Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,526
- 2,288
I have an idea of a new gun reform bill which I feel would be a fair compromise between both sides of the issue.
The basically layout of the bill is as follows....
1; A complete ban on direct private person-to-person sales & the establishment of Firearms Brokerages.
Under this law, it would be illegal for a gun owner to sale their gun to another person. Instead, all private sales would be required to go through firearms brokerages. These would be private businesses which handle all private sales. They would handle background checks, would hold firearms during required waiting periods, etc. Brokerages would also keep records of all sales, and customers. They would have on record the name, address, and other information of any person who purchased a firearm. This information would only be made available to law enforcement or the government with a warrant signed by a judge.
This is bullshit. Where's the "fair compromise?
Other than for any warranty issues (which can be handled by the purchaser of a firearm), what would be the purpose of maintaining a database of everyone who buys a gun, and what gun they purchased?
2; A complete ban on all full auto weapons, and all attachments and modifications which allow a semi-auto weapon fire at a full auto or near full-auto rate. Possession of a functional full-auto weapon, except by military or law enforcement, or licensed private security firms would be a federal felony.
When was the last time a fully automatic weapon was used in a mass shooting?
Fully automatic weapons are currently almost impossible to get as it is, and those who go through the time and expense aren't exactly the 18 year old loaner types who are going to shoot up a grocery store...
3; A ban on public carry of all firearms which are not properly holstered. In other words, no more carrying rifles and shotguns around.
This is stupid. Just as there's a proper way to carry a handgun, so is there a proper way to carry a rifle and/or a shotgun...
And no carrying sidearms unless they are in a proper holster. Again this wouldn't apply to on-duty law enforcement, military, or licensed private security firms who are actively performing their duties.
I have a .25 caliber pistol which fits quite nicely in my front jeans pocket, and I'll continue to carry it there regardless of any law. What's the intent of the requirement to have a firearm in a "proper holster", and what, exactly, would that be?
4; Active prosecution of any state or local clerks or officials who fail to properly log mental health or criminal histories into the federal background check database. Cases of neglect, would result in misdemeanor charges. Cases where a person is found to have intentionally refused to properly report this information would result in felony charges.
Who's doing the reporting of these histories?
5; Automatic accomplice charges for all cases where a gun is knowingly sold to a criminal. What this means is that if a personally knowingly and intentionally sales a gun to a criminal, they will be automatically charged as accomplices to any crimes committed using that gun. If the criminal uses the gun to murder someone, the seller will be charged with murder.O
I don't necessarily have an issue with this...
6; No second amendment rights to any person who is a member of any organization which is designated as a terrorist group, a criminal organization, or is currently being investigated for a violent and/or gang related crime.
This is a tough one.
For shits & giggles, let's say I'm a member of MS-13 (I'm a 60 year old white guy, so it's not likely, but work with me). I renounce my membership in that gang.
What happens then?