Terral
Terral Corp CEO
- Mar 4, 2009
- 2,493
- 92
- 83
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
Hi Uninhibited:
Homosexual rights? Men and women citizens of the USA have rights granted under the U.S. Constitution whether they call themselves heterosexuals or homosexuals or the man in the moon. The idea that you need or deserve special ‘homosexual rights’ (sick), as a reward for playing house with Jack instead of Jane, is nothing but utter stupidity and nonsense.
Wonderful. No you are going to question me to death . . . A true homosexual has never been born. You have many heterosexual males and many heterosexual females in denial of their ‘sexuality’ with which 'they were' born . . .
The point is that ‘sex’ pertains to reproduction of the species and ‘homosexual’ is an oxymoron having nothing to do with ‘sex’ at all. Perhaps your use of terms is more proper that characterizes gay folks as ‘homo-lust-uals.’ :0)
There are no contradictions in God’s Living Word, but men invent seeming contradictions every day through their errant misinterpretations. The OP third-party resources are sufficient for making the case that “No True Homosexual Has Ever Been Born” naturally from two homosexual males or two homosexual females in denial of their own ‘sexuality.’
Superior has nothing to do with anything. One heterosexual ‘or’ homosexual male hooks up with one heterosexual ‘or’ homosexual female to ‘naturally produce’ heterosexual offspring. Suppose the child is named “Jack” and he is placed among all the other babies born that day in the maternity ward. You approach the window and see little Jack in his little baby bed with a big fat smile on his face. Are you looking at a heterosexual male or a homosexual? :0)
So much for your line-by-line rebuttal . . . Homosexuality is another oxymoron term used to describe a person by ‘his indecent behavior’ in direct conflict with the ‘sex’ with which he or she was born. Everybody here was born either a heterosexual male OR a heterosexual female, unless you have both sets of plumbing. You can call yourself an Arabian Stallion or one of The Three Stooges, but I will bet the house that you are either a heterosexual male or a heterosexual female . . .
Homosexuality has nothing to do with ‘sex’ like heterosexuality or Asexuality where species reproduce copies of their own kind. Of course a professing homosexual male or homosexual female can also reproduce naturally with a member of the opposite sex, so long as all of the plumbing remains intact. Why? That is simple: Because they are really heterosexual males and heterosexual females only in denial of their true sexuality . . .
Lord-Have-Mercy . . . Thank you very much, but your uninhibited and under-moderated writing style is just a bit too much for a bible thumper like me.
GL,
Terral
Homosexual rights? Men and women citizens of the USA have rights granted under the U.S. Constitution whether they call themselves heterosexuals or homosexuals or the man in the moon. The idea that you need or deserve special ‘homosexual rights’ (sick), as a reward for playing house with Jack instead of Jane, is nothing but utter stupidity and nonsense.
Wonderful. No you are going to question me to death . . . A true homosexual has never been born. You have many heterosexual males and many heterosexual females in denial of their ‘sexuality’ with which 'they were' born . . .
The point is that ‘sex’ pertains to reproduction of the species and ‘homosexual’ is an oxymoron having nothing to do with ‘sex’ at all. Perhaps your use of terms is more proper that characterizes gay folks as ‘homo-lust-uals.’ :0)
There are no contradictions in God’s Living Word, but men invent seeming contradictions every day through their errant misinterpretations. The OP third-party resources are sufficient for making the case that “No True Homosexual Has Ever Been Born” naturally from two homosexual males or two homosexual females in denial of their own ‘sexuality.’
Superior has nothing to do with anything. One heterosexual ‘or’ homosexual male hooks up with one heterosexual ‘or’ homosexual female to ‘naturally produce’ heterosexual offspring. Suppose the child is named “Jack” and he is placed among all the other babies born that day in the maternity ward. You approach the window and see little Jack in his little baby bed with a big fat smile on his face. Are you looking at a heterosexual male or a homosexual? :0)
LOL. You're trying to define homosexuality out of existence?! That's hilarious! I tried to take your post seriously but I just can't.
So much for your line-by-line rebuttal . . . Homosexuality is another oxymoron term used to describe a person by ‘his indecent behavior’ in direct conflict with the ‘sex’ with which he or she was born. Everybody here was born either a heterosexual male OR a heterosexual female, unless you have both sets of plumbing. You can call yourself an Arabian Stallion or one of The Three Stooges, but I will bet the house that you are either a heterosexual male or a heterosexual female . . .
You mean language isn't perfectly precise? What an amazing discovery!
Homosexuality has nothing to do with ‘sex’ like heterosexuality or Asexuality where species reproduce copies of their own kind. Of course a professing homosexual male or homosexual female can also reproduce naturally with a member of the opposite sex, so long as all of the plumbing remains intact. Why? That is simple: Because they are really heterosexual males and heterosexual females only in denial of their true sexuality . . .
So a woman giving a man a blowjob isn't sexual. A man fucking a woman in the ass isn't sexual. Sex that doesnt lead to babies isn't sex. You can't be serious.
Lord-Have-Mercy . . . Thank you very much, but your uninhibited and under-moderated writing style is just a bit too much for a bible thumper like me.
GL,
Terral
Last edited:
Half-gay?
