Virginia House Democrats pass sweeping gun control package

[M14 Shooter]

PRO GUN. Against not having rules (including rules on use and storage)
GUNS do and can kill, Some rules & laws needed & enforced.

These laws shall not infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms.
So, what do you have in mind?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Odd thing....Never once have any of my guns grew little hands and feet, broke out of the gun room, loaded themselves, and went out and terrorized the village.

You clearly did not have a P320.

 

[toobfreak]

A gun is an inanimate object. Control the evildoers who use the guns. But no, demofascists want crime, so they can pass laws that only affect the law abiding.

More to the point, democrats want crime because it gives them purpose for being, for being elected, to solve the problems they themselves originally created.

Democrats depend of class warfare--- peace, law and order, and prosperity are a poor soil upon which to grow the seeds of malcontent and victimhood needed to maintain class warfare.

 

[sartre play]

These laws shall not infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms.
So, what do you have in mind?

Just what I posted, read it again. PRO GUN. some rules,
USE AND STORAGE. SOME TRAINING,, FEW RULES,
bUT THOSE RULES & LAWS INFORCED.

 

[SweetTea]

You clearly did not have a P320.
View attachment 1220890

I still want an M18/P320. I don't carry with one in the chamber anyway. Also, the majority of the US military carry this weapon. Odds are pretty low of whatever is going on to happen to me.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Just what I posted, read it again. PRO GUN. some rules,
USE AND STORAGE. SOME TRAINING,, FEW RULES,
bUT THOSE RULES & LAWS INFORCED.

Legal requirements to store your guns and to receive training before you can own them violate the constitution.
Sorry.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I still want an M18/P320. I don't carry with one in the chamber anyway. Also, the majority of the US military carry this weapon. Odds are pretty low of whatever is going on to happen to me.

What do you want it for? This is not a criticism. There are many variants now such that you can purchase to preference.

 

[westwall]

Just what I posted, read it again. PRO GUN. some rules,
USE AND STORAGE. SOME TRAINING,, FEW RULES,
bUT THOSE RULES & LAWS INFORCED.

All of those violate the 2nd Amendment, so they are non starters.

 

[1srelluc]

You clearly did not have a P320.
View attachment 1220890

Nope, Just a 9mm 226 and a couple .45 220s.

 

[SweetTea]

What do you want it for? This is not a criticism. There are many variants now such that you can purchase to preference.

I already have a Glock 19x and an M&P 45 for carry. It just makes sense to have the 9mm chosen by the US military. It is also very configurable since it is based on the P320 platform. They offer a variant with a thumb safety. I would likely rotate between it and my Glock for carry.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I already have a Glock 19x and an M&P 45 for carry. It just makes sense to have the 9mm chosen by the US military. It is also very configurable since it is based on the P320 platform. They offer a variant with a thumb safety. I would likely rotate between it and my Glock for carry.

Yes, they have a thumb safety variant. I would not suggest to move between the two because you might get a brain fart in a crisis. I have seen too many competition 1911 shooters do that. But thats just me.

 

[SweetTea]

Yes, they have a thumb safety variant. I would not suggest to move between the two because you might get a brain fart in a crisis. I have seen too many competition 1911 shooters do that. But thats just me.

Yeah, now a 1911 is definitely a different animal. I have a Sig 1911 .45. WAY to big and heavy to carry, but you are right, I could get messed up with that one in a tense situation, though I actually prefer the ergonomics of the 1911. The differences between the Glock and the Sig are very minimal other than the thumb safety that I would have to get used to on the M18. I don't know that I would trust carrying the non-safety version with one in the chamber and not appendix carry for sure.

 

[WEATHER53]

Legal requirements to store your guns and to receive training before you can own them violate the constitution.
Sorry.

Lib loons and their judges love to make sweeping declarations and “laws” that are federally and constitutionally prohibited
Children putting on a show Forb children

 

[Invisibleflash]

All of those violate the 2nd Amendment, so they are non starters.

The 2A is not a right...it is an opinion. If it was not an opinion, SCOTUS would have no effect on it.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The 2A is not a right...it is an opinion.

Wow. Where'd you dig this up?
The 2A prohibits the government from taking certain actions with respect to the right to keep and bear arms; "shall not be infringed" is a command, not an opinion.

 

[SweetTea]

The 2A is not a right...it is an opinion. If it was not an opinion, SCOTUS would have no effect on it.

View attachment 1220947

Wrong, it is a right.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The 2nd Ammendment is supported by Supremert Court judicial interpretation.

Your opinion regarding the interpretation is one thing, but it doesn't mean that it is not a right. It most certainly is.

 

[Synthaholic]

Trump was already coming for you guns. Democrats are not.

 

[Synthaholic]

"A well regulated Militia"

That contradicts any regular citizen not in a militia owning guns..

 

[Failzero]

That contradicts any regular citizen not in a militia owning guns..

Militia is Citizenry

 

[Failzero]

That contradicts any regular citizen not in a militia owning guns..

I’m Militia and as I’m inactive I’m Citizenry too