'World's' Most Fake News EXPOSED...AGAIN

[Old Rocks]

Again, find me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that rejects the reality of AGW in their policy statements.

 

[jc456]

SNOWFLAKE SCIENTISTS LIED IN ORDER TO GET FUNDING.

It's not very complex.

When the left doesn't have the proper stats, they just lie.

YES, those damn scientists even faked these photos.......damn them...LOL

The idiot of the year award goes to.......


Do you realize that polar bears can swim? That the picture of the polar bear proves nothing? More fake information from you.

The other picture depicts smog. Smog is NOx (: a fog made heavier and darker by smoke and chemical fumes; also : a photochemical haze caused by the action of solar ultraviolet radiation on atmosphere polluted with hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen especially from automobile exhaust) not carbon dioxide.

It also provides the very foundational part of the argument about climate change. Until you get China and India and other nations who are thousands of times larger polluters than the United States, any government involvement on our part is for the benefit of the rich, not the world.

Again, 'Alternative Facts' smell just like where they came from.

Global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data | Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions | US EPA

Reading comprehension is essential.

Why yes, it is. And so is a knowledge of history. For there was a time in this nation when our cities and rivers were very polluted. Not just CO2 and CH4, but smog so thick that it was a hazard for breathing. And a river so polluted that it burned as it flowed through a city.

Now you in the GOP wish to go back to that time. Oh yes, eliminate the EPA, and we can enjoy those good times again. What fucked up idiots you are.

 

[jc456]

Again, find me a Scientific Society, a National Academy of Science, or a major University that rejects the reality of AGW in their policy statements.

why, they don't represent the scientists. post one with a scientist name on it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

ANY criticism of right wingers' rejection of science will, henceforth, be called "fake news".......Please adhere to that new policy.

So, expecting evidence and actual testing is "rejection of science" where your acceptance of dogma on faith is what you think science is, gnat?

 

[nat4900]

So, expecting evidence and actual testing is "rejection of science" where your acceptance of dogma on faith is what you think science is, gnat?

No. no....don't get me wrong, I DO want for you to roast your nuts as the ozone layer is pierced.....

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

No. no....don't get me wrong, I DO want for you to roast your nuts as the ozone layer is pierced.....

Great. So you think fake data that defrauds the public and dupes them into giving money to the greedy priests of your church will achieve your goal?

 

[mamooth]

Great. So you think fake data that defrauds the public and dupes them into giving money to the greedy priests of your church will achieve your goal?

No. We reject your denier fake data. How often do we have to say that? You're a fraud, therefore we reject you and your attempts to defraud the public.

You deniers should know by now that you always get busted when you attempt your fraud. And we're not going to go away. We'll keep busting you every time you attempt your fraud. Therefore, you may as well give up and stop trying to push your various frauds.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
No. We reject your denier fake data.

Yes, data is from denier infidels, You of the faithful must be guarded against data and facts. The dogma of your cult is the only thing tha you can read.

The devil is trying to trick you with all of those facts, statics and actual experiments. You are the faithful, you serve Gaia and ensure that only what the cult tells you ever reaches your brain.

Blind faith is what you have, never question, never test. You are an AGW cultist, you follow the truthiness of the faith. (filth?)

 

[edthecynic]

How do you know it's fake news? Maybe NOAA actually did rush the report?

How about the lie in the below quote from the OP. Is that fake enough for you?

Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”

 

[easyt65]

How about the lie in the below quote from the OP. Is that fake enough for you?

Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”

Are you saying the buoys have did show a warming trend? If so, can you prove it / prove Curry wrong?

 

[edthecynic]

NOA DID fake the data...again.

Which is, of course a LIE!!!!!
Even your own "whistleblower" Bates in an interview with The Associated Press said there was "no data tampering, no data changing, nothing malicious."

"It's really a story of not disclosing what you did," Bates said in the interview. "It's not trumped up data in any way shape or form."

 

[nat4900]

Only a true IDIOT would still dispute the available data......and since idiots DO exist (mostly of the conservative stripe) arguing over this issue is no longer necessary.....You CANNOT fix stupidity on this forum nor can you fix such stupidity with brain dead partisans.

 

[edthecynic]

How about the lie in the below quote from the OP. Is that fake enough for you?

Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.”

Are you saying the buoys have did show a warming trend? If so, can you prove it / prove Curry wrong?

Can't you read the chart?????
And there we see how the deniers lie, after posting a graph of the buoy and satellite data showing a warming trend, the lowest lows and highest highs are progressively higher, the denier plays dumb as if no data was posted.

 

[edthecynic]

It is ALWAYS interesting when a "whistle blower" goes to a BRITISH newspaper to blow the whistle, and the story is picked up by a right wing rag like Daily Caller to have right wing idiots SWEAR that the entire global warming is a myth......LOL

And don't forget the whistleblower and author of the British article fabricated a fake graph as proof!!!!!
If GW was a myth why do deniers NEED to make FAKE graphs??????

 

[edthecynic]

World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online

Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data

• The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming
• It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
• America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
• The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data

Fake graph from your fake news article.

 

[jc456]

[
No. We reject your denier fake data.

Yes, data is from denier infidels, You of the faithful must be guarded against data and facts. The dogma of your cult is the only thing tha you can read.

The devil is trying to trick you with all of those facts, statics and actual experiments. You are the faithful, you serve Gaia and ensure that only what the cult tells you ever reaches your brain.

Blind faith is what you have, never question, never test. You are an AGW cultist, you follow the truthiness of the faith. (filth?)

and they deny reality.

 

[edthecynic]

World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online

Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data

• The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming
• It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
• America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
• The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data

Fake graph from your fake news article.

Notice the deniers do not even deny that the graph is a fake!!!!!!!

 

[nat4900]

And don't forget the whistleblower and author of the British article fabricated a fake graph as proof!!!!!
If GW was a myth why do deniers NEED to make FAKE graphs??????

Here's my take on all this: To get noticed and even become infamous, one needs to "buck the trend" ......The author would NEVER have gotten any notoriety if he were just one of the thousands of legitimate scientists.....So, the guy, craving fame (even if infamy) becomes a denier....

Sort of like a black man backing Pete Sessions for AG.......

 

[Vandalshandle]

Reading these threads is almost as much fun as going through 1940's Life Magazines and reading cigarette company ads in which 9 out of 10 doctors who smoke recommend Camels for their patients who smoke, because they are milder, and smoother and less irritating to the throat..

and the cigarettes still sell today at about the same if not greater rate than when those commercials were pulled. hmmmmm why is that?

A perfect example of fake news, just like when the climate change deniers quote scientists who work for Exxon and publish "proof" that manmade climate change does not exist.

One in Five U.S. Adults Smoke, Tied for All-Time Low

 

[Billy_Bob]

Predictions of Rising Sea Levels
A Decade Ago Has Finally Been
Proven TRUE! The only thing that
can save us now is MONEY - send
donations to

Obama/HillaryToSaveTheWorld@Hillary'sPrivateE-mailServer.com

how far west did the water go?

I love it when they use that clip from a movie and BELIEVE IT'S REAL..