Why would anyone object to Virginia’s new gun laws?

Law abiding American citizens are citizen soldiers dating back to the Minuteman
The 2nd is clear about well regulated.


clear how??? just that we need one,,it would be kinda dumb to not have the people armed to have that militia,,,

or are you saying the government should provide all arms???
The national guard is our well regulated militia.


they are enlisted men not a militia,,,
Notice how everyone of these traitors has to lie?


thats all they have left,,,
 
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.

because they violate the Constitution.

That should be enough even for you.
Wrong.

None of the proposed measures have been invalidated by the Supreme Court.
Don't have to be, just like I don't have to be arrested and sent to prison by a court for commiting a felony, to know it's against the law to commit a felony.
 
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.
 
Absolutely there is nothing in those laws that any rational person should find objectionable. It is about the public safety. Given comments on this board and others by right-wingers there are people that should not be anywhere near dangerous objects much less guns.
/——/ Those who give up liberty for the false sense of security deserve neither. BF
Liberty to me is going to church and not fearing I will be shot in the head during a hymnal.
Government cannot prevent that

killers will always find a way

better you should try to stop the hate being spewed toward Christians
Keeping guns out of the hands of lunatics will.
You mean a total ban and confiscation

thats not acceptable

and would not succeed anyway since criminals do not obey the law
What’s not acceptable is the lies you and others on the right propagate.

None of the proposed measures authorize ‘confiscation.’
 
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.

The Supreme Court onced ruled Separate but Equal was Constitutional under Plessey. I have a feeling you think the SC was wrong under Citizens United.

It's like yo morons think the SC can't be wrong when it rules in your favor. All this is really is appeal to authority.
 
Do you really want to live in a society where you can’t even pray in a house of worship without the fear that someone will put a bullet in you?



We already do.

All a person has to do is a simple search on church shooting and a list of them will pop up.

That is what the weapons nuts have done to America. Make it not safe to even go to a place of worship or into a school or a mall or movie theater without being murdered by a crazy person with a weapon.

Let us know your winning strategy for preventing 'crazy people' from obtaining firearms.

WITHOUT infringing on the rights on the non-crazies.
Red flag laws

Red flag laws are for removing firearms from people that MAY be a risk to themselves, or others.

They do little to prevent people from obtaining them.

Red flags can also add someone to a no sell list

Do you object to keeping crazy people from buying guns?

Do you object to keeping crazy people from buying guns?

Not if it keeps people like you from owning firearms.

I remember you advocated preventing people from owning firearms after they had been diagnosed by someone in a cubical, per one of Obamas EOs.

Thank god that is no longer in effect.
 
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.
So criminals will do a background check when they buy their stolen firearms? What does one gun a month do?
How will a ban on carrying a firearm stop a criminal?.

So you agree that any government that creates a carry ban they are open to being sued when someone is shot and killed in those areas?
 
/——/ Those who give up liberty for the false sense of security deserve neither. BF
Liberty to me is going to church and not fearing I will be shot in the head during a hymnal.
Government cannot prevent that

killers will always find a way

better you should try to stop the hate being spewed toward Christians
Keeping guns out of the hands of lunatics will.
You mean a total ban and confiscation

thats not acceptable

and would not succeed anyway since criminals do not obey the law
What’s not acceptable is the lies you and others on the right propagate.

None of the proposed measures authorize ‘confiscation.’

None of the proposed measures authorize ‘confiscation.’
REd Flag laws aren't about confiscation ?
 
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.
And when the peope rise up and alter them, they next will be smart
 
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.
DF328136-CFF9-4C42-8CED-FA21C8E2DDE7.webp
 
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.

The Supreme Court onced ruled Separate but Equal was Constitutional under Plessey. I have a feeling you think the SC was wrong under Citizens United.

It's like yo morons think the SC can't be wrong when it rules in your favor. All this is really is appeal to authority.

What the Supreme Court did was common sense. The 2nd Amendment says a well-regulated militia.
 
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.

because they violate the Constitution.

That should be enough even for you.
Wrong.

None of the proposed measures have been invalidated by the Supreme Court.
Wait. What?

You mean something that is being proposed hasn’t made its way thru the courts and been ruled on by the USSC already?

Shocking!
 
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.

The Supreme Court onced ruled Separate but Equal was Constitutional under Plessey. I have a feeling you think the SC was wrong under Citizens United.

It's like yo morons think the SC can't be wrong when it rules in your favor. All this is really is appeal to authority.

What the Supreme Court did was common sense. The 2nd Amendment says a well-regulated militia.
Is that all it says ? Lol poor guy
 
/——/ Those who give up liberty for the false sense of security deserve neither. BF
Liberty to me is going to church and not fearing I will be shot in the head during a hymnal.
Government cannot prevent that

killers will always find a way

better you should try to stop the hate being spewed toward Christians
Keeping guns out of the hands of lunatics will.
You mean a total ban and confiscation

thats not acceptable

and would not succeed anyway since criminals do not obey the law
What’s not acceptable is the lies you and others on the right propagate.

None of the proposed measures authorize ‘confiscation.’
None of the currently proposed measures

the dems dropped that idea as a bridge too far
 
15th post
Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.

The Supreme Court onced ruled Separate but Equal was Constitutional under Plessey. I have a feeling you think the SC was wrong under Citizens United.

It's like yo morons think the SC can't be wrong when it rules in your favor. All this is really is appeal to authority.
The Supreme Court once ruled that it was lawful for FDR to issue an edict that justified the incarceration of American citizens without due process. The Supreme Court once found a "right to privacy" that didn't exist in the Constitution to justify the "legal" murder of the unborn. So what's the point?
 
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.

The Supreme Court onced ruled Separate but Equal was Constitutional under Plessey. I have a feeling you think the SC was wrong under Citizens United.

It's like yo morons think the SC can't be wrong when it rules in your favor. All this is really is appeal to authority.

What the Supreme Court did was common sense. The 2nd Amendment says a well-regulated militia.

That's the right of the States. The right of the PEOPLE is to keep and bear arms.

commas mean things.
 
I think you might live in the wrong country, you can’t infringe on my rights.. sorry buddy

You live in the wrong country. No one is infringing on anyone's rights. Regulation of firearms is allowable.
Its actually not you can try but the Supreme court will knock it down, And if they don’t we the people have a right to alter or abolish you

The Supreme Court has already ruled that many of these are constitutional.

The Supreme Court onced ruled Separate but Equal was Constitutional under Plessey. I have a feeling you think the SC was wrong under Citizens United.

It's like yo morons think the SC can't be wrong when it rules in your favor. All this is really is appeal to authority.

What the Supreme Court did was common sense. The 2nd Amendment says a well-regulated militia.

The 2nd Amendment says a well-regulated militia.

It also states "the Right of the People to Keep and Bear Arms"

NOT the Right of the Militia.
 
Back
Top Bottom