Why We Don't Have Universal Health Care.

Actually, anyone saying such a thing is obviously ignorant of the fact that "government", at the behest of lobbies, is effectively running healthcare, in an extremely expensive manner that benefits certain interests other than the people's.
Well, that was a useless post ^^^

Thanks for the links.

I went online and did private healthcare insurance. The excess/co pay was £250. So the quote came out at £54 per month. If I increase the excess to the max, £1000, then monthly payments drop to £47 per month.

1000007790.webp



So I can have state and private healthcare at a fraction of the cost compared to the US.
 
And then Obama required people to actually buy it. What else am I required to buy? A TV? Certain types of foods? Certain types of clothes? An air conditioner?
 
I questioned a couple of nurses from British Columbia, Canada over thirty years ago about the free health care in that country. The confirmed that, yes, Canada had free health care, but the heart surgery that I had just gotten after a three day wait might have had a wait of a year or longer and that was over thirty years ago.
Canada has long wait times as well. They save money because people die
 
Canada has long wait times as well. They save money because people die
The Pentagon spends as much on weapons as the ten countries below the US on this list. Yes, including Russia and China. So if the arms race were reduced by at least half, I think there would be enough money for healthcare.
But under capitalism, it is more profitable to produce weapons, than to treat some plebeians. And as we all know, capitalism is about profit and only profit.
 
The Pentagon spends as much on weapons as the ten countries below the US on this list. Yes, including Russia and China. So if the arms race were reduced by at least half, I think there would be enough money for healthcare.
But under capitalism, it is more profitable to produce weapons, than to treat some plebeians. And as we all know, capitalism is about profit and only profit.
False equivalency. Lets compare the useless social programs we waste money on. The process of funding government controlled healthcare never works. The NHS in the UK is collapsing Drs leaving and its out of funds. Wait times are in months even years. They have higher taxes a VAT tax and its still not enough.
Capitalism always forces the best service at the lowest cost until government gets involved. Profits define excellence because people are making choices. When its the government you have no choice you get screwed
 
Capitalism always forces the best service at the lowest cost until government gets involved. Profits define excellence because people are making choices. When its the government you have no choice you get screwed
It is said that in the Middle Ages, during the execution of thieves, other thieves would pick the pockets of those present. Some conclude from this that the death penalty and the entire system of punishment are meaningless, since people still manage to break the law despite the fear of punishment.
But they do not take into account the fact that without punishment, the number of crimes could be even higher.
The same applies to the state/government. I am absolutely certain that under capitalism, without the government, capitalists would steal everything, singing sweet songs about "free choice that people have.” Capitalism is about profit. Profit today, and preferably right now. Capitalists are unable and unwilling to plan for the long term.
 
Bullshit. The USA has universal health care. We've had universal health care for a very long time.

You can't name a single person in the USA who does not have access to health care.
If that claim is true, why is it that the largest single factor in causes of personal bankruptcy is medical debt?
 
And then Obama required people to actually buy it. What else am I required to buy? A TV? Certain types of foods? Certain types of clothes? An air conditioner?
ACA was a feeding trough for the insurance industry. That's all it was ever intended to be. Google Liz Fowler.
 
Well, then since the rich are already rich, let’s have the rich shut down all their businesses and put 90% of the country out of work. If that isn’t appealing to you then stop attack the rich who give jobs to 90% of the money earners in America.
 
Well, then since the rich are already rich, let’s have the rich shut down all their businesses and put 90% of the country out of work. ...the rich who give jobs to 90% of the money earners in America.
Interestingly, american slave owners said the same thing: They feed the slaves, and without their organizational skills, thanks to which the slaves have work and a roof over their heads, the slaves would be lost.
 
I just want the left to tell us truthfully what they want to have happen to the job givers?
 
15th post
for one countries like sweden have a fraction of our population
have you seen how high their tax burden is to "pay" for this? some 40%

it's not FREE, nothing is

Imagine you are healthy and never use it whereas your neighbor is a heavy drinker and smoker
and constantly in the clinic, you are paying extra for their life choices.
Just care about your self, wouldn't want to be unselfish & care about others?
 
Just care about your self, wouldn't want to be unselfish & care about others?
LOL, talking out your ass, why should I pay more for somebody that drinks, smokes and does drugs and is always in the hospital than somebody that is healthy? that is grade A socialism so clearly you are a fan, enjoy no freedom of choice
 
Back
Top Bottom