A True Homosexual Has Never Been Born

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Terral, Mar 5, 2009.

  1. Terral
    Offline

    Terral Terral Corp CEO

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,490
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +91
    Greetings to All:

    My goal in this post is to use the New American Standard Bible, Vine’s Expository Dictionary of NT Words, Holman’s Exhaustive Concordance and Webster’s Online Dictionary to prove that a true ‘homosexual’ has never been born. The whole ‘Gay Rights’ debate is argument over a myth.

    Paul says,

    The King James Bible and Vine’s Expository Dictionary of NT Words cannot help us in defining the Biblical Greek terms for the word Homosexual. That term simply does not appear in the Text. The Lockman Scholars did inaccurately translate one Greek word into ‘homosexual.’ The Greek word is “arsenokoites” (#733a). This word is created from the joining of two Greek words “arsen” (#730) meaning “a man,” and “koite” (#2845) meaning “a bed.” The literal translation here is a ‘bed man.’ The NASB says,

    The NKJV says,

    Both of these translations are actually paraphrased attempts at interpreting the Greek for you, instead of being an actual literal translation. But, we can gain a proper understanding from both. The important thing to note is that they are describing people by their behavior. For the record, Paul kicks off his most widely read New Testament Epistle by talking about this behavior, saying,

    Paul closes his discourse on this topic by saying,

    Once again, the Apostle Paul is describing people by their behavior, and not by the means in which they were originally born into the world. In fact, when 'they exchanged the truth for a lie,' then God gave them over so that their women 'exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural.' And herein rests the key to unlock 'the truth' of this homosexuality matter. Holy Scripture gives us descriptions of people who have exchanged something natural for something unnatural. Let us go to Webster’s dictionary, as a neutral secular source, and work through a short word study on three related words. Then we can draw some conclusions from the true definition of those terms.

    The three words in our study are: Heterosexual, Asexual and Homosexual which all have ‘sex’ as the root of the word. The source is Merriam-Webster Online:

    Sex >> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/sex

    The first (1) definition defines female or male as these two individual forms. Therefore, by definition every person alive today is either female or male. The second (2) definition includes the specific characteristics of living things by their ability to reproduce. So parents reproduce either females or males of our species. Definition three (3a) pertains to the phenomena or behavior of ‘sex,’ as in “having sex.” This definition is restricted in its scope by definitions (1) and (2), where ‘sex’ is a behavioral characteristic involved in reproduction of the species. And (3b) is the ‘act’ of having ‘sex,’ again, about reproduction. The final (4) definition pertains to the sex organs; again, of the male and female of the species from the definitions above.

    Heterosexual >> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/heterosexual

    This primitive definition of our prefix (heter) means ‘different,’ or ‘other.’ Add the suffix (ual) and we have a word that describes people of different sexes (male and female) according to their ability to reproduce. Thus Hetero-Sex-ual.

    Asexual >> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/asexual

    Here again, the ‘sex’ part of the word causes the definition to include “reproducing by reproductive processes . . .” Both Heterosexual and Asexual organisms are defined by how they reproduce. That is the common trait of both words that contain the root ‘sex.’

    Homosexual >> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/homosexual

    Right here is where the dictionary fails to hold to the rules of grammar. As defined above, the root ‘sex’ appears to signify a means of reproduction. The word homosexual here is void of such language. In fact, these words ‘sexual desire’ are wrongly used to describe this behavior. Homosexual activities do not involve reproductive processes. This word does not accurately define anyone according to their ‘sex.’ Homosexual is not an accurate scientific term that describes any living thing on this planet. The joining of two sperm cells or female eggs will never produce a ‘homosexual’ male or female. By definition it is impossible for two people of the same sex to have ‘sexual intercourse.’ Instead, every living person on this planet is either a heterosexual male, or a heterosexual female by definition. They can call themselves homosexual males and females in the same way that people call themselves all sorts of things. The problem is that being male and female places them solidly within the heterosexual group.

    This point becomes plainly obvious, when we consider that ‘reproduction’ creates copies/duplicates of the male and female parents. Every single person born naturally on this planet is the product of one heterosexual male and one heterosexual female. Therefore, every person ever born is a duplicate/copy/facsimile of their heterosexual parents. Therefore, according to the definition of the terms, a true homosexual male or female has never been born.

    In Christ Jesus,

    Terral
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2009
  2. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    You know King James was gay don't you? :lol:
     
  3. Terral
    Offline

    Terral Terral Corp CEO

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,490
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +91
    Hi Diuretic:

    That is funny!

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    However, I am willing to bet the house that King James had exactly one heterosexual father and exactly one heterosexual mother, just like everybody here and everyone ever born naturally on God’s Green Earth. Would you like to bet otherwise?

    The difference is that professing ‘homosexuals’ can change their ‘sexual orientation’ back and forth every day of the week and twice on Sunday if that makes them feel all warm and fuzzy inside. However, nobody here can change the ‘sex’ with which THEY WERE BORN. Of course people ‘can’ play with the plumbing to represent themselves as either sex, but we are talking about the sex (male or female = excepting hermaphrodites of course) that they carried out of the womb. Please take a good look around and tell everyone here just how many of your professing ‘Gay’ friends have anything other than exactly one heterosexual male father and exactly one heterosexual female mother? I do believe the answer from everyone is ZERO. :0)

    Why? That is easy and thank you for asking: A True Homosexual Has Never Been Born.

    GL,

    Terral
     
  4. Amanda
    Offline

    Amanda Calm as a Hindu cow

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,426
    Thanks Received:
    1,005
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,006
    O.m.g.
     
  5. GHook93
    Offline

    GHook93 Aristotle

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    17,921
    Thanks Received:
    3,126
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +4,932
    Have you ever had a homo as a friend? I have and its eye-opening. They are genetically program to like men. You can bump your bible folklore all you want, but in the end you will find that you are wrong!

    A 9/11 truther also! So you doubly suck!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2009
  6. LiveUninhibited
    Offline

    LiveUninhibited Caffeine Junkie

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Messages:
    503
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +62
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og2EILBl3gE]YouTube - Speak English!!![/ame]
     
  7. Coloradomtnman
    Offline

    Coloradomtnman Rational and proud of it.

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,311
    Thanks Received:
    863
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    Denver
    Ratings:
    +1,495
    Using the Bible and some dictionaries to argue REALITY. Now there's a persuasive argument.

    Go back to bible school and pray that God takes you to Heaven soon, because reality is obviously too much for you.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Terral
    Offline

    Terral Terral Corp CEO

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,490
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +91
    Hi Amanda, GHook, LiveUninhibited and Colorado:

    [​IMG] [​IMG] [​IMG]

    If you guys will put down the stones for one minute: Do any of you have one argument against anything presented in the Opening Post of this thread? :0) No. Do any of you guys know one person who is the product of one homosexual male and another homosexual male born naturally somewhere on God’s Green Earth? Do any of you guys know even one person with one homosexual female father and one homosexual female mother? No? Welcome to the club, because all of my hair is gray and I have been around for some time and have never seen anything like that either. :0)

    GL,

    Terral
     
  9. Coloradomtnman
    Offline

    Coloradomtnman Rational and proud of it.

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2008
    Messages:
    4,311
    Thanks Received:
    863
    Trophy Points:
    200
    Location:
    Denver
    Ratings:
    +1,495
    Okay. I've never met someone who was born from homosexual parents, but with the advent of sperm banks and artificial insemination, I'm sure it can happen. Just because I haven't met one, doesn't mean they don't exist.

    And, I don't think that quotes from the Bible are valid arguments. I'm an adherent of observable and testable proofs, not quotes of an ancient book of Jewish myths.

    So, there's your rebuttal.
     
  10. Amanda
    Offline

    Amanda Calm as a Hindu cow

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    4,426
    Thanks Received:
    1,005
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,006
    I said OMG because you obviously spent a lot of time putting that together and it's... well... pointless.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 4

Share This Page