'World's' Most Fake News EXPOSED...AGAIN

Nice 'FAKE NEWS' Photos.....you should have paid more attention to the article / link about how there has been MORE glacial ice created than lost!


Queasy is the typical moron who "thinks" that if his refrigerator is making ice cubes, surely there's no problem......LOL
 


Predictions of Rising Sea Levels
A Decade Ago Has Finally Been
Proven TRUE! The only thing that
can save us now is MONEY - send
donations to

Obama/HillaryToSaveTheWorld@Hillary'sPrivateE-mailServer.com

:p
 
Queasy is the typical moron who "thinks" that if his refrigerator is making ice cubes, surely there's no problem......LOL
...there isn't anything wrong with the ice maker.

IDIOT! :lmao:
 
The 'Fake News' to which I was referring IS 'Global WRMING'. NOA DID rush the report. NOA DID fake the data...again.


Indeed, the melting iceberg on the two poles have been faked as we faked the moon landing.....LOL


I can't wait for right wingers to accuse the left of placing a GIANT hairdryer on the poles' icebergs, just to "fake" the news of global warming....
so you think the arctic has no ice?
giphy.gif
 


Predictions of Rising Sea Levels
A Decade Ago Has Finally Been
Proven TRUE! The only thing that
can save us now is MONEY - send
donations to

Obama/HillaryToSaveTheWorld@Hillary'sPrivateE-mailServer.com

:p
how far west did the water go?
 
Whistleblower: NOAA Scientists Manipulated Temperature Data To Make Global Warming Seem Worse

NOAA Scientists Manipulated Temperature Data To Make Global Warming Seem Worse

"A whistleblower says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) rushed a landmark study claiming the planet was warming much faster than expected in order to influence international climate negotiations.

“Dr. Bates’ revelations and NOAA’s obstruction certainly lend credence to what I’ve expected all along – that the Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the president’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study,”

Scientists have been debating over the so-called “pause” in global warming since at least 2013, referring to the period from 1998 to 2014 without any significant rise in global average temperature.

Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”
You are such a non-stop rube begging to be lied to.

Do not buy the House Science Committee’s claim that scientists faked data until you read this

The source of their evidence, according to Committee spokesperson Thea McDonalds, was a Daily Mail article. The Daily Mail is a British tabloid most famous for outlandish headlines such as "Is the Bum the New Side Boob” and "ISIS Chief executioner winning hearts with his rugged looks.” This is not the first time that the House Science Committee has used spurious evidence to dispute the existence of human-driven climate change.

<snip>

The House Science Committee press release, which includes quotes from committee Chairman Lamar Smith as well as Darin Lahood (R-Ill) and Andy Biggs (R-Ariz), misrepresents a procedural disagreement as proof that human caused climate change is not occurring. It's akin to pointing to a family argument as proof that they aren't actually related.
 
Having known scientists within noaa, I have been told for years the data was being manipulated. If you dare get caught speaking out, lose your job.
Another really fucking dumb ass. Consider, how do you get the meteorologists in all the other nations to agree to that same manipulation? Every nation studying the warming has come to the same conclusion, we are warming fast, and we are already seeing the results of that warming. So now you are advancing the idea that millions of scientists all over the world are in on a giant conspiracy? Perhaps your tin hat is a bit too tight?
 
Reading these threads is almost as much fun as going through 1940's Life Magazines and reading cigarette company ads in which 9 out of 10 doctors who smoke recommend Camels for their patients who smoke, because they are milder, and smoother and less irritating to the throat..

 
Reading these threads is almost as much fun as going through 1940's Life Magazines and reading cigarette company ads in which 9 out of 10 doctors who smoke recommend Camels for their patients who smoke, because they are milder, and smoother and less irritating to the throat..


and the cigarettes still sell today at about the same if not greater rate than when those commercials were pulled. hmmmmm why is that?
 
SNOWFLAKE SCIENTISTS LIED IN ORDER TO GET FUNDING.

It's not very complex.

When the left doesn't have the proper stats, they just lie.


YES, those damn scientists even faked these photos.......damn them...LOL

China_Smog_4_1448991731132_27676273_ver1.0_640_480.jpg



Polar%20Bear%20by%20Carla%20Lombardo%20Ehrlich
The idiot of the year award goes to.......


Do you realize that polar bears can swim? That the picture of the polar bear proves nothing? More fake information from you.

The other picture depicts smog. Smog is NOx (: a fog made heavier and darker by smoke and chemical fumes; also : a photochemical haze caused by the action of solar ultraviolet radiation on atmosphere polluted with hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen especially from automobile exhaust) not carbon dioxide.

It also provides the very foundational part of the argument about climate change. Until you get China and India and other nations who are thousands of times larger polluters than the United States, any government involvement on our part is for the benefit of the rich, not the world.
 
Because fools like you exist. However, there is an upside to that. Since your life span will more than likely be considerably shorter than mine, as I draw max SS, I will be spending some of your contributions. And I will enjoy that to the max.
 
SNOWFLAKE SCIENTISTS LIED IN ORDER TO GET FUNDING.

It's not very complex.

When the left doesn't have the proper stats, they just lie.


YES, those damn scientists even faked these photos.......damn them...LOL

China_Smog_4_1448991731132_27676273_ver1.0_640_480.jpg



Polar%20Bear%20by%20Carla%20Lombardo%20Ehrlich
The idiot of the year award goes to.......


Do you realize that polar bears can swim? That the picture of the polar bear proves nothing? More fake information from you.

The other picture depicts smog. Smog is NOx (: a fog made heavier and darker by smoke and chemical fumes; also : a photochemical haze caused by the action of solar ultraviolet radiation on atmosphere polluted with hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen especially from automobile exhaust) not carbon dioxide.

It also provides the very foundational part of the argument about climate change. Until you get China and India and other nations who are thousands of times larger polluters than the United States, any government involvement on our part is for the benefit of the rich, not the world.
Again, 'Alternative Facts' smell just like where they came from.

global_emissions_country_2015.png


Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions | US EPA
 
SNOWFLAKE SCIENTISTS LIED IN ORDER TO GET FUNDING.

It's not very complex.

When the left doesn't have the proper stats, they just lie.


YES, those damn scientists even faked these photos.......damn them...LOL

China_Smog_4_1448991731132_27676273_ver1.0_640_480.jpg



Polar%20Bear%20by%20Carla%20Lombardo%20Ehrlich
The idiot of the year award goes to.......


Do you realize that polar bears can swim? That the picture of the polar bear proves nothing? More fake information from you.

The other picture depicts smog. Smog is NOx (: a fog made heavier and darker by smoke and chemical fumes; also : a photochemical haze caused by the action of solar ultraviolet radiation on atmosphere polluted with hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen especially from automobile exhaust) not carbon dioxide.

It also provides the very foundational part of the argument about climate change. Until you get China and India and other nations who are thousands of times larger polluters than the United States, any government involvement on our part is for the benefit of the rich, not the world.
Again, 'Alternative Facts' smell just like where they came from.

global_emissions_country_2015.png


Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions | US EPA
Reading comprehension is essential.
 
SNOWFLAKE SCIENTISTS LIED IN ORDER TO GET FUNDING.

It's not very complex.

When the left doesn't have the proper stats, they just lie.


YES, those damn scientists even faked these photos.......damn them...LOL

China_Smog_4_1448991731132_27676273_ver1.0_640_480.jpg



Polar%20Bear%20by%20Carla%20Lombardo%20Ehrlich
The idiot of the year award goes to.......


Do you realize that polar bears can swim? That the picture of the polar bear proves nothing? More fake information from you.

The other picture depicts smog. Smog is NOx (: a fog made heavier and darker by smoke and chemical fumes; also : a photochemical haze caused by the action of solar ultraviolet radiation on atmosphere polluted with hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen especially from automobile exhaust) not carbon dioxide.

It also provides the very foundational part of the argument about climate change. Until you get China and India and other nations who are thousands of times larger polluters than the United States, any government involvement on our part is for the benefit of the rich, not the world.
Again, 'Alternative Facts' smell just like where they came from.

global_emissions_country_2015.png


Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions | US EPA
Reading comprehension is essential.
Why yes, it is. And so is a knowledge of history. For there was a time in this nation when our cities and rivers were very polluted. Not just CO2 and CH4, but smog so thick that it was a hazard for breathing. And a river so polluted that it burned as it flowed through a city.

Now you in the GOP wish to go back to that time. Oh yes, eliminate the EPA, and we can enjoy those good times again. What fucked up idiots you are.
 
When dollars are involved, it is easy. And the total number of scientists percentage is given for a reason.
Popular Technology.net: 97% Study Falsely Classifies Scientists' Papers, according to the scientists that published them
Dr. Benny Peiser’s Letter to “Science” and Its Rejection


Having known scientists within noaa, I have been told for years the data was being manipulated. If you dare get caught speaking out, lose your job.
Another really fucking dumb ass. Consider, how do you get the meteorologists in all the other nations to agree to that same manipulation? Every nation studying the warming has come to the same conclusion, we are warming fast, and we are already seeing the results of that warming. So now you are advancing the idea that millions of scientists all over the world are in on a giant conspiracy? Perhaps your tin hat is a bit too tight?
 

Forum List

Back
Top