Yes or No: Is a "deal" with Iran worth the paper it is written on?

[Penelope]

They know that the whole world is watching, especially Israel.

The whole world watches them consistently lie and support terrorism too.
So, in your opinion, by voting yes, you believe Iran shows trustworthiness?

Yes

Based on what? Their support for terrorist organizations? Their constant denial that they are developing nuclear weapons? Their open desire to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth? Their lack of remorse for the hostages they took back in the 70's?
What have they done recently that gives you reason to consider them trustworthy?

They have never started a war or did a coup in another country. The US should be ashamed of itself for what they did in Iran along with the Brits.

mm mmm - and Iran has a long, illustrious human rights record...they are a shining beacon to peace lovers everywhere. Women especially.

SA also, but you don't see us fighting with them. Humanitarian reasons have nothing to do with this. If it did we ought to do something about Israel's treatment of the Pals.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

What Obama is negotiating is not a treaty. A treaty requires approval of the Senate, and he has already said the Congress does not matter to him as long as he has a pen and a phone.

Congress made themselves not matter. **** 'em.

"not matter" because they don't agree with who you agree with...got it

Not matter because they can't do shit, and stand for even less.

So you support America returning to monarchical rule. Unless you disagree with the ruler, of course. Got that too.

I support it being run as it was founded, by the elites not the rabble.

So a plutocracy then, or kleptocracy...which is what we are now. So you should be happy then

 

[iamwhatiseem]

The whole world watches them consistently lie and support terrorism too.
So, in your opinion, by voting yes, you believe Iran shows trustworthiness?

Yes

Based on what? Their support for terrorist organizations? Their constant denial that they are developing nuclear weapons? Their open desire to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth? Their lack of remorse for the hostages they took back in the 70's?
What have they done recently that gives you reason to consider them trustworthy?

They have never started a war or did a coup in another country. The US should be ashamed of itself for what they did in Iran along with the Brits.

mm mmm - and Iran has a long, illustrious human rights record...they are a shining beacon to peace lovers everywhere. Women especially.

SA also, but you don't see us fighting with them. Humanitarian reasons have nothing to do with this. If it did we ought to do something about Israel's treatment of the Pals.

Haha...distract much?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Congress made themselves not matter. **** 'em.

"not matter" because they don't agree with who you agree with...got it

Not matter because they can't do shit, and stand for even less.

So you support America returning to monarchical rule. Unless you disagree with the ruler, of course. Got that too.

I support it being run as it was founded, by the elites not the rabble.

So a plutocracy then, or kleptocracy...which is what we are now. So you should be happy then

Wrong kind of elites. A government bought but not paid for. No thanks.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

"not matter" because they don't agree with who you agree with...got it

Not matter because they can't do shit, and stand for even less.

So you support America returning to monarchical rule. Unless you disagree with the ruler, of course. Got that too.

I support it being run as it was founded, by the elites not the rabble.

So a plutocracy then, or kleptocracy...which is what we are now. So you should be happy then

Wrong kind of elites. A government bought but not paid for. No thanks.

Oh I am sorry, I forgot you were referring to the anointed one.
The elite, the Dear Leader. How could have I forgotten?
Anything he says or does is of course above reproach or questioning...got it.

 

[Yarddog]

Has Iran ever broken a treaty they've signed?

What Obama is negotiating is not a treaty. A treaty requires approval of the Senate, and he has already said the Congress does not matter to him as long as he has a pen and a phone.

Congress made themselves not matter. **** 'em.

They may not matter to you and , I guess Obama, and other democrats. So its nice that you have given up on congress, I take it you wont bother to vote next time for your state representative, Why bother?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Not matter because they can't do shit, and stand for even less.

So you support America returning to monarchical rule. Unless you disagree with the ruler, of course. Got that too.

I support it being run as it was founded, by the elites not the rabble.

So a plutocracy then, or kleptocracy...which is what we are now. So you should be happy then

Wrong kind of elites. A government bought but not paid for. No thanks.

Oh I am sorry, I forgot you were referring to the anointed one.
The elite, the Dear Leader. How could have I forgotten?
Anything he says or does is of course above reproach or questioning...got it.

Not at all, Obama is just a man, but he's the right kind versus the Koch brothers.

 

[FA_Q2]

They know that the whole world is watching, especially Israel.

The whole world watches them consistently lie and support terrorism too.
So, in your opinion, by voting yes, you believe Iran shows trustworthiness?

Yes

Based on what? Their support for terrorist organizations? Their constant denial that they are developing nuclear weapons? Their open desire to eliminate Israel from the face of the earth? Their lack of remorse for the hostages they took back in the 70's?
What have they done recently that gives you reason to consider them trustworthy?

Earned the ire of the right.

That is all that is required for the left to trust them.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Has Iran ever broken a treaty they've signed?

