Demo purposely misquote Trump

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The Nixon indictments are evident in Trump. Nixon was famous for the allegation that, "If the President does it, it is not illegal," like Trump asserting that he can do anything he wants as President. Then the "Us-word" is easily shown Trump "Wrapping himself up in the flag." Nixon was usually thought more legendary about that, in the events surrounding discovery of the Watergate break-in

wrap (oneself) in the flag

The investigations presenting evidence and indictments get less murky going into the Trial phase.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(For the Kingdom of Heaven is about creating Homelessness: (Matt 25:14-30)!)

You do realize that the Republicans will run the trial, so there will no be any Democrap BS. Right?

 

[BS Filter]

If Democrats couldn't lie they wouldn't be able to sleep at night.

 

[mascale]

There will in fact be House Managers, The Supreme Court Justice presiding. The presiding judge customarily runs a trial, and The House Managers are likely to be Democrats.

Trump has time to resign!

The Mueller Investigation found 12 Hackers from the Russian Military involved, for example. The Trump Administration is only public record with a less than vigorous pursuit. What the House Managers really have will maybe get public starting during next week.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Indictments will get voted on next week, all public record and during public record!)

 

[BS Filter]

There will in fact be House Managers, The Supreme Court Justice presiding. The presiding judge customarily runs a trial, and The House Managers are likely to be Democrats.

Trump has time to resign!

The Mueller Investigation found 12 Hackers from the Russian Military involved, for example. The Trump Administration is only public record with a less than vigorous pursuit. What the House Managers really have will maybe get public starting during next week.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Indictments will get voted on next week, all public record and during public record!)

You're having a dream.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

There will in fact be House Managers, The Supreme Court Justice presiding. The presiding judge customarily runs a trial, and The House Managers are likely to be Democrats.

Trump has time to resign!

The Mueller Investigation found 12 Hackers from the Russian Military involved, for example. The Trump Administration is only public record with a less than vigorous pursuit. What the House Managers really have will maybe get public starting during next week.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The Indictments will get voted on next week, all public record and during public record!)

Did you know the Republicans can vote it down with a simple majority before a trial ever starts?

Of course you didn't because you were not even a hard spot in you Daddy's pants when the last impeachment was made.

 

[mascale]

Anyone a Russian Agent--having failed at the concept, "Wrapping Oneself Up In The Flag:" Is also posted--Admiral Rockwell Tory--even ignorant of the vote of Senator McConnell, Republican Senators siding with McConnell, then after them--Senators Collins, Romney, Murkowski. There is a remote chance that enough will be persuaded to actually convict. There is a far better chance that enough will be persuaded, with a vote to convict even exceeding 55. 10% of Republican US Senators is five, creating a vote of 52, for the Democrat indictments. 10% of Republican voters are already persuaded the indictments already are warranted--before the trial.

"If the President does it, it is not illegal!" was the basis defense of Richard Nixon. The Senators can be asked if they really believe that a President absolutely--can "Wrap the Office Up In The Flag" for personal agenda--disguised as some immediate National Security Interest. They can be asked if the President absolutely: Shoot anyone he wants to on the streets of NYC.

The autocratic posts of people unfamiliar with US History, mores, idioms, language and custom are less likely found persuasive.

The Trial is announced, and already on--at the Senate, both leaders on record.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Probably a Greek came up with the Mattew 25:14-30, against the backdrop of Matthew 20:1-16!)

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Anyone a Russian Agent--having failed at the concept, "Wrapping Oneself Up In The Flag:" Is also posted--Admiral Rockwell Tory--even ignorant of the vote of Senator McConnell, Republican Senators siding with McConnell, then after them--Senators Collins, Romney, Murkowski. There is a remote chance that enough will be persuaded to actually convict. There is a far better chance that enough will be persuaded, with a vote to convict even exceeding 55. 10% of Republican US Senators is five, creating a vote of 52, for the Democrat indictments. 10% of Republican voters are already persuaded the indictments already are warranted--before the trial.

