CAUGHT ON TAPE: Dem Operative Stuffs Ballot Box in Arizona (Video)

Reports of retail election fraud - as opposed to wholesaleelection fraud - are virtually always the style of Republicans; retail in this case meaning the cases of individuals operating for their own gain, as in voting in two polling places or perhaps two states like New York and again in a "winter" home state of say Florida as an example.

By the same paradigm wholesale fraud is systemic fraud to change or inject many votes wholesale into the system to attempt to force an outcome favorable to the fraudsters purposes.

I.E. if there is wholesale fraud then there is retail fraud just as there are retail politics - one on one - and there is wholesale politics as in mass communications or ballot stuffing.

What happened in 2008 in Indiana's primary is a good example of wholesale fraud when both Obama's and Clinton's campaign supporters didn't bother with getting the required minimum of 500 names of supporters in each congressional district but instead simply wrote down the names and forged the the signatures of a large proportion of well known Democrats to meet the requirement without which they would've failed.

Among those names was former Indiana Governor Joe Kernan (among others) who stated to the media and in court that his name had been used without his permission and his signature had even been forged. It was shown that neither OB nor HRC had met the law's requirement but the damage was done and their votes in the subsequent primary election were allowed to stand as legitimate because the discovery and court case came too late. That is an example of wholesale fraud.

A candidate lying about his address or his qualifications is still retail fraud, and much easier to discover and remedy, at least in my opinion.

Please provide a "credible" link to support your claims.
 
Nope, no voter fraud for Democrats!

The Gateway Pundit ^

They don’t even try to hid their lawlessness anymore. A vulgar, violent Democratic operative was caught on tape stuffing a ballot box. The man dropped a large box of hundreds of early ballots on the table and started stuffing the ballot box....

The probability of that is the exact reason, I wait for the day before an election to drop my mail-in ballot in the drop-off container at the courthouse. :thup:
 
Reports of retail election fraud - as opposed to wholesaleelection fraud - are virtually always the style of Republicans; retail in this case meaning the cases of individuals operating for their own gain, as in voting in two polling places or perhaps two states like New York and again in a "winter" home state of say Florida as an example.

By the same paradigm wholesale fraud is systemic fraud to change or inject many votes wholesale into the system to attempt to force an outcome favorable to the fraudsters purposes.

I.E. if there is wholesale fraud then there is retail fraud just as there are retail politics - one on one - and there is wholesale politics as in mass communications or ballot stuffing.

What happened in 2008 in Indiana's primary is a good example of wholesale fraud when both Obama's and Clinton's campaign supporters didn't bother with getting the required minimum of 500 names of supporters in each congressional district but instead simply wrote down the names and forged the the signatures of a large proportion of well known Democrats to meet the requirement without which they would've failed.

Among those names was former Indiana Governor Joe Kernan (among others) who stated to the media and in court that his name had been used without his permission and his signature had even been forged. It was shown that neither OB nor HRC had met the law's requirement but the damage was done and their votes in the subsequent primary election were allowed to stand as legitimate because the discovery and court case came too late. That is an example of wholesale fraud.

A candidate lying about his address or his qualifications is still retail fraud, and much easier to discover and remedy, at least in my opinion.

Please provide a "credible" link to support your claims.
Do your own search - it only takes a few well chosen search terms.
 
Ok... this once I'll answer your questions:

You asked: Explain why 90%+ of scientists self ID as Dems/Libs?

Easy, that is just not true. Show me where 90% of scientists self identify as democrat. Are you talking about high school teachers? Engineers? Define scientist and tell me who you are polling.

You asked: Explain hoe red states are so poor, and blue states pay the freight?

