Why We Don't Have Universal Health Care.

Right

But even if we were just talking about England, it’d still be the more populated than any single state
IT makes no difference. The system is in serious trouble and needs more funds, more Drs modern drugs, mental healthcare fir children. They have 2 tier system. Private fir the wealthy and the NHS for the common people
 
IT makes no difference. The system is in serious trouble and needs more funds, more Drs modern drugs, mental healthcare fir children. They have 2 tier system. Private fir the wealthy and the NHS for the common people
The only point I was making (to the other poster) is that it’s ridiculous to compare England to Alabama or Georgia in this context since their populations are vastly smaller
 
The only point I was making (to the other poster) is that it’s ridiculous to compare England to Alabama or Georgia in this context since their populations are vastly smaller
Why would population make any difference.
 
Socialized medicine always goes broke and lowers the quality if care which costs more because its the government stupid
You didn't cover any of that, you thick ****.

Both braincells please, not just the retarded indoctrinated shit you were spoonfed by your government.
 
PeterPilot you went quiet. How is the NHS structured in the UK, what percentage is funded by government, how does the government interface with the NHS, how does private healthcare and the NHS interact, does the government lose court cases with the NHS, and what percentage of Bits have healthcare cover?

When Americans say, "I don't want government running my healthcare", that just shows their knowledge is so small on the subject, you get one one-hundreth of a postage stamp and write it all down on that.
How the Brits structure their bureaucracies has precious little to do with whether or not universal healthcare could work in the US. So if those questions you asked keep you awake at night, do your own research and inform yourself.

What the Scamdemic showed is that both healthcare for profit systems as in the US, and healthcare provided by the state as in Canada and Britain, were all in on the fraud.

I suspect that the founders would not be opposed to some sort of universal healthcare if the government could afford to do it. Given that our Department of Military Aggression has been unable to ever pass an audit, and that it cannot account for trillions of dollars shows that we do have the $ do provide universal healthcare. What's important is how the system is designed. While we could learn something from the British and Canadian and other such systems, we could also avoid mistakes they've made. I am not informed about the details of those systems, and don't intend to become familiar with such trivia.
 
You forgot Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland. Its the UK not England
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own versions of NHS that operate separate from England's
 
You’re paying for them via the high premiums you pay through whatever health insurance you pay into. They’re the reason insurance is so expensive
Exactly. Maybe we need to start charging fat people higher premiums like we do for smokers
 
How the Brits structure their bureaucracies has precious little to do with whether or not universal healthcare could work in the US. So if those questions you asked keep you awake at night, do your own research and inform yourself.

What the Scamdemic showed is that both healthcare for profit systems as in the US, and healthcare provided by the state as in Canada and Britain, were all in on the fraud.

I suspect that the founders would not be opposed to some sort of universal healthcare if the government could afford to do it. Given that our Department of Military Aggression has been unable to ever pass an audit, and that it cannot account for trillions of dollars shows that we do have the $ do provide universal healthcare. What's important is how the system is designed. While we could learn something from the British and Canadian and other such systems, we could also avoid mistakes they've made. I am not informed about the details of those systems, and don't intend to become familiar with such trivia.
Americans say, "Government is not running my healthcare", but they be got ABSOLUTELY no idea how healthcare is rand and structured in other countries. That's how inept they are on the subject. Every time you guys vouch for an expensive healthcare system, we just cringe at every comment.
 
Americans say, "Government is not running my healthcare", but they be got ABSOLUTELY no idea how healthcare is rand and structured in other countries. That's how inept they are on the subject. Every time you guys vouch for an expensive healthcare system, we just cringe at every comment.
Your poor grammar and spelling suggest your thought processes are equally inefficient.
 
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own versions of NHS that operate separate from England's
They are small differences essentially the same problems are in every Country
 
Socialized medicine always goes broke and lowers the quality if care which costs more because its the government stupid
Odd that police, fire protection and defense are not considered "socialist". Just because something necessary is done collectively doesn't make it Marxist, "socialist", "communist" or "evil". Are we so unable to arrive at an original solution?
 
15th post
PeterPilot you went quiet. How is the NHS structured in the UK, what percentage is funded by government, how does the government interface with the NHS, how does private healthcare and the NHS interact, does the government lose court cases with the NHS, and what percentage of Bits have healthcare cover?

When Americans say, "I don't want government running my healthcare", that just shows their knowledge is so small on the subject, you get one one-hundreth of a postage stamp and write it all down on that.
Actually, anyone saying such a thing is obviously ignorant of the fact that "government", at the behest of lobbies, is effectively running healthcare, in an extremely expensive manner that benefits certain interests other than the people's.
 
Odd that police, fire protection and defense are not considered "socialist". Just because something necessary is done collectively doesn't make it Marxist, "socialist", "communist" or "evil". Are we so unable to arrive at an original solution?
Socialism is government control of all business and the economy. Thats not the police
 
The NHS in the UK is collapsing. Its out of funds, DRs leaving in large numbers, wait times months even years. Socialized health care never works. You pay more and get a lower quality and there is zero i ovation in treatments and drugs. Yt in the UK they pay more taxes and have a lower living standard than America and it still went broke.
I questioned a couple of nurses from British Columbia, Canada over thirty years ago about the free health care in that country. The confirmed that, yes, Canada had free health care, but the heart surgery that I had just gotten after a three day wait might have had a wait of a year or longer and that was over thirty years ago.
 
Your poor grammar and spelling suggest your thought processes are equally inefficient.
Americans say, "Government is not running my healthcare", but they have ABSOLUTELY no idea how healthcare is ran and structured in other countries. That's how inept they are on the subject. Every time you guys vouch for an expensive healthcare system, we just cringe at every comment.
 
Back
Top Bottom