What Obama is negotiating is not a treaty. A treaty requires approval of the Senate, and he has already said the Congress does not matter to him as long as he has a pen and a phone.

Congress made themselves not matter. **** 'em.

They may not matter to you and , I guess Obama, and other democrats. So its nice that you have given up on congress, I take it you wont bother to vote next time for your state representative, Why bother?

My state picks GOP assholes so it hardly matters, but if you don't vote you can't *****.

 

[TooTall]

Has Iran ever broken a treaty they've signed?

What Obama is negotiating is not a treaty. A treaty requires approval of the Senate, and he has already said the Congress does not matter to him as long as he has a pen and a phone.

Congress made themselves not matter. **** 'em.

According to you, but in the real world a treaty would have to be ratified by the Congress.

If it's a treaty, but it doesn't have to be now does it?

It isn't a treaty, that is why I voted that it is not worth the paper it it written on.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Has Iran ever broken a treaty they've signed?

What Obama is negotiating is not a treaty. A treaty requires approval of the Senate, and he has already said the Congress does not matter to him as long as he has a pen and a phone.

Congress made themselves not matter. **** 'em.

According to you, but in the real world a treaty would have to be ratified by the Congress.

If it's a treaty, but it doesn't have to be now does it?

It isn't a treaty, that is why I voted that it is not worth the paper it it written on.

If Iran is just stringing these assholes along, and they are, that's good because that's what they should be doing.

 

[TooTall]

What Obama is negotiating is not a treaty. A treaty requires approval of the Senate, and he has already said the Congress does not matter to him as long as he has a pen and a phone.

Congress made themselves not matter. **** 'em.

"not matter" because they don't agree with who you agree with...got it

Not matter because they can't do shit, and stand for even less.

So you support America returning to monarchical rule. Unless you disagree with the ruler, of course. Got that too.

I support it being run as it was founded, by the elites not the rabble.

The founders established three co-equal branches of government and you have decided that only one branch is needed. Is that right?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Congress made themselves not matter. **** 'em.

"not matter" because they don't agree with who you agree with...got it

Not matter because they can't do shit, and stand for even less.

So you support America returning to monarchical rule. Unless you disagree with the ruler, of course. Got that too.

I support it being run as it was founded, by the elites not the rabble.

The founders established three co-equal branches of government and you have decided that only one branch is needed. Is that right?

They are hardly co-equal, and in this case not at all.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

So you support America returning to monarchical rule. Unless you disagree with the ruler, of course. Got that too.

I support it being run as it was founded, by the elites not the rabble.

So a plutocracy then, or kleptocracy...which is what we are now. So you should be happy then

Wrong kind of elites. A government bought but not paid for. No thanks.

Oh I am sorry, I forgot you were referring to the anointed one.
The elite, the Dear Leader. How could have I forgotten?
Anything he says or does is of course above reproach or questioning...got it.

Not at all, Obama is just a man, but he's the right kind versus the Koch brothers.

Obama works for Wall Street and the Central Banks, obviously, so your right that is so much better than the Koch brothers...er wait...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I support it being run as it was founded, by the elites not the rabble.

So a plutocracy then, or kleptocracy...which is what we are now. So you should be happy then

Wrong kind of elites. A government bought but not paid for. No thanks.

Oh I am sorry, I forgot you were referring to the anointed one.
The elite, the Dear Leader. How could have I forgotten?
Anything he says or does is of course above reproach or questioning...got it.

Not at all, Obama is just a man, but he's the right kind versus the Koch brothers.

Obama works for Wall Street and the Central Banks, obviously, so your right that is so much better than the Koch brothers...er wait...

Obama works with what he has. The GOP works with what used to be.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Obama works with what he has. The GOP works with what used to be.

And what he has is Wall Street, large corporations, the central banks and the wealthiest top 7%.
They are the only people who have benefited from his Presidency on the whole.
PERIOD.
So which one are you?
Or are you just another rube?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Obama works with what he has. The GOP works with what used to be.

And what he has is Wall Street, large corporations, the central banks and the wealthiest top 7%.
They are the only people who have benefited from his Presidency on the whole.
PERIOD.
So which one are you?
Or are you just another rube?

I am a realist. What are you, Marxist?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Obama works with what he has. The GOP works with what used to be.

And what he has is Wall Street, large corporations, the central banks and the wealthiest top 7%.
They are the only people who have benefited from his Presidency on the whole.
PERIOD.
So which one are you?
Or are you just another rube?

I am a realist. What are you, Marxist?

That's fine. As a realist, you would of course be forced to agree that the top 7% are the only group of people in America that has benefited from Obama's economic policies.
You would have to agree that we are at an all time high of part-time jobs as a percentage of total jobs available.
You would have to agree that, on average, 93% of all employed Americans are making less now than before 2008, despite 4 record years of earnings for the top 7%.
Doing a much, much better job of trickle down economics than Reagan could have EVER dreamed. But as a realist - you already know this of course.