Believing In A God Is Evil

[HUGGY]

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

And just how long have the Jews and the Jesus freaks been selling the god nonsense? 3000 years?

I don't know, but I'm not trying to sell you anything, so don't try to sell me anything. See how that works?

You...I believe it was you...asked for some proof about evolution. I maintain that if evolution is true that most if not all of the god references in the bibles go bye bye.

There are a handful of folks that believe that evolution can be true independent of whether a god exists or not. From what I can tell you are not among that group. You seem to believe that god made man in his image of course independent of all other life on this planet.

As far as "selling" you anything I am not sure what you mean. I am "selling" the idea that telling and passing on lies is wrong and therefor evil IMHO.

Since there is no factual supporting evidence that god exists I maintain that god as understood by most organized religion is a bald faced lie.

It is a lie to suggest that believing in a god causes no one harm.. That is clearly a lie as shown by the clerk that won't sign marriage licences for the homos. Now I suppose you will run with THAT saying I am a homo lover..and I quote the homos or some nonsense. Fact is that the homos ARE human beings and the clerk is causing them harm. At least she was until she got her dumb religious ass arrested.

You asked for proof about the evolution and against my common sensibilities I did a quick search and provided some pretty good, easy to digest 411.

AND did you offer any factual evidence that god exists? No..you just started crying about my thumbnail offering.

I'm beginning to think you are not capable of playing a straight game. You just WANT there to be a god and that's that. What YOU are selling is your own personal need that there be a god. I have no such need so I guess it's NO SALE.

Tell ya what, if you want to shorten your posts to comments, rather than speeches, I'll answer you. Let's do one thing at a time, ok? I don't wanna have to write a damn book just to answer one post.

Huggy's posts are historically rants without substance. Once in a blue moon he comes up with something valid, but it's very, very rare, and it's more of a chance occurrence rather than evidence of any ability on his part.

I get it. You don't like the topic. Thanks for chiming in with this helpful and informative reply.

 

[HUGGY]

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

She works on the mountain of information AKA "Firstly because I said so and secondly because you are a Poopy Head".

If those methods come up short there is always the third reason why she is always correct. That would be because liberal's murder millions of babies.

"Because God said so" can be inserted at any time as well. Me? I would be fascinated to hear these recordings.

 

[koshergrl]

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

She works on the mountain of information AKA "Firstly because I said so and secondly because you are a Poopy Head".

If those methods come up short there is always the third reason why she is always correct. That would be because liberal's murder millions of babies.

"Because God said so" can be inserted at any time as well. Me? I would be fascinated to hear these recordings.

If you were even casually acquainted with reality, it would make you more entertaining.

 

[HUGGY]

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

She works on the mountain of information AKA "Firstly because I said so and secondly because you are a Poopy Head".

If those methods come up short there is always the third reason why she is always correct. That would be because liberal's murder millions of babies.

"Because God said so" can be inserted at any time as well. Me? I would be fascinated to hear these recordings.

If you were even casually acquainted with reality, it would make you more entertaining.

Says the individual who bases her life and everything she believes, says and does on an ancient fantasy story.

I bet your dictionary is a hoot. Next to the word "fact" KG has covered the accepted definition with black marker and in the margin replaced it with "whatever KG believes it is".

 

[S.J.]

I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions.

I fully understand your THEORY and what you are trying to say happens, I'm simply pointing out that you have no proof. You keep insisting that your conclusion is proof, which in reality is nothing more than guessing. Thus, your frustration drives you to keep returning to your mantra of "you just don't understand" or "I gave you proof" when you actually did not prove a damn thing. Then you get pissed off because I don't accept your GUESSING as proof. You cannot, and will never be able to prove a process you claim takes millions of years. You would have to isolate different species and observe them over millions of years while you wait for them to transform into other species. Go ahead, we'll wait.

 

[koshergrl]

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

She works on the mountain of information AKA "Firstly because I said so and secondly because you are a Poopy Head".

If those methods come up short there is always the third reason why she is always correct. That would be because liberal's murder millions of babies.

"Because God said so" can be inserted at any time as well. Me? I would be fascinated to hear these recordings.

If you were even casually acquainted with reality, it would make you more entertaining.

Says the individual who bases her life and everything she believes, says and does on an ancient fantasy story.

I bet your dictionary is a hoot. Next to the word "fact" KG has covered the accepted definition with black marker and in the margin replaced it with "whatever KG believes it is".

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

I'm sorry, all I read is "I'm an idiot blah blah blah blah blah still an idiot blah blah blah blah oh and I have nothing to add to this conversation. Sincerely, twattera."

 

[HUGGY]

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

She works on the mountain of information AKA "Firstly because I said so and secondly because you are a Poopy Head".

If those methods come up short there is always the third reason why she is always correct. That would be because liberal's murder millions of babies.

"Because God said so" can be inserted at any time as well. Me? I would be fascinated to hear these recordings.

If you were even casually acquainted with reality, it would make you more entertaining.

Well you have me there. If I wanted a casual relationship with reality you would be the first I would ask how that works. Secondly I don't filter my acceptance of reality on if it entertains me. But if I regress to having the mind of a five year old I will give you a request on how that works also.

 

[BreezeWood]

In evolution a species does not give birth to another species.

.
Believing In A God Is Evil

no, but at the convergence one specimen will ... the process to "birth" is infinitely alterable as a progression through time with a cumulative objective and conclusion.

only at the Apex, purity as preordained by the Almighty may change occur.

.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Proof. We're looking for proof.

You have no desire to look at proof. That is why you dismiss everything without watching or reading it. You have clearly shown that you fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution. You're in no position to demand proof for anything when you simply dismiss it without even an attempt to understand or review the material.

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

And just how long have the Jews and the Jesus freaks been selling the god nonsense? 3000 years?

I don't know, but I'm not trying to sell you anything, so don't try to sell me anything. See how that works?

You...I believe it was you...asked for some proof about evolution. I maintain that if evolution is true that most if not all of the god references in the bibles go bye bye.

There are a handful of folks that believe that evolution can be true independent of whether a god exists or not. From what I can tell you are not among that group. You seem to believe that god made man in his image of course independent of all other life on this planet.

As far as "selling" you anything I am not sure what you mean. I am "selling" the idea that telling and passing on lies is wrong and therefor evil IMHO.

Since there is no factual supporting evidence that god exists I maintain that god as understood by most organized religion is a bald faced lie.

It is a lie to suggest that believing in a god causes no one harm.. That is clearly a lie as shown by the clerk that won't sign marriage licences for the homos. Now I suppose you will run with THAT saying I am a homo lover..and I quote the homos or some nonsense. Fact is that the homos ARE human beings and the clerk is causing them harm. At least she was until she got her dumb religious ass arrested.

You asked for proof about the evolution and against my common sensibilities I did a quick search and provided some pretty good, easy to digest 411.

AND did you offer any factual evidence that god exists? No..you just started crying about my thumbnail offering.

I'm beginning to think you are not capable of playing a straight game. You just WANT there to be a god and that's that. What YOU are selling is your own personal need that there be a god. I have no such need so I guess it's NO SALE.

While you only appear to be here to shout how you don't believe in a God at all so you can criticize the beliefs of others. While in turn when other issues happen people like you deny that you are targeting those same beliefs with progressive issues. Then you wonder why the liberals support for any specific candidate is being shredded at the seams? It's because your far left beliefs are dissuading the moderates from supporting them.

*****SMILE*****

 

[sealybobo]

If we can agree that lying is wrong and spreading a lie is wrong and therefore evil. Then we must conclude that believing in god and preaching the belief in god is wrong and clearly evil.

There are only truths and untruths. Truths have factual evidence to make truth self evident. Untruths are any variety of statements, beliefs or information passed on from one person to any other not supported by facts.

Religious people want to believe what they say is true. That does not relieve them of the consequences of telling or believing a lie if what they believe turns out to be untrue.

These people want to believe that they are good. Wanting to believe what you think and do just isn't good enough. Those ISIS Muslims believe they are doing good when they cut off the heads of non believers. They believe just as strongly as any Christian believes what they choose to believe.

I submit that those that want so dearly to believe in a god get busy and prove this or any god's factual existence is true or admit they have been lying to themselves and promoting a lie to others and in doing so continuing to promote a giant fraud on society. Fraud is wrong therefore evil.

