Why the whining about men voting to overturn Roe v. Wade?

[Dayton3]

If the rumors about the voting lineup in the Supreme Court is to be believed a 5-4 majority is set to overturn Roe V. Wade.

Apparently this voting bloc consists of Barrett and three white male justices and Clarence Thomas. I've heard lots of complaints about a "group of men" voting to overturn Roe v. Wade.

But.

It was a group of men (7) who voted in favor of Roe v. Wade in the first place. So aren't complaints about the group intending to vote against Roe today a bit hypocritical?

 

[Thinker101]

If the rumors about the voting lineup in the Supreme Court is to be believed a 5-4 majority is set to overturn Roe V. Wade.

Apparently this voting bloc consists of Barrett and three white male justices and Clarence Thomas. I've heard lots of complaints about a "group of men" voting to overturn Roe v. Wade.

But.

It was a group of men (7) who voted in favor of Roe v. Wade in the first place. So aren't complaints about the group intending to vote against Roe today a bit hypocritical?

But Libs thrive on their hypocrisy.

 

[Mr Natural]

We guys should just butt out of the abortion issue. It’s none of our business.

 

[Anomalism]

The reality of the matter is that men can and do influence these things. Telling men to butt out just isn't productive.

 

[DukeU]

We guys should just butt out of the abortion issue. It’s none of our business.

Saving innocent lives is everyone's business.

 

[elektra]

Abortion is good for men. Men don't always need the burden of being a father. It is nice to be able to convince a young woman to abort and not bother the man

 

[ColonelAngus]

Its a legal issue and a state issue ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION.

The cult wants to violate the Constitution over emotion.

They just always want their way or they tantrum out like fucking babies.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

We guys should just butt out of the abortion issue. It’s none of our business.

That's because males are never aborted, right?

 

[eagle1462010]

::Issues4Life Foundation | Judgment At Nuremberg

The Issues4Life Foundation is dedicated to addressing the issues surrounding the inviolability or sanctity of human life in the African-American community.

www.issues4life.org

On Monday, January 22nd, 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 and simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton regarding the issue of abortion. The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy "somewhere" under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state's two (2) legitimate interests in regulating abortions and protecting women's health and ultimately the protection the potentiality of human life. Importantly, the United States Supreme Court never declared abortion itself to be a constitutional right. Rather, the Supreme Court said: "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins … the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer." Then, in the very text of the Roe v. Wade decision, the High Court made a key admission:

"The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157] for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment."1

In my opinion, the United States Supreme Court needed to "resolve the difficult question of when life begins … " before rendering judgment on the death of the only product of a human male and a human female, that is a human being. Below are clips from the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremburg. In light of the fact that not one (1) of the seven (7) Supreme Court justices that made up the majority for 1973 Roe v. Wade decision are alive today, you can be the judge. Top

 

[Darkwind]

If you want abortion to be a Federal law or a Right as set forth by the US Consitution, then you simply need to pass an Amendment to the US Constitiution.

It then becomes a moot point until and unless there are enough votes and will to create an Amendment rescinding the Abortion Amendment.

 

[konradv]

If you want abortion to be a Federal law or a Right as set forth by the US Consitution, then you simply need to pass an Amendment to the US Constitiution.

It then becomes a moot point until and unless there are enough votes and will to create an Amendment rescinding the Abortion Amendment.

Its a legal issue and a state issue ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION.

The cult wants to violate the Constitution over emotion.

They just always want their way or they tantrum out like fucking babies.

If men had babies, abortion would be in the Bill of Rights.

 

[Darkwind]

If men had babies, abortion would be in the Bill of Rights.

No, it would not.

However, it can be. Just elect people who think that killing should be codified in the Constitution.

A simple concept that can be grasped even by the left.

 

[dudmuck]

::Issues4Life Foundation | Judgment At Nuremberg

The Issues4Life Foundation is dedicated to addressing the issues surrounding the inviolability or sanctity of human life in the African-American community.

www.issues4life.org

On Monday, January 22nd, 1973 the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 and simultaneously with a companion case, Doe v. Bolton regarding the issue of abortion. The Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy "somewhere" under the due process clause of the 14th Amendment extended to a woman's decision to have an abortion, but that this right must be balanced against the state's two (2) legitimate interests in regulating abortions and protecting women's health and ultimately the protection the potentiality of human life. Importantly, the United States Supreme Court never declared abortion itself to be a constitutional right. Rather, the Supreme Court said: "We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins … the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer." Then, in the very text of the Roe v. Wade decision, the High Court made a key admission:

"The appellee and certain amici argue that the fetus is a "person" within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, [410 U.S. 113, 157] for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment."1

In my opinion, the United States Supreme Court needed to "resolve the difficult question of when life begins … " before rendering judgment on the death of the only product of a human male and a human female, that is a human being. Below are clips from the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremburg. In light of the fact that not one (1) of the seven (7) Supreme Court justices that made up the majority for 1973 Roe v. Wade decision are alive today, you can be the judge. Top

 

[Mr Natural]

If men had babies, abortion would be in the Bill of Rights.

It would be as easy as getting a haircut.

 

[Unkotare]

If men had babies, abortion would be in the Bill of Rights.

Don't be ridiculous. If men had the babies, humans would have gone extinct millennia ago.

 

[Dayton3]

If it would get you people to shut up I would be for all of those.

 

[eagle1462010]

lol

Trolling when you have no answers.

How many laws in New York will be thrown out if Roe Versus Wade is overturned?

 

[Slade3200]

If the rumors about the voting lineup in the Supreme Court is to be believed a 5-4 majority is set to overturn Roe V. Wade.

Apparently this voting bloc consists of Barrett and three white male justices and Clarence Thomas. I've heard lots of complaints about a "group of men" voting to overturn Roe v. Wade.

But.

It was a group of men (7) who voted in favor of Roe v. Wade in the first place. So aren't complaints about the group intending to vote against Roe today a bit hypocritical?

The primary focus of RvW supporters is “Womens Rights” so it’s not a mystery why complaints about men making decisions/votes are part of their talking points

 

[Paleman]

The reality of the matter is that men can and do influence these things. Telling men to butt out just isn't productive.

Based on Mr Cleans warped viewpoint, we need not bother to call 911 if we see him being mugged----not our business, not our problem.

The reality of the matter is that men can and do influence these things. Telling men to butt out just isn't productive.

 

[Hellbilly]

DNA testing to identify the father. Force all men to support the child they helped create.