Easy, that is just not true. Republican states are less expensive to live in, one result of being less expensive is the average rate of pay can also be lower due to the cost of living being lower. Additionally, many retired folks live in republican states. Most bullshit reports about red states sucking down welfare are counting SS as welfare, which is a lie. Further, many of the republican states are in proximity to where the immigration, legal and illegal, is occurring. Still further, many pf the republican states are rural states with lots of farms and such, where incomes are generally lower. You can't compare a job picking strawberries, with a job trading stocks on the NY stock exchange. Even further, just because a state is republican, does not mean everyone in the state is republican. Shockingly there are many millions of democrats in republican states. Even more shockingly, there are many millions of republicans in democrat states. You assume, incorrectly that the republicans in democrat states are donating their incomes as "democrats" and you also assume, incorrectly that democrats receiving welfare in republican states are doing so as republicans. IOW you're a fool for believing said lies.

You said: Yes, the platform of the GOP is gut taxes for the rich, note how the ONLY tax increase they didn't fight to keep, was Obama's temp 2% reduction on SS?

Nonsense! Bush's tax breaks reduced taxes for the middle class and poor SIGNIFICANTLY MORE by percentage of income than it did for the upper income classes. SIGNIFICANTLY BIGGER CUTS WENT TO THE POOR However, the democrats are apparently math challenged and don't understand that going from 8% taxes to zero percent taxes is a significantly bigger tax cut than going from 35% to 28% or from 28% to 23%. Or the democrats start lying about capital gains taxes being the same thing as personal income taxes. IOW the democrats for the most part are silent to the truth, mentally handicapped, or liars... you pick. As for the 2% reduction on SS.. OMFG SS payments are to fund SS. Are you democrats actually arguing to DEFUND SOCIAL SECURITY? WTF?


Got it, you have all the right wing memes (LIES) down


Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans: Pew Poll

The ideological discrepancies were similar. Nine percent of scientists said they were "conservative" while 52 percent described themselves as "liberal," and 14 percent "very liberal."

Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans Pew Poll



Weird, immigration is happening in the poorest red states like Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, West Virginia, Louisiana, Montana, South Carolina, Kentucky, Alabama, and North Carolina? lol


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala A theory of a divided nation

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.



Blue States are from Scandinavia Red States are from Guatemala New Republic

Can Scott Walker make the case for conservatism?

Economy Killer Scott Walker Takes Wisconsin to 49th in the Country

But Walker has developed a consistent record for failure. Republicans try to blame the economy, but these measurements put his state at the bottom with a projected decrease in growth, compared to others that indicate growth.
And then there’s the other data. In March of this year, Wisconsin plunged to 44th in private sector job growth. Also, Wisconsin came in as the fifth worst in terms of the erosion in private-sector wages.

Forbes named Wisconsin one of the “worst states” for business in December of 2012. Wisconsin is 44th for overall economic performance and 39th for business climate.

In May of 2013, the Chamber of Commerce rewarded 2016 hopeful Scott Walker for making Wisconsin last in job growth, noting that he made Wisconsin an “enterprising state”. FYI, an enterprising state is one that embracing right wing ideology, based on the premise that tax cuts will lead to growth, jobs, and general greatness.

However, the Chamber’s own study placed Wisconsin dead last for short term job growth from September 2010 and November 2012.

“Wisconsin clearly is not leading the recovery,” William Delwiche, an economist in Milwaukee at Robert W. Baird & Co, told the Journal Online. That’s an understatement if ever there were one.

Economy Killer Scott Walker Takes Wisconsin to 49th in the Country



Scott Walker has failed Wisconsin and Minnesota is the proof

Scott Walker has failed Wisconsin and Minnesota is the proof - JSOnline

Yes, the GOP fought for Dubyas's tax cuts, the ones where the richest saved over $1,000,000 per family in 9 years from it!


Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years

  • The average tax cut that people making over $1 million received exceeded $110,000 in each of the last nine years — for a total of more than $1 million over this period.
  • The tax cuts made the tax system less progressive.


  • Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities




    Fueled income inequality: This chart from the Congressional Research Service suggests that the Bush tax cuts, which significantly reduce top marginal tax rates and capital gains rates, helped widen income inequality in the 2000s. As the report says, “as the top tax rates are reduced, the share of income accruing to the top of the income distribution increases — that is, income disparities increase.” This chart shows how the percentage of income flowing to the top 0.1 percent of earners increases as top tax rates decrease.




