They would declare a candidate lying about his position was grounds for removal.He should do what Obama does and just lie about it.
hey it worked for Obama. so why not.they don't seem to mind
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They would declare a candidate lying about his position was grounds for removal.He should do what Obama does and just lie about it.
hey it worked for Obama. so why not.they don't seem to mind
They would declare a candidate lying about his position was grounds for removal.He should do what Obama does and just lie about it.
hey it worked for Obama. so why not.they don't seem to mind
Of course they are, and when Scott Walker begins to question science in regards to evolution, that becomes relevant.Are a candidates views on science of any import? We use science in a lot of government projects including the military. For example, a president was once asked once about a new type of bomb, another president about space and one even had a program to wipe out polio named after him.
Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
Obama doesn't, he's a self described Christian who believes in God and the bible and prays.[/
You are lying again.
It's for the children.They would declare a candidate lying about his position was grounds for removal.He should do what Obama does and just lie about it.
hey it worked for Obama. so why not.they don't seem to mind
oh that's right. only Democrats are allowed to lie
You can prove this?Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
WHO CARES. you people just don't give up do you?
His views aren't yours so that MAKES HIM WRONG?
JUST how uppity snobbish and INTOLERANT is that folks
You kicked them out of power for stuff like this and them telling YOU THAT YOUR views are wrong and not worthy.
plus it's already been posted and it was was dude also
prove it? You're talking to "Jake, King of the Unsubstantiated Statement."You can prove this?Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
He should do what Obama does and just lie about it.
hey it worked for Obama. so why not.they don't seem to mind
Our allies in all parts of the world will negotiate with us regardless of what a President thinks on a nonsense issue like evolution. They want the money and their greed will overcome any unfounded notion that they have some kind of aversion with the USA because of scientific theory.Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
Obama said he believed marriage was between one man and one woman, and Axelrod says he was lying. He always believed in gay marriage.He should do what Obama does and just lie about it.
hey it worked for Obama. so why not.they don't seem to mind
I must have missed that. What did he say?
In any case, no one knows what Walker's beliefs on evolution are. So it's pretty moot.Our allies in all parts of the world will negotiate with us regardless of what a President thinks on a nonsense issue like evolution. They want the money and their greed will overcome any unfounded notion that they have some kind of aversion with the USA because of scientific theory.Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
Yes...but I chalk it off to another in a long series of "Made up shit" that you find here at the USMB.In any case, no one knows what Walker's beliefs on evolution are. So it's pretty moot.Our allies in all parts of the world will negotiate with us regardless of what a President thinks on a nonsense issue like evolution. They want the money and their greed will overcome any unfounded notion that they have some kind of aversion with the USA because of scientific theory.Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
If a candidate professed to be a devout Muslim, I'd likely chose him over a militant atheist. Our personal beliefs should not color our political decisions, but our lack of personal beliefs; a moral compass, if you will, affects every action we take.WHO CARES. you people just don't give up do you?
His views aren't yours so that MAKES HIM WRONG?
JUST how uppity snobbish and INTOLERANT is that folks
You kicked them out of power for stuff like this and them telling YOU THAT YOUR views are wrong and not worthy.
plus it's already been posted and it was was dude also
Stefunny...Stefunny...Stefunny... What a person's core beliefs are is 100% relevant to someone making decisions in the voting booth.
Would you think it relevant if a candidate was a devout Muslim?
Should a candidate be allowed to dodge a question if they believed in Sharia Law?
We SHOULD be INTOLERANT of fanatics getting into government.
If a candidate professed to be a devout Muslim, I'd likely chose him over a militant atheist. Our personal beliefs should not color our political decisions, but our lack of personal beliefs; a moral compass, if you will, affects every action we take.WHO CARES. you people just don't give up do you?
His views aren't yours so that MAKES HIM WRONG?
JUST how uppity snobbish and INTOLERANT is that folks
You kicked them out of power for stuff like this and them telling YOU THAT YOUR views are wrong and not worthy.
plus it's already been posted and it was was dude also
Stefunny...Stefunny...Stefunny... What a person's core beliefs are is 100% relevant to someone making decisions in the voting booth.
Would you think it relevant if a candidate was a devout Muslim?
Should a candidate be allowed to dodge a question if they believed in Sharia Law?
We SHOULD be INTOLERANT of fanatics getting into government.
Sharia.... Well, Sharia runs counter to the laws of our nation and our Constitution, so yes, that matters. The fact that Walker refused to answer a snotty reporter, doesn't.
It's a variant of "When did you stop beating your wife?"Yes...but I chalk it off to another in a long series of "Made up shit" that you find here at the USMB.In any case, no one knows what Walker's beliefs on evolution are. So it's pretty moot.Our allies in all parts of the world will negotiate with us regardless of what a President thinks on a nonsense issue like evolution. They want the money and their greed will overcome any unfounded notion that they have some kind of aversion with the USA because of scientific theory.Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
Anything for an argument.
I've no doubt President Obama believes in evolution as all educated people do, including the Pope.Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
Obama doesn't, he's a self described Christian who believes in God and the bible and prays.
So is evolution science?And did their views on evolution influence any decision or answer they made? No.Are a candidates views on science of any import? We use science in a lot of government projects including the military. For example, a president was once asked once about a new type of bomb, another president about space and one even had a program to wipe out polio named after him.
Another troll thread aimed at a putative front runner.
I'd swear the lefty drones here are programmed by the DNC.
Pretty much.....It's a variant of "When did you stop beating your wife?"Yes...but I chalk it off to another in a long series of "Made up shit" that you find here at the USMB.In any case, no one knows what Walker's beliefs on evolution are. So it's pretty moot.Our allies in all parts of the world will negotiate with us regardless of what a President thinks on a nonsense issue like evolution. They want the money and their greed will overcome any unfounded notion that they have some kind of aversion with the USA because of scientific theory.Our allies in Europe will not negotiate with a President who does not believe in evolution.
Anything for an argument.