Democrat fumes at Super Bowl crowd for not standing during black national anthem sung by Andra Day

[Batcat]

No one part of American history is the entire thing.... that's kinda inherent in being a part....

Exactly.

 

[Curried Goats]

"Black National" anthem.

What's wrong with this picture?

What's wrong is that your culture is so fucking deplorable and backwards that you're still using a song written by slaver as your anthem and thus are compelled, through shame, to also play one that isn't offense to non mutant Americans.

 

[Resnic]

There is only one national anthem. And it isn't the nword anthem.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Where is Nygeria? Is that in China?

Armstrong Williams? His record speaks for itself.

And yet he is correct.

 

[JusticeHammer]

What's wrong is that your culture is so fucking deplorable and backwards that you're still using a song written by slaver as your anthem and thus are compelled, through shame, to also play one that isn't offense to non mutant Americans.

STFU commie goat fucker.

 

[Curried Goats]

STFU commie goat fucker.

I don't have to bitch. You do have to put up with the Black National Anthem playing at your sporting events because you're a culture of cucks.

 

[laferia52]

Democrat fumes at Super Bowl crowd for not standing during black national anthem sung by Andra Day

Tennesse Democratic Rep. Steve Cohen expressed outrage at the Super Bowl LVIII crowd for not standing up during the black national anthem.

nypost.com

Armstrong Williams: Playing the Black national anthem at Super Bowl 58 ‘attempts to divide the nation’ by race | STAFF COMMENTARY

Armstrong Williams explains why he believes playing the ‘Black National Anthem’ at the Super Bowl is divisive.

www.baltimoresun.com

​

Armstrong Williams: Playing the Black national anthem at Super Bowl 58 ‘attempts to divide the nation’ by race​

there is only one anthem in america the american anthem. racist dem want all black nfl. if want to her go to nygeria. this is americna were americna national anthem is sung. you dot like it move.

I only stand for our national anthem, The Star-Spangled Banner. There is only one national anthem.

 

[Seymour Flops]

If they really wanted people to stand up, they should have played the redneck, national anthem. The singer tells you to stand up before he even starts singing.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

American black history is a part of American history not the entire thing.

I agree, so why is it conservative whites don't want it taught?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

And yet he is correct.

Actually he isn't, I find it comical when I hear fools like Armstrong Williams accusing black folks of dividing the country.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Actually he isn't, I find it comical when I hear fools like Armstrong Williams accusing black folks of dividing the country.

I find it comical when a libtard doesn't believe the truth. Most racists I know are black.

 

[JusticeHammer]

I don't have to bitch. You do have to put up with the Black National Anthem playing at your sporting events because you're a culture of cucks.

No, I turn the channel. The cucks are you and idiots like you.

 

[Curried Goats]

No, I turn the channel. The cucks are you and idiots like you.

Looking away doesn't stop it from happening.

 

[Vrenn]

I find it comical when a libtard doesn't believe the truth. Most racists I know are black.

Funny you should mention that. My next door neighbors, 1 is a magat white who only wants certain types of people to move in (yes, dorathy, he's said it) and the other is latino and anyone that is not latino is stupid and deserves to be taken advantage of.

 

[scruffy]

Actually he isn't, I find it comical when I hear fools like Armstrong Williams accusing black folks of dividing the country.

It's even more comical when someone asserts black "folks" are homogeneous.

 

[Batcat]

I agree, so why is it conservative whites don't want it taught?

Perhaps conservatives want history taught accurately.

The 1619 Project - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Snip


The 1619 Project has received criticism from historians, both from the political left and the right, who question its historical accuracy.[6][10] In a letter published in The New York Times in December 2019, historians Gordon S. Wood, James M. McPherson, Sean Wilentz, Victoria E. Bynum, and James Oakes applauded "all efforts to address the enduring centrality of slavery and racism to our history" and deemed the project a "praiseworthy and urgent public service," but expressed "strong reservations" about some "important aspects" of the project and requested factual corrections. Most prominently, these scholars denied the project's claim that slavery was essential to the beginning of the American Revolution. In response, Jake Silverstein, the editor of The New York Times Magazine, defended The 1619 Project and refused to issue corrections.[11]

In March 2020, in light of persistent criticism of the project's portrayal of the role of slavery, including from one of its own consulting historians, Leslie M. Harris, The New York Times issued a "clarification", modifying one of the passages on slavery's role that had sparked controversy.[12][13] In September 2020, controversy again arose when the Times updated the opening text of the project website to remove the phrase "...understanding 1619 as our true founding..." without any accompanying editorial note to point to what was being redone.[a] According to critics, including Bret Stephens, a conservative columnist at the Times, claimed the differences showed that the newspaper was backing away from some of the initiative's controversial claims.[15] The Times defended its practices, with Hannah-Jones saying that most of the project's content had remained unchanged.[16][

 

[Superbadbrutha]

I find it comical when a libtard doesn't believe the truth. Most racists I know are black.

Now the victims of racism in America are the racist. How many black folks do you know that are racist?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

It's even more comical when someone asserts black "folks" are homogeneous.

Who asserted that?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Perhaps conservatives want history taught accurately.

The 1619 Project - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Snip


The 1619 Project has received criticism from historians, both from the political left and the right, who question its historical accuracy.[6][10] In a letter published in The New York Times in December 2019, historians Gordon S. Wood, James M. McPherson, Sean Wilentz, Victoria E. Bynum, and James Oakes applauded "all efforts to address the enduring centrality of slavery and racism to our history" and deemed the project a "praiseworthy and urgent public service," but expressed "strong reservations" about some "important aspects" of the project and requested factual corrections. Most prominently, these scholars denied the project's claim that slavery was essential to the beginning of the American Revolution. In response, Jake Silverstein, the editor of The New York Times Magazine, defended The 1619 Project and refused to issue corrections.[11]

In March 2020, in light of persistent criticism of the project's portrayal of the role of slavery, including from one of its own consulting historians, Leslie M. Harris, The New York Times issued a "clarification", modifying one of the passages on slavery's role that had sparked controversy.[12][13] In September 2020, controversy again arose when the Times updated the opening text of the project website to remove the phrase "...understanding 1619 as our true founding..." without any accompanying editorial note to point to what was being redone.[a] According to critics, including Bret Stephens, a conservative columnist at the Times, claimed the differences showed that the newspaper was backing away from some of the initiative's controversial claims.[15] The Times defended its practices, with Hannah-Jones saying that most of the project's content had remained unchanged.[16][

You mean the white historians who want us to teach His-Story and not History.

 

[Lumpy 1]

I’ll stand up with Blacks when they stand up for the national anthem, no problem..