"If the President does it, it is not illegal!" was the basis defense of Richard Nixon. The Senators can be asked if they really believe that a President absolutely--can "Wrap the Office Up In The Flag" for personal agenda--disguised as some immediate National Security Interest. They can be asked if the President absolutely: Shoot anyone he wants to on the streets of NYC.

The autocratic posts of people unfamiliar with US History, mores, idioms, language and custom are less likely found persuasive.

The Trial is announced, and already on--at the Senate, both leaders on record.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Probably a Greek came up with the Mattew 25:14-30, against the backdrop of Matthew 20:1-16!)

You suck at math too! Do any of those numbers even approach 67?

The dems are secretly praying the moderate in districts won by Trump in 2016 defect and they lose impeachment outright. They are also se rely praying that the Republicans vote it down before it starts because they don't want all those Dems called as witnesses, mainly Biden because he will be on display on Capitol Hill instead of hitting the campaign trail, along with Warren, Booker, Sanders, Klobuchar, etc.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Yep dems purposely misquoted Trump, and CNN confirmed it:

Trump: Democrats ‘Purposely Misquoted’ Me In Impeachment Hearing. CNN: ‘He’s Correct’

Dems lied, and CNN actually confirmed that it was not true!

Big deal.

Me vs Us

The favor was the same.

You mean when Zelensky held a press conference announcing the investigation of Quid Pro Joe?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Anyone a Russian Agent--having failed at the concept, "Wrapping Oneself Up In The Flag:" Is also posted--Admiral Rockwell Tory--even ignorant of the vote of Senator McConnell, Republican Senators siding with McConnell, then after them--Senators Collins, Romney, Murkowski. There is a remote chance that enough will be persuaded to actually convict. There is a far better chance that enough will be persuaded, with a vote to convict even exceeding 55. 10% of Republican US Senators is five, creating a vote of 52, for the Democrat indictments. 10% of Republican voters are already persuaded the indictments already are warranted--before the trial.

"If the President does it, it is not illegal!" was the basis defense of Richard Nixon. The Senators can be asked if they really believe that a President absolutely--can "Wrap the Office Up In The Flag" for personal agenda--disguised as some immediate National Security Interest. They can be asked if the President absolutely: Shoot anyone he wants to on the streets of NYC.

The autocratic posts of people unfamiliar with US History, mores, idioms, language and custom are less likely found persuasive.

The Trial is announced, and already on--at the Senate, both leaders on record.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Probably a Greek came up with the Mattew 25:14-30, against the backdrop of Matthew 20:1-16!)

You're talking about democrat Party leaders who will soon have to disclose who gave them the orders to spy on Trump

 

[mascale]

Regardless of the meandering idiocy posted by Russian-Agent-apparent, Admiral Rockwell Tory poster--the trial is clearly a Democratic Party momentum builder for 2020.

1. The Republicans cannot go on record, opposed to a fair trial coming to the Senate with basis in the House Indictments.
2. Departures from customary rules of evidence can be raised with US Supreme Court Chief Justice, suddenly in the spotlight. The Republicans will be in the spotlight, trying if they do--to embarrass that office, too.
3. Any defense of the concept of a Nixon-like defense of Imperial, Above-the-Law Presidencies: Will be on record, against a giant public record. That could be sufficient to even force a Presidential resignation.
4. Ads will be running, going into 2020--posting Trump Clips against and Trial record.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(The source of the geo-mapped Donald "John" Trump tweets can be changed!)

 

[EvMetro]

Claiming a personal aggrandizing act, or discourse, as a National Interest matter is Abuse of Power. Richard Nixon would often "Wrap" his personal aggrandizing initiatives, "Up in the flag." "Wrapping himself up in the flag," was the common charge of the Abuse of Power at the time. "If the President does it, it is not illegal," was the similar Richard Nixon mantra, now the Donald John Trump kind of mantra. The "us" usage is evidence of Abuse of Power, in the U.S. legal history. "Us" and "Me" are truly not interchangeable. The usage is evidence of the Donald John Trump: Even Tweet geo-mapping crimes(?).

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(New Presidential Tweets have a geo-mapping context, even(?)!)

This thread is specifically about Trump's words being changed to fit a political narrative. Your Nixon discussion has nothing to do with the dishonest act that this thread is about, and only serves as a method of marginalizing the dishonest act that the thread is about. Please post something that you have read and understand the artice that the thread is about.

 

[EvMetro]

Regardless of the meandering idiocy posted by Russian-Agent-apparent, Admiral Rockwell Tory poster--the trial is clearly a Democratic Party momentum builder for 2020.

1. The Republicans cannot go on record, opposed to a fair trial coming to the Senate with basis in the House Indictments.
2. Departures from customary rules of evidence can be raised with US Supreme Court Chief Justice, suddenly in the spotlight. The Republicans will be in the spotlight, trying if they do--to embarrass that office, too.
3. Any defense of the concept of a Nixon-like defense of Imperial, Above-the-Law Presidencies: Will be on record, against a giant public record. That could be sufficient to even force a Presidential resignation.
4. Ads will be running, going into 2020--posting Trump Clips against and Trial record.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(The source of the geo-mapped Donald "John" Trump tweets can be changed!)

It looks like you have responded to the wrong thread. This thread is about a Democrat purposely misquoting Trump in order to dishonestly make it look like Trump said something he didnt say, but that lefties REALLY, want him to have said.

 

[EvMetro]

People who don't see why it's a big deal to change somebody's words that have quote marks around them in order to make them fit a political narrative

Classic.
How many times have conservatives CHANGED trumps own words saying things like......

"He meant to say...."
"He didn't say that." When in FACT it is on video.

"He meant to say..." are the words that the dishonest person who changed Trump's words failed to use.

 

[blastoff]

Regardless of the meandering idiocy posted by Russian-Agent-apparent, Admiral Rockwell Tory poster--the trial is clearly a Democratic Party momentum builder for 2020.

1. The Republicans cannot go on record, opposed to a fair trial coming to the Senate with basis in the House Indictments.
2. Departures from customary rules of evidence can be raised with US Supreme Court Chief Justice, suddenly in the spotlight. The Republicans will be in the spotlight, trying if they do--to embarrass that office, too.
3. Any defense of the concept of a Nixon-like defense of Imperial, Above-the-Law Presidencies: Will be on record, against a giant public record. That could be sufficient to even force a Presidential resignation.
4. Ads will be running, going into 2020--posting Trump Clips against and Trial record.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!
(The source of the geo-mapped Donald "John" Trump tweets can be changed!)

You’d have a much better chance selling this bullshit in Hollyweird.

 

[EvMetro]

Yep dems purposely misquoted Trump, and CNN confirmed it:

Trump: Democrats ‘Purposely Misquoted’ Me In Impeachment Hearing. CNN: ‘He’s Correct’

Dems lied, and CNN actually confirmed that it was not true!

He actually got something right? Guess Grandad was right. Even a blind pig will find and acorn once in while.

Who got what right? Your post sounds like you didn't read the article, or that you are trying to marginalize the dishonest quote change.

 

[EvMetro]

The Republicans appear to be making a claim that the Democratic Party is changing the transcript of the Ukrainian phone call language to include a "Do ME a favor" reading instead of "Do US a favor" reading of the language used. That would be the Republicans charging Donald John Trump with Abuse of Power.

The concept applied in the guilty verdict opinions about Richard Nixon clearly makes the Republicans now charging Donald John Trump with Abuse of Power. The concept applied to Nixon was the same: Wrapping himself up in the flag." It was common then. It will easily be common next week, and in January.

wrap (oneself) in the flag

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(The "Donald John Trump" geo-locations of the Tweet Storms is also apparent in new languages(?)!)

Wrapping in a flag is only a politically motivated allegation, not a fact. The lefty who changed "us" to "me" obviously didn't believe the flag wrap notion, or Trump's words wouldn't have been changed. What do you think about changing Trump's words and then wrapping quote marks around them?

 

[mascale]

Another Russian-Agent poster--EvMetro poster--unfamiliar with US History--specifically about the Nixon Administration: Also fails at applied English. The "Us" is in fact a quote. The context is not even an investigation, but only the announcement of an investigation. No clear context is otherwise provided. The "Us" alludes to some national interest unspecified in the phone call of what need there is, or was, for any investigation.

"Me" is a poetic license interpretation of what the sentence then intends to be understood. The concept was more famous in the Nixon Administration--and exact clone of Trump, who is announced on record to be able to do whatever he wants to do without regard to statute, limitations, checks and balances, or other common US political policy and understandings. "The lefty who changed 'us' to 'me'" in fact got it right.

Trump is record as just like Nixon, apparently even keep secret tapes he won't release. That even got Nixon into heaps of trouble. Trump is already in heaps of trouble, when it comes to making Republicans if they believe in the Imperial Presidential Powers, or not. The reasonable conclusion about "Wrapping Oneself in the Flag," is in the sentence. Who benefits from the favor, Department of Defense? They had already signed off on the aid.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(In the Don John there can be Tweet Storms, even!)

 

[Terri4Trump]

Yep dems purposely misquoted Trump, and CNN confirmed it:

Trump: Democrats ‘Purposely Misquoted’ Me In Impeachment Hearing. CNN: ‘He’s Correct’

Dems lied, and CNN actually confirmed that it was not true!

How many time does it need to be said, Democrats are pathological liars

 

[White 6]

Yep dems purposely misquoted Trump, and CNN confirmed it:

Trump: Democrats ‘Purposely Misquoted’ Me In Impeachment Hearing. CNN: ‘He’s Correct’

Dems lied, and CNN actually confirmed that it was not true!

He actually got something right? Guess Grandad was right. Even a blind pig will find and acorn once in while.

Who got what right? Your post sounds like you didn't read the article, or that you are trying to marginalize the dishonest quote change.

I did. Well aware, that CNN (on of the bastions mainstream media scorned on this board) caught it and called him out, and of course I was trying to marginalize the rare occasion that Trump whined of foul play and was actually correct. His being factually correct in this instance is an anomaly lost (at this point) among in his shouted half-truths and outright lies.

 

[mascale]

Like OP posted: Democrats paraphrased a tape the Lying Republicans refused to release, releasing instead a paraphrase and parody: Easily able to be paraphrased and parodied.

Notice from the Helsinki news conference, From Trump and Putin.
______________________________________
"Did you want President Trump to win the election and did you direct any of your officials to help him do that?"
"PUTIN: Yes, I wanted him to win. Because he talked about bringing the U.S. Russia relationship back to normal."
__________________________________
Is the one word, "Yes," some nature of admission of guilty as questioned? A deliberate lie in most languages requires a context and backdrop against which veracity can be measured. (Many would contend that evading the answer to the question in its entirety is a lie!)

The Democrats are not accused of withholding the original transcript, (THE LIE), or failing to acknowledge the paraphrase released--then further paraphrased.

Notice below: There can be no genuine contention that the paraphrase is a lie--since the real transcript was never released.
___________
"It looks like you have responded to the wrong thread. This thread is about a Democrat purposely misquoting Trump in order to dishonestly make it look like Trump said something he didnt say, but that lefties REALLY, want him to have said."
_______________

"Wrapping oneself in the Flag." is better said to be about both Trump and NIxon.

wrap (oneself) in the flag

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Clone-making not really a lie!)