A "jury" of one.....Barr did what he was hired by Trump to do....

[impuretrash]

If you don't like Barr's summary just wait until the report is declassified. ..and when it fails to satisfy your partisan bloodlust, just say the redacted parts are hiding proof of collusion. Easy peasy.

 

[kyzr]

He actually said that he would "release as much as he could".

Do you think the entire report should be Released?

Trump said its Barr's call. I'll say its Barr's call. During his interview Barr said that he would release as much as possible.
Personally I would not release the report because the LAW says I don't have to.
The fucking dems don't deserve to see how their coup attempt played out.

Trump can cover up the report

It will only make it appear he is hiding something. If the report is as good as Barr said...why can’t we see it?

1. Trump has nothing to do with the report, its Barr's.
2. No collusion and no obstruction, means that there is nothing to hide.
3. The LAW says that the AG presents a summary, if you want the report next time change the law. (Hint: if its not indictable you don't say anything)

Sure he does

If Trump wants it released, it will be released

No collusion or obstruction means nothing meeting criminal thresholds. We can only assume the rest

Barr said he would release the report. If hi meant a personal summary, he should have said that at his confirmation

At his confirmation he said that "he would release as much as he could". So its up to Barr's interpretation.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Sure he does

If Trump wants it released, it will be released

No collusion or obstruction means nothing meeting criminal thresholds. We can only assume the rest

Barr said he would release the report. If hi meant a personal summary, he should have said that at his confirmation

Both Mueller and Barr (and perhaps even Rosenstein) will have to face 2 or 3 House committees....under oath.
Whether such testimony will happen before or after the FULL report is released (or leaked) is still a sticking point.

They will also face senate investigations on a fraud investigation

The men of America have already made their judgement

The deep state guilty of high treason

Who is that group that makes that judgment

It's the group that always wins

The MEN

 

[GreenAndBlue]

The men's different judgment than women's will stop the women's judgements that elects crooks that destroys the nation

Men will rise up and stop all of this harm like always

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Barr has flipped rosenstein to go after the whole deep state crooks

And mueller who is guilty of high treason with the men of America

 

[harmonica]

STILL crying nat??

 

[rightwinger]

I'm sure NY is watching.

Yep.........Based on his long and corrupt business history, almost every New Yorker hates the clown's guts.

Which is why he won the ny primary with overwhelming support

He won the primary with about 25% support

President of the United States Donald J. Trump. It’s not hard to be Democrats in a free and fair election. They are kooks.

Not overwhelming was it?

 

[rightwinger]

Do you think the entire report should be Released?

Trump said its Barr's call. I'll say its Barr's call. During his interview Barr said that he would release as much as possible.
Personally I would not release the report because the LAW says I don't have to.
The fucking dems don't deserve to see how their coup attempt played out.

Trump can cover up the report

It will only make it appear he is hiding something. If the report is as good as Barr said...why can’t we see it?

1. Trump has nothing to do with the report, its Barr's.
2. No collusion and no obstruction, means that there is nothing to hide.
3. The LAW says that the AG presents a summary, if you want the report next time change the law. (Hint: if its not indictable you don't say anything)

Sure he does

If Trump wants it released, it will be released

No collusion or obstruction means nothing meeting criminal thresholds. We can only assume the rest

Barr said he would release the report. If hi meant a personal summary, he should have said that at his confirmation

At his confirmation he said that "he would release as much as he could". So its up to Barr's interpretation.

The House voted unanimously that the report should be released to the public

Why are Republicans changing their mind. If the report exhonorates the President, wouldn’t they want everyone to see it?

 

[imawhosure]

To Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice.....

Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe.

Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees.

The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump?

Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers:

a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr???

OR

b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction??

Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....

(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol)

Then explain why the signer of the last FISA warrant (Rosenstein) agree on the findings?

You people are screwed, you really are, and all your spinning is laughable, but predicted-)

 

[nat4900]

Then explain why the signer of the last FISA warrant (Rosenstein) agree on the findings?

Switching to Rosenstein and pretending to know what he said???...........The fucking FISA bullshit has been found to be WHOLLY legal.....Carter Page was being recruited by Russian spies (your new friends.)

Stick to the thread's topic....

 

[imawhosure]

To Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice.....

Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe.

Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees.

The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump?

Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers:

a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr???

OR

b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction??

Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....

(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol)

Then explain why the signer of the last FISA warrant (Rosenstein) agree on the findings?

You people are screwed, you really are, and all your spinning is laughable, but predicted-)

Laugh all you want Nat, because very soon, we are going to be laughing even harder at you!

 

[Mike473]

I don't blame people here for having a hard time accepting the truth. The media has pushed the Russia propaganda hard. So, hard it is difficult to reconcile how they could report on treason and Russian collusion every day, all day, and yet it not be true.

Denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. It is going to take a while for people to get over this.

 

[imawhosure]

Then explain why the signer of the last FISA warrant (Rosenstein) agree on the findings?