My brother really believes. But then isn't he lying to himself?

Forgive them for they know not what they do.

I can't believe they believed moses when he said he talked to God. If they'd swallow that the rest is easy.

It's OK to think some creator must have created all this. I disagree but I get it. But don't tell me this very elaborate bs story that should be called out 4 words in. In the beginning God. Excuse me who?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

I understand your evolution 'theory'. It is only a theory.

You and the other atheist's haven't answered my question on what kick started the universe.

Does this mean I'm correct in assuming a miracle happened and that your big bang theory is just another creation theology?

It would seem so.

*****SMILE*****

 

[sealybobo]

Sort of like idiots who believe we evolved from apes?

Not just apes. All living things share an ancestor. See that tree? You're related. See that dog? You share an ancestor.

Your explanation is what? That a God made a million different Beatles? You don't think all birds share a common ancestor? You think a God made all the different birds individually? We've even proven our theories. Unless you can prove or show us that a God planted a duck, zebra, rhino, wolf, fox, sheep etc.

Your hypothesis is based on ignorant lies of old. The truth is so much better.

 

[sealybobo]

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

I understand your evolution 'theory'. It is only a theory.

You and the other atheist's haven't answered my question on what kick started the universe.

Does this mean I'm correct in assuming a miracle happened and that your big bang theory is just another creation theology?

It would seem so.

*****SMILE*****

The God hypothesis isn't even a theory. Certainly not a scientific one. It's complete bullshit.

 

[S.J.]

Sort of like idiots who believe we evolved from apes?

Not just apes. All living things share an ancestor. See that tree? You're related. See that dog? You share an ancestor.

Your explanation is what? That a God made a million different Beatles? You don't think all birds share a common ancestor? You think a God made all the different birds individually? We've even proven our theories. Unless you can prove or show us that a God planted a duck, zebra, rhino, wolf, fox, sheep etc.

Your hypothesis is based on ignorant lies of old. The truth is so much better.

Show us your proof.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

I understand your evolution 'theory'. It is only a theory.

You and the other atheist's haven't answered my question on what kick started the universe.

Does this mean I'm correct in assuming a miracle happened and that your big bang theory is just another creation theology?

It would seem so.

*****SMILE*****

The God hypothesis isn't even a theory. Certainly not a scientific one. It's complete bullshit.

Now that would depend on what a person believes God is all about now wouldn't it?

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[sealybobo]

It does come as a surprise to me as I really do believe you've read squat. This is demonstrated by the type of questions you ask and your responses. You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works. Now this is one video just over 3 minutes. Please watch and then maybe your question will be answered or maybe you would like to rephrase it.

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

I understand your evolution 'theory'. It is only a theory.

You and the other atheist's haven't answered my question on what kick started the universe.

Does this mean I'm correct in assuming a miracle happened and that your big bang theory is just another creation theology?

It would seem so.

*****SMILE*****

The God hypothesis isn't even a theory. Certainly not a scientific one. It's complete bullshit.

Now that would depend on what a person believes God is all about now wouldn't it?

*****CHUCKLE*****

No because at the core of the argument or debate is that something must have created all this. Athiest disagree because we lack evidence. Theist believe because they can't imagine any other way. That's it.

Everything else is bullshit. Heaven, hell, angels, devils and gods. All bullshit.

You believe the unbelievable without sufficient evidence and that I find unbelievable.

 

[S.J.]

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

I understand your evolution 'theory'. It is only a theory.

You and the other atheist's haven't answered my question on what kick started the universe.

Does this mean I'm correct in assuming a miracle happened and that your big bang theory is just another creation theology?

It would seem so.

*****SMILE*****

The God hypothesis isn't even a theory. Certainly not a scientific one. It's complete bullshit.

Now that would depend on what a person believes God is all about now wouldn't it?

*****CHUCKLE*****

No because at the core of the argument or debate is that something must have created all this. Athiest disagree because we lack evidence. Theist believe because they can't imagine any other way. That's it.

Everything else is bullshit. Heaven, hell, angels, devils and gods. All bullshit.

You believe the unbelievable without sufficient evidence and that I find unbelievable.

Sounds like you're describing one of your own. Where's your proof?

