Would Americans support US troops seizing and occupying Kharg Island ?

We've all seen the reports of the USS Tripoli headed towards the Persian Gulf carrying thousands of Marines , Armor , ect .. It wouldn't be a surprise if said troops are being sent to occupy Kharg Island, an area of critical strategic and economic importance to the Islamofascist regime in Iran .. Even though there's a very good chance that US troops will not face any major resistance if they land on Kharg Island , would it still been seen as a reversal of Trumps claim of no boots on the ground in Iran ? or would Americans view the occupation of said undefended island as not putting troops on the ground in Iran? would Americans view it as a good strategic move to put even more pressure on the Islamofascist regime ?


The IDF should send special forces to Kharg Island to hold it, once Iran's military troops and Basij thugs are decimated. If they don't Russia or China could feasibly send in a small force and then it couldn't be attacked without risking WWIII.
 
The IDF should send special forces to Kharg Island to hold it, once Iran's military troops and Basij thugs are decimated. If they don't Russia or China could feasibly send in a small force and then it couldn't be attacked without risking WWIII.
I think the job is best accomplished by an arab force or the Kurds
 
you have no idea about how important strategically and economically important that island is do you .. face it .. the Islamofascist regime the you and your comrades have allied with is getting pounded .. commie ..
So when are YOU enlisting?
 
Trump loyalist would support anything Trump does.
The democrats oppose anything Trump does.

Most of us America 1st folks would like to see an end to this war, quickly. And our bases in the middle east closed.
 
Well apparently he did talk to 4 members of congress, I know thats probably the minimum but it wasnt illegal. As I understand it Congress has 60 days after the start of a military action to authorize or extend the action..

Honestly I understand why Trump would not go before all of congress and give them a vote on this. WIthout the element of surpise it wouldnt even have been worth doing. Taking out their top leadership and catching their naval vessels and airforce off guard was everything. If this truely turns out to be a very short conflict, THAT will be the reason why.

Had Trump gone before the Democrats, this would have been leaked in no time.
But what about the national outrage over 1,000 dead Americans over the past 47 years? Can we name one of them, when and where without a Google search?

I never heard about that even once until Trump needed an excuse to back up Jared’s Tingling Spidey Sense as a pretext to sneak attack Iran
 
We've all seen the reports of the USS Tripoli headed towards the Persian Gulf carrying thousands of Marines , Armor , ect .. It wouldn't be a surprise if said troops are being sent to occupy Kharg Island, an area of critical strategic and economic importance to the Islamofascist regime in Iran .. Even though there's a very good chance that US troops will not face any major resistance if they land on Kharg Island , would it still been seen as a reversal of Trumps claim of no boots on the ground in Iran ? or would Americans view the occupation of said undefended island as not putting troops on the ground in Iran? would Americans view it as a good strategic move to put even more pressure on the Islamofascist regime ?


That isnt what anyone thinks of when using the term "boots on the ground". We already have had literal boots on the ground in Iran for weeks, if not longer. Certainly there are Green Berets there, they just arent advertizing their presence.

Boots on the ground means "an invasion force of thousands, supported by tank brigades". Nothing short of that counts. The use of Special Forces doesnt count either.
 
Last edited:
Not to my knowledge.
But.
But if you get intelligence claiming that Iran still has enough enriched uranium to make 11 nuclear bombs, do you just ignore it and go play golf or do you do something about it, unlike his Democrat predecessors?
Check DNI threat assessment.

Irans nuclear program was not a threat until Jared’s Spidey Sense told Trump otherwise
 
15th post
But what about the national outrage over 1,000 dead Americans over the past 47 years? Can we name one of them, when and where without a Google search?

I never heard about that even once until Trump needed an excuse to back up Jared’s Tingling Spidey Sense as a pretext to sneak attack Iran
I'm getting really SICK of reading your BLACK PILL NONSENSE. It's nothing but your HATRED of Israel.
THAT'S IT.
I can't believe how you dismiss the Islamic TERRORISM that Iran has been funding and ARMING since their ******* revolution.
ALL of your posts oose with venomous disdain for Israel, and it has completely clouded your assessment of what's ACTUALLY GOING ON.
You, and the rest of the BLACK PILL BRIGADE are a total disappointment.
SAD AND PATHETIC. 🙄
 
I'm getting really SICK of read8ng your BLACK PILL NONSENSE. It's nothing but your HATRED of Israel.
THAT'S IT.
I can't believe how you dismiss the Islamic TERRORISM that Iran has been funding and ARMING since their ******* revolution.
ALL of your posts oose with venomous disdain for Israel, and it has completely clouded your assessment of what's ACTUALLY GOING ON.
You, and the rest of the BLACK PILL BRIGADE are a total disappointment.
SAD AND PATHETIC. 🙄
My outrage is because America was already on a razor’s edge and did not need to go to war over Jared’s Tingling Spidey Sense!

Tens of trillions of our debt is directly from building Greater Israel

Sneak attacking Iran was the absolute last thing we needed. But maybe it will be exactly what’s needed to make July 4th Independence Day again
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom