You Can't Rape the Willing!

[EvilCat Breath]

No, because nobody did that.

But that you didn't understand the legal arguments is kind of on you.

I understand perfectlynp having listened to losers like you patiently explaining why the judge is wrong for 50 years.

If the judge is wrong, he can come here, start serving his sentence and expla8n it to an entirely different judge.

 

[JoeB131]

I understand perfectlynp having listened to losers like you patiently explaining why the judge is wrong for 50 years.

If the judge is wrong, he can come here, start serving his sentence and expla8n it to an entirely different judge.

Well, the judge was wrong.

And why should anyone come here and submit themselves to a system that is biased against them?

How often does someone lie to you and you keep trusting them? For me, it's one and done!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Well, the judge was wrong.

And why should anyone come here and submit themselves to a system that is biased against them?

How often does someone lie to you and you keep trusting them? For me, it's one and done!

Good for you. Not so good for this child rapist.

 

[JoeB131]

Good for you. Not so good for this child rapist.

Why? He'll die an old man in his chateau in France, surrounded by all his awards and accolades.

Just hope the government never gets a bug up its ass about you.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Why? He'll die an old man in his chateau in France, surrounded by all his awards and accolades.

Just hope the government never gets a bug up its ass about you.

He can stay there.

 

[JoeB131]

He can stay there.

I'm sure he will.

I'm just sorry California wasted millions of dollars trying to get him back when they could have gone after real criminals who did real harm.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I'm sure he will.

I'm just sorry California wasted millions of dollars trying to get him back when they could have gone after real criminals who did real harm.

No harm, it was just a 13 year old. A dime a dozen, really.

 

[JoeB131]

No harm, it was just a 13 year old. A dime a dozen, really.

A 13 year old who refused to testify and whose family settled with Polanski for a shitload of money.

She had no problem with the way it turned out. Maybe save your outrage for people who've been actual victims.

You can start with the Sandy Hook Kids.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

A 13 year old who refused to testify and whose family settled with Polanski for a shitload of money.

She had no problem with the way it turned out. Maybe save your outrage for people who've been actual victims.

You can start with the Sandy Hook Kids.

The girl was hounded by the press until her life became a nightmare. Polanski would be guilty if he had killed her and there was no one to testify. She was 13 years old. He should have been executed for that rape.

You are the same kind of sleaze ball for defending him.

 

[JoeB131]

The girl was hounded by the press until her life became a nightmare. Polanski would be guilty if he had killed her and there was no one to testify. She was 13 years old. He should have been executed for that rape.

You are the same kind of sleaze ball for defending him.

Except he didn't kill her. He had sex with her. She joined him for breakfast the next day.

Agenlica Houston saw her the next day and didn't think anything was amiss. (She was also unaware how old she was.)

Yes, the press hounds her, by showing up on her lawn every time Polanski is in the news. That's on them.

No, we don't execute people for having sex with minors. If we did, we'd be executing hundreds of thousands of people. most of them minors themselves.

Again, He admitted to what he did, he made restitution, he served a sentence, and the state, by its own standard, admitted he wasn't a danger.

If he hadn't been a celebrity, this would have been the end of the matter.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Except he didn't kill her. He had sex with her. She joined him for breakfast the next day.

Agenlica Houston saw her the next day and didn't think anything was amiss. (She was also unaware how old she was.)

Yes, the press hounds her, by showing up on her lawn every time Polanski is in the news. That's on them.

No, we don't execute people for having sex with minors. If we did, we'd be executing hundreds of thousands of people. most of them minors themselves.

Again, He admitted to what he did, he made restitution, he served a sentence, and the state, by its own standard, admitted he wasn't a danger.

If he hadn't been a celebrity, this would have been the end of the matter.

It doesn't matter. You pedophile supporting dope. He raped and sodomized a 13 year old girl after drugging her. Under statutory rape laws alone he would see prison.

 

[JoeB131]

It doesn't matter. You pedophile supporting dope. He raped and sodomized a 13 year old girl after drugging her. Under statutory rape laws alone he would see prison.

Actually, most people convicted of Statutory Rape never see prison.

Here's the ugly truth. Rape is probably one of the most consequence-free crimes in the country, and it was ever WORSE in the 1970s

So what you had was a victim who wasn't willing to testify, a defendant who was sympathetic, and the only reason he spent any time in prison at all was that he took responsibility.