 

[HUGGY]

You have no desire to look at proof. That is why you dismiss everything without watching or reading it. You have clearly shown that you fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution. You're in no position to demand proof for anything when you simply dismiss it without even an attempt to understand or review the material.

This may come as a surprise to you but you're not the first person to try to sell this shit. I've read that crap before, many times, and I don't intend to invest any more time in reading the same old shit again. No one could prove anything then and no one can prove anything now, including you. You give the same answers everyone else gives who try to sell that theory as I stated earlier in this thread. You fail to provide proof so you resort to rhetorical comments like "You fail to recognize the basic concept of evolution". That's the kind of "proof" you guys give. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. When I read those claims of proof, I see a lot of speculation but the "proof" is always something like "Therefore, it appears that....." Proof would be showing documentation of a transition from one species to another, not two sets of bones that are similar. You can't do that, and we've seen NO examples of a transformation since science has been claiming it happens.
The bottom line here is that you believe strongly in your theory and you are willing to put your faith in it based on someone's speculation. That's fine if you want to believe it but until you have proof, REAL proof, you're just another atheist trying to convince others to be as gullible as you.

And just how long have the Jews and the Jesus freaks been selling the god nonsense? 3000 years?

I don't know, but I'm not trying to sell you anything, so don't try to sell me anything. See how that works?

You...I believe it was you...asked for some proof about evolution. I maintain that if evolution is true that most if not all of the god references in the bibles go bye bye.

There are a handful of folks that believe that evolution can be true independent of whether a god exists or not. From what I can tell you are not among that group. You seem to believe that god made man in his image of course independent of all other life on this planet.

As far as "selling" you anything I am not sure what you mean. I am "selling" the idea that telling and passing on lies is wrong and therefor evil IMHO.

Since there is no factual supporting evidence that god exists I maintain that god as understood by most organized religion is a bald faced lie.

It is a lie to suggest that believing in a god causes no one harm.. That is clearly a lie as shown by the clerk that won't sign marriage licences for the homos. Now I suppose you will run with THAT saying I am a homo lover..and I quote the homos or some nonsense. Fact is that the homos ARE human beings and the clerk is causing them harm. At least she was until she got her dumb religious ass arrested.

You asked for proof about the evolution and against my common sensibilities I did a quick search and provided some pretty good, easy to digest 411.

AND did you offer any factual evidence that god exists? No..you just started crying about my thumbnail offering.

I'm beginning to think you are not capable of playing a straight game. You just WANT there to be a god and that's that. What YOU are selling is your own personal need that there be a god. I have no such need so I guess it's NO SALE.

While you only appear to be here to shout how you don't believe in a God at all so you can criticize the beliefs of others. While in turn when other issues happen people like you deny that you are targeting those same beliefs with progressive issues. Then you wonder why the liberals support for any specific candidate is being shredded at the seams? It's because your far left beliefs are dissuading the moderates from supporting them.

*****SMILE*****

You have been on this MB for about 5 minutes and you just show up and "know my beliefs"?

In this vague and hate filled post it is you that has shown YOUR agenda which has NOTHING to do with me.

Here is a heads up for you Sparky. I have never voted democrat in the 66 years I've been on this earth.

As a typical RWer you ASSUME you know everything and actually you only know what you are told to know by people(The Kochs) that don't give a rat's ass about you. If you had done any research on MY posts you would know that I have never praised Hillary or Obama. I have defended the OFFICE of the presidency as I believe every American should. Disrespect for the highest office on the planet is ignorant as it only makes us as Americans appear that we don't want to stand up for our country in the eyes of others, the terrorist types, that gain boldness believing that we are soft and stupid.

I am an old school republican as far as political leanings. Eisenhower was the last republican president that wasn't a glorified used car salesman or an actor. I am embarrassed to admit that I voted for Bush's daddy and young George and look where that got us. Herbert Walker invaded Iraq under false premise but at least he had the sense to pull out before he had destroyed the whole country. Dumb ass "W" driven by the most evil Americans ever close to the oval office in Cheney and Rove damn near bankrupted the country and invaded two countries based on lies. So I will NEVER ..I repeat NEVER vote for a republican president again. That doesn't mean I lean left. It means that republicans have become vile and crazy demigods with stupid religious agendas and will take our country to war with hardly a scrap of an honest reason.

But you don't want to hear a voice of reason do you. You have already made up your mind ..or better put ..someone is using you and has made up your mind for you. You think you know who is a liberal and based on this non existent proof go off running at the mouth about how this person or that person is a "lefty" or a "liberal". You REALLY don't have a clue what you are talking about. Lucky you that the internet is a safe place to hide. Where I live you would have swallowed most of your teeth by now because that's what happens to a-holes that tell lies on others.

Have a good day.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

This made me laugh: " You keep asking for proof of a transition of one spieces into another but that is not how evolution works."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

First of all..it's spEcies.

But aside from that...you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof? But you maintain your faith in an unproven (and unprovable) theory is somehow *different* and *more scientific-y*????

Anyway, when you're going to call other people ignorant, you might want to proof read your own retardism a little better.

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

I understand your evolution 'theory'. It is only a theory.

You and the other atheist's haven't answered my question on what kick started the universe.

Does this mean I'm correct in assuming a miracle happened and that your big bang theory is just another creation theology?

It would seem so.

*****SMILE*****

The God hypothesis isn't even a theory. Certainly not a scientific one. It's complete bullshit.

Now that would depend on what a person believes God is all about now wouldn't it?

*****CHUCKLE*****

No because at the core of the argument or debate is that something must have created all this. Athiest disagree because we lack evidence. Theist believe because they can't imagine any other way. That's it.

Everything else is bullshit. Heaven, hell, angels, devils and gods. All bullshit.

You believe the unbelievable without sufficient evidence and that I find unbelievable.

I have all the proof I need that God exists.

You on the other hand simply have another creation theology provided by your alter of scientific knowledge.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[sealybobo]

Get a load of this. This person seems to think to refute my point that finding a spelling mistake is all it takes and then they go on to insert a non word "scientific-y". I presented proof. Proof that you creationist retards can't even read, watch or acknowledge. Until anything I posted is addressed were done. The whole lot of you are the biggest cowards going. You clutch on to beliefs that require zero evidence (which is why it is called faith) and in turn demand proof or evidence of evolutuion which there are mountains of it. When it is actually presented in written form like is post # 25 or in the form of a video in posts # 29 & 90, not one person even attempts to read or watch this information, let alone refute or dispute it. None of you people are even looking for the truth. You cling on to your beliefs and will cry fowl at every corner without even reading, watching or comprehending anything that is presented to you. Creationists are the most dishonest people and they know it.

Now I know you could only come back with a spelling error and a strawman Koshergirl, I wouldn't expect anything more out of you, I think you would give us all heart attacks if you actually addressed the issues that were presented. You claimed "you do realize that Christians say the same thing when asked for proof?" but give no examples. You need to clarify what it is you are talking about. I pointed out that SJ clearly does not understand how evolution works by his example of questions. He says he has heard or read it all before but this is not true because his line of questioning has nothing to do with what evolution claims. In evolution a species does not give birth to another species. This is explained in full detail in both videos but creationists are unwilling to put themselves in a position where they can actually learn something. It's better to cry foul at something you haven't read or watched than to actually refute actual information.

I understand your evolution 'theory'. It is only a theory.

You and the other atheist's haven't answered my question on what kick started the universe.

Does this mean I'm correct in assuming a miracle happened and that your big bang theory is just another creation theology?

It would seem so.

*****SMILE*****

The God hypothesis isn't even a theory. Certainly not a scientific one. It's complete bullshit.

Now that would depend on what a person believes God is all about now wouldn't it?

*****CHUCKLE*****

No because at the core of the argument or debate is that something must have created all this. Athiest disagree because we lack evidence. Theist believe because they can't imagine any other way. That's it.

Everything else is bullshit. Heaven, hell, angels, devils and gods. All bullshit.

You believe the unbelievable without sufficient evidence and that I find unbelievable.

Sounds like you're describing one of your own. Where's your proof?

Of what? Something that isn't there?

We're right back to where we were before moses supposedly talked to God. Before he came down with that lie some people believed. Moses' encounter just confirmed their belief. Soon they had a thick book to read full of fascinating stuff.