M14 Shooter
The Light of Truth
No one thought the left would accept the Mueller report unless it confirmed their narrative - and they're proving us correct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still waiting to see the report
Barr was not hired to give his version of it. He said he would be transparent
Howlong you plan on crying and living a delusionTo Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice.....
Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe.
Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees.
The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump?
Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers:
a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr???
OR
b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction??
Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....
(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol)
Mueller did not say that there was no obstruction. Let that sink in.NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
Did that sink in yet?
Still waiting to see the report
Barr was not hired to give his version of it. He said he would be transparent
He actually said that he would "release as much as he could".
Mueller did not say that there was no obstruction. Let that sink in.NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
Did that sink in yet?
Mueller did not say that there was no obstruction. Let that sink in.NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
Did that sink in yet?
Still waiting to see the report
Barr was not hired to give his version of it. He said he would be transparent
He actually said that he would "release as much as he could".
Do you think the entire report should be Released?
Tax returns? Hell, you're still waiting for hope and change.Reminds me if the Trump Tax Returns we were promised
Here it comes folks, another snowflake rationalization bitter disappointment thread . . . .A "jury" of one.....Barr did what he was hired by Trump to do....
It's not like we all didn't see this one coming . . . .
View attachment 252173 View attachment 252174 View attachment 252175
View attachment 252176 View attachment 252177 View attachment 252178
Why are you angered by the very very real possibility that Trump did not conspire with the Russians or commit obstruction?Above an example of just how far up Trump'ass some of his cultists are happy to be in.....LMAO
Mueller and an entire DOJ team reviewed the obstruction points for over three weeks and all of them concluded nothing rose to the charge of obstruction.
Call for objectivity from someone who is not.To Barr's credit, he DID state in his little letter that Mueller could NOT determine whether Trump was exonerated from the charge of obstructing justice.....
Since Trump openly (ans stupidly) stated to the Russian ambassador that he fired Comey because of the Russian probe.....and since Trump openly stated to Lester Holt that he wanted Comey gone because of that same on-going Russian probe.........Trump HIMSELF prompted a special counsel probe.
Now, based on Barr's memo as a private citizen that he felt that Trump should never have been investigated as a a president (which was basically a letter requesting Trump to appoint him as AG)....and based on the DOJ unofficial "policy" that a president is ABOVE the law, Barr WILL be called to testify before one or two House committees.
The questions that Barr will be asked will entail his "conclusion" that although Mueller openly stated that the president was NOT exonerated, WHY did Barr determine that there's no further need to investigate Trump?
Basically, based on Mueller's indecision on whether Trump did or did not obstruct justice, the questions for Barr will be interesting in how he answers:
a. Did Mueller hand off a final decision of Trump's obstruction to a jury of one; i.e., Barr???
OR
b. Did Mueller intend for Congress to be the ultimate "judge" on whether there WAS obstruction??
Of course, a close review of the entire Mueller report can best address the two above questions.....
(Go at it, Trump cultists.......but please try some objectivity.....lol)
Mueller and an entire DOJ team reviewed the obstruction points for over three weeks and all of them concluded nothing rose to the charge of obstruction.
Hey, nitwit.......Did Mueller state in his report that Trump was EXONERATED from obstruction?....YES or NO???
Just answer that fucking question or crawl back up Trump' ass ......LOL
Mueller did not say that there was no obstruction. Let that sink in.NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION, NO COLLUSION, NO OBSTRUCTION,
Did that sink in yet?
Mmmmmmm, I love the smell of butthurt in the morning.