Will Obama do anything about ISIS

[mudwhistle]

OBAMA: I'm bombing the shit out of ISIS.

RUBE: Duhhhh, is Obama going to do anything about ISIS, or what?

Obama has been bombing Syria. The rubes thinks he actually fighting ISIS. He really arming and training them, and then ignoring them.

Obama is knowingly running away from the worst war ideology in the world: war-making Islam. Since he is constitutionally unable to tell the truth, he has to lie about it. Suddenly the Wahhabi torture theology of ISIS – identical to that of the Taliban – no longer makes for a “terrorist” gang. No, they are an “indigenous insurgency,” following the most shameful lie of the left today, the corrupt idea that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom-fighter. We should have realized that when Obama allowed the young people’s Green Revolution in Tehran to be killed and tortured into silence at the very beginning of this administration.

We have lost our moral bearings, and the left likes it that way.

Obama is a typical leftist horror story, just as merciless as Lenin, Chávez, and Pol Pot. Since we’ve exhausted the English vocabulary for describing him and his gang, I suggest we borrow his own lies to describe him.

He is Obama the Merciful, the Compassionate, the Servant of the most ruthless war theology in history.

He is not my president, and in a moral sense, he is not an American president at all.

Articles Samantha Power Genocide Enabler​

 

[BlindBoo]

Uhhh, well he could have drawn a red line like he did in Syria.

What do you think Reagan, Truman, Kennedy, or even Clinton and Bush would have done? A US president needs a set of balls, obama has a *****. Hillary has bigger balls than obama does.

ISIS is Obama not finishing what he started in Syria. He runs is big mouth talking tough then runs and hides when they call him out, now they are openly taunting the U.S. and mocking this clown.

Let the half a million troops Iraq has deal with ISIS. It's their country, afterall.

Why do you want Americans dying in place of Iraqis?

Why don't you puke liberals grow a pair, it was your man Obama who drew the red line.

The red line was a threat to take action if chemical weapons were used. Chemical weapons were used and a threat of air strikes caused the Russians to offer the removal of Syria's chemical weapons. With that offer came the backing off of the air strike threats and Russia's removal of the weapons. Problem solved without risk to US Airmen or collateral damage from air strikes. Which part of the Red Line resolution ultimatum are you dissatisfied with?

That you can come here and say with a straight face that Obama backed up his "red line" statement shows how far you're willing to go to put a good face on this failure of a President.

It was another failures of the do nothing Congress.

Obama Calls for Military Strike Against Syria But First He Asks Congress To Vote for It Mother Jones

President Barack Obama made a case for launching a limited military strike against the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in retaliation for the chemical weapons attack mounted presumably by regime forces near Damascus earlier this month. "This menace must be confronted," Obama declared. This was no surprise. The Obama administration has clearly been heading toward such a decision. But in an unexpected move, Obama said that it was not necessary to rush into such an attack—his military advisers had assured him that such an assault could be effective even if taken weeks from now—and that he would seek authorization from Congress before ordering an attack on the Syrian regime.

 

[g5000]

Your link, or at least the title is bull shit and 3 years old. Obama has been gutting the military from the day he walking into the White House.

Time to whip out your dick and tell us what Obama should be doing about ISIS.

Go ahead.

 

[Edgetho]

OBAMA: I'm bombing the shit out of ISIS.

RUBE: Duhhhh, is Obama going to do anything about ISIS, or what?

You're lying again, Brian.

the Lying ********** in Chief hasn't bombed anybody and the US has NOT conducted 2,000 Air Strikes.

You're just another dimocrap liar.

 

[g5000]

OBAMA: I'm bombing the shit out of ISIS.

RUBE: Duhhhh, is Obama going to do anything about ISIS, or what?

You're lying again, Brian.

the Lying ********** in Chief hasn't bombed anybody and the US has NOT conducted 2,000 Air Strikes.

You're just another dimocrap liar.

Time to whip out your dick and tell us what Obama should be doing about ISIS.

Go ahead.

 

[Ava]

Will Congress allocate the resources necessary or will he have to wade through a series of partisan shenanigans to take more action?

When will the Republican Congress do something about ISIS affiliated , Ebola laden children coming from Latin America?

Obama cut the military. Let him deal with.

Military spending will continue to rise under President Obama’s plan, just at a slightly slower rate. Why has this sparked so much controversy? Self-identified neoconservative Bill Kristol said that the so-called cuts “would decimate our military.” Some Republican lawmakers such as Rep. Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (Calif.) called the nonexistent cuts “dangerous and irresponsible.”

How much of an increase in military spending will satisfy them? It’s interesting to note that Rep. McKeon’s top campaign contributors include Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing Co. and General Dynamics. These defense contractors lobby for more military spending that would add to their company’s bottom line.

President Obama is Not Actually Cutting Military Spending But He Should FreedomWorks

Your link, or at least the title is bull shit and 3 years old. Obama has been gutting the military from the day he walking into the White House.

The military and the economy. What better way to bring down a nation to third world standards.

 

[mudwhistle]

The civilized world is not obligated to sacrifice precious lives, even for a profoundly moral cause. We are not infinitely powerful. But we have an elementary right and duty to tell the truth, and to act on it when we can. Obama’s abandonment of millions and millions of people is a cruel defeat for elementary morality. Those who don’t get that are sociopaths, and those who twist it are liars. Abandoning Afghanistan is not, as the delusional left will say, some sort of victory. The rise of barbarian sadistic regimes, those who routinely oppress all women and girls because they can, is not – repeat: not – a wonderful moral victory.

But Obama and his media lackeys will try to paint it that way.

Today we don’t even allow ourselves to think that the Cold War was a noble and civilizing effort by the United States and its allies against the kind of barbarism that we see today being practiced by ISIS – and we know about ISIS only because social media make it impossible for the left to censor it. The left cares only about power, and the resulting millions of dead and wounded are simply the price to pay for Progress.

(Today they are doing it with third-trimester abortions here at home. The domestic left is exactly the international left. They have no mercy.)

Now Obama is willingly – maybe joyously – retreating from lands where we made a difference. We gave and sacrificed precious lives and treasure in Afghanistan, in Iraq, and elsewhere. It was the right thing to do after 9/11/01 for our national security, and it was the moral thing to do. Today Obama is turning Afghanistan over to the barbaric Taliban, just as we seem to be turning Iraq over to ISIS and an Iranian proxy regime in Baghdad. Articles Samantha Power Genocide Enabler​

 

[g5000]

The civilized world is not obligated to sacrifice precious lives, even for a profoundly moral cause. We are not infinitely powerful. But we have an elementary right and duty to tell the truth, and to act on it when we can. Obama’s abandonment of millions and millions of people is a cruel defeat for elementary morality. Those who don’t get that are sociopaths, and those who twist it are liars. Abandoning Afghanistan is not, as the delusional left will say, some sort of victory. The rise of barbarian sadistic regimes, those who routinely oppress all women and girls because they can, is not – repeat: not – a wonderful moral victory.

But Obama and his media lackeys will try to paint it that way.

Today we don’t even allow ourselves to think that the Cold War was a noble and civilizing effort by the United States and its allies against the kind of barbarism that we see today being practiced by ISIS – and we know about ISIS only because social media make it impossible for the left to censor it. The left cares only about power, and the resulting millions of dead and wounded are simply the price to pay for Progress.

(Today they are doing it with third-trimester abortions here at home. The domestic left is exactly the international left. They have no mercy.)

Now Obama is willingly – maybe joyously – retreating from lands where we made a difference. We gave and sacrificed precious lives and treasure in Afghanistan, in Iraq, and elsewhere. It was the right thing to do after 9/11/01 for our national security, and it was the moral thing to do. Today Obama is turning Afghanistan over to the barbaric Taliban, just as we seem to be turning Iraq over to ISIS and an Iranian proxy regime in Baghdad. Articles Samantha Power Genocide Enabler​

Any chickenshit can whine like you bitches are.

Time to whip out your dick and tell us what Obama should be doing about ISIS.

Go ahead.

Close ISIS's checking account? Boots on the ground? What?

Man up, coward.

 

[mudwhistle]

OBAMA: I'm bombing the shit out of ISIS.

RUBE: Duhhhh, is Obama going to do anything about ISIS, or what?

You're lying again, Brian.

the Lying ********** in Chief hasn't bombed anybody and the US has NOT conducted 2,000 Air Strikes.

You're just another dimocrap liar.

Time to whip out your dick and tell us what Obama should be doing about ISIS.

Go ahead.

Obama is incapable of doing anything about ISIS other than change their name to " - "

 

[mudwhistle]

The civilized world is not obligated to sacrifice precious lives, even for a profoundly moral cause. We are not infinitely powerful. But we have an elementary right and duty to tell the truth, and to act on it when we can. Obama’s abandonment of millions and millions of people is a cruel defeat for elementary morality. Those who don’t get that are sociopaths, and those who twist it are liars. Abandoning Afghanistan is not, as the delusional left will say, some sort of victory. The rise of barbarian sadistic regimes, those who routinely oppress all women and girls because they can, is not – repeat: not – a wonderful moral victory.

But Obama and his media lackeys will try to paint it that way.

Today we don’t even allow ourselves to think that the Cold War was a noble and civilizing effort by the United States and its allies against the kind of barbarism that we see today being practiced by ISIS – and we know about ISIS only because social media make it impossible for the left to censor it. The left cares only about power, and the resulting millions of dead and wounded are simply the price to pay for Progress.

(Today they are doing it with third-trimester abortions here at home. The domestic left is exactly the international left. They have no mercy.)

Now Obama is willingly – maybe joyously – retreating from lands where we made a difference. We gave and sacrificed precious lives and treasure in Afghanistan, in Iraq, and elsewhere. It was the right thing to do after 9/11/01 for our national security, and it was the moral thing to do. Today Obama is turning Afghanistan over to the barbaric Taliban, just as we seem to be turning Iraq over to ISIS and an Iranian proxy regime in Baghdad. Articles Samantha Power Genocide Enabler​

Any chickenshit can whine like you bitches are.

Time to whip out your dick and tell us what Obama should be doing about ISIS.

Go ahead.

Close ISIS's checking account? Boots on the ground? What?

Man up, coward.

Shouldn't you be back in the Oval Office under his desk?

 

[g5000]

Come on!

Do any of you parroting whiners have a plan, or are you just a flock of piss drinkers?

 

[g5000]

OBAMA: I'm bombing the shit out of ISIS.

RUBE: Duhhhh, is Obama going to do anything about ISIS, or what?

You're lying again, Brian.

the Lying ********** in Chief hasn't bombed anybody and the US has NOT conducted 2,000 Air Strikes.

You're just another dimocrap liar.

Time to whip out your dick and tell us what Obama should be doing about ISIS.

Go ahead.

Obama is incapable of doing anything about ISIS other than change their name to " - "

The civilized world is not obligated to sacrifice precious lives, even for a profoundly moral cause. We are not infinitely powerful. But we have an elementary right and duty to tell the truth, and to act on it when we can. Obama’s abandonment of millions and millions of people is a cruel defeat for elementary morality. Those who don’t get that are sociopaths, and those who twist it are liars. Abandoning Afghanistan is not, as the delusional left will say, some sort of victory. The rise of barbarian sadistic regimes, those who routinely oppress all women and girls because they can, is not – repeat: not – a wonderful moral victory.

But Obama and his media lackeys will try to paint it that way.

Today we don’t even allow ourselves to think that the Cold War was a noble and civilizing effort by the United States and its allies against the kind of barbarism that we see today being practiced by ISIS – and we know about ISIS only because social media make it impossible for the left to censor it. The left cares only about power, and the resulting millions of dead and wounded are simply the price to pay for Progress.

(Today they are doing it with third-trimester abortions here at home. The domestic left is exactly the international left. They have no mercy.)

Now Obama is willingly – maybe joyously – retreating from lands where we made a difference. We gave and sacrificed precious lives and treasure in Afghanistan, in Iraq, and elsewhere. It was the right thing to do after 9/11/01 for our national security, and it was the moral thing to do. Today Obama is turning Afghanistan over to the barbaric Taliban, just as we seem to be turning Iraq over to ISIS and an Iranian proxy regime in Baghdad. Articles Samantha Power Genocide Enabler​

Any chickenshit can whine like you bitches are.

Time to whip out your dick and tell us what Obama should be doing about ISIS.

Go ahead.

Close ISIS's checking account? Boots on the ground? What?

Man up, coward.

Shouldn't you be back in the Oval Office under his desk?

Time to whip out your dick and tell us what Obama should be doing about ISIS.

Go ahead.

 

[g5000]

Clearly you are all a bunch of whiners with no actual ideas.

It is time you learned that no one gives a flying **** about the opinion of someone who doesn't have any answers.

 

[BlindBoo]

Will Congress allocate the resources necessary or will he have to wade through a series of partisan shenanigans to take more action?

When will the Republican Congress do something about ISIS affiliated , Ebola laden children coming from Latin America?

Obama cut the military. Let him deal with.

Military spending will continue to rise under President Obama’s plan, just at a slightly slower rate. Why has this sparked so much controversy? Self-identified neoconservative Bill Kristol said that the so-called cuts “would decimate our military.” Some Republican lawmakers such as Rep. Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (Calif.) called the nonexistent cuts “dangerous and irresponsible.”

How much of an increase in military spending will satisfy them? It’s interesting to note that Rep. McKeon’s top campaign contributors include Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing Co. and General Dynamics. These defense contractors lobby for more military spending that would add to their company’s bottom line.

President Obama is Not Actually Cutting Military Spending But He Should FreedomWorks

Your link, or at least the title is bull shit and 3 years old. Obama has been gutting the military from the day he walking into the White House.

President Obama did not gut the military.

 

[g5000]

I clearly caught you parroting rubes with your pants down. I should have been bombarded with solutions to ISIS by now.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I clearly caught you parroting rubes with your pants down. I should have been bombarded with solutions to ISIS by now.

ISIS is an idea, buried deep within Islam. The way to defeat an idea is with a better idea. In this case the better idea is Liberalism, something you and they both hate.

You both have the same mentality, hence the problem without any solution but time and education.

 

[mudwhistle]

Will Congress allocate the resources necessary or will he have to wade through a series of partisan shenanigans to take more action?

When will the Republican Congress do something about ISIS affiliated , Ebola laden children coming from Latin America?

Obama cut the military. Let him deal with.

Military spending will continue to rise under President Obama’s plan, just at a slightly slower rate. Why has this sparked so much controversy? Self-identified neoconservative Bill Kristol said that the so-called cuts “would decimate our military.” Some Republican lawmakers such as Rep. Howard P. “Buck” McKeon (Calif.) called the nonexistent cuts “dangerous and irresponsible.”

How much of an increase in military spending will satisfy them? It’s interesting to note that Rep. McKeon’s top campaign contributors include Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing Co. and General Dynamics. These defense contractors lobby for more military spending that would add to their company’s bottom line.

President Obama is Not Actually Cutting Military Spending But He Should FreedomWorks

Your link, or at least the title is bull shit and 3 years old. Obama has been gutting the military from the day he walking into the White House.

President Obama did not gut the military.

Yes, he is still gutting the military. I keep seeing all of those armored vehicles you sycophants demanded from Bush being shipped to parts unknown. Who knows which police force will be driving them in a couple of months. Half of the soldiers and civilians here will be let go. The threat is growing and he's downsizing like Bill Clinton did in the 90s. It's all some kind of sick game for you people. A Dummycrap gets in office and he guts the military. A Repug gets in and he tries to rebuild it again, all the while you assholes are criticizing him for military spending.

I'm literally sick and tired of it.

 

[mudwhistle]

I clearly caught you parroting rubes with your pants down. I should have been bombarded with solutions to ISIS by now.

Yeah, if you think a person can write an OPORD in a few seconds feel free to do it yourself dipshit. Without up to date intel it's a waste of time. But knock yourself out. Be sure to consult your Ranger's Handbook.

Here's the outline:

OPORD [sequential order number and fiscal year] [code name] - [issuing headquarters] (place the overall security classification and an abbreviated title at the top of the second and any following pages.)

1. SITUATION.

a. Enemy Forces.
b. Friendly Forces.
c. Attachments and Detachments.


2. MISSION. A concise statement that includes the Who, What, Where, When, and Why of the operation to be conducted.

3. EXECUTION.

a. Commander's Intent
b. Concept of operations.
(1) Maneuver.
(2) Fires.
(3) Reconnaissance and Surveillance.
(4) Intelligence.
(5) Engineer.
(6) Air Defense.
(7) Information Operations.
c. Tasks to Maneuver Units.
d. Tasks to Combat Support.
(1) Intelligence.
(2) Engineer.
(3) Fire Support.
(4) Air Defense.
(5) Signal.
(6) CBRNE (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive weapons)
(7) Provost Marshal.
(8) MISO (Military Information Support Operations, formerly Psychological Operations or PSYOP)
(9) Civil Military.

e. Coordinating Instructions.
(1) Time or condition when the plan or order becomes effective.
(2) CCIR (Commander's Critical Information Requirements)
(3) Risk Reduction Control Measures.
(4) Rules of Engagement.
(5) Environmental Considerations.
(6) Force Protection.


4. SUSTAINMENT.

a. Support Concept.
b. Materiel and Services.
c. Medical Support.
d. Personnel.
e. Civil Military.


5. Command and Control.

a. Command.
b. Control.​

Operations order - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[mudwhistle]

BTW, since you faggots can't even identify the enemy you're going to have a rough time writing the damned thing.

 

[Siete]

I clearly caught you parroting rubes with your pants down. I should have been bombarded with solutions to ISIS by now.

Military action will never work so the RW idiots don't have any answers.

shocking isn't it.