Why Replace DEI With MEI When 'Merit' Has Been a CONDITION of Federal Employment Per the 'Merit Systems Protection Board' (MSPB) Since 1978?

GTFOH, in order to push DEI, the qualifications, skills and performance standards were lowered. There are countless examples of this having been done.
Just to be clear I fully acknowledge there are also countless examples of white men being hired not based on qualifications, skills or performance. Joe as POTUS is a perfect example.
stop feeding that inferior idiot.
 
Glass is shattering. Every time YOU post you’re embarrassing yourself, dragon breath.
IKR? When did I ever say that TJ was an all-white school? That racist assumes that because the school ranked so high, it must be all white. Then, ironically, she accuses ME of assuming it was #1 because it was all-white.

Irony isn’t even strong enough a word for that one!
 
IKR? When did I ever say that TJ was an all-white school? That racist assumes that because the school ranked so high, it must be all white. Then, ironically, she accuses ME of assuming it was #1 because it was all-white.

Irony isn’t even strong enough a word for that one!
When Canada becomes the 51st state she ll cry
 
Every time you post, you embarass yourself with your complete idiocy. You immediately assume that the school is no longer number 1, because of the black students attending instead of the real reason - excluding anyone who might bring their scores down.

When you cherry pick your students so that you only accept top ranked students in the first place, it's easy to pretend your school is the best. These kids would succeed regardless of where they went to school.

There are more than 95,000 primary schools in the USA, and this one isn't #1 because they were an all white school. They were #1 because they wouldn't let ANYONE in would cause their scores to go down.

In other words, Lisa, you'd never be accepted. You have no critical thinking skills at all.
….and then the lib ends up with the usual personal insult. These people need new tactics; I’m getting bored.
 
I don’t “assume” the school is no longer #1. It was reported it was #15 after losing standards for blacks and Latinos.

Also, every time you post you show your ignorance and anti-white racism. The school was never majority white, and certainly not ALL white. It was 70% Asian, because the Asians kids are the smartest overall and also the most disciplined and studious, as a whole.

And yes, of COURSE they were #1 because they wouldn’t admit weaker students and instead held to a very high standard. Once the libs in that county decided there were too many Asians (racism right there) and too few blacks and Latinos (because they couldn’t make the cut), they lowered standards. The result, as expected, is that letting weaker stidents in lowers the overall score of the school. Duh.

The people hurt are the Asians. But as we know, libs are fine with racism toward successful minorities.
Lisa, We can thank Jimmy Carter for the drop in student learning. It started falling here


Creating the DoED was Carter's fulfillment of a 1976 presidential campaign promise, when he earned the endorsement of the largest labor union in the United States—the National Education Association (NEA). As the Washington Post reported in 1980:

The NEA gave its first presidential endorsement ever in 1976, when Walter Mondale promised them, at an NEA annual meeting, that the Carter administration would form an education department. At the 1976 Democratic National Convention, more delegates — 180 — belonged to the NEA than any other group of any kind. They've endorsed Carter for 1980, and were a major force in getting delegates to the Iowa caucuses…
 
Lisa, We can thank Jimmy Carter for the drop in student learning. It started falling here


Creating the DoED was Carter's fulfillment of a 1976 presidential campaign promise, when he earned the endorsement of the largest labor union in the United States—the National Education Association (NEA). As the Washington Post reported in 1980:
And it’s only gotten worse as the libs have turned education into indoctrination - of all the social justice lib nonsense.
 
WE white black brown yellow red, ARE all going down.... When greed the power of money & the teachings of hate rule.
We no longer seek a UNITED STATES, FOR AMERICA.
 
WE white black brown yellow red, ARE all going down.... When greed the power of money & the teachings of hate rule.
We no longer seek a UNITED STATES, FOR AMERICA.
Why’d you allow demofks to do that?
 
Merit was supplanted with so many feelings tries
 
I’m all for hiring for merit but it seems like a lot of applicants these days don’t want to prove they’re qualified.

My department spent about eight months this year to fill an entry level position. Not for a lack of candidates but because they refused to take the basic aptitude test, or failed/refused) a background check or drug test.
 
I’m all for hiring for merit but it seems like a lot of applicants these days don’t want to prove they’re qualified.

My department spent about eight months this year to fill an entry level position. Not for a lack of candidates but because they refused to take the basic aptitude test, or failed/refused) a background check or drug test.
Many of the unemployed want to dictate the terms and conditions of gaining and maintaining employment
 
Many of the unemployed want to dictate the terms and conditions of gaining and maintaining employment
My favorite ones were the…
“what do you mean it’s a Union position” ones… it’s mentioned in the job title.

That or the ones questioning the aptitude test, background check or drug test… all of which are listed in the job posting.

I used to think they missed them but this crew were literally like… “we didn’t think you really meant that”
 
I don’t “assume” the school is no longer #1. It was reported it was #15 after losing standards for blacks and Latinos.

Also, every time you post you show your ignorance and anti-white racism. The school was never majority white, and certainly not ALL white. It was 70% Asian, because the Asians kids are the smartest overall and also the most disciplined and studious, as a whole.

And yes, of COURSE they were #1 because they wouldn’t admit weaker students and instead held to a very high standard. Once the libs in that county decided there were too many Asians (racism right there) and too few blacks and Latinos (because they couldn’t make the cut), they lowered standards. The result, as expected, is that letting weaker stidents in lowers the overall score of the school. Duh.

The people hurt are the Asians. But as we know, libs are fine with racism toward successful minorities.
Race quotas are like reverse apartheid.
Or, if it ain’t broke, break it.
 
Glass is shattering. Every time YOU post you’re embarrassing yourself, dragon breath.

When you fail to refute the post and go straight to personal attacks, you've conceded the argument, FatBoi. Logic and facts have never been your strong suit. Try posting a rebuttal.

Is it possible the school cherry pick entrants using their entry exam to ensure their high ranking or not???? It's a simple logic problem.

Maybe you be at the gym. That's more your intellectual speed.
 
When you fail to refute the post and go straight to personal attacks, you've conceded the argument, FatBoi. Logic and facts have never been your strong suit. Try posting a rebuttal.

Is it possible the school cherry pick entrants using their entry exam to ensure their high ranking or not???? It's a simple logic problem.

Maybe you be at the gym. That's more your intellectual speed.
when will you refute something? We grow tired of your canadian propaganda.
 
When you fail to refute the post and go straight to personal attacks, you've conceded the argument, FatBoi. Logic and facts have never been your strong suit. Try posting a rebuttal.

Is it possible the school cherry pick entrants using their entry exam to ensure their high ranking or not???? It's a simple logic problem.

Maybe you be at the gym. That's more your intellectual speed.
Blah blah blah

51st state
 
The bald fact is that Republicans will lie, deceive and misrepresent everything being done by Democrats to ensure equality, because Republicans don't want "equality", they want a white male oligarchy. White men get all the good jobs. The non-whites are here to serve the dominant race.

Their anti-abortion stance has NOTHING to do with the morality of terminating a viable pregnancy, but rather to force WHITE WOMEN to have more babies. White people are not reproducing in numbers large enough to maintain the all or mostly white populations in Europe or North America.

Both Russia and Hungary have lost millions of mostly young, well educated adults, with skills that are highly marketable in the first world. Their populations are declining and aging.

The ONLY way for majority white nations to continue to grow and expand is non-white immigration. The demand for ambitious, educated workers is growing, and authoritarian dictatorships which limit personal speech and freedoms, are seeing their young adults leaving and not returning.

America is fast becoming the South Africa of the free world. Not surprising that so many white South African billionaires are behind it. Elon Musk, Peter Thiele, David Sacks (Trump's new AI and Crypto czar). All were partners in PayPal, and now all investing heavily to influence American elections.

Patrick Soon-Shiong, another South African billionaire, worked in Trump's last administration on Operation Warp Speed.

It's not surprising that the wealthy South Africans would seek to remake the USA into Apartheid South Africa. No wonder Musk keeps getting sued for racist toxic workplaces.

The first thing he did when he took over X was to get rid of all of the perks and benefits for the workers, and drive out the best people. X has been a glitchy disaster ever since.




Stick to your kiddy toys. If you didn't bother to read the OP, you shouldn't bother to comment.
The emoticon wasn't enough. Thank you, I always appreciate reading your insights.
 
Yes. The sibling with the lower score was hired because his score fit within the range where enough blacks scored to justify the hiring pattern.
The tests were simplified in 1978 in order to make sure everyone scored high enough to enable the race-based hiring pattern.
The two of you need to take your comedy show on the road, I'm sure there are a ton of dumbasses who would appreciate your perspectives.

Did it never occur to you that there exists such a thing as "suitability" for a particular job which factors in things other than just the score?

Like someone who scores 98% on the civil service exam is smart enough to have several other options and may not stay in the position long or view the position as a career job.

The above is not speculation, as are both of your observations, these are things that have been discussed with me by individuals who work in placement/talent acquisition or have just wanted to be level with me.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom