Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
well that settles that if Spielberg said it was true then it must be true,Spielberg's Schindler's list is as good a source as any. based on survivor accounts and testimony
no it was the survivors who validated it
you must mean the skin lamp shade bit.
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......Currently, fourteen European countries as well as the State of Israel either explicitly prohibit the denial of the Holocaust or have enacted laws that can be used to punish Holocaust deniers. However, two questions arise with respect to these laws. First, are they effective in preventing the resurgence of Nazism and the promotion of hatred and genocide? And second, do these laws violate free speech, and if they do, is this a permissible violation?
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......Currently, fourteen European countries as well as the State of Israel either explicitly prohibit the denial of the Holocaust or have enacted laws that can be used to punish Holocaust deniers. However, two questions arise with respect to these laws. First, are they effective in preventing the resurgence of Nazism and the promotion of hatred and genocide? And second, do these laws violate free speech, and if they do, is this a permissible violation?
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......Currently, fourteen European countries as well as the State of Israel either explicitly prohibit the denial of the Holocaust or have enacted laws that can be used to punish Holocaust deniers. However, two questions arise with respect to these laws. First, are they effective in preventing the resurgence of Nazism and the promotion of hatred and genocide? And second, do these laws violate free speech, and if they do, is this a permissible violation?
a perfect example of how banning legitimizes it in the eyes of it's adherents...it becomes legitimized as "what are they trying to supress".The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......Currently, fourteen European countries as well as the State of Israel either explicitly prohibit the denial of the Holocaust or have enacted laws that can be used to punish Holocaust deniers. However, two questions arise with respect to these laws. First, are they effective in preventing the resurgence of Nazism and the promotion of hatred and genocide? And second, do these laws violate free speech, and if they do, is this a permissible violation?
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......Currently, fourteen European countries as well as the State of Israel either explicitly prohibit the denial of the Holocaust or have enacted laws that can be used to punish Holocaust deniers. However, two questions arise with respect to these laws. First, are they effective in preventing the resurgence of Nazism and the promotion of hatred and genocide? And second, do these laws violate free speech, and if they do, is this a permissible violation?
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
They are trying to hide the money making scheme called the "holohoax".
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......Currently, fourteen European countries as well as the State of Israel either explicitly prohibit the denial of the Holocaust or have enacted laws that can be used to punish Holocaust deniers. However, two questions arise with respect to these laws. First, are they effective in preventing the resurgence of Nazism and the promotion of hatred and genocide? And second, do these laws violate free speech, and if they do, is this a permissible violation?
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......Currently, fourteen European countries as well as the State of Israel either explicitly prohibit the denial of the Holocaust or have enacted laws that can be used to punish Holocaust deniers. However, two questions arise with respect to these laws. First, are they effective in preventing the resurgence of Nazism and the promotion of hatred and genocide? And second, do these laws violate free speech, and if they do, is this a permissible violation?
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
Jews have and are committing genocide, Germans have not. Germans fought a war.
Oh lots of money made from WWII for the jews. Lots of sympathy as well. What a racket. Any of your distant relatives die in WWII. I think everyone alive has some. Hitler got a bad rap.
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......Currently, fourteen European countries as well as the State of Israel either explicitly prohibit the denial of the Holocaust or have enacted laws that can be used to punish Holocaust deniers. However, two questions arise with respect to these laws. First, are they effective in preventing the resurgence of Nazism and the promotion of hatred and genocide? And second, do these laws violate free speech, and if they do, is this a permissible violation?
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
The 3rd question should be: What are they trying to hide and Why? ......
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
You are certainly the fount of knowledge when it comes to vulgar so I suppose I should respect your assessment
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
Jews have and are committing genocide, Germans have not. Germans fought a war.
Damn...you made me snort my soda out my nose.
That is certainly and interesting....interpretation...of events.
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
Jews have and are committing genocide, Germans have not. Germans fought a war.
Damn...you made me snort my soda out my nose.
That is certainly and interesting....interpretation...of events.
It is CLASSIC--------jews created the BUBONIC PLAGUE that knocked off 1/3 of
Europe in the 14th century. Ask Penelope
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
You are certainly the fount of knowledge when it comes to vulgar so I suppose I should respect your assessment
I am a fount of knowledge in many fields------I do really well ----guessing ----
while watching JEOPARDY-----at home
Coyote-----sunni agrees with your assessment that the filth of Nazism is
legitimate and that the genocide was GOOD IN THE EYES OF ALLAH AND
HIS RAPIST PAL MUHUMMAD
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
You are certainly the fount of knowledge when it comes to vulgar so I suppose I should respect your assessment
I am a fount of knowledge in many fields------I do really well ----guessing ----
while watching JEOPARDY-----at home
sorry----not fount-----FONT (I think----must I google?)
Put down the bottle Rosie.
read the last few posts coyote-----sunni has endorse your post because he interprets it as an endorsement of the legitimacy of Nazi genocide of jews and
Islamic denial thereof. Your comment is-----typically vulgar
You are certainly the fount of knowledge when it comes to vulgar so I suppose I should respect your assessment
I am a fount of knowledge in many fields------I do really well ----guessing ----
while watching JEOPARDY-----at home
sorry----not fount-----FONT (I think----must I google?)
Start living dangerously Rosie - take a google!
