Discussion in 'Politics' started by Redfish, Sep 11, 2018.
I never claimed that was the reason, but nice try, dupe.
If you had an argument to make, you'd have made it. Instead you're giving us snivelling excuses why you can't possibly back up your silly little conspiracy.
Either pinch off your 911 conspiracy about WTC 'metal', or continue to give us excuses why you can't.
I win either way.
So you're ignoring the claims of your own conspiracy video. Shocker.
If even YOU are going to treat your youtube video like garbage to be discarded and ignored, surely you'll understand why we treat it the same way.
I didn't say that either. I see your pattern though, and I'm sorry but if you're going to keep doing that, I have no desire to deal with you. Continue on with your blindness, it makes no difference to me.
More deflection. Answer the question or run along. Of course "you win", just ask you. You don't define how the game is played butch
It deflects and obfuscates and claims "victory".
Laughing......you're projecting. Insinuating claims that you can't possibly back up, that's what you do. See, I actually provided evidence to specifically and factually refute a claim in the silly youtube video.
"Um, no.....Rumsfeld didn't say there was 2.3 'trillion missing'. He was talking about about how incompatible accounting systems don't allow transactions to be tracked. And was advocating updating our the IT at the Pentagon
And guess what? They still don't.
If 911 was to 'cover up' the accounting discrepancies, why weren't they covered up?
Try again. This time actually reading what you're responding to.
even though this is all IT does when backed up against the wall taken to school and nowhere left to run
as always like clockwork,when confronted with facts IT cant refute and backed up against the wall with nowhere to run,IT does this-
Laughing......more snivelling excuses why you can't possibly back up your silly little conspiracy?
When you have more than snivelling excuses, find me. I'll be right here.
You offered a youtube video. It made factually inaccurate claims. I refuted those claims factually. You've abandoned those claims....despite them being from your own video. And now flee entirely.
Again, if even YOU are going to treat the video and its claims like garbage, why would you expect me to treat it as anything else?
Separate names with a comma.