Why the whining about men voting to overturn Roe v. Wade?

Yeah, a SCOTUS justice should be able to determine the difference between a man and a woman or be dismissed as unqualified. BTW, a democrat controlled congress confirmed those three justices.
Historiography / transgender issues - Transgender people are known to have existed since ancient times. A wide range of societies had traditional 3rd gender roles, or otherwise accepted trans people in some form. Often becoming an integral part of the society or culture. India is just one example of that tradition. India was the first nation to recognize the third gender officially / legally. India has a population of over a million transgender people. They are integral part of that society. 10 Nations around the world recognize transgender rights. 10 cultures around the world recognize transgender rights. Belgium was very specific when they enacted their transgender protection laws, they said they did not want to repeat the same mistake they did with homosexuals. The United States is wise to do this when they did, before the Advent of the age of lies and conspiracies arose that are destroying the fabric of American Life.
 
Actually no, it's the business of sick minded, hateful nosy bodies.
So now you are advocating for murder? Because anyone who takes an interest is a busybody? I sure am glad you were so supportive of all of those BLM "busybodies" that burned, looted and MURDERED in support of George Floyd two years ago.
 
We guys should just butt out of the abortion issue. It’s none of our business.
Oh, but it is if you want to be a father and the woman you impregnate wants to deny you fatherhood. She holds your reproductive freedom in her hands.
 
Historiography / transgender issues - Transgender people are known to have existed since ancient times. A wide range of societies had traditional 3rd gender roles, or otherwise accepted trans people in some form. Often becoming an integral part of the society or culture. India is just one example of that tradition. India was the first nation to recognize the third gender officially / legally. India has a population of over a million transgender people. They are integral part of that society. 10 Nations around the world recognize transgender rights. 10 cultures around the world recognize transgender rights. Belgium was very specific when they enacted their transgender protection laws, they said they did not want to repeat the same mistake they did with homosexuals. The United States is wise to do this when they did, before the Advent of the age of lies and conspiracies arose that are destroying the fabric of American Life.
Nice try--all irrelevant, and inept, but nice. Now "DEFINE WOMAN."
 
We guys should just butt out of the abortion issue. It’s none of our business.
Correct, this is nothing more than a power grabbing issue by callous, cold-hearted people who neither care for, know or even understand why some women need abortions.
 
Correct, this is nothing more than a power grabbing issue by callous, cold-hearted people who neither care for, know or even understand why some women need abortions.
Abortions have not been banned moron. The issue has been returned to the states. I don't know of any state that has banned abortions necessitated by medical conditions. Inconvenience and "Uh oh, I got drunk and fucked the wrong guy last night." are not reason for murder of innocents.
 
Big deal. They changed their minds about precedent.
And that's the problem, of course. If any criminal charges were to come of their testimony, the prosecution would have to prove that they didn't simply change their minds.

Impeachment, on the other hand, is a political function rather than a legal one, but it would require a hay-uge swing in popular opinion.
 
If the rumors about the voting lineup in the Supreme Court is to be believed a 5-4 majority is set to overturn Roe V. Wade.

Apparently this voting bloc consists of Barrett and three white male justices and Clarence Thomas. I've heard lots of complaints about a "group of men" voting to overturn Roe v. Wade.

But.

It was a group of men (7) who voted in favor of Roe v. Wade in the first place. So aren't complaints about the group intending to vote against Roe today a bit hypocritical?
Men are allowed only one opinion on abortion.
 
And that's the problem, of course. If any criminal charges were to come of their testimony, the prosecution would have to prove that they didn't simply change their minds.

Impeachment, on the other hand, is a political function rather than a legal one, but it would require a hay-uge swing in popular opinion.
When I looked up the information on removing a supreme Court Justice, they are removed by impeachment.
 
Men are allowed only one opinion on abortion.
People on the supreme Court are supposed to have no biases or prejudices one way or another on an issue if they do they're not supposed to vote on the issue. In essence, the courts should not be able to rule on abortion, and by their omissions in their abortion laws, States should not be able to pass blankets legislation that address is abortion. Either all abortions are illegal or they are not. That's why I contend it's always been a woman's right to choose what to do with her own body. Government and Court interference is not welcome, wanted or needed. I just wish the supreme Court would have done the right thing and outlaw all abortion laws years ago. That would have solved this perceived problem and restore some legitimacy to the supreme Court.
 
And that is in the constitution where??
Article III, Section 1, Clause b. "The Judges ... shall hold their offices during good behaviour ..."

The Justices in this case could be subject to impeachment, not trial, meaning no proof of a crime is required. All they'd need is 218 Representatives to impeach, and 67 Senators to remove.
 

Forum List

Back
Top