Switching to Rosenstein and pretending to know what he said???...........The fucking FISA bullshit has been found to be WHOLLY legal.....Carter Page was being recruited by Russian spies (your new friends.)

Stick to the thread's topic....

STFU clown! Has Paige been indicted for anything? Has he even been interrogated on more than 1 occasion. You phony people are going to take a bath very soon thanks to Mueller ending the probe, and I am PERSONALLY going to come here and chase you across this board, laughing the whole time, you damn HOAXSTER-)

 

[Olde Europe]

Then explain why the signer of the last FISA warrant (Rosenstein) agree on the findings?

You people are screwed, you really are, and all your spinning is laughable, but predicted-)

To what extent Rosenstein agreed with the findings in the Mueller report you patently do not know. His signing of the FISA warrant has plainly nothing to do with his agreement (or none) with the findings.

But yea, you laughing about "spinning" is definitely funny.

 

[nat4900]

Paige been indicted for anything?

Moron......,Page was instrumental in sending one Russian spy to prison and the other had to sneak out of the country back to Russia.....He helped the FBI....THAT is why he wasn't indicted......STOP listening to Hannity.

 

[kyzr]

Trump said its Barr's call. I'll say its Barr's call. During his interview Barr said that he would release as much as possible.
Personally I would not release the report because the LAW says I don't have to.
The fucking dems don't deserve to see how their coup attempt played out.

Trump can cover up the report

It will only make it appear he is hiding something. If the report is as good as Barr said...why can’t we see it?

1. Trump has nothing to do with the report, its Barr's.
2. No collusion and no obstruction, means that there is nothing to hide.
3. The LAW says that the AG presents a summary, if you want the report next time change the law. (Hint: if its not indictable you don't say anything)

Sure he does

If Trump wants it released, it will be released

No collusion or obstruction means nothing meeting criminal thresholds. We can only assume the rest

Barr said he would release the report. If hi meant a personal summary, he should have said that at his confirmation

At his confirmation he said that "he would release as much as he could". So its up to Barr's interpretation.

The House voted unanimously that the report should be released to the public

Why are Republicans changing their mind. If the report exonerates the President, wouldn’t they want everyone to see it?

The LAW is the LAW. The law says what the law says. Whining about it is just whining.
If Barr doesn't follow the Law as written take it to court, otherwise stop fucking whining.
Right now Trump won and the game is over. If the House wants to take it to court, go for it.
No collusion, no obstruction, game over.

 

[nat4900]

No collusion, no obstruction, game over.

Hey, not my place to fix fucked up stupidity and cult devotion.......Go have an enema.

 

[miketx]

The Republicans investigated Bill Clinton for five years, starting with an investigation into some real estate investments by the Clintons.

When that didn't pan out, the investigation moved on to looking into the firing of White House Travel Office personnel.

When that didn't pan out, the investigation moved on to looking into the suicide of Vince Foster. That didn't pan out, either.

But the Republicans kept going and going. They refused to quit.

And then, finally, they nailed Bill Clinton for lying about a blowjob.

The Republicans never gave up. FIVE YEARS. They kept going until they finally nailed their man.

And did the Republicans suffer for this?

Nope. They acquired the House, the Senate, and the White House for all their hard work.



You can just smell the karma coming, can't you?

No what we smell is that we don't have a government as full of criminals as we did then. People are going to get into trouble over this, and it doesn't matter what Clinton did or Obama, this crap is way over board. And you know what else, all these crimes were supported by scum such as yourself.

 

[toobfreak]

A "jury" of one.....Barr did what he was hired by Trump to do....

Here it comes folks, another snowflake rationalization bitter disappointment thread . . . .
It's not like we all didn't see this one coming . . . .
View attachment 252173 View attachment 252174 View attachment 252175
View attachment 252176 View attachment 252177 View attachment 252178

Above an example of just how far up Trump'ass some of his cultists are happy to be in.....LMAO

Do us all a favor Nat and show us how a Leftist Baby Snowflake can really cry! Oh No! Mueller didn't find that Trump used Russians to steal the election! WHAAAAAAAA!
That means once again that Hillary lost to a guy with ZERO experience in politics to a career politician! WHAAAAAAAA! And I bet you bought a dozen copies of Hillary's book "What I Want You To Think Really Happened!: WHAAAAAAA!

 

[leftwinger]

A "jury" of one.....Barr did what he was hired by Trump to do....

Here it comes folks, another snowflake rationalization bitter disappointment thread . . . .

It's not like we all didn't see this one coming . . . .

View attachment 252173 View attachment 252174 View attachment 252175
View attachment 252176 View attachment 252177 View attachment 252178

Above an example of just how far up Trump'ass some of his cultists are happy to be in.....LMAO

Nat, if Barr was lying...don't you think Mule and 19 Dems would be saying "wait a minute, that is not what the report says"

Also Rosie was in on the review and letter. He would never agree to say "no collusion" unless nothing is there.