    Benefited the wealthy: By any measure, the Bush tax cuts have benefited the wealthy more than the middle class. Here’s a chart, based on data from the Tax Policy Center, showing the distributional breakdown of the Bush tax cuts before they were amended on Tuesday. Going forward, the top 1 percent of earners will benefit much less -- though still quite a bit.


    image-3.jpg



    The legacy of the Bush tax cuts in four charts - The Washington Post
nailed it big time ... great response
You two are retards...
5-26-11tax-f1.jpg




July 30, 2012


Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years

  • The average tax cut that people making over $1 million received exceeded $110,000 in each of the last nine years — for a total of more than $1 million over this period.
  • The tax cuts made the tax system less progressive.
Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


CBO: Bush Tax Cuts Responsible For Almost A Third Of Deficit In Last 10 Years (2001-2010)




TOP 1% GOT 30% OF BUSH TAX CUTS, TOP 20% RECEIVED 74% OF BENEFITS


Benefited the wealthy: By any measure, the Bush tax cuts have benefited the wealthy more than the middle class.

image-3.jpg


The legacy of the Bush tax cuts in four charts - The Washington Post



EFFECTIVE TAX RATE HISTORY




25-chart-taxmageddon.w529.h427.2x.gif
Dumb ass retard thinks the rich used to pay a 71% tax rate. Dumb ass retard also thinks a 20% tax cut for the rich is bigger than a 20% reduction for the poor. Why? Because he's a dumb ass retard.

THINKS? FACT BUBBA

ONCE MORE

wealth-graphic2.jpg
 
Got it, you have all the right wing memes (LIES) down


Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans: Pew Poll

The ideological discrepancies were similar. Nine percent of scientists said they were "conservative" while 52 percent described themselves as "liberal," and 14 percent "very liberal."

Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans Pew Poll



Weird, immigration is happening in the poorest red states like Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, West Virginia, Louisiana, Montana, South Carolina, Kentucky, Alabama, and North Carolina? lol


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala A theory of a divided nation

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.



Blue States are from Scandinavia Red States are from Guatemala New Republic

Can Scott Walker make the case for conservatism?

Economy Killer Scott Walker Takes Wisconsin to 49th in the Country

But Walker has developed a consistent record for failure. Republicans try to blame the economy, but these measurements put his state at the bottom with a projected decrease in growth, compared to others that indicate growth.
And then there’s the other data. In March of this year, Wisconsin plunged to 44th in private sector job growth. Also, Wisconsin came in as the fifth worst in terms of the erosion in private-sector wages.

Forbes named Wisconsin one of the “worst states” for business in December of 2012. Wisconsin is 44th for overall economic performance and 39th for business climate.

In May of 2013, the Chamber of Commerce rewarded 2016 hopeful Scott Walker for making Wisconsin last in job growth, noting that he made Wisconsin an “enterprising state”. FYI, an enterprising state is one that embracing right wing ideology, based on the premise that tax cuts will lead to growth, jobs, and general greatness.

However, the Chamber’s own study placed Wisconsin dead last for short term job growth from September 2010 and November 2012.

“Wisconsin clearly is not leading the recovery,” William Delwiche, an economist in Milwaukee at Robert W. Baird & Co, told the Journal Online. That’s an understatement if ever there were one.

Economy Killer Scott Walker Takes Wisconsin to 49th in the Country



Scott Walker has failed Wisconsin and Minnesota is the proof

Scott Walker has failed Wisconsin and Minnesota is the proof - JSOnline

Yes, the GOP fought for Dubyas's tax cuts, the ones where the richest saved over $1,000,000 per family in 9 years from it!


Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years

  • The average tax cut that people making over $1 million received exceeded $110,000 in each of the last nine years — for a total of more than $1 million over this period.
  • The tax cuts made the tax system less progressive.


  • Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities




    Fueled income inequality: This chart from the Congressional Research Service suggests that the Bush tax cuts, which significantly reduce top marginal tax rates and capital gains rates, helped widen income inequality in the 2000s. As the report says, “as the top tax rates are reduced, the share of income accruing to the top of the income distribution increases — that is, income disparities increase.” This chart shows how the percentage of income flowing to the top 0.1 percent of earners increases as top tax rates decrease.




    Benefited the wealthy: By any measure, the Bush tax cuts have benefited the wealthy more than the middle class. Here’s a chart, based on data from the Tax Policy Center, showing the distributional breakdown of the Bush tax cuts before they were amended on Tuesday. Going forward, the top 1 percent of earners will benefit much less -- though still quite a bit.


    image-3.jpg



    The legacy of the Bush tax cuts in four charts - The Washington Post
nailed it big time ... great response
You two are retards...
5-26-11tax-f1.jpg




July 30, 2012


Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years

  • The average tax cut that people making over $1 million received exceeded $110,000 in each of the last nine years — for a total of more than $1 million over this period.
  • The tax cuts made the tax system less progressive.
Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


CBO: Bush Tax Cuts Responsible For Almost A Third Of Deficit In Last 10 Years (2001-2010)




TOP 1% GOT 30% OF BUSH TAX CUTS, TOP 20% RECEIVED 74% OF BENEFITS


Benefited the wealthy: By any measure, the Bush tax cuts have benefited the wealthy more than the middle class.

image-3.jpg


The legacy of the Bush tax cuts in four charts - The Washington Post



EFFECTIVE TAX RATE HISTORY




25-chart-taxmageddon.w529.h427.2x.gif
Dumb ass retard thinks the rich used to pay a 71% tax rate. Dumb ass retard also thinks a 20% tax cut for the rich is bigger than a 20% reduction for the poor. Why? Because he's a dumb ass retard.

THINKS? FACT BUBBA

ONCE MORE

wealth-graphic2.jpg
^idiot does not know how to read a chart.
 
Reports of retail election fraud - as opposed to wholesaleelection fraud - are virtually always the style of Republicans; retail in this case meaning the cases of individuals operating for their own gain, as in voting in two polling places or perhaps two states like New York and again in a "winter" home state of say Florida as an example.

By the same paradigm wholesale fraud is systemic fraud to change or inject many votes wholesale into the system to attempt to force an outcome favorable to the fraudsters purposes.

I.E. if there is wholesale fraud then there is retail fraud just as there are retail politics - one on one - and there is wholesale politics as in mass communications or ballot stuffing.

What happened in 2008 in Indiana's primary is a good example of wholesale fraud when both Obama's and Clinton's campaign supporters didn't bother with getting the required minimum of 500 names of supporters in each congressional district but instead simply wrote down the names and forged the the signatures of a large proportion of well known Democrats to meet the requirement without which they would've failed.

Among those names was former Indiana Governor Joe Kernan (among others) who stated to the media and in court that his name had been used without his permission and his signature had even been forged. It was shown that neither OB nor HRC had met the law's requirement but the damage was done and their votes in the subsequent primary election were allowed to stand as legitimate because the discovery and court case came too late. That is an example of wholesale fraud.

A candidate lying about his address or his qualifications is still retail fraud, and much easier to discover and remedy, at least in my opinion.

Please provide a "credible" link to support your claims.
Do your own search - it only takes a few well chosen search terms.


Right wing fearmongering?

A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.
New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations
 
nailed it big time ... great response
You two are retards...
5-26-11tax-f1.jpg




July 30, 2012


Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years

  • The average tax cut that people making over $1 million received exceeded $110,000 in each of the last nine years — for a total of more than $1 million over this period.
  • The tax cuts made the tax system less progressive.
Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


CBO: Bush Tax Cuts Responsible For Almost A Third Of Deficit In Last 10 Years (2001-2010)




TOP 1% GOT 30% OF BUSH TAX CUTS, TOP 20% RECEIVED 74% OF BENEFITS


Benefited the wealthy: By any measure, the Bush tax cuts have benefited the wealthy more than the middle class.

image-3.jpg


The legacy of the Bush tax cuts in four charts - The Washington Post



EFFECTIVE TAX RATE HISTORY




25-chart-taxmageddon.w529.h427.2x.gif
Dumb ass retard thinks the rich used to pay a 71% tax rate. Dumb ass retard also thinks a 20% tax cut for the rich is bigger than a 20% reduction for the poor. Why? Because he's a dumb ass retard.

THINKS? FACT BUBBA

ONCE MORE

wealth-graphic2.jpg
^idiot does not know how to read a chart.

EFFECTIVE tax rates for the top 0.01 (1/10th of 1%) went fro above 70% to 30% Bubba, lol


GROW A FUKKING BRAIN
 
You two are retards...
5-26-11tax-f1.jpg




July 30, 2012


Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years

  • The average tax cut that people making over $1 million received exceeded $110,000 in each of the last nine years — for a total of more than $1 million over this period.
  • The tax cuts made the tax system less progressive.
Bush Tax Cuts Have Provided Extremely Large Benefits to Wealthiest Americans Over Last Nine Years mdash Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


CBO: Bush Tax Cuts Responsible For Almost A Third Of Deficit In Last 10 Years (2001-2010)




TOP 1% GOT 30% OF BUSH TAX CUTS, TOP 20% RECEIVED 74% OF BENEFITS


Benefited the wealthy: By any measure, the Bush tax cuts have benefited the wealthy more than the middle class.

image-3.jpg


The legacy of the Bush tax cuts in four charts - The Washington Post



EFFECTIVE TAX RATE HISTORY




25-chart-taxmageddon.w529.h427.2x.gif
Dumb ass retard thinks the rich used to pay a 71% tax rate. Dumb ass retard also thinks a 20% tax cut for the rich is bigger than a 20% reduction for the poor. Why? Because he's a dumb ass retard.

THINKS? FACT BUBBA

ONCE MORE

wealth-graphic2.jpg
^idiot does not know how to read a chart.

EFFECTIVE tax rates for the top 0.01 (1/10th of 1%) went fro above 70% to 30% Bubba, lol


GROW A FUKKING BRAIN
Hey DUMB ASS.. THE LINE ACROSS THE BOTTOM IS BY YEAR.
 

So you conflate ELECTION REGISTRATION fraud with actual election fraud? lol



Fraudulent registration is election fraud.
Oh aren't you the rocket scientist ... repub-lie-can push this kind of stupidity to justify their rants ... so how many did those Fraudulent registration cast a vote Mudpacker???? that would be a big fat goose egg
We've been discovering a shitload of them, two years after the election of course. By the time they discover the crime it's always too late billycock.
:fu:
 
Dad2three
Right wing fearmongering?
A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.
New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations

It happens a lot and it's ubiquitous:

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_19098003
Former Indiana governor: Not my signature on Obama petition

" - SOUTH BEND, Ind. (AP) — Former Gov. Joe Kernan says a signature on a petition to place Barack Obama's name on Indiana's 2008 primary ballot isn't his, putting him among dozens of dubious signatures found in a newspaper's investigation.

Kernan, a Democrat who campaigned for Hillary Clinton during the 2008 primary, told the South Bend Tribune that he didn't sign the Obama document.

"No, not at all," the former South Bend mayor said when asked whether the signature next to his name on the Obama petition looked like his own. "Nor does the printing look like mine."

The Tribune reported Wednesday that it has talked with more than 40 people who say they didn't sign ballot petitions submitted in St. Joseph County for Obama or Clinton, despite their names appearing on the documents.

The Tribune first reported Sunday that it and the Howey Politics Indiana newsletter had found pages from Clinton and Obama petitions with names and signatures that appear to have been copied by hand from a petition for 2008 Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Jim Schellinger.

The petitions were filed with the Indiana Election Division after the St. Joseph County Voter Registration Office verified individuals' information on the documents. - "



In this case either the primary support didn't exist or it was done to save the expenditure of effort which the Republican candidates had to expend. It also produces public cynicism and a loss of confidence in the system acting as a voter suppression strategy as in "why bother, they're just going to steal the election anyway?"

Primary elections are where candidates become general election candidates and far fewer people vote meaning that fewer false votes have an outsized influence.

Those are 40 signatures on a petition in which only 500 signatures are required to get on the primary ballot.
 
Last edited:
Dad2three
Right wing fearmongering?
A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.
New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations

It happens a lot and its ubiquitous:

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_19098003
Former Indiana governor: Not my signature on Obama petition

" - SOUTH BEND, Ind. (AP) — Former Gov. Joe Kernan says a signature on a petition to place Barack Obama's name on Indiana's 2008 primary ballot isn't his, putting him among dozens of dubious signatures found in a newspaper's investigation.

Kernan, a Democrat who campaigned for Hillary Clinton during the 2008 primary, told the South Bend Tribune that he didn't sign the Obama document.

"No, not at all," the former South Bend mayor said when asked whether the signature next to his name on the Obama petition looked like his own. "Nor does the printing look like mine."

The Tribune reported Wednesday that it has talked with more than 40 people who say they didn't sign ballot petitions submitted in St. Joseph County for Obama or Clinton, despite their names appearing on the documents.

The Tribune first reported Sunday that it and the Howey Politics Indiana newsletter had found pages from Clinton and Obama petitions with names and signatures that appear to have been copied by hand from a petition for 2008 Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Jim Schellinger.

The petitions were filed with the Indiana Election Division after the St. Joseph County Voter Registration Office verified individuals' information on the documents. - "



In this case either the primary support didn't exist or it was done to save the expenditure of effort which the Republican candidates had to expend.

Primary elections are where candidates become general election candidates and far fewer people vote meaning that fewer false votes have an outsized influence.

Those are 40 signatures on a petition in which only 500 signatures are required to get on the primary ballot.

So you don't know what ELECTION fraud is and what type of election fraud voter ID's, the ONLY typo of 'restrictions' the GOP is currently pushing? lol


EVERY election time right wingers come up with this NONSENSE about an EPIDEMIC of fraud happening, yet after the elections and it's been proven top be BULLSHIT, THEY HAVE AMNESIA!!!



A lot of Republicans complain about voter fraud. Indiana Secretary of State Charlie White actually committed it

So long as you’re a Republican, you won’t spend any time in jail for voter fraud. And, if you’re Charlie White, Indiana’s lucky, now-former Republican secretary of state who received just one year of home detention for all of those crimes, you’ll likely be “elated,” just as White was after his sentencing hearing last week.

Voter fraud retires shameless GOP official - Salon.com



December 07, 2011

Conviction in GOP voter-suppression scheme

Paul E. Schurick, the 2010 campaign manager for former Maryland governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., was convicted Tuesday by a Baltimore jury of four counts stemming from a robocall that prosecutors said was intended to suppress the black vote.


Fortunately, other members of the former Republican governor’s team will also stand trial for their role.

Conviction in GOP voter-suppression scheme Political Animal The Washington Monthly


8 Kentucky Republicans Convicted Of Extortion, Vote Buying & Selling, Tampering With Voting Machines

Lexington KY local and state news by the Lexington Herald-Leader Kentucky.com
 
Dad2three
Right wing fearmongering?
A new nationwide analysis of 2,068 alleged election-fraud cases since 2000 shows that while fraud has occurred, the rate is infinitesimal, and in-person voter impersonation on Election Day, which prompted 37 state legislatures to enact or consider tough voter ID laws, is virtually non-existent.
New database of US voter fraud finds no evidence that photo ID laws are needed - Investigations

It happens a lot and it's ubiquitous:

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_19098003
Former Indiana governor: Not my signature on Obama petition

" - SOUTH BEND, Ind. (AP) — Former Gov. Joe Kernan says a signature on a petition to place Barack Obama's name on Indiana's 2008 primary ballot isn't his, putting him among dozens of dubious signatures found in a newspaper's investigation.

Kernan, a Democrat who campaigned for Hillary Clinton during the 2008 primary, told the South Bend Tribune that he didn't sign the Obama document.

"No, not at all," the former South Bend mayor said when asked whether the signature next to his name on the Obama petition looked like his own. "Nor does the printing look like mine."

The Tribune reported Wednesday that it has talked with more than 40 people who say they didn't sign ballot petitions submitted in St. Joseph County for Obama or Clinton, despite their names appearing on the documents.

The Tribune first reported Sunday that it and the Howey Politics Indiana newsletter had found pages from Clinton and Obama petitions with names and signatures that appear to have been copied by hand from a petition for 2008 Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Jim Schellinger.

The petitions were filed with the Indiana Election Division after the St. Joseph County Voter Registration Office verified individuals' information on the documents. - "



In this case either the primary support didn't exist or it was done to save the expenditure of effort which the Republican candidates had to expend. It also produces public cynicism and a loss of confidence in the system acting as a voter suppression strategy as in "why bother, they're just going to steal the election anyway?"

Primary elections are where candidates become general election candidates and far fewer people vote meaning that fewer false votes have an outsized influence.

Those are 40 signatures on a petition in which only 500 signatures are required to get on the primary ballot.


Officials found guilty in Obama, Clinton ballot petition fraud

Officials found guilty in Obama Clinton ballot petition fraud Fox News


NOT stopped with GOP VOTER SUPPRESSION ID REQUIREMENTS!!!
 

So you conflate ELECTION REGISTRATION fraud with actual election fraud? lol


Fraudulent registration is election fraud.
Oh aren't you the rocket scientist ... repub-lie-can push this kind of stupidity to justify their rants ... so how many did those Fraudulent registration cast a vote Mudpacker???? that would be a big fat goose egg
We've been discovering a shitload of them, two years after the election of course. By the time they discover the crime it's always too late billycock.
:fu:
registration his shit maybe you might educate your self:suck:

So you conflate ELECTION REGISTRATION fraud with actual election fraud? lol



Fraudulent registration is election fraud.
Oh aren't you the rocket scientist ... repub-lie-can push this kind of stupidity to justify their rants ... so how many did those Fraudulent registration cast a vote Mudpacker???? that would be a big fat goose egg
We've been discovering a shitload of them, two years after the election of course. By the time they discover the crime it's always too late billycock.
:fu:
it was never too late mudpacker ... these people who were convicted, mudpacker were people who registered voters illegally not people who voted illegally ...here's what morons like you don't get mudpacker ... registering a voter and voting are two different things... all of your supposedly illegalities are registration violations... registering a voter and actual voting are two different things... all of your supposedly illegals votes are are registration not actual people voting... we have never denied that Acorn had registered voters and were convicted for doing so... those registration were taken from a phone book... when Acorn turned those registrations the state had to prove if they could vote...if they couldn't vote there wasn't a issue... every one of those cases they convicted the people for registering a voter, not a person actually voting... all of you so-called proof and ladygunslnger were registration violation not people voting ... so call us when you both can prove somebody voted illegally and then we will take that one serious if you two took your lips off of boehner back side and actually show is some proof of illegal voting we wouldn't laugh at you:suck:
 
Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans: Pew Poll

So digging into your hate site, we find that the Pew Poll is really of members of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This means that virtually all medical doctors, pharmacologists, dentists, and engineers are excluded at the outset.

Essentially it is a poll of climate change advocates.

http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/528.pdf

I don't blame you, you're just a spambot - an artificial stupidity routine.

But Huffing Glue is again disseminating half-truths.
 

Forum List

Back
Top