Wikileaks Uncovers Attempt To Protect Obama In Email Scandal

Vigilante

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2014
51,327
18,077
2,290
Waiting on the Cowardly Dante!!
Just confirming that the "Small Penis" president was up to his eyes in this corruption!

wnd.com ^
| October

One of the nation’s top legal minds, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, told WND the latest Wikileaks bombshell confirms his belief that Hillary Clinton wasn’t prosecuted for mishandling classified information because President Obama would have been implicated, too.

Wikileaks released an email on Friday from March 4, 2015, sent by Clinton’s eventual presidential campaign manager, John Podesta, to her attorney Cheryl Mills, asking if they should decline to turn over emails between Clinton and President Obama sent over her private server.

Podesta suggested invoking “executive privilege” to withhold the emails just one day after the House Benghazi Committee had told Clinton to provide all her emails.

Podesta’s email read: “Think we should hold emails to and from potus [President of the United States]? That’s the heart of his exec privilege
 
How stupid do you have to be to believe RussiaLeaks/WikiLies???????
 
How stupid do you have to be to believe RussiaLeaks/WikiLies???????
image.jpeg
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
How stupid do you have to be to believe RussiaLeaks/WikiLies???????
How stupid do you have to be to realize NONE of the Wikileaks have been refuted, except by low 2 digit IQ'd ass lickers of the DemocRAT party!
Only to people too stupid to know they have been edited by RussiaLeaks/WikiLies.
Again repeating for the terminally deranged and morons...That's your Eddy The Liars .NO ONE has refuted ANY of these.
 
In reality, it all does prove that the Democrats are totally stupid when it comes to securing their communications. The whole bunch must be entirely computer illiterate. The idiots really can't even determine exactly who it is that is hacking them to death.
 
Just confirming that the "Small Penis" president was up to his eyes in this corruption!

wnd.com ^
| October

One of the nation’s top legal minds, former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy, told WND the latest Wikileaks bombshell confirms his belief that Hillary Clinton wasn’t prosecuted for mishandling classified information because President Obama would have been implicated, too.

Wikileaks released an email on Friday from March 4, 2015, sent by Clinton’s eventual presidential campaign manager, John Podesta, to her attorney Cheryl Mills, asking if they should decline to turn over emails between Clinton and President Obama sent over her private server.

Podesta suggested invoking “executive privilege” to withhold the emails just one day after the House Benghazi Committee had told Clinton to provide all her emails.

Podesta’s email read: “Think we should hold emails to and from potus [President of the United States]? That’s the heart of his exec privilege


A Special Prosecutor is coming.. This is why ole Barry who HATES the Clinton's is swallowing his pride and trying to get her elected.. He's facing a prison cell as well.
 
How stupid do you have to be to believe RussiaLeaks/WikiLies???????
How stupid do you have to be to realize NONE of the Wikileaks have been refuted, except by low 2 digit IQ'd ass lickers of the DemocRAT party!
Only to people too stupid to know they have been edited by RussiaLeaks/WikiLies.

Russia edited tens of thousands of emails?

Give us the specific examples of the edits.

Nicely done..
 
How stupid do you have to be to believe RussiaLeaks/WikiLies???????
How stupid do you have to be to think you can simply wave off bad news with zero evidence?

The leftist sheep were even made fun of in one of Helly's emails.. did you read the one where she called them complacent and brain dead? LMAO
And then we have the Gruber comments. This isn't even news, the left wing party elites know their base consists of malleable morons.
 
I don't think the emails have been edited, they seem legit. I just dont think they are as big of a deal as they are being blown up to be. They are private conversations from years ago amoungst staffers who are strategizing for a campaign. Hardly damning to Clinton. Can you imagine the backend of the GOP campaign? Can you imagine if YOUR private communications were all made public and scrutinized by everybody? How many enemies would you make? How much would be taken out of context. It's an ugly ugly thing. And y'all wonder why Hillary was trying to be secure and private with her emails. Case in point
 

Forum List

Back
Top