That the system decided to punish him a bit more because of his celebrity, is a problem with the system.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Actually, most people convicted of Statutory Rape never see prison.

Here's the ugly truth. Rape is probably one of the most consequence-free crimes in the country, and it was ever WORSE in the 1970s


View attachment 1170862

So what you had was a victim who wasn't willing to testify, a defendant who was sympathetic, and the only reason he spent any time in prison at all was that he took responsibility.

That the system decided to punish him a bit more becae of his celebrity, is a problem with the system.

The only problem is you who finds a 44 year old man drugging and raping a 13 year old girl titilating. The judge did not approve of the plea agreement. It happens every day. He was sentenced and fled. He should come back and start serving his sentence.

 

[JoeB131]

The only problem is you who finds a 44 year old man drugging and raping a 13 year old girl titilating. The judge did not approve of the plea agreement. It happens every day. He was sentenced and fled. He should come back and start serving his sentence.

It wasn't the judge's call, and it was a sentence he previously agreed to.

You must be the stupidest poster on the board.

I think that the government acting in good faith is more important than getting a desired result. I'm sorry you are too stupid to understand this concept. I'm not sure if this is a learning disabilty or not, but it doesn't seem like you have reasoning skills.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It wasn't the judge's call, and it was a sentence he previously agreed to.

You must be the stupidest poster on the board.

I think that the government acting in good faith is more important than getting a desired result. I'm sorry you are too stupid tthat's o understand this concept. I'm not sure if this is a learning disabilty or not, but it doesn't seem like you have reasoning skills.

The sentence was agreed to between the prosecutor and the rapist. No judge is obligated to accept a plea agreement. It is ALWAYS the judge's call. That's why there is a judge.

Your judgment is clouded by your love and support for this child rapist. I actually have never come across anyone who so steadfastly supports a child rapist. Even if they do, they try to hide it.

 

[Chuz Life]

The sentence was agreed to between the prosecutor and the rapist. No judge is obligated to accept a plea agreement. It is ALWAYS the judge's call. That's why there is a judge.

Your judgment is clouded by your love and support for this child rapist. I actually have never come across anyone who so steadfastly supports a child rapist. Even if they do, they try to hide it.

You are reaching the level of disgust that I did, which prompted me to put him on ignore.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You are reaching the level of disgust that I did, which prompted me to put him on ignore.

Someone should go through this guy's computer. That level of understanding usually means pictures somewhere.

 

[Chuz Life]

Someone should go through this guy's computer. That level of understanding usually means pictures somewhere.

Nothing surprises me anymore.

Especially online.

The way some here were indirectly blaming and shaming Epstein's victims is what made me remember my Grandfathers words: "You can't rape the willing."

My grandpa used those words in a completely different way, to discourage my aunts from tempting fate.

These tards actually think the idea could be used to let Epstein (Maxwell and all the other Johns) off the hook.

 

[JoeB131]

You are reaching the level of disgust that I did, which prompted me to put him on ignore.

You are the one who started a thread about women asking to be raped, dude.

Also, aren't you the one who whines about "rights"? This judge violated Polanski's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. But it's okay because he's a bad man.

The sentence was agreed to between the prosecutor and the rapist. No judge is obligated to accept a plea agreement. It is ALWAYS the judge's call. That's why there is a judge.

No, that's not why a judge exists. A judge's purpose is to not care who wins, only to ensure the process is fair. We have an adversarial justice system for a reason, with rules governing the conduct of the state.

Your judgment is clouded by your love and support for this child rapist. I actually have never come across anyone who so steadfastly supports a child rapist. Even if they do, they try to hide it.

Um, I support the rule of law, but again, I think your learning disability precluded understanding that.

As for Polanski, I don't even like most of his movies. I thought Chinatown was okay, but Rosemary's Baby was just annoying.

Someone should go through this guy's computer. That level of understanding usually means pictures somewhere.

My... understanding of the rule of law? You do get rule of law, don't you?

 

[JoeB131]

Nothing surprises me anymore.

Especially online.

The way some here were indirectly blaming and shaming Epstein's victims is what made me remember my Grandfathers words: "You can't rape the willing."

My grandpa used those words in a completely different way, to discourage my aunts from tempting fate.

These tards actually think the idea could be used to let Epstein off the hook.

Um, Epstein is dead. No one let him "off the hook".

I think the problem is both left and right think that there is something that they can "get" the other side with, as he was friends with both Clinton and Trump.