Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 88,997
- 66,972
- 3,565
You tell meSo the IRGC has been Gazafying the non Sharia population?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You tell meSo the IRGC has been Gazafying the non Sharia population?
I haven’t heard about itYou tell me
The Palis or Hamas?That is the most recent act of terrorism by the Pals
But ultimately it dates back to the creation of radical islam in 1400
Blah blah blah "sneak attack". Are you ******* kidding?My outrage is because America was already on a razor’s edge and did not need to go to war over Jared’s Tingling Spidey Sense!
Tens of trillions of our debt is directly from building Greater Israel
Sneak attacking Iran was the absolute last thing we needed. But maybe it will be exactly what’s needed to make July 4th Independence Day again
Thats not trueI haven’t heard about it
There’s one ME government that’s exterminating a population and it’s not Iran
They are one in the sameThe Palis or Hamas?
The Palestinians took in Jewish refugee after WWII and lived peacefully until the Zionists decided they couldn’t coexist
I knowBlah blah blah "sneak attack". Are you ******* kidding?
The negotiations went nowhere. No DEAL was accepted by Iran. They KNEW what the consequences were going to be. There was no SNEAK about it.
Gee, I'd bet you're on the GENOCIDE bandwagon too with Mamdani.
Man, I can't believe a poster I've respected for DECADES has suck so low. SAD.
Are you sure?They are one in the same
We need to get the crazy Jihadis out of the government first, especially the IRGC.That's hilarious! Oh wait you're not serious are you?
I thought you wanted Iranians to run Iran
I completely disagree. Kicking the Iran can down the road has gotten THOUSANDS killed since their ******* revolution FIFTY YEARS AGO.I know
I feel a little badly about that too
But I see things and understand things a certain way. It’s easier for me to live with this friction than to pretend I agree
The crux of it is that Iran should have stayed way down near the bottom of the “To Do” list.

You assume the Tripoli makes it to the island. It needs to transit the Strait first.Show of hands, who thinks parking a Marine expeditionary force on an Island with no cover and in range of every enemy drone and missile is a good idea?
What's their mission, assuming Iran allows them to land on the island?
And how do you get to the island?There is no real strait there. The island is in the Persian Gulf, not the Strait of Hormuz.
View attachment 1232076
By boat.And how do you get to the island?
What's gonna impede their passage? YOU?You assume the Tripoli makes it to the island. It needs to transit the Strait first.
That's trueYou assume the Tripoli makes it to the island. It needs to transit the Strait first.
Yes
Hamas id embedded within the community
I don't know. It would seem to me that they would be sitting ducks for Iranian missiles. They'd probably stand a better chance with a ground invasion than having 2000 troops all on a little bitty Island close by.We've all seen the reports of the USS Tripoli headed towards the Persian Gulf carrying thousands of Marines , Armor , ect .. It wouldn't be a surprise if said troops are being sent to occupy Kharg Island, an area of critical strategic and economic importance to the Islamofascist regime in Iran .. Even though there's a very good chance that US troops will not face any major resistance if they land on Kharg Island , would it still been seen as a reversal of Trumps claim of no boots on the ground in Iran ? or would Americans view the occupation of said undefended island as not putting troops on the ground in Iran? would Americans view it as a good strategic move to put even more pressure on the Islamofascist regime ?