Wouldn't it have been easier...

[Care4all]

And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country?

Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.

Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...

The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....

Why didn't we take that approach?

 

[Mac1958]

And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country.

Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.

Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...

The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....

Why didn't we take that approach?

Interesting thought, and the data on the age bands was there pretty early.

On the other hand, we love to lose our shit, panic, politicize everything and point the finger, and we wouldn't have been able to do that.

Priorities. Priorities.
.

 

[there4eyeM]

Prudence, efficacy and logic would solve too many problems. It is much more useful to thrash around and convulse in all directions over various crises.
More useful, that is to...
well, it is evident to whom.

 

[eagle1462010]

It would make it hard to spread later........yeah I agree......let the younger get it.......hunker down .and then they can no longer spread it..............

Also........plasma from those already having it has been used as treatment also.......This is a killer to 60 and up and those with chronic illnesses mainly.........the younger people just cut through it like butter mainly

 

[eagle1462010]

One problem.....the scientific community and press would go bat shit crazy if we gave the virus to people on PURPOSE.

 

[Erinwltr]

Unfortunately prudence is not a page in DJT's administration repertoire.

 

[eagle1462010]

Unfortunately prudence is not a page in DJT's administration repertoire.

YAWN

 

[gipper]

And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country.

Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.

Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...

The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....

Why didn't we take that approach?

It does make one wonder if this whole thing wasn’t made up by nefarious forces for nefarious reasons.

 

[Erinwltr]

One problem.....the scientific community and press would go bat shit crazy if we gave the virus to people on PURPOSE.

WTF Dude?

 

[Erinwltr]

Unfortunately prudence is not a page in DJT's administration repertoire.

YAWN

Fuck off and go collect your social security check.

 

[eagle1462010]

One problem.....the scientific community and press would go bat shit crazy if we gave the virus to people on PURPOSE.

WTF Dude?

LOL

If the young get it...............on PURPOSE......LOL

They get small symptoms from it .........and walk away....they would not be able to spread it anymore........and the virus isn't killing them.......or in most cases it's mild to nothing in the young.

 

[Erinwltr]

And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country.

Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.

Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...

The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....

Why didn't we take that approach?

It does make one wonder if this whole thing wasn’t made up by nefarious forces for nefarious reasons.

No it does not. Skip to the logical reasons for this happening. Susan Rice briefed this administration about this exact pandemic.

 

[Erinwltr]

One problem.....the scientific community and press would go bat shit crazy if we gave the virus to people on PURPOSE.

WTF Dude?

LOL

If the young get it...............on PURPOSE......LOL

They get small symptoms from it .........and walk away....they would not be able to spread it anymore........and the virus isn't killing them.......or in most cases it's mild to nothing in the young.

Thank You Doctor Know Nothing.

 

[eagle1462010]

One problem.....the scientific community and press would go bat shit crazy if we gave the virus to people on PURPOSE.

WTF Dude?

LOL

If the young get it...............on PURPOSE......LOL

They get small symptoms from it .........and walk away....they would not be able to spread it anymore........and the virus isn't killing them.......or in most cases it's mild to nothing in the young.

Thank You Doctor Know Nothing.

stfu........Do you know what vaccines do......hmmm.......

This dang thing is gonna cause a danged worldwide DEPRESSION you idiot.......so.......yeah...the OP has a dang good point......stop being a moron.....thanks.

 

[Care4all]

We need the healthy to catch this sucker, so next season, they are less likely to catch it and spread.

If we quarantine the elderly and those with preexisting conditions that are at risk, we protect them...while the rest of the population that is healthy, gets it, and builds up immunity to it, so the following season with it coming back, will be less catastrophic?

 

[gipper]

And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country.

Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.

Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...

The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....

Why didn't we take that approach?

It does make one wonder if this whole thing wasn’t made up by nefarious forces for nefarious reasons.

No it does not. Skip to the logical reasons for this happening. Susan Rice briefed this administration about this exact pandemic.

Yes it does.

 

[eagle1462010]

We need the healthy to catch this sucker, so next season, they are less likely to catch it and spread.

If we quarantine the elderly and those with preexisting conditions that are at risk, we protect them...while the rest of the population that is healthy, gets it, and builds up immunity to it, so the following season with it coming back, will be less catastrophic?

Which brings up the seasonability of this.........seems when summer hits it will subside greatly.....even though the scientists are going........well we can't confirm this.....it's new.......but in the back of their mind they go......yeah it is gonna go down like this.

 

[Olde Europe]

And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country.

Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.

Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...

The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....

Why didn't we take that approach?

That's the dumbest thing I have read from you in all this time. Surprising, frankly.

Folks are dying throughout the age cohorts, even the young. These are the first you sacrifice on the altar of the economy.

Worse than that, even while not dying, folks fall seriously ill, also throughout the age cohorts, and in numbers sure to overwhelm every healthcare system on earth. Even if you can successfully isolate the elderly, that's ten percent of the population in hospitals in an extremely fast-spreading epidemic. An overwhelmed healthcare system results in many more deaths, to start with, not least deaths and sick among the clinic personnel. How do you treat all the Covid-19 patients then, not to mention all the other sick that still need treatment and care?

Also, those who fall even mildly ill - also throughout all age cohorts - live, probably for the rest of their life, with a 20 to 30% reduced lung function. Yet another sacrifice you make on the altar of the economy.

Yes, building up antigens is important. You know, that's what a vaccine is for, and without the death toll or other consequences of falling ill, don't you?

All in all, you clearly haven't thought this through, and seem to have replaced your care for all with dollar signs.

 

[gipper]

We need the healthy to catch this sucker, so next season, they are less likely to catch it and spread.

If we quarantine the elderly and those with preexisting conditions that are at risk, we protect them...while the rest of the population that is healthy, gets it, and builds up immunity to it, so the following season with it coming back, will be less catastrophic?

Quarantine won’t protect them. Likely kills them.


Leaders Of Western Nations Misled Over Quarantine/Social Distancing
Spring equinox and rise in solar uv radiation will predictably bring mild epidemic to an abrupt halt (except for quarantined populations)
By Bill Sardi

March 21, 2020

Quarantines are counter-productive, as a chart below reveals. The full extent of a predicted spring “cure” that will predictably bring infectious disease to an abrupt halt will only become apparent in time, with the exception of the quarantined populations who now face indoor “urban lockdown” in the U.S., Italy and elsewhere.

A recently published analysis reveals influenza virus activity correlates with low-temperature/low UV radiation. That report states: “It is now becoming evident that meteorological factors are associated with seasonality of influenza virus epidemics.” Temperature and UV intensity are the No. 1 and No. 2 predictive factors for influenza activity. Crowding of populations in jails and other confined indoor quarters only prolongs the epidemic by virtue of the lack of sunlight indoors. Low temperature results in people wearing skin-covering clothes that completely blocks all skin exposure to the sun, the primary source for vitamin D in humans.

Destructive quarantines

The fact that onerous quarantines have now brought about economically destructive measures that will surely result in the collapse of western economies, all because of a massive misdirection. This is sure to have political consequences in nations where their population was mistakenly “locked indoors.” The public’s over reliance on government to solve its problems will be indelibly shaken. The failure of the news press to question health authorities by mindlessly repeating all the orders issued by government may cause the news press to cover for its own culpability.

The infectious disease epidemic will subside, but the economic consequences are so destructive as to demoralize the citizenry and irreversibly destroy the standard of living in western nations that unwittingly followed this doomsday prescription.

Spring Equinox and Rise in Solar UV Radiation Will Predictably Bring Mild Epidemic to an Aburpt Halt (Except for Quarantined Populations) - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

 

[jillian]

And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country.

Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.

Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...

The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....

Why didn't we take that approach?

That would have required that Donald be honest and give a damn.

 

[jillian]

And more prudent and effective if we had taken the steps to isolate all those that are at high risk of dying from the corona virus 19, than to shut the whole country down or to shutter the whole country.

Also, I understand that it is important that As many healthy people that could get it, get it....the better.... because they build up antigens...much like a vaccination, that helps prevent them from getting it again in the fall.... it's part of the reason we've been able to subdue other deadly viruses.

Plus, most of the at risk, are older and not working...

The economy would have gone on as usual, no shut downs, no market crashes....

Why didn't we take that approach?

That's the dumbest thing I have read from you in all this time. Surprising, frankly.

Folks are dying throughout the age cohorts, even the young. These are the first you sacrifice on the altar of the economy.

Worse than that, even while not dying, folks fall seriously ill, also throughout the age cohorts, and in numbers sure to overwhelm every healthcare system on earth. Even if you can successfully isolate the elderly, that's ten percent of the population in hospitals in an extremely fast-spreading epidemic. An overwhelmed healthcare system results in many more deaths, to start with, not least deaths and sick among the clinic personnel. How do you treat all the Covid-19 patients then, not to mention all the other sick that still need treatment and care?

Also, those who fall even mildly ill - also throughout all age cohorts - live, probably for the rest of their life, with a 20 to 30% reduced lung function. Yet another sacrifice you make on the altar of the economy.

Yes, building up antigens is important. You know, that's what a vaccine is for, and without the death toll or other consequences of falling ill, don't you?

All in all, you clearly haven't thought this through, and seem to have replaced your care for all with dollar signs.

And yet she’s so much smarter than you. You aren’t even in the same strata