Sea levels rise by 'unexpected' amount in 2024: NASA

[abu afak]

.......

Snapshots of mean ocean temperature over the last 700 000 years using noble gases in the EPICA Dome C ice core​

Abstract. Together with the latent heat stored in glacial ice sheets, the ocean heat uptake carries the lion's share of glacial–interglacial changes in the planetary heat content, but little direct information on the global mean ocean temperature (MOT) is available to constrain the ocean...

cp.copernicus.org
View attachment 1111887

YOUR Link Continues

"..In contrast to Today's Warming, where Radiative forcing is Caused through Anthropogenic Emissions of CO2, past climate cycles are generally believed to have been driven by orbital changes in the latitudinal and seasonal distribution of incoming solar radiation (Milankovic, 1941), with changing greenhouse gas concentrations representing an important amplifying feedback."..."
- - - - - - -

That's what happens you Finally source/Link a graph!
LOFL you Dishonest Clown.
Now you try it aga!n when you think I'm not around.


Ding is NOT conversant but deceptive.
He now Knowingly RE-USES a LINK/Graph which Refutes him when He thinks he can get away with it
It's either One line and/or one Picture from Nowhere which doesn't say what He says it does.

Have a Nice page.

`

 

[toobfreak]

Exactly ... SB closely fits Earth's surface ...

But Earth has TWO surfaces, the solid tectonic surface above water, and the hydraulic surfaces of the oceans.

... no mention of hysteresis ...

Why should there be? The actions of hysteresis would be written into the modeling code, wouldn't it?

There's no "storage" time in SB ... except to perform the work involved ... energy flows from excess to lack instantaneously ...

Of course there is storage of energy, it would be a contradiction of physics for there not to be. To argue otherwise is to be ridiculous. Why are you trying to make me responsible for your lack of understanding? Why don't you instead just go out and try to learn more.

Worse, you first say there is no storage time, then you contradict yourself be saying there IS storage time to perform necessary work, then the coup de grace is your claim that energy acts instantly, now conflicting even with relativistic theory. Ouch.

Ouch, ouch, ouch.