Do unto others as you want them to do unto you" or "Love thy neighbor as thyself" or "forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us...."

simply giving Justice or true Love....the Golden Rule imho.

care

Jesus was teaching everyday to use in their lives. Would that not include politicians to turn the other cheek? Jesus believed in the ten commandments as far as I know, and can you name one law system in the world that does not use as a basis one of those ten? I know not a one.

Again, I never said Jesus was trying to get across a political movement or message. Simply stating that when compared, Jesus's message compares closely the most to the political movement of Socialism. That is what I try to focus on when it comes to religion, what you bolded.

Would Jesus not want for us to take care of our fellow man without malice and be forgiving? Isn't that the whole definition of Welfare and Social Security? Giving money to a cause without malice in order to help those who cannot help themselves?

That is one way to look at it. However, the last line
This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother from your heart.”

This can be applied to debt forgiveness. If others treat with you the kindness of relief of debt, should you not treat others in the same fashion? If this was applied to our society today, it would not be capitalism.

Trust me Care, the first and foremost point of any religious teaching should be charity and goodwill. I am merely pointing out the ways that Jesus's teachings and actions are more Socialist then anything.
 
The fact that Jesus does not condemn slavery but encourages it should be enough proof.

The bible is not going to say God or Jesus is wrong. However, history and facts prove them and it wrong.

I do love how you ask me to find direct verses for my own points when you cannot find direct verses for your own.

"In his image" means we look like him and we are a reflection of him. Which is true, I never said we are him. However, godform or being God does not make you perfect. If we are a reflection of God, then we are a reflection of the fact that nobody is perfect.

Jesus does not say that slavery is A ok, he does not speak to that manner....what he tells them is to submit to their masters in the name of God.

He is saying that walking the extra mile with ones adversary, or turning ones cheek, or submitting to your master....being kind in every manner, no matter what they do to you....ONE UPS THEM....it showed that their belief in their one God was actually stronger than the Masters and the evil they sometimes brought.....and He says it will be like "burning coals" on their heads....the heads of those that thought, ruled them....it would make them feel guilty for being mean, evil or whatever! And possibly convert them in to believing in our God.

Also, can you post the ENTIRE passage on the rich person's chances on making it to heaven being harder than a camel going through an eye of a needle, if memory serves the passage continues which gives full meaning to the verse and i will go over that with you if I am correct/

it is the next couple of verses i think....
 
The fact that Jesus does not condemn slavery but encourages it should be enough proof.

The bible is not going to say God or Jesus is wrong. However, history and facts prove them and it wrong.

I do love how you ask me to find direct verses for my own points when you cannot find direct verses for your own.

"In his image" means we look like him and we are a reflection of him. Which is true, I never said we are him. However, godform or being God does not make you perfect. If we are a reflection of God, then we are a reflection of the fact that nobody is perfect.

Jesus did not encourage slavery. Slavery in Jesus' time had a whole different connotation. Slaves actually had rights, and could own their own fortunes. They were not required to serve for their entire lives, and could seek resistitution for damages down to them.

I do have direct verses for my own points, and I post them continually. Have you asked me for one I didn't provide? Ask away. But you are making false claims about the bible, and your inability and unwillingness to find scripture to back up your claims show you up, as I stated already.

And yes, I made my point succinctly. That you are unable to come up with anything better than "well just because the bible says it doesn't make it true" has nothing whatsoever with the original line of discussion and your question, which was...if we are made in his image, how come we aren't perfect?

I answered that question and your lame reply in no way negates it. You're simply throwing stuff out there to give you an opportunity to pop off with your ridiculous theories, which have nothing to do with fact or even the Bible and are based solely on your own emotions and lack of information about the subject.

I'm giving you the answers. Whether you want to believe they're true or not is immaterial to the questions you're asking. I can tell you specifically that Jesus did not support any particular government, other than the government of faithful communities among their brethren. He did not advocate for slavery. And the bible is specific that he was perfect, he is the son of God and also God in flesh, and that when we die we will not attain "godness" but simply a more perfection version of ourselves and the presence of God.

If you dispute those facts are supported by the bible, by all means provide the verses which put the lie to them. Otherwise, identify your ridiculous comments as simply being your opinion, instead of presenting them as biblical fact, which they most certainly are not.
 
Did I ever say he was pulling for any particular party? No

I can quote scripture too, but all I'm told is that it's bullshit or I'm twisting it. Asking for a quote is being a hypocrite when you yourself cannot find a direct quote in the bible where Jesus says "I am God".

I've quoted from both the O.T and N.T countless times in many threads in the last day. Besides, you assume that most Christians just know when they see a scripture from the Bible or hear it. I will bet you a dime a dozen that at least 50% of the Christians in America have not looked at the bible as closely as I have. And I am supposedly the Anti-Christ doing Satan's work. :lol:

And to further prove my point:

Crisis in America's Churches: Bible Knowledge At All-Time Low


Yes, you are once again being dishonest. You said he was a socialist and supported slavery.

So you are once again caught in a lie.
 
Jesus does not say that slavery is A ok, he does not speak to that manner....what he tells them is to submit to their masters in the name of God.

He is saying that walking the extra mile with ones adversary, or turning ones cheek, or submitting to your master....being kind in every manner, no matter what they do to you....ONE UPS THEM....it showed that their belief in their one God was actually stronger than the Masters and the evil they sometimes brought.....and He says it will be like "burning coals" on their heads....the heads of those that thought, ruled them....it would make them feel guilty for being mean, evil or whatever! And possibly convert them in to believing in our God.

Also, can you post the ENTIRE passage on the rich person's chances on making it to heaven being harder than a camel going through an eye of a needle, if memory serves the passage continues which gives full meaning to the verse and i will go over that with you if I am correct/

it is the next couple of verses i think....

There are several verses from the Bible on slavery, even by Jesus; not just that one. Sure, being kind in every manner,etc might one up them but it does not make their life any better. Obviously most slave masters did not feel bad considering the fact they owned slaves until they died. We would still have slavery today in some form in the United States if not for the law.

What it comes down to with the bible is the way we find all the meaning in it. The way you look at it and I look at it could be two different things.

However, that does not mean that Jesus condemned slavery; just merely told the slaves to turn the other cheek to it. I'm sorry, but if a man told me that by being good to a slaveowner will help convert them to see your side and then you'll be free is bullshit when applied. In theory, it sounds nice but when applied no.

And to your second question, I put that whole thing in quotes because I got that from a website. I, myself was having a bit of trouble finding the passage it was in. If you do find it though, feel free to tell me.

(For the record, I'm not saying you encourage slavery at all. I know you care, I'm just simply stating that Jesus would be wrong if his message to slavery was "to turn the other cheek". One cannot turn the cheek to everything in life and expect to be rewarded with kindness in return.

And no, I'm not saying when you fail to turn the other cheek that must mean you need to respond with violence; you don't have or need to.

Let me read you something, I'm sure you'd apperciate reading it at the very least:

"Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say, 'wait'. But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim...when you see the vast majority of your twenty million Negro brothers smothering in an airtight cage of poverty in the midst of an affluent society; when you suddenly find your tongue twisted and your speech stammering as you seek to explain to your six-year-old daughter why she can't go to the public amusement park that has just been advertised on television, and see tears welling up in her eyes when she is told that Funtown is closed to colored children, and see ominous clouds of inferiority beginning to form in her little mental sky...when you take a cross-country drive and find it necessary to sleep night after night in the uncomfortable corners of your automobile because no motel will accept you..when your wife and mother are never given the respected title 'Mrs'...when you are forever fighting a degenerating sense of 'nobodiness' - then you will understand why we find it difficult to wait. There comes a time when the cup of endurance runs over, and men are no longer willing to be plunged into the abyss of despair."

That is a Letter from a Birmingham Jail, April 16,1963. The writer of that letter was Martin Luther King Jr.
 
Last edited:
Yes, you are once again being dishonest. You said he was a socialist and supported slavery.

So you are once again caught in a lie.

You failed to disprove my points that he wasn't a Socialist or supported Slavery. At the very least, he failed to condemn Slavery which in itself is supporting Slavery.
 

Forum List

Back
Top