Greenland ice melt worse than previously believed

Current consensus estimates". LOL!

Environmental Wackos making up shit again? Like we see all the time?
AGW deniers making accusations without producing the slightest hint of evidence, EVER.

Almost ewvery single one of you, in every single post, in every single thread, every singe day is nothing but an out and out fucking liar.
 
Fuck you, you ignorant, lying bigot.



And THAT is the real state of "climate science" today. The CO2 FRAUD is easily busted on all of their phony claims, and respond this way when busted...
 
AGW deniers making accusations without producing the slightest hint of evidence, EVER.

Almost ewvery single one of you, in every single post, in every single thread, every singe day is nothing but an out and out fucking liar.


LOL!!!

Greenland time line....

2 million years ago - all green, even the northern tip...



400k-800k years ago center of Greenland went from forest to ice age...




And then there are the Vikings, who colonized and farmed the southern tip of Greenland until the 1400s, when they were frozen out by the advancing ice age, and their dwellings remain buried under 600 "ice core layers" of ice....


GREENLAND FROZE while North America went from the image below to today...


Ice Age in North America, Illustration Stock Photo - Alamy




And THAT is why "Milankovich Cycles" was introduced AFTER homO went silent 2010-2012, because the FBI FRAUD case involved noticing the above truth, and North American Ice Age was "re-written" or "canceled" to make room for the Co2 FRAUDs unbelievably stupid McBULLSHIT....

BUSTED ON BOTH POLES RIGHT HERE....




 
Things like: atmospheric CO2 levels, global temperature, ocean heat content, sea level, ice mass balance at the poles, Greenland and the world's glaciers. Where President Obama lives doesn't mean Jack Shit. That you think it does tells me there's a good chance you're a right wing bigot.
And you guarantee that you can bring balance back to the Greenland ice by taxing Americans $3 Trillion annually?

What a deal!
 
And you guarantee that you can bring balance back to the Greenland ice by taxing Americans $3 Trillion annually?

What a deal!
Whatever it will cost, it will cost less than paying for the consequences of doing NOTHING and the sooner the problem is addressed the less it will cost and the more effective and successful will be the solution.
 
Whatever it will cost, it will cost less than paying for the consequences of doing NOTHING and the sooner the problem is addressed the less it will cost and the more effective and successful will be the solution.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!

Of Course!

Adding another 50% annually to the Inflation Rate by spending $3T is worth keeping the Obamas happy in the oceanfront mansion!

What's wrong with us that we don't understand that?
 
Whatever it will cost, it will cost less than paying for the consequences of doing NOTHING and the sooner the problem is addressed the less it will cost and the more effective and successful will be the solution.

What's wrong with us that we don't understand that?
I don't have a clue. You're going to have to figure that out all by your little lonesome.
 
Only idiots ignore solid science or could it be that you just don`t care?

What's "solid science"?

Is that we're you decide America must pay $3T Annually and work everything back to that "settled science"?

Unlike Relativity, there's no more testing, no experiments, just showing charts and graphs and models
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
Hahaha, after billions are spent researching greenland and global warming they find out years later that they somehow missed a disaster?

That means there is no ice loss and this is another part of the largest hoax in history.
 

Abstract​

Nearly every glacier in Greenland has thinned or retreated over the past few decades1,2,3,4, leading to glacier acceleration, increased rates of sea-level rise and climate impacts around the globe5,6,7,8,9. To understand how calving-front retreat has affected the ice-mass balance of Greenland, we combine 236,328 manually derived and AI-derived observations of glacier terminus positions collected from 1985 to 2022 and generate a 120-m-resolution mask defining the ice-sheet extent every month for nearly four decades. Here we show that, since 1985, the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has lost 5,091 ± 72 km2 of area, corresponding to 1,034 ± 120 Gt of ice lost to retreat. Our results indicate that, by neglecting calving-front retreat, current consensus estimates of ice-sheet mass balance4,9 have underestimated recent mass loss from Greenland by as much as 20%. The mass loss we report has had minimal direct impact on global sea level but is sufficient to affect ocean circulation and the distribution of heat energy around the globe10,11,12. On seasonal timescales, Greenland loses 193 ± 25 km2 (63 ± 6 Gt) of ice to retreat each year from a maximum extent in May to a minimum between September and October. We find that multidecadal retreat is highly correlated with the magnitude of seasonal advance and retreat of each glacier, meaning that terminus-position variability on seasonal timescales can serve as an indicator of glacier sensitivity to longer-term climate change.





"
The study analyzed satellite images to track retreat and found that the breakup of icebergs has accelerated in Greenland and that previous analyses might have underrated its influence.

“Current consensus estimates of ice-sheet mass balance have underestimated recent mass loss from Greenland by as much as 20%,” the study’s authors wrote. In recent decades, almost every Greenland glacier has thinned or retreated.

The study, which was published Wednesday in the journal Nature, is yet another sign that Greenland’s ice is melting at hastening and concerning rates. Scientists are growing increasingly concerned that the Earth’s warming could trigger tipping points for major ice sheets. Greenland contains about 8% of the world’s freshwater. Its total melt would raise sea levels by almost 7 feet and could change ocean circulation patterns. "
But wait. The Antarctic Ice Cap, which is six times larger than the Arctic Ice Cap had record growth between 2013-15. NASA, predictably, couldn't explain it.

But the news about Greenland is wonderful. Maybe some of it will become habitable soon.
 
But wait. The Antarctic Ice Cap, which is six times larger than the Arctic Ice Cap had record growth between 2013-15. NASA, predictably, couldn't explain it.
There is no ice cap in the Arctic. There is a shrinking sheet of sea ice.

That growth was likely due to the 2015 El Nino, not from any cessation of global warming.



1724380884442.webp
 
There is no ice cap in the Arctic. There is a shrinking sheet of sea ice.

That growth was likely due to the 2015 El Nino, not from any cessation of global warming.



View attachment 999835


the Co2 FRAUD has lied about Antarctic ice the entire time. Antarctic ice has grown every year of the Co2 FRAUD. We took them to court in 2007...



  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.



the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.




AND, of course, if there was an actual ongoing net ice melt on Earth, Surface Air Pressure would be rising, but it is instead declining over the past 70 years...
 
There is no evidence of an ongoing net ice melt on Greenland either. Greenland's ice grows a new "ice core layer" every year, and has not retreated at all, still burying Viking dwellings from the 1400s in hundreds of layers